Playoffs in the FCS

Championship History​

YearChampionCoachScoreRunner-UpSite
2023South Dakota StateJimmy Rogers23-3Montana Frisco, Texas
2022South Dakota StateJohn Stiegelmeier45-21North Dakota StateFrisco, Texas
2021North Dakota StateMatt Entz38-10Montana StateFrisco, Texas
2020Sam HoustonK.C. Keeler23-21South Dakota StateFrisco, Texas
2019North Dakota StateMatt Entz28-20James MadisonFrisco, Texas
2018North Dakota StateChris Klieman38-24Eastern WashingtonFrisco, Texas
2017North Dakota StateChris Klieman17-13James MadisonFrisco, Texas
2016James MadisonMike Houston28-14Youngstown StateFrisco, Texas
2015North Dakota StateChris Klieman37-10Jacksonville StateFrisco, Texas
2014North Dakota StateChris Klieman29-27Illinois StateFrisco, Texas
2013North Dakota StateCraig Bohl35-7TowsonFrisco, Texas
2012North Dakota StateCraig Bohl39-13Sam Houston StateFrisco, Texas
2011North Dakota StateCraig Bohl17-6Sam Houston StateFrisco, Texas
2010Eastern WashingtonBeau Baldwin20-19DelawareFrisco, Texas
2009VillanovaAndy Talley23-21MontanaChattanooga, Tenn.
2008RichmondMike London24-7MontanaChattanooga, Tenn.
 

Attachments

I had thought ACU QB McIvor got hurt late 1H after he was sacked pretty hard. But I see he did come back out to take a knee before HT and then they opened the 2H with the backup. So that might indicate that ACU coaches just put up the white flag as they were really really flat in that game and it was pretty clear that they had no juice after clinching the UAC and having emptied the tank to beat Tarleton the week prior. Probably rather risk much I suspect they decided to use the 2H to rest some players and get ready for the playoffs. It only made sense to win this game if they could get a top 8 seed, which was possible, but also very debatable as they'd be among about a half dozen teams vying for the last team to get a first round bye. The way the game started and how it played out, I think the coaches saw the writing on the wall. So unless I see anything otherwise I will assume McIvor is good to go this week.
 
DateTeamStandingScrPredPwinMarginTotal
Thu 11.28Tuskegee
@ Alabama St
(5-5)
# 86 (6-5)
0
0
7
35
0 %
100 %

-27.5
41.5
Fri 11.29Alabama A&M
@ Florida A&M
# 102 (6-5)
# 73 (6-5)
0
0
27
35
28 %
72 %

-7.5
59.5
Sat 11.30Southern Univ
Grambling
Bayou Classic @ New Orleans LA
# 88 (7-4)
# 106 (5-6)
0
0
24
23
52 %
48 %
-1.546.5
Sat 11.30Illinois St
@ SE Missouri St
playoff
# 11 (9-3)
# 27 (9-3)
0
0
27
24
57 %
43 %
-2.551.5
Sat 11.30Central Conn
@ Rhode Island
playoff
# 78 (7-5)
# 16 (10-2)
0
0
14
35
6 %
94 %

-20.5
48.5
Sat 11.30TN Martin
@ New Hampshire
playoff
# 20 (8-4)
# 18 (8-4)
0
0
28
27
50 %
50 %
-0.552.5
Sat 11.30Lehigh
@ Richmond
playoff
# 50 (8-3)
# 14 (10-2)
0
0
17
31
15 %
85 %

-14.5
49.5
Sat 11.30E Kentucky
@ Villanova
playoff
# 25 (8-4)
# 12 (9-3)
0
0
17
27
19 %
81 %

-10.5
45.5
Sat 11.30Drake
@ Tarleton St
playoff
# 79 (8-2)
# 17 (9-3)
0
0
10
35
3 %
97 %

-25.5
48.5
Sat 11.30Northern Arizona
@ Abilene Chr
playoff
# 15 (8-4)
# 21 (8-4)
0
0
31
28
55 %
45 %
-2.555.5
Sat 11.30Tennessee St
@ Montana
playoff
# 46 (9-3)
# 7 (8-4)
0
0
14
38
4 %
96 %

-24.5
51.5

Note, copy/paste doesn't show it well. Massey has Southern, Illinois State, NAU and UTM as the favorites. Otherwise the home team is favored in all except the neutral Southern-Grambling game.

Sagarin:

Screenshot 2024-11-25 at 11-27-59 College Football Ratings Page.png

Reddit FCS 'sportsbook'


11/28: Tuskegee @ Alabama State -26.5 (O/U 42)
11/29: Alabama A&M @ Florida A&M -6.5 (O/U 58.5)
11/30: CCSU @ Rhode Island -14.5 (O/U 48)
11/30: Drake @ Tarleton -21 (O/U 48)
11/30: EKU @ Villanova -9.5 (O/U 44.5)
11/30: Illinois State -2 @ Southeast Missouri (O/U 51.5)
11/30: Lehigh @ Richmond -8.5 (O/U 50.5)
11/30: Northern Arizona -2.5 @ Abilene Christian (O/U 56.5)
11/30: Southern vs. Grambling -2 (O/U 47)
11/30: Tennessee State @ Montana -15 (O/U 52.5)
11/30: UT Martin -1.5 @ New Hampshire (O/U 51.5)
[td] /r/FCS Sportsbook - FCS Games[/td]
 
Last edited:
IMG_1103.jpeg

From FanDuel. DraftKings had odds up all year but had not reposted them yet.

The Montana St side of the bracket I think is harder. Idaho, USD or Davis will all have to go to Bozeman. Those however all high quality teams. I’d think MSU should win that side, but I there are 4 teams can realistically win that side whereas on the other side it’s more clearly either SDSU or NDSU
 
Last edited:
Lines are out at Fan Duel already. I need more time to figure it out, but I did jump on

Alabama A&M +7.5, SEMO+3.5, EKU+9.5, ACU +3.5, UTM/UNH Und 50.5
 
I just took Tarleton at 14.5 also, I can't see that line going lower
 
I do have a Montana St future from before at DK, but I just put $10 on Idaho at +10,000. I do not think they can win the title, but they are a way better team than those odds suggest. Had many injuries through the year which created some games playing out in a way they wouldn't have if they were otherwise healthy. Downside is they will have to play every game on the road assuming they win hosting the Lehigh/Richmond winner after their first round bye. While it would surprise me if they beat Montana St, I'd expect it to be a better game with their #1 QB than it was the first time. If they managed to escape Bozeman, they would matchup fairly well with either Davis or USD.
 
Tarleton State -15.5
Richmond -10.5
Tennessee State +17.5

I played all three of these and considering a few others.
 
DraftKings has their's up too. Slight differences here or there. Don't see anything offshore yet.
 
