Frank Costanza
You are what your record says you are
I have a weird feeling, even with Howard, that ohio is going to play in the championship.
I should have clarified that I think Texas has a QB issue, and the pass catcher issues are for UGA.The TE / WRs have had really good hands this season, before yesterday.
No argument on the QB.
Those are actually all entertaining games and extremely regionalFirst round game projections (On3 / ESPN)
SMU @ Texas
Indiana @ ND
Tenn @ ohio
Clemson @ Penn State
Let’s just let Vegas determine the rankings
What would SMU vs Alabama be? Alabama vs Miami? Miami vs SMU?
It’s the most objective process in a very subjective process.
Louis Riddick asked do you trust Riley Leonard over Ewers and Allar? Uh. Yes, I do.
I just noticed this. These pricks already had it done by 8pm last nightWhy is this thing 4 hrs long?
I'm ok if Northern Illinois gets inScrew it, SMU lost to a 3 loss team in their conference championship, and their conference happens to be very weak - like mid-major weak. I’m not putting them in.
They had their chance.
Brett McMurphy reporting that SMU is in
Screw it, SMU lost to a 3 loss team in their conference championship, and their conference happens to be very weak - like mid-major weak. I’m not putting them in.
They had their chance.
Bama lost by 3 TDs against a bad Oklahoma team. They had their shot.
Old Piss lost at home to a Kentucky team that went 1-7 in the conference. They had their shot.
South Carolina lost by 24 at home to that same Old Miss team. They had their shot.
You can slam any team in this thing other than oregon.
I assume he just woke up and is in boxersSaban looks thrilled to be on the show.
SMU beating Pitt was possibly the game of the year on that particular day, so that's pretty significantAgreed, but solely from a “what have they done/who have they beat” perspective when compared to others, the answer for SMU is nothing/nobody.
here's the thing, a majority of the QBs in the playoff are mediocreI have a weird feeling, even with Howard, that ohio is going to play in the championship.
That's being pretty kindhere's the thing, a majority of the QBs in the playoff are mediocre
Agreed, but solely from a “what have they done/who have they beat” perspective when compared to others, the answer for SMU is nothing/nobody.
Anyone on this board that says they won't watch the games is lying as they place a bet on Russian ping pong.Maybe I'm in the minority, but I think the subjectivity is a large part of what makes college football unique and interesting and great. If there were nothing but autobids, we'd all be talking about our fantasy football lineups and some of the good bball on today. But instead, we have dozens of fanbases glued to their phone/computer/TV. And outside of the fanbases involved, nobody really feels that strongly one way or the other, but we all pretend like we do. Millions will say in about an hour they won't even watch the games, but they of course will
Pretty comparable to Indiana (beat a few teams that are prob between 25 and 50), but Indiana didn't have to play a conference champ game.
I must be watching something else because I think Allar is closer to Christian Hackenburg than being good.Louis Riddick asked do you trust Riley Leonard over Ewers and Allar? Uh. Yes, I do.
Very comparable to Indiana. But Indiana in a much stronger conference.
Committee telling us it’s better to lose to good teams as long as you beat bad ones
I was commenting on Texas and Penn St’s position. Their resumes hinge on good losses more than anything elseCommittee saying we can't stick it to the ACC two years in a row
They weren't having a watch party, no?Not even showing a live reaction from SMU shows you where they fall in the grand scheme of things lol
Not even close. Oregon as the 1 seed got screwed. Penn St and Texas rewarded for beating nobody. This bracket is a jokeThey got it right