05:30 PM | ||||
317 | Dallas Cowboys | +4 -110 | +167 | O 46½ -110 |
318 | San Francisco 49ers | -4 -110 | -192 | U 46½ -110 |
Last edited:
05:30 PM | ||||
317 | Dallas Cowboys | +4 -110 | +167 | O 46½ -110 |
318 | San Francisco 49ers | -4 -110 | -192 | U 46½ -110 |
Hopefully.Sets up perfectly for the 49ers. Public will overreact to 1H of Seahawks game and the Boys blowing out a college team.
49ers 31 Cowboys 21
Could easily see thatMy guess is 4.0 to 4.5
Settles at 3.5-4.0.
SF -3 guessing?
Glad someone else sees this like I do. I think SF overwhelms this garbage Cowboy team. 34-10ishI’d bury SF at 3. The difference in DVOA compared to the other games and their differences, this should be about an 8, 8.5 point spread. There’s a bigger drop off in weighted DVOA from SF to Dallas than Philly/NY and KC/Jax.
42-2 my guessNiners all day.
NY Sack Exchange gave Plunkett problems, harassed him into 3 picks. I don't recall the guy Plunkett hit to take the lead in the 3rd Q....a 57 yard pass to Malcolm Barnwell?That was not Super Bowl MVP Jim Plunkett's best game, @Gandolf
Strike season in the middle of the Raiders dynasty. Such BS
I think Dallas, Jags and Giants are playing in this round because of how weak their Wildcard opponent was.Talk will be about Parsons and pass rush vs Purdy and how he reacts but I have a feeling that the niners can run very effectively on the Cowboys. Meanwhile, the niners defense is a bit of a different animal for the cowboys offense to face after having open guys all over the place last night. It wasn't like Dak was asked to fit anything into close coverage or through small windows ... those guys were WIDE open. Good luck with that this week.
Also, what is Dallas gonna do about the kicker problem right now? They likely need to attempt a few FGs in this one and that was probably the ugliest kicking performance I have ever seen last night. I don't want to overreact to that but damn.
In addition, while it was total domination by the cowboys, they succeeded on multiple 4th downs in that game and intercepted Brady in the EZ (not sure what that was). Dallas is built for being in the lead defensively where they can just pin their ears back and their weak tackling secondary doesn't have to support in run defense. I have seen most of their games. Diggs is probably the worst tackling cornerback in the league (great cover guy when not gambling too much).
SF has a lot of misdirection in their playbook which they can use to take away some of that aggressiveness from Dallas defense.
When Dallas is right, they look very tough to beat. If they play their A game they are right there with SF or anyone else imo. But SF is consistent and more talented.
One of these coaches has to win .....
I would lean towards SF at these numbers. 6 seems fair to me.
Crazy how low this line is. It made me look at the 9ers season schedule. 9ers have played below average teams for the majority of their season and got waxed by KC. Hard to imagine Dallas making this a game when you look how poorly they’ve played entering the lowly Bucs game.Wait, did someone call TB a college team?? I stopped reading at that point.
SF is pretty much everyone’s pick to win the NFC (mine included), so shocked this didn’t open higher. I’ll likely be on SF but something tells me it won’t be easy.
Probably a fair line considering how many Cow fans are out there in the world that don't give a shit about losing money.Dallas now a juiced +3.5! Is someone doing a head fake to get this to 3 then unload on SF? Or is this simple overreaction to Mondays blowout?
Can we get a deep fake of Summerall and Madden for this one? I'd even accept a deep fake of Summerall with Caliendo doing a live Madden impression. I like Burkhardt and Olsen but this is Cowboys-Niners we're talking about here. It's the greatest playoff rivalry in league history! Meeting #9 ties Cowboys/Rams and Niners/Packers for most in league history.
Your points with respect to the cowboys are pretty valid. I would even contend the green bay loss was more of a fluke than the jax one (which i agree was a bit flukey). Your subsequent take about the niners I take a bit of issue with only because I don't think the SF team that was around in the first half of the season is the team we see now. And that waxing to kc was an odd game with a 1 pt deficit for SF at half and 5 pt deficit halfway through the third. It had a ton of penalties and 5 combined turnovers and kc averaged over 11 yards per pass. I would call that a bit flukey too. In any event, the SF team since McCaffery has just been a different animal. The Bears game was Lance's first start if I was not mistaken and in the rain. They were minus 3 in turnovers in the 1 pt loss to denver, and minus 3 in turnovers (including fumble return td) against Atlanta in that loss (outgained atl and had more yards per play). So I am wouldn't weigh all those games the same way as I would the second half of the season games and even if I did, unless I thought the turnover bug was a significant risk in this one, I wouldn't weigh them too heavily either. Basically agree with the Dallas points but disagree somewhat with the SF points.I said it before the Dal/TB game, but worth repeating here, Dallas has had an excellent season. The talking heads were being unjustly critical of them because they came out flat against Washington in week 18, but overall look at their body of work. A loss at Philly (3 int from C Rush) and two OT losses at Jacksonville (bit flukey) and at Green Bay. I don’t put much into the week 1 loss against Tampa Bay when Dak went down. In my opinion, much more impressive than SF’s body of work.
Dallas tt u4.5 is my playI fully acknowledge the SF team looks a lot different with C-Mac and Purdy. We can only analyze what’s in front of us and since the info is limited I don’t wanna throw out or ignore the whole first half of the season, but certainly should give it less weIght. One could argue this will be the stiffest test San Fran has faced since the changes at QB and RB, and I’m guessing that explains the opening line. The rest situation surely favors San Fran - that cannot be ignored. I also do not like Dallas’ depth at WR, one of the worst 2/3 combos in the league IMO. Definitely a lot to digest here.