I took Alabama A&M as a reaction to how FAMU is closing out their season. Last week they allowed Bethune ssn highs in yards (416 6.2) and pts (38). That game was tight throughout after FAMU got up by 10, BC then led by 7. FAMU got up by 10 again twice, but BC cut it down to 3 both times which is what the final margin was. Last year FAMU beat BC by 17 and limited them to just 7 pts and 234y (3.4) just to illustrate how much different this FAMU team is. That game is played at a neutral site. FAMU's last home game was the shocking loss as 31 pt favorites to Mississippi Valley State. FAMU D did not allow ssn highs to Valley, but it was one of Valley's better offensive games (24 pts 341y 5.4). FAMU lost that game due to some meaningful TOs and some special teams issues (FAMU Fum own 22 = MV TD, 71y MV KO ret set up short field TD, FAMU Fum at MV01 and MV26 final minute). The week before that, FAMU lost at Prairie View as a 17 pt favorite. Richardson was hurt 1Q in this one and again, some very meaningful TOs contributed to the 19 point loss (two FAMU TOs near RZ and threw pick-six). BC and MVSU are the two worst teams in the SWAC and PV is only 5-7 overall, 3-5 in league. That is about as bad of a 3 game stretch that anyone can have vs poor teams with FAMU going 1-2 SU, 0-3 ATS.

Alabama A&M just played MVSU and Valley did post their best offensive game of the year vs them (35 pts and 481y 5.8) which is no good sign for Alabama A&M. Bulldogs did pull away in the 2H of that one to lead 49-28 before Valley's TD on their final possession.

This got me thinking Over although the O/U records don't necessarily support it. It is a little higher than I would like currently at 56 or 56.5. In SWAC play FAMU has gone Over just 3-4 (avg total 46.9) and Alabama A&M went 4-3 to the Over (avg total 55.8). There are some good Ds in the SWAC, for instance both FAMU and Alabama A&M went Under vs Alabama State and Southern who are two of the top SWAC Ds. Without factoring those two opponents they have gone Over combined 7-3 vs the rest of their league schedules. But again, the number is a little high.

Both these Ds are about mid-pack, maybe slightly worse sometimes. Feel like both offenses have a chance to move it well. Even with the issues FAMU has had lately, their last 4 games have averaged 450ypg and they put up 404 (6.5) on that good Southern D 5 weeks ago. Alabama State is averaging 440 ypg their last 4 games which includes Southern although they were limited to just 361 (5.5) on them.

Both these teams have outgained 6 of their 7 SWAC opponents on the year. They each lost to Jackson State; FAMU lost 21-35 (-89 ttl yards) although FAMU had a 4Q lead on the road in that one. Alabama A&M lost on the road as well 28-35 (+126 ttl yards). Jackson got up on them 38-10 HT, but A&M came back and JSU didn't do much 2H.

So in the end, based on the play of FAMU lately, they clearly are not playing their best ball and both teams have pretty good offensive potential. Hoping for a close compelling game and thinking it can happen that way where the dog and the point matter. Keeping an eye on the total should it drop to the 55 or below range.
 
Last edited:
Not a big fan how it played out where the Big South / OVC got 3 playoff teams in. I get it because of their records, but that conference as a whole is really really really bad. People like to bang on certain conferences, but really don't hear many mention the Big South OVC. Better teams were left out of the playoff from the So Con, but they lost a game that cost them so record wise, Big South Teams were in position. It is just crazy to think that Tennessee Tech who didn't make the playoff at all was as close as Lindenwood beating UT Martin in OT and then in a 3-way tie with SEMO and TSU, Tennessee Tech would've got the autobid. But because UT Martin was able to beat Lindenwood at home in OT (as 18.5 pt home fav), there was a 4-way tie and that left TTU the odd team out and the other 3 got in. Not a good league to send 3 teams out of 24 to the playoff.

Here we are with SEMO hosting Illinois State even though Illinois State is the seeded team and should be hosting a game, but an agreement between Illinois State and the state high school football association to host championship games on their campus. So Illinois State has to hit the road.

I'm not fan of SEMO, but did take some +3.5 just on principle. Illinois State is from the big and bad MVFC, but it was a down year in that league number 1. #2 Illinois State only played 1 of the other 3 MVFC playoff teams, missing both South Dakota teams and they got blown out by NDSU 42-10 being outgained by 338 yards. There was one other quality team in the MVFC this year, Missouri State. Now Missouri State was a strong team vs the rest of the league, but very clearly not on par with the best as NDSU beat them 59-21 and SDSU beat them 45-9. Missouri State went 8-4, 6-2 in the MVFC. Why do I bring up Missouri State then? Because other than NDSU, the other good team Illinois State played in the conference was Missouri State and Missouri State beat Illinois State 41-7!

Illinois State did face a number of injuries this year, as have many teams, but when looking over their games vs the good teams, they really didn't compete at all. They played two teams with winning records and got outscored 17 to 83. And vs some of the bad teams...Illinois State allowed 426 yards and 32 pts to Murray State. Allowed 503 yards and 34 pts to Western Illinois! Now they had some good games too, ended the year on a 5-0 SU run but just 2-3 ATS all as favorites. So they have played better down the stretch vs not very good teams than earlier in the season, I will give them that. But weighing their results overall, I played against them as a road favorite, even a small road favorite.

Not a big fan of cozing up to SEMO who I have also been critical of this year, with good reason...because well, when you only score 12 pts on Lindenwood and 19 pts on NW State you got some issues, not to mention allowing 593y and 45 pts to Western Illinois, so actually I did mention it.

There are lots of common opponents:

Illinois State beat Eastern Ill 31-7, SEMO beat them 38-27, but SEMO led 34-14.

Illinois State beat Southern Ill (ranked #19 at the time) 45-10, although SIU outgained them 487-407 (SIU 3 TOs from the 21 yard line and closer, plus some stopped on downs and SIU #2 QB went down and #3 finished the game).
SEMO beat Southern Ill (ranked #7 at the time) 38-21 when SIU was healthier, it was the first start for SIU's #2 QB

Illinois State beat Western Ill 51-34, and WIU outgained them 503-390 (ISU had three TD drives of 46y or less for various reasons plus a blk'd FG ret TD).
SEMO beat Western Ill 54-45 and WIU slightly outgained them 593-567 (SEMO had 5 scoring drives of 46y or less, but also kicked some short FGs)

The kicking short FG thing is a problem for SEMO. Fortunately they do have a very good kicker (DC Pippin), but unfortunately he is kicking too many RZ FGs. Because SEMO's O is very pass dependent they don't have much of a running game they can use and the field compresses the passing game can get limited. They get into the RZ alot, 55 times is alot, but they only have 32 TDs which ends as 58%, just ok, but it is not good enough and that would be the biggest concern for the SEMO offense here. It's why they only scored 19 on NW State with 420 ttl yards (1 TD 7 RZ trips), why they only scored 26 on CSU with 415 ttl yards (2 TD 6 RZ trips). 30 pts is ok on 432 ttl yards vs GW (but just 2 TDs 6 RZ trips). 6 games this year they were 50% or less TDs in the RZ. So that is a concern.

I'm less concerned about their run game because they really don't try to run. 6 games this year they attempted 25 or fewer rushes. By comparison Illinois State has no such game below 25 attempts. The SEMO O goes through the arm of DeLaurent which is usually pretty good way to go. He has several school passing records. Some of the better passing teams have moved it vs Illinois St through the air. And they protect him well, giving up just 16 sacks while attempting 550 passes.

