With you on Warriors and teased me down and Wiz up. 10 is a bunch in that game I think. Also popped Wiz +5 I think they win this one.
Thoughts on Bulls/Cavs tomorrow? Already hit Bulls +200 for the series but wondering your thoughts on game 1 steal with the Cavs trying to figure out how to deal with loss of Love, no JR, etc.
Gl Emkee. Complete contrast in styles. The way the Warriors are playing, hard to see their style not winning out.
I don't see how refs had anything to do with this.
Rockets played terrible, coached even worse.
They were so sure they will win playing straight on basketball, that they didn't try to do any simple things like trapping, forcing Austin to make decisions under pressure, force him to take much more than the 12 shots he took (though forcing is a strong word - just give him an excuse and he will shoot).
its the conf semi's....I doubt that angle applies here
Yeah, so i guess last night Cleveland didn't miss Love/JR aka 33% of team offensive production..
Right. I'm not sure you understand what "the angle" is that they are talking about. The angle that they are talking about is when a star player is out that the team actually performs better (against the expectations) and either wins or covers. So, yesterday's performance by the Cavs would bolster Calimike's assertion that the star player out angle isn't valid in the playoffs. (I'm not sure I believe that, nor that yesterday's game would be an example since Bron and Kyrie are really the stars, just bringing it up for the discussion to show what the 'star player out angle' actually is)
Lean late? I got nothing...
just curious why star player out angle wouldn't apply in the playoffs?
lmao. Stick to soccer
Right. I'm not sure you understand what "the angle" is that they are talking about. The angle that they are talking about is when a star player is out that the team actually performs better (against the expectations) and either wins or covers. So, yesterday's performance by the Cavs would bolster Calimike's assertion that the star player out angle isn't valid in the playoffs. (I'm not sure I believe that, nor that yesterday's game would be an example since Bron and Kyrie are really the stars, just bringing it up for the discussion to show what the 'star player out angle' actually is)
The 'star player out' theory is a combination of two things,
1. The team whose star player is out rallies and plays with a more focused effort to fill the void.
2. The opponent loses focus and plays with less intensity because they believe the game is won already.
In the playoffs the 2nd part of the equation shouldn't apply because it's the playoffs, every win is important. In the regular season you have the luxury of being able to 'take a few games off'.
95% of the teams currently in the playoffs would have whipped the Clips in that Game 1 spot. The Rockets' nucleus is comprised of idiots albeit physically talented, and the two key guys on the bench (Smith and Brewer) play the game like they are on crack or 'bath salts' but at the end of the day, it's the coaches job to get his team up for the game. I blame Lurch for Game 1's loss.
Refs a little dicey. Head ref Callahan not helping the home team so far this postseason but was kind towards small home faves during the regular season. Brothers is bi-polar.
LeBron 13-26 SU as an away dog in the playoffs (2-6 SU as an away dog in Game 3 of a 7-game playoff series).
LeBron 4-13 SU as an away dog off a home win in the playoffs.
Bulls 15-4 SU as a home fave off a 10+ away loss under Thibs.
Bulls 7-0 SU last 7 after a loss in which they lost the 1st quarter by 15+.
Rose's struggles on 1 day of rest as opposed to 2 day's all over the interwebs, like it when I see things like that.
This is a much bigger game for Chicago than Cleveland, imo. Like 'em to respond.