Thx, Play2. Don't I know you from the old forum hood back in the day? lol
Thx, Indy.
Adding for 1/2 Unit: Marshall -3 @ Ohio (-115)
Looking at Marshall's first game their offensive results ended up landing pretty close to the negative regression I projected for them. The running regression was right on, though the passing game was not quite as good. But then again, being Purdue it was one of the best pass defenses they'll face on the schedule this year, so the result is not that far out of expectation at all. What does this mean? It means I can trust my stats on them offensively this game. The defensive regression for Marshall + Purdue's offensive projected progress came out pretty spot on, as well. Just because Marshall had two pick 6s doesn't mean they didn't deserve to win. Purdue did have 57 more total yards in the game, but that's because they ran 30 more plays on offense than Marshall did. Marshall had a higher ypp and ypc average, and the difference was especially advantageous in the rushing yards per carry. When it's all said and done, the team with both the higher ypp and ypc is going to get the win a majority of the time.
As for Ohio, I projected a fairly easy win over Idaho, so no surprise there.
Adding for 1/2 Unit: Iowa -3.5 @ Iowa State
Iowa had an okay game eating their week #1 cupcake, Illinois State. Iowa State played a tougher, chewier cupcake in Northern Iowa (a team that threatens to choke FBS schools to death on occasion, such is it's toughness). ISU won 31-7, but a quick look at the box score shows that the two teams were almost identical in total yardage. ISU was much better in the passing game, while Northern Iowa did better in the running game. Color me not that impressed, I'll take the Hawkeyes, in spite of the Cyclones history of playing them tougher than they should.