KJ
Bump. Set. Shuma!
Please stop calling each other names. It's a good discussion. Keep it rolling.
Thanks.
Shit you shouldn't have to say unless you teach kindergarten for $200 Alex
Please stop calling each other names. It's a good discussion. Keep it rolling.
Thanks.
They said it was of importance but not the only metric of importance.
If winning your conf championship is the end-all, be-all for YOU...then there really isn't anything to discuss. But that's your preference and not the preference of the committee nor their stated goal.
"Rules are rules" apparently...and there is no rule that conference championships are mandatory for entry into the playoffs.
Conference title games do matter.. they mattered last night in PAC 12 and they will matter tonight in ACC. Just apparently don't matter as much in BiG10
Shit you shouldn't have to say unless you teach kindergarten for $200 Alex
There are currently 19 users browsing this thread. (9 members and 10 guests)
oh boy mrtake and takeit both here, it's gettin real
They said it was of importance but not the only metric of importance.
If winning your conf championship is the end-all, be-all for YOU...then there really isn't anything to discuss. But that's your preference and not the preference of the committee nor their stated goal.
"Rules are rules" apparently...and there is no rule that conference championships are mandatory for entry into the playoffs.
Is your contention that just the conference champs go to playoff?
Just curious, as you make numbers, would it be fair to say that the BiG or Sec or whatever has a hater road than the MAC or 'Merican?
I know you are smart so the answer is yes. So then, I guess you would say,"Right, so dispose of those teams when you meet!"
And I would say, "Yes!"
Ok.....but what would happen is the OOC games we love so much would be gone.
I like the spirit of your argument but it just can't happen Kyle
*but please don't play an ass juice schedule
Like I said earlier, when someone smarter than myself and everyone else here is able to figure that out then let me know. It'll be great!
Well the difference between the 1 loss tOSU and the 2 loss teams you mentioned is that tOSU is not even playing the their conference title game, and one of the 2 loss teams will be the champion. The committee said last year that winning the conference was of great importance. So the fact that now it's somehow different, and a team that isn't even playing in the title game may make the playoff is a complete and utter joke.
Especially in a year where there is a lot of parody in college football. Conference championships should hold more weight than normal.
"It is a very small margin of separation in the committee's eyes between No. 4 Washington and No. 5 Michigan," Hocutt said. "I don't think I can emphasize enough the small margin of separation the selection committee sees between those two teams.
:rofl::rofl:
Similar strength of schedule too. so that is no excuse.
Right. Obviously.
This is from the CFP Protocol, directly from the mouths of the committee...
When circumstances at the margins indicate that teams are comparable, then the following criteria must
be considered:
Championships won
Strength of schedule
Head
-
to
-
head competition (if it occurred)
Compara
tive outcomes of common opponents (without incenting margin of victory)
So, how in the world can anyone possibly justify tOSU getting in over PSU? It literally goes against exactly what the fuck the committee said. Period.
You'd be the smartest MF'er in the room if the fucknuts were sitting at 5. You'd tell us all about it.
Michigan were 2OT away from being in. Their schedule was abysmal (Colorado were schedule after they came off a 1-11 season, and 7 straight losing seasons)
not even an osu fan so u can go fuck yourself thx
dont care about your plight or any other malcontent in this thread
So, how in the world can anyone possibly justify tOSU getting in over PSU? It literally goes against exactly what the fuck the committee said. Period.
Why are you making all of this so personal?
Actually, last year the committee listed it as the #1 factor on their list of factors. It literally has nothing to do with what I want, I was simply stating facts.
Even if the conference title was simply on their list of 5 factors (there may have been more, just using a number), how can someone who didn't even make the title game be in? Either it IS a factor, or it's not...but they can't say that it is (again, it was the #1 reason they gave for TCU being omitted) one year and then change the rules the next year, that makes no sense. Well, they can do whatever they'd like, as we are witnessing, but it's still completely moronic.
Again, why is this so personal for you?
And how is anyone using actual logic a malcontent? I just posted the committee's protocol, which clearly states what they are going by, or should be as that's what they said. Didn't you claim the committee hadn't actually stated that conference titles mattered? How about head to head? How about strength of schedule? What happens if one team has 2 of the 3 over the other team, and the SOS is close (I'm not sure, PSU may have that edge as well)?
It's my understanding that it's a factor among other factors. But I'm not on the committee so I know as much as you do. Which isn't much. As you say, they seem to reserve the right to do whatever they want.
Not taking it personal with you...but if I'm going to be cursed out, labeled a troll and other annoying assumptions then I'll stoop to that level and fire back. Until I suppose I'm chased out of this thread by the lynch mob who seem to have mistaken me for Condi Rice.
You have to admit that this is pretty funny at a minimum.
It's my understanding that it's a factor among other factors. But I'm not on the committee so I know as much as you do. Which isn't much. As you say, they seem to reserve the right to do whatever they want.
Not taking it personal with you or others who have discussed this civilly...but if I'm going to be cursed out, labeled a troll and other annoying assumptions then I'll stoop to that level and fire back. Until I suppose I'm chased out of this thread by the lynch mob who seem to have mistaken me for Condi Rice.
It's definitely extra chaotic now. But with 4 slots for 5 power conferences the chances of it not being chaotic on a yearly basis were slim.
I believe I said that conference championships weren't the "end-all, be-all", ie. not the sole criteria.
5 conf, 4 teams. throw out the winner of the worst conference.....and the winner of the best conference because we like the ohio and hate the pedos.
The only problem is that you are the one who "stooped to that level" first, and others were simply replying to you in the same fashion.
false. was cussed out by skoalmint and so I cussed back at him. and at that point, this shit began to get irritating.
either way, are you ready to move on from it or do you want to continue this nonsense? as i said, i have no problem with u but fuck it, it's 20 vs. 1 in this thread so we can just turn it into a huge internet brawl. your call.