The Defenses I think are fairly even. Some of the pure numbers and stats are better for SEMO D likely because of a weaker schedule.

SEMO is not dogged often. With DeLaurent starting at QB SEMO is 3-1 ATS as a dog vs FCS since 2022 with one outright upset. The 3 losses have come by an average of 5.3 ppg. Last time with him playing they were a home dog of 4.5 and they lost by 1 to SIU last year (RB fumbled late to allow SIU to score game winning TD on short field).

Illinois State this year is 2-1 ATS as a short favorite (4 or less), but just one of those games came as a favorite vs a team with a winning record and that was the loss to Missouri State where Illinois State as -2.5.

Illinois State is the more balanced and perhaps more reliable offense. Rittenhouse is dual threat, DeLaurent is mobile, but it's all about his passing not his running. The Ds are even and I am ok taking my chances with SEMO at home as a dog here. Weather should be good, little cold below 40, no wind and minimal chances of rain.

Illinois State was 4-2 to the Over the first half of this year, but has gone Under 4-2 in the second half of the year. SEMO was 3-3 O/U in the first half, but Under 5-1 over their last 6. Don't beleive I like the Under here as much though.
 
Central Connecticut State 2 weeks ago came from 14 down to force OT with Robert Morris, would’ve lost had RM made their FG in the bottom of OT1 and then won on a deflected pass for a 2pt conversion. And last week 8 Duquesne turnovers were the story in their 7 pt win. CCSU’s first win vs a ranked opponent since 2014. CCSU is NEC Championship for their first playoff trip since 2019. It may’ve been fairly unlikely that they got here, but one thing is for sure the Devils have been an outstanding dog all year, 6-0 ATS with 3 outright upsets and the losses came by just 9 total points. Overall 9-2 ATS after their week 1 loss at Central Mich. Several weak teams among their W/L record though. Yale and Dartmouth are some quality teams that CCSU legitimately could've beaten.

They have been strong getting TFLs, sacks and turnovers, they lead the NEC and are top 12 nationally in those categories. I’m not comparing all the stat rankings of the playoff teams, but I would suspect that CCSU’s offense is the weakest of the 24 teams in the playoff. I wouldn’t call it bad, just not very productive of threatening. RB Howard is a good all-purpose player and QB Olsen is capable as are the receivers, but generally unremarkable. The games they win they don’t win by much margin, even the bad teams. Played a better 1H than the score showed at Stonehill (should’ve had 3 TDs rather than just 2 as they fumbled at the SH05 near end of 2Q), but they didn’t do much on O in the 2H. Vs Mercyhurst they only led 31-20 until a final 58y TD run stretched the margin to 18 (and for the cover) in the final minute. Only beat Wagner by 10. The O just does enough, not much more. They’re just kind of a solid group all around, offense, special teams and defense. It is definitely an offense that is opportunistic and capitalizes off the things their defense sets up for them. They have proved to be a tough out, other than the 56 pt loss week 1 vs Central Mich, nobody has beat them by more than 4 pts.

Rhode Island is 5-3 ATS as a favorite. Some of the numbers are close to the margin so they could be a little worse depending on lines (like last week at Bryant). The thing about Rhode Island this year, they win a lot, but how they win isn’t as impressive as their 10-2 record. I’ll run down their games from recent to oldest. Last week at Bryant, URI trailed 6-7 and 13-14, only led 28-21 until they scored a TD with 3min left to go up by 14 (some spreads on this game were -14/14.5, closed at -12). URI did outgain them 425-316, but the ypp was better for Bryant at 6.1-5.8. Bryant converted 67% 3rd downs! Bryant actually grew a lot this year and were tough dog their last 4 games so credit to that team. Week before that…Albany led 17-0! URI was able to comeback and win that one 20-17 and were slightly outgained by 58y. They did compete well with Delaware, Rhody D scored and only losing by 3 due to a late score that cut the margin from 10 to 3. URI only had one drive over 54y in that game and took advantage of some short fields, but they were in the game throughout vs Hens despite a 90 yardage deficit. URI beat Monmouth but in that home game they never led until 1:17 left! Monmouth led that one by 11 twice although URI did finish with a 141 yard edge. They beat Maine, game was 7-7, 14-14 then URI scored the final 10 pts, yards were even. Rhody D scored in the UNH game and got a late short field TD for their largest MOV game on the year, 26-9. UNH O was lost at sea at that point in the season (game was 3-2 HT). URI did beat Brown by 10 in a game that was never more than a 7 pt margin for 57 minutes. Beat Hampton in OT, easily could’ve lost in regulation (Hampton blk’d xpt, but were called for offside, rekick was good and it went to OT). Hampton led by 14 twice in the 2H! Now we are back in September where they barely beat Long Island, were outgained by 81y yards in the win vs Campbell and they beat HC by 3 in the opener on a go-ahead TD with :19 left.

What does it all mean? It means seeing a 2 TD spread with a minus next to it by Rhode Island’s name isn’t something that interests me. Their biggest win on the year was 17 vs UNH, a game that Rhody O had just 318 yards and their D and ST led them to as many pts as their O did.

The offense does have a pretty decent ceiling though, they just don’t always come through with the points. A little less certain what we'll get with Helms at QB now after sometimes splitting with time with Farrell who was hurt vs Delaware and had surgery. Farrell gave them a running threat and was the main guy, often entire games or the majority of the time. Helms is the Clemson transfer, jury may still be out on how good he can be. He never overtook Farrell for the job before injury and Farrell was good enough to be named 3rd team All CAA. In the 3 games Helms has been the guy now, he’s 60% with just a 3-4 ratio for 213 ypg. Farrell was under 60% with an 11-8 ratio for less ypg passing, but he was their #2 rusher with 302y and 5 TDs. Skill players are good for URI and the OL is solid.

Best thing about them is their D and especially the front 7 with several playmakers on the DL and among the LBs. This is definitely going to be a big edge as this legit good CAA D unit should be able to cause some issues for an already limited CCSU O.

Should be noted that URI played the bottom 4 rush offenses in the league and also played Campbell who is the 7th worst rush O. Their strong run D numbers therefore are skewed because of who they played. Hampton and Delaware are both top 4 rush Os in the CAA and when they played URI, Delaware ran for 203 (5.3) – which is slightly over Delaware’s season avg (184 5.1) and Hampton ran for 172 (3.6) which is slightly under the HU avg (195 4.3). URI’s overall run D avg is 118ypg 3.3 allowed good enough for #2 in the league, but that number was built vs weak rush Os. I don’t expect CCSU to be good running vs them – URI should handle them. Just wanted to provide some context on their high run D number.

I think for me this spread is right. Realistically it shouldn’t be lower than 2 TDs. Duquesne was just favored by 7 at CCSU, so if Duquesne was hosting CCSU that line would’ve been probably just under 2 TDs. Rhode Island should be the right side, but I just do not think it is for me. URI had been on my fade list often when they were favored and I have only played on them when dogged. So maybe I have kind of a mental block or something that has me not liking them to win by some kind of margin especially when I have seen CCSU hang tough in so many games.

