NHL 2nd Round - In-Games

[mogo]

only 1 shot....

it always seems like most of the ones the pens take get blocked before they even reach the net....

 

[Joe Public]

it always seems like most of the ones the pens take get blocked before they even reach the net....

They seem to be settling for long shots through a D-man, but without much traffic in front. That doesn't get it done.

But at least they controlled the play in the zone.

 

[Joe Public]

Here we go.

We MUST score on this PP.

 

[Joe Public]

God our PP is awful.

 

[Joe Public]

Good job by the Caps, but really it's just a bad PP by the Pens. Their PP is horrible right now.

 

[guaranteeed]

That PP was bad, I do remember in last years playoffs the Pens PP looked unstoppable

 

[guaranteeed]

Terrible shot by Kunitz, hes not gonna score from there he needs to shoot low for a rebound, not in to the logo on the chest

 

[guaranteeed]

shouldn't this be the time you but malkin and crosby together so that when passes like that are made they end up in the net?

not fedetenko taking those shots

 

[Joe Public]

Gonna need the EN for the over.

 

[Joe Public]

That PP was bad, I do remember in last years playoffs the Pens PP looked unstoppable

Yeah, and in the first round they consistently looked horrible on the PP vs. Philly. It's not a one-time thing.

 

[guaranteeed]

I still think Pitt can tie this

 

[Gandolf]

Ovechkin 2-0 on draws vs Malkin there.

 

[guaranteeed]

if the over misses by 2 inches...

 

[Joe Public]

Ugh.

 

[Joe Public]

One thing we learned in this game is that the Washington Capitals are not the Philadelphia Flyers on the draw.

 

[guaranteeed]

why wasnt that icing on the capitals there?

should have been penguins offensive zone faceoff with 15 seconds left

 

[Joe Public]

That's a horrible beat on the total. Just horrible.

F**k.

Congratulations Caps fans and bettors.

 

[Joe Public]

why wasnt that icing on the capitals there?

should have been penguins offensive zone faceoff with 15 seconds left

Agreed.

 

[Gandolf]

Pound that over on Monday. Only thing keeping this from being a 5-4 game was early nerves and some stunning goaltending.

Homes went 4-0 in Game 1. Time for some road win chases.

 

[mogo]

Pens PP needs to step up and get better....


that stick save was the game saver for wash.. gotta say it was one of the best i've ever seen...

 

[Joe Public]

I second that entire post, Gandolf.

 

[Gandolf]

I second that entire post, Gandolf.

:cheers:

 

[BetCrimes1984]

FFS - 3 goals in the 1st and no Over, what a piece of shit to wake up to.

 

[B.A.R.]

FFS - 3 goals in the 1st and no Over, what a piece of shit to wake up to.

No doubt BC

2-1 early, I leave and come home to a 3-2 final:angry:

 

[Joe Public]

2-1 early, I leave and come home to a 3-2 final

Oh, if you're mad now, just wait until you see the save that robbed the Pens of goal number three, and therefore, the over.

 

[BetCrimes1984]

Pens blow goats.

 

[Joe Public]

Easy there.

 

[guaranteeed]

time for Roberto to have a big game

 

[Joe Public]

<!-- / icon and title --> <!-- message --> time for Roberto to have a big game

Again, I completely agree with you.

PP 'Nucks.

 

[Joe Public]

That's how you shoot from the slot.

1-0 Vancouver.

 

[Joe Public]

And Vancouver will go right back on the PP.

 

[guaranteeed]

Ya big shot by Salo, no screen and he still buries it.

Hawks are so undisciplined, just comes with being a young team

 

[Joe Public]

Uh oh, 5 on 3 coming for a minute and a half.

 

[guaranteeed]

Edler!

 

[Joe Public]

Dammit, Pittsburgh, how come your PP can't perform like this.

2-0.

Still on the PP.

 

[guaranteeed]

Lidstrom junior does have a bullet of a shot

 

[BetCrimes1984]

Got Vancouver in a parlay, 2-0

 

[Joe Public]

I have the under and am officially worried.

 

[Joe Public]

Although, if anybody was going to score two in the first period, for the under's sake, this was the best possible choice.

 

[guaranteeed]

I have the under and am officially worried.

the fact that Chicago came back on thursday and tied it makes it likely the Canucks have stressed playing 60 minutes and team defence. could help

 

[Joe Public]

Agreed.

I now want to see a solid two and a half periods of really good Vancouver defense.

 

[Joe Public]

ok, corrected again, so now it does look like it was 5 on 2 for about 30 ticks

It wasn't.

It started with matching penalties and Chicago getting an extra man in the box. Then, just as that PP started, Chicago took another penalty.

 

[BetCrimes1984]

These totals need to open with the hook before I'm interested. They're showing no adjustment at all for CHC's games being high scoring. It's as if the line was based on the goalies alone, and that doesn't cut it.

 

[BetCrimes1984]

ok, corrected