FD has 14.5 and DK is 15.5. When it goes up at the other books I’m sure it will tick upward. If I had to make a pick it would be URI although I don’t think I am going to put any money on it. Maybe an alt line if I can get it below 14 without too much juice. A lot of typing for me to say I’m not betting it.
 
I did immediately like the Under 50.5 in the UT Martin – New Hampshire game. It is 48.5 now FD and 46.5 at DK. Under in UNH FCS games are 7-2-2 by my count (avg total 50.13). UT Martin Unders are 5-6 (avg total 53.18).

If you watch New Hampshire you know they just are not good offensively. Such a drastic change from last year when their O is what led them and the D usually let them down. Now the D leads them and the O tries to score enough points.

I know I have posted a lot about the New Hampshire offense on here through the year when justifying their opponent as a play or taking an Under. Take last week, UNH definitely won that game because of their D, held Maine below 200y of O, 0-for-9 on 3rd down, held them to 8 FDs! But…the UNH O, they only had 286 ttl yards. Maine had a better ypp 4.4-4.0. UNH O wasn’t much better for 3Q vs Stony Brook, but they had a 3 TD 4Q and came from 20 down to win that one. UNH O posted just 326 ttl yards in that one (4.5). SB lost back-to-back fumbles in their own territory where UNH was able to get 2 TDs off just 66y of O short fields. Similar story vs Monmouth 3 games ago. UNH had a 5y TD drive after a muffed punt recovery and a 27y TD after an INT. UNH had 335y (3.9) in that one. Beat Albany 31-14, had some O in that one right? Not really. A 50y pick-six contributed to the 31 pts and just 297y of O, but did have a good 5.8 ypp which is by far the best they had vs anyone since September. Now we are back in the dark ages of UNH O, mid season when they scored 6 on Nova with just 254 ttl yards (3.9) and 9 on URI with just 235 ttl yards (3.5). How about 151 ttl yards and 2.6 yppg in a WIN at Elon! Ok, I’ll stop there. They actually did have some good O in Sept, thanks to playing Stonehill and Bryant.

An interesting thing about UNH is they are running it more than they are passing it the last several games. 38att – 122y (3.2) at Maine to 34 passes. 45att – 130y (2.9) vs Monmouth to 41 passes. 31att – 89y (3.0) at Albany to just 20 passes. That is 3 of their last 4 games. They did pass more than run vs SB because they were down and had to come back, but even there they ran 32att – 63y (2.0). So what is this? They are really trying to run the ball, but clearly are not very good at it. Started 3 different guys at RB in that span due to some injuries. They have been inserting a small starting CB Mead some at RB and he ripped off a 57y TD run (which means their other 37 runs netted just 65y). They must have realized their passing O is not good enough so no matter how inefficient their run game is, they still want to do it. The actual yards by the guys running the ball is better than the overall team stats because UNH gives up a lot of negative TFLs and sacks which get subtracted. UNH allows 8 TFLs per game! This ranks last in the CAA (115th nationally). They are the CAA’s worst rush O, but they try.

So that all sound great for the Under!

Other than WR Tomlinson (who was injured last week unsure status) – all the stars on this UNH team is on D. DEs Silver and Ruiz have been studs for 3 years now. Awesome they stuck around and didn’t transfer out. Silver has been 1st or 2nd Tm CAA all FOUR years and was just named CAA D POY this week. Ruiz has been 1st or 2nd Tm for just three years. Owens transferred in as a grad Safety after a nice career at Yale and he immediately had a huge impact. Toscano is a 5th year at LB and also terrific. They are almost 100 yards and a TD better on D this year than last. Of note, in the unbalanced schedule CAA, they did play 6 of the bottom 8 total Os in the league and only played 2 of the top 8 (Monmouth and Stony Brook). They held Monmouth to half their PPG (20) and were great in yards allowed to them (313 5.5). SB got their scoring avg on them (30), but the yards were down (326 5.1).

I think this D is pretty much for real and the O is not good.

I am personally less familiar with UT Martin. I do know they failed to score an offensive TD at home vs Tennessee Tech and finished with just 9 pts, and 185 ttl yards – almost just want to totally throw that result out. They scored 26 in regulation at Lindenwood last week (445y). Normally they are much better O than that though. Scored 28 on Tennessee State, 21 right out the gate and then punted 5 of their next 6 and scored just 1 TD the rest of the game there. UTM scores a lot vs the worst teams, 40 on CSU, 52 on EIU, 45 on WIU, 35 on GW and pretty good scoring O back in Sept except for the Mo State game.

I think their D is better than their O anyway though. Only three FCS teams have ran for over 100y on them – TTU 107y (3.1), GW 146y (4.3 – top RB for GW had 112y 6.6ypc), and UNA 122y (3.3). Pretty solid run D, just one off game vs GW. They are good, not great at the sacks and TFLs so not too many of those rush numbers are skewed by sacks, just a solid run D and an excellent front 7 (DL Charles Perkins, Christian Dowell, LBs Jaylon Sharp, Tevin Shipp all outstanding). Top 5 run D in FCS. Top 10 3rd down D, Top 10 with 18 INTs on D!

You know, I was reluctant for some reason to like UT Martin in the game, but the more I look here I think I do. I was not sold on the UTM O vs quality D and I can’t unsee the box score from the TTU game, but they likely have a better O than UNH. 4 of the 5 OL are 5th years (3 of which were just named among the top 10 OL in the conference including 2 first teamers), good running game with Patrick Smith leading, solid receivers, QB Dent I guess is pretty good, can run too.

I thought the weather was going to be a problem, but actually it won’t be. Just cold, low 40s, not that much colder than Martin Tennessee with this cold front coming through. Think the cold might effect UTM guys a little more, but not a deal breaker. People say that UNH is a weird place to play, I don’t know. I look back and URI beat them pretty easily there (in the 2H at least). SB was up 20 on them there before they blew it in the final 15 minutes.

Already have the Under and now I am going to take some UT Martin as well. +1 now at DK. This opened UTM -2.5 at FD, current -1.5. I will do some dollar cost avg approach here in case line keeps moving.
 
Central Connecticut State 2 weeks ago came from 14 down to force OT with Robert Morris, would’ve lost had RM made their FG in the bottom of OT1 and then won on a deflected pass for a 2pt conversion. And last week 8 Duquesne turnovers were the story in their 7 pt win. CCSU’s first win vs a ranked opponent since 2014. CCSU is NEC Championship for their first playoff trip since 2019. It may’ve been fairly unlikely that they got here, but one thing is for sure the Devils have been an outstanding dog all year, 6-0 ATS with 3 outright upsets and the losses came by just 9 total points. Overall 9-2 ATS after their week 1 loss at Central Mich. Several weak teams among their W/L record though. Yale and Dartmouth are some quality teams that CCSU legitimately could've beaten.

They have been strong getting TFLs, sacks and turnovers, they lead the NEC and are top 12 nationally in those categories. I’m not comparing all the stat rankings of the playoff teams, but I would suspect that CCSU’s offense is the weakest of the 24 teams in the playoff. I wouldn’t call it bad, just not very productive of threatening. RB Howard is a good all-purpose player and QB Olsen is capable as are the receivers, but generally unremarkable. The games they win they don’t win by much margin, even the bad teams. Played a better 1H than the score showed at Stonehill (should’ve had 3 TDs rather than just 2 as they fumbled at the SH05 near end of 2Q), but they didn’t do much on O in the 2H. Vs Mercyhurst they only led 31-20 until a final 58y TD run stretched the margin to 18 (and for the cover) in the final minute. Only beat Wagner by 10. The O just does enough, not much more. They’re just kind of a solid group all around, offense, special teams and defense. It is definitely an offense that is opportunistic and capitalizes off the things their defense sets up for them. They have proved to be a tough out, other than the 56 pt loss week 1 vs Central Mich, nobody has beat them by more than 4 pts.

Rhode Island is 5-3 ATS as a favorite. Some of the numbers are close to the margin so they could be a little worse depending on lines (like last week at Bryant). The thing about Rhode Island this year, they win a lot, but how they win isn’t as impressive as their 10-2 record. I’ll run down their games from recent to oldest. Last week at Bryant, URI trailed 6-7 and 13-14, only led 28-21 until they scored a TD with 3min left to go up by 14 (some spreads on this game were -14/14.5, closed at -12). URI did outgain them 425-316, but the ypp was better for Bryant at 6.1-5.8. Bryant converted 67% 3rd downs! Bryant actually grew a lot this year and were tough dog their last 4 games so credit to that team. Week before that…Albany led 17-0! URI was able to comeback and win that one 20-17 and were slightly outgained by 58y. They did compete well with Delaware, Rhody D scored and only losing by 3 due to a late score that cut the margin from 10 to 3. URI only had one drive over 54y in that game and took advantage of some short fields, but they were in the game throughout vs Hens despite a 90 yardage deficit. URI beat Monmouth but in that home game they never led until 1:17 left! Monmouth led that one by 11 twice although URI did finish with a 141 yard edge. They beat Maine, game was 7-7, 14-14 then URI scored the final 10 pts, yards were even. Rhody D scored in the UNH game and got a late short field TD for their largest MOV game on the year, 26-9. UNH O was lost at sea at that point in the season (game was 3-2 HT). URI did beat Brown by 10 in a game that was never more than a 7 pt margin for 57 minutes. Beat Hampton in OT, easily could’ve lost in regulation (Hampton blk’d xpt, but were called for offside, rekick was good and it went to OT). Hampton led by 14 twice in the 2H! Now we are back in September where they barely beat Long Island, were outgained by 81y yards in the win vs Campbell and they beat HC by 3 in the opener on a go-ahead TD with :19 left.

What does it all mean? It means seeing a 2 TD spread with a minus next to it by Rhode Island’s name isn’t something that interests me. Their biggest win on the year was 17 vs UNH, a game that Rhody O had just 318 yards and their D and ST led them to as many pts as their O did.

The offense does have a pretty decent ceiling though, they just don’t always come through with the points. A little less certain what we'll get with Helms at QB now after sometimes splitting with time with Farrell who was hurt vs Delaware and had surgery. Farrell gave them a running threat and was the main guy, often entire games or the majority of the time. Helms is the Clemson transfer, jury may still be out on how good he can be. He never overtook Farrell for the job before injury and Farrell was good enough to be named 3rd team All CAA. In the 3 games Helms has been the guy now, he’s 60% with just a 3-4 ratio for 213 ypg. Farrell was under 60% with an 11-8 ratio for less ypg passing, but he was their #2 rusher with 302y and 5 TDs. Skill players are good for URI and the OL is solid.

Best thing about them is their D and especially the front 7 with several playmakers on the DL and among the LBs. This is definitely going to be a big edge as this legit good CAA D unit should be able to cause some issues for an already limited CCSU O.

Should be noted that URI played the bottom 4 rush offenses in the league and also played Campbell who is the 7th worst rush O. Their strong run D numbers therefore are skewed because of who they played. Hampton and Delaware are both top 4 rush Os in the CAA and when they played URI, Delaware ran for 203 (5.3) – which is slightly over Delaware’s season avg (184 5.1) and Hampton ran for 172 (3.6) which is slightly under the HU avg (195 4.3). URI’s overall run D avg is 118ypg 3.3 allowed good enough for #2 in the league, but that number was built vs weak rush Os. I don’t expect CCSU to be good running vs them – URI should handle them. Just wanted to provide some context on their high run D number.

I think for me this spread is right. Realistically it shouldn’t be lower than 2 TDs. Duquesne was just favored by 7 at CCSU, so if Duquesne was hosting CCSU that line would’ve been probably just under 2 TDs. Rhode Island should be the right side, but I just do not think it is for me. URI had been on my fade list often when they were favored and I have only played on them when dogged. So maybe I have kind of a mental block or something that has me not liking them to win by some kind of margin especially when I have seen CCSU hang tough in so many games.

FD has 14.5 and DK is 15.5. When it goes up at the other books I’m sure it will tick upward. If I had to make a pick it would be URI although I don’t think I am going to put any money on it. Maybe an alt line if I can get it below 14 without too much juice. A lot of typing for me to say I’m not betting it.
CCSU would make my playlist at 17.5 or more as they are scrappy and don’t just roll over.
 
I’m not sure how Richmond and Lehigh matchup, I will just look at how they have played.

Richmond is 4-5 ATS as a favorite. Their best win was as a dog hosting Delaware, but their regular season finale felt like their strongest win of the year vs a quality team. Assuming William & Mary was still a quality team, as W&M was slumping pretty hard to close the season out. Richmond cared, I wonder how much W&M did. Either way, Spiders dominated them. Everyone knows Richmond has won 10 straight….but…..that W&M game stopped a trend where Richmond was actually outgained in the immediate 3 straight games that preceded W&M, vs Towson, at Campbell and at Hampton (not all so great teams). They outgained Bryant by 293y, otherwise on average, they have only outgained their other 7 CAA opponents by an avg of +29.7 ypg and that includes the +143y on W&M last week and their MOV in those games is just 10.8 ppg. Beat NC A&T (the worst team in the CAA) 20-17, Towson 35-24 (misleading final as Towson just kept turning it over or SOD and handing Richmond free FGs), Campbell 27-24, Hampton 24-21. Not trying to take away the good wins vs W&M and Delaware, but it does show this is not some juggernaut of a special kind of team. Richmond seems to be getting lots of love, but the CAA is full of soft teams and half of Richmond’s 8 CAA wins came against 4 of the 5 worst teams in the league and as stated some of those were surprisingly close. All told, Richmond beat 3 teams with a winning record this year.

They have had some strong defensive games like vs W&M and Delaware who they held both to a combined 100y rushing (allowed 2.2 and 1.6 ypc respectively to each). But then they allowed Hampton to run for 194 (4.0) and Campbell 273 (6.8), Elon 161 (5.2) and Delaware St 192 (5.3). It’s a good run D (127 ypg, 3.9 ypc allowed), but statistically it is about the same as Elon and Towson, so that puts it in somewhat of a different light. QB pressure and sacks is where they excel on D. Upper third pass eff D, but have allowed some curious games through the air (Towson, NC A&T, Delaware St).

Richmond O is pretty good, I like their run game and Coleman at QB, good receivers. Spider O doesn’t turn it over much and their D does a good job creating TOs so field position wise that certainly sets up their O. Not great in the RZ on O (55% TDs) and actually not great RZ D either (TDs allowed 62%). Good special teams.

While Richmond gets the headlines for their 10 straight wins (even with the unimpressive wins and non-covers as favorites); Lehigh comes into the playoffs on fire. 5-0 SU and ATS run, 4-0 ATS as favorites with one outright upset (10-7 vs HC as +7 dog). Lehigh outgained 9 of their 11 FCS opponents this year by 97 ypg on avg and the two they didn’t were just -35 vs HC and -45 vs LIU. The Bucknell loss looks bad, but Bucknell had a 100y KO ret and 31y short field TD after a Fum recovery and a 79y pick-six that broke a 21-21 tie. Lehigh outgained them 500-270. The other bad loss was at Yale following Lehigh’s double bye weeks. It followed the Bucknell game and marked the second straight game that they saw their opponent get multiple TDs off TOs either directly or on short fields. Yale had a pretty good offensive game and Richmond might be able to do something similar. That line was Yale -7 and they won 38-23 although total yards were 372-365 for Lehigh (in addition to the pts off TOs, Lehigh was also SOD at the Y13). Offense seems to work better with the Fr Johnson at QB instead of the 5th Yr Perri. Johnson has running ability and better arm. Another Fr at RB is a real good all-purpose Jaden Green plus they have hard running Yoder. Good running team, not an overly threatening passing O that doesn't spread it around much.

Patriot League Champion hasn’t done so bad lately in their first round playoff games:

2023 Lafayette (+7) lost but covered at Delaware 36-34, Laf -38 ttl yards

2022 Holy Cross (-7) won and covered vs New Hampshire 35-19, HC +102 ttl yards

2021 Holy Cross (+13.5) won and covered at Villanova 21-16, HC +66 ttl yards

Richmond has beat Lehigh recently, 2022 30-6 and 2021 31-3 where Richmond was big favorites of -22 at home and -16 away. Those Leigh teams had a combined 5-17 record in those years while the Spiders were 15-9 being a second round playoff team in 2021.

One note on injury, stud LB Mike DeNucci for Lehigh was injured last week, unsure of status. Key player.

I really have not known what to do with the spread from when it came out, but kind of thought if it went up I would maybe take Lehigh. No doubt a step-up for Lehigh here to travel to one of the top CAA teams, but also of concern for Richmond is how some of their games vs lesser opponents have gone. I think Lehigh can hold up at the line of scrimmage and run the ball some and handle some of the rush that Richmond will have. I worry about plays Richmond can make passing and I do not think that Lehigh can hurt Richmond in the same fashion. I don’t have much of an opinion on the total although it feels like an Under.

Guess I will be watching to see what the spread does. I expect it to get bet up over 14 at some point.
 
Looks like MB won't put any FCS or D2 games up today. But they have D2 hoops lines for today. Dirty pricks. I'm cashing out. Done with them.
 
They put up lines every damn week during the regular season and not for the playoffs when there is a limited schedule today anyway with so many FBS game yesterday.
 
MB probably has a mole here and saw we started a thread on Dll football and didn't want the exposure :)

I started playing NFL MLs there this week, figured my college action was likely done there this week.
 
I don't understand how that works. How or why is it limited like that for your access to books outside the US?

Honestly I don't know it works. Online isn't allowed in Georgia. MB and BetUs took my money and honestly I was worried about getting paid. So I only deposited $100 1st time just figuring I wouldn't be allowed to get paid off, but so far no issues.

All other books shut me down as soon as I typed in GA in filling out the sign up form.
 
I took EKU +9.5 but don't necessarily like it. I was just playing against the type of performances the 2024 Villanova football team has displayed this year. Now, last week the Delaware win was pretty good, they always beat Delaware it seems. Looked better on the scoreboard than in the box score though. Delaware outgained them 409-362. Hens turned it over on 3 of their final 4 drives which led to 10 Nova pts. Nova only had two drives all game over 50 yards. Nova allowed over 400 (5.5) to Delaware, week before then allowed 502 (9.7) at Monmouth. Usually Nova D pretty good, but the CAA just doesn't have many good teams so everything gets skewed. They did a good job on Stony Brook (24 pts and 310 4.2 allowed) so credit there, but Towson got 394 (5.7) on them. Nova would've lost that game, but either bad RZ O by Towson or good RZ D by Nova allowed them to win.

Been a better play against team this year, 3-6-1 ATS as a favorite. Only cover vs a decent team is SB...who they trailed by 10 mid 3Q vs SB but did win by 18. Their other two covers were against the worst team in the Patriot, Colgate, and the worst team in the CAA, NC A&T. Not good.

EKU had been a good fade team as well mid-season, after their bye they were on a 0-3 ATS run, 0-2 ATS as dogs at SUU and at ACU and then 0-1 ATS as a fav with their 28-17 win at Utah Tech as 19pt fav. Then it changed after the 1H at Tarleton. The Tarleton game put them on a stretch of 3 outright wins as dogs before their lackluster season finale vs North Alabama where they won, but failed to cover a small line as a favorite.

EKU has been outgained in 5 of their last 7 games, they only outgained Utah Tech by 16. Did outgain Austin Peay by 115y, a game in which they won by 3 in OT.

EKU really isn't a very good team overall. They are strong on 3rd down and they possess the ball well.

I don't really like either one of these teams and just took the pts against a weak favorite.
 
Tarleton is pretty self explanatory. They could be in the 40s on offense if it goes right and I don't know how many Drake can scroe. Drake has been held to 22 or less in 3 Pioneer games this year, so....it's a pretty weak offense that has failed to run for 100y on 5 of their 7 league games. Their D ranks well, but it's from the Pioneer. Tarleton is somewhere between EWash and South Dakota. Drake beat EWash 35-32 in OT but they followed that up by losing at South Dakota 42-3 (28-3 HT). Think the potential is here for a big Tarleton win, they should be really amped up for first FCS playoff game since moving up from Dll.

The other game I took is ACU +3.5. Which I think Northern Arizona is fine and all, solid team. Weak resume since they didn't play all the best teams in the Big Sky, but I'm not going to spend time knocking them. I like their team in general. I just do not think the #5 team from the Big Sky, who went 0-2 vs the top 4 league teams and who only has 7 D1 wins should be road chalk at the UAC Champion. That is basiclly my entire reasoning.

Tennessee State at Montana I have not spent any time looking at yet. I did wonder, how might Montana respond from losing their biggest game of the year and follow that up with the first round playoff game? I found the answer in 2022 when they lost at MSU and then hosted a top 15 ranked SEMO team and won 34-24 but failed to cover as 13 pt favorites. So they should be able to shake last week's loss and be ready here. Problem is, Montana just isn't that good. Especially in the 1H. Trailed Portland State 0-3 at home 2 weeks ago, huh?! Only led Cal Poly and Northern Colorado 14-0 on the road the two games prior where they used some 2H surge to make the finals look good (only outgained CP by 39y) in 42-7 win. They really struggled with NAU before that as well and NAU was on their #2 QB. NAU actually led 13-3 HT, in Missoula! Kind of hate that the only game TV weighed in on was this one so we get a 10:15 kick doing TSU absolutely no favors. TSU played pretty poorly earlier in the season (TTU and CSU) and I got a little sour on them, but since then they went 6-0 ATS with 4 outright upsets! Looking back seeing they were dogged vs EIU and GW is kind of funny now. They have a fairly weak offense, but the D is pretty decent. As long as they can deal with the cold weather, the way the Griz have played the last 5 weeks, if that Griz team shows up, TSU should be ok in the number assuming a low scoring game. Now, if the high flying Griz O from weeks 4, 5, and 6 shows up, when they scored 46 on Western Carolina and 52 on E Washington and 48 on Weber, if that happens - and the Griz have all the capability to rekindle the O if they can find a match - TSU will be no match for them if Montana O clicks like it once did.
 
BM has a cheap Tarleton ML, -653, about half price everywhere else. First time I have seen BM offer FCS MLs
 
Lehigh outright!!!

Cool win for those guys. They lost two defensive starters to injury carried out on a stretcher during the game plus their stud LB DNP. Theme that hurt Richmond, couldn't score TDs in the RZ, just like several other games. Really like seeing a team like Lehigh win.

Richmond is moving to the Patriot next year FYI.

CAA, I don't want to pile on like everyone will and call it bad, but it is so mediocre. 0-4 ATS today from the big bad CAA with one of the worst offensive showings I've seen all year by New Hampshire, Richmond lost, Villanova damn near maybe shoulda lost, hell URI could've lost to CCSU!
 
Too big of a gap between games yesterday so I started drinking, and I never drink of college football Saturdays, so of course I fell asleep a few minutes into the TSU-Griz game. Replaying it now. I know I lost a 1H TSU bet on some BS Montana FG with :00. Will see how that happened.

Shout out to BookMaker for yesterday for having both 1H and 2H side/total offerings with buy point options. I need lots of action on Saturdays, NFL I can place one bet and walk away, college I want engagement on several bets spread across various outlets. Bovada let's you tease FCS games. Appreciated the offshores yesterday.

Pretty sure Illinois State was just the right side even though SEMO couldn't stop turning it over like it was cool. Had 7 lost TOs in the first 3Q which included 2 pick-sixes and an 8th TO happened in the EZ in the 4Q. There were actually a couple other near TOs as well. That is why you will see SEMO with a 602-322 (6.0-4.7) yard edge. DeLaurent passed it 85x! Illinois State D knew that SEMO wouldn't run and they just swarmed receivers as best they could and try to force DeLaurent into errant throws and that worked. They will face a completely different animal next week at UC Davis. I thought the Illinois State offense was largely unimpressive - their longest "drive" was just 62y and that was actually a 62y TD pass. Their next longest drives were 58y on 10 plays and 46y on 13 plays and 40y on 3 plays.

CCSU made things interesting as they have all year. Rhode Island got up 14-0 on a pick-six then they pretty much just held on the rest of the game. Hunter Helms is not good, expect him to have a rough go at Mercer next week. Both RBs were the stars; Howard led in rush and receiving for the Devils with 155 of their 271 ttl yards while Grant ran 29-223! URI could've been fair amount better if they had the right QB this year. Pretty decent all around team that is just missing a little something. Would've been fun to see CCSU advance and have every CAA team lose.

Already without defensive leader LB DeNucci, Lehigh saw DE Matt Spatney and LB Tyler Ochojski (each started every game this year) both carried off the field on stretchers during the game at Richmond. Story of the game was that Lehigh D that kept Richmond out of the EZ long enough to keep the Mountainhawks in the game. Richmond O moved the ball well in the 1H, drove to the L08, L10 and L04 and kicked FGs on all 3. The one right before half they mismanaged the clock and timeout usage and lost the opportunity for one more play before a FG with :00 on the clock. Then in the 2H it was big plays from Lehigh that made the difference. Richmond had just scored on 4th down to go up 16-7 when Jaden Green (who will probably be a Fr AA) ripped of a 65y TD run to make it a 2 pt game again. On Lehigh's next possesion, a QB run for 19y on 3rd and 17 was key point in the game as they got a 54y TD pass a couple plays later and the 20-16 lead with just 6min to go. Richmond was set to get the ball back with 1min left, but they muffed the punt and Lehigh recovered. Saw this on another message board, but Lehigh supposedly is the only FCS team to have participated in the playoffs in every decade from the 1970s to current! Pretty cool!

UTM dominated New Hampshire even more than the 41-10 score shows. UNH's only TD was a KO return TD and ultimately expectations of UNH's O being bad were realized, the strength of their D was overstated. In the 1H UTM had a 343-24 ttl yard edge! 14-1 First Downs! 27-7 UTM lead at that point. Those stats finished as 482-124 (6.1-2.4) ttl yards and 22-6 FDs. UNH's longest drive was 40y. Losing that Under by .5 pt hurts.

Villanova played like Villanova. Probably should've lost. EKU led 14-0, but lost 17-22. EKU had a receiver in the back of the EZ on the final play of the game, but the receiver lost is awareness of where he was and what could've been a dramatic game winning TD was simply an incomplete pass caught out of bounds. This game really turned late 3Q. Villanova QB was rolling out and it looked like he was going to try and pass the ball, but he had not yet brought it up by his shoulders, the ball remained down by his waist, he was tackled and the ball came loose, a fumble that was scooped and scored by EKU which would've given them a 24-16 lead. Instead, replay overturned the fumble, calling it an incomplete pass and while I think you can tell his intention was to try and flick the ball out somehow, he never actually did, the hit by the defender dislodged the ball. EKU HC went berserk and was hit with an unsportsman like penalty. Villanova would take a 19-17 lead at the end of that drive.

Tarleton unforutnately found themselves in a hole 1Q and it effected how the game ultimately played out. Tarleton went for a 4th-1 at their own 29 on the opening drive and were stuffed = Drake 7-0. Later a Drake punt was touched by Tarleton and recovered by Drake at the T26 = Drake 14-3. From that point on the game went as most would've expected, Drake led 43-21 after scoring a TD with about 2min left, so of course everyone knows what was about to happen, not only did Drake go down to score with :45 left, they got the 2pt conv so all Tarleton spreads lost.

Fears from last week were realized when Abilene Christian starting QB McIvor was out for the playoff game. I had heard people who know more than me this week say he was playing, but instead it was backup Carson Haggard got the start after finishing the 2H last week and was ok. Obviously the D was the story with the 24-0 shutout win. Hicks had a big game running which is sometimes an underappreciated part of the ACU O.

I'm about to see how I lost my 1H TSU bet. Yup there it is, :10 left, Montana had just kicked a FG to go up 13-3 and they pouch kicked the ball and TSU couldn't fall on it and Montana recovered = 16-3 HT instead of a 10 pt margin. Looking at box score now, I see Junior Bergen had TWO punt ret TDs! Griz led by as many as 27-6. A big KO return to the M12 set up TSU for their first TD and then Montana was sacked/fumbled on the next possession and after a good return, TSU started at the M11 and one play later it was 27-20. Montana outgained them 369-277 (5.7-4.6). Montana lost 3 fumbles, two that led to 10 TSU pts and the third was lost at the T02 - but Bergen ret'd the ensuing punt after that one so maybe a wash there).

Pretty good day of football. It lacked the drama the FBS games appeared to have had. But that is the tradeoff with FCS, I get what I want out of it, exactly what I want out of it and don't have to be annoyed by anything that I don't like at the other level.

Will have to see when the lines some out this week. I expect tomorrow, but will need to check throughout today as well just in case.
 
Last edited:
Massey

DateTeamStandingScrPredPwinMarginTotal
Sat 12.07Southern Univ
@ Jackson St
playoff | SWAC Championship
# 86 (8-4)
# 51 (10-2)
0
0
14
33
9 %
91 %

-18.5
48.5
Sat 12.07Montana
@ S Dakota St
playoff
# 8 (9-4)
# 1 (10-2)
0
0
13
37
5 %
95 %

-23.5
50.5
Sat 12.07Villanova
@ Incarnate Word
playoff
# 12 (10-3)
# 10 (10-2)
0
0
24
28
39 %
61 %

-4.5
54.5
Sat 12.07Rhode Island
@ Mercer
playoff
# 17 (11-2)
# 11 (10-2)
0
0
20
31
21 %
79 %

-10.5
52.5
Sat 12.07Abilene Chr
@ N Dakota St
playoff
# 15 (9-4)
# 3 (10-2)
0
0
14
40
6 %
94 %

-26.5
57.5
Sat 12.07Tarleton St
@ South Dakota
playoff
# 16 (10-3)
# 4 (9-2)
0
0
14
34
10 %
90 %

-20.5
52.5
Sat 12.07TN Martin
@ Montana St
playoff
# 14 (9-4)
# 2 (12-0)
0
0
20
37
15 %
85 %

-16.5
56.5
Sat 12.07Illinois St
@ UC Davis
playoff
# 7 (10-3)
# 5 (10-2)
0
0
21
28
28 %
72 %

-7.5
52.5
Sat 12.07Lehigh
@ Idaho
playoff
# 35 (9-3)
# 6 (9-3)
0
0
14
35
8 %
92 %

-20.5
50.5


Sagarin

Screenshot 2024-12-01 at 19-47-51 College Football Ratings Page.png

Reddit FCS 'sportsbook'


12/7: Abilene Christian @ North Dakota State -24.5 (O/U 58.5)
12/7: Illinois State @ UC Davis -7.5 (O/U 54)
12/7: Lehigh @ Idaho -11.5 (O/U 51)
12/7: Montana @ South Dakota State -22 (O/U 52.5)
12/7: Rhode Island @ Mercer -12 (O/U 51.5)
12/7: Southern @ Jackson State -19 (O/U 49)
12/7: Tarleton @ South Dakota -19.5 (O/U 53)
12/7: UT Martin @ Montana State -15 (O/U 56.5)
12/7: Villanova @ UIW -7.5 (O/U 53)
[td] /r/FCS Sportsbook - FCS Games[/td]


If McIvor returns for ACU that game could be interesting. The defensive performance from them was highly unexpected and incredibly improbable, so they aren't that good on that side of the ball. Could be a good Over game there.

Rittenhouse can give Illinois State a punchers chance, good receivers on that team too. Think Davis is too strong all around, I will ML them.

I have very much enjoyed the ride of Lehigh football this year. But Idaho will have their way with them, I don't see it close, especially if 3 starters are out for the front 7 of a solid Lehigh D. Don't think they have close to enough on O if they have to try and keep up.

Jacks should win fairly comfortably, line projecting pretty high though.

Mercer and Under

Tarleton O is going to need to have the game of their lives and that D is not good enough - South Dakota is strong

I am looking forward to seeing how long the UT Martin run D can hold up, but I fear for that offense - Cats shouldn't have too much trouble, those projected lines looks a little low on that one

If there is a team that I would say could lose this week it would be Incarnate Word. So, I kinda like their team, but they have played some closer games vs some average-type Southland teams and the CAA is full of average type teams and Villanova has been a big disappointment this year, BUT, that Villanova team has some players on the roster. Calzada only has one multi-INT game this year, but he plays a little wild at times. Not sure if I would want to bet Villanova, but if they won depending how it plays out, would not totally surprise me I'm saying.
 
Let's see how close I get

South Dakota St. -17.5
Mercer -7
UIW -9
Montana St. -20
South Dakota -22
North Dakota St. -21.5
UC Davis -3.5
Idaho -15
 
Lines came out right before HT of the Monday night NFL game

Mercer opened -9.5, NDSU total opened 55.5, Montana St -16.5, Davis -6.5, Idaho -13.5, Mercer ML was -310, UIW ML was -200, Montana St was -750, Davis was -200, Idaho was -490

That is what I took.

On the road this week, will probably see what's going on towards the end of the week.
 
I think South Dakota kills Tarleton

Probably beats them so bad they reconsider wanting to move up to the FBS
 
Leaning South Dakota, South Dakota State and Idaho. Headed to airport on business, back Thursday night, so will see how lines shake out over the next few days.
 
I played Idaho and USD as well those two teams should firmly control their respective games at home.

could get talked into an ACU/NDSU over if we see 55.5 and could see South Dakota State suffocating Montana, who is really unimpressive on the road.
 
BOL first of the offshores I check with lines. Unsure when they released
 
Depth Charts on Game Notes are often wrong, such as last week Lehigh's had Mike DeNucci as the starter and he DNP. This week they do not list him as starter or backup. Which could just be a reflection of last week's lineup rather what to expect on who takes the field. This week's Game Notes lists DE Spatny and LB Ochojski as starters - but supposedly statements have been made they would be out this week. So whatever that is worth.

Abilene Christian QB McIvor playing?

Monday at his press conference ACU HC said it was still too early to say if McIvor would be back. But a news story online had this quote, which also was supposedly Monday:
“We fully expect him to be," Patterson said Monday.

McIvor suffered an undisclosed injury during the final game of the regular season and didn't play in last Saturday's 24-0 home victory against Northern Arizona in Abilene, Texas.

The 6-foot-2, 210-pound McIvor has completed 63% of his passes for 3,675 yards and 29 touchdowns with five interceptions in 12 games. He's averaging 306.3 passing yards per game. McIvor, a Texas Tech transfer, is in his third season as the team's starting quarterback and has played in 34 career games for the Wildcats. Abilene Christian coach 'fully' expects QB Maverick McIvor to play against Bison

Rumors of interviews at FBS openings - Eck (Utah State) and Vigen (Fresno).
 
Back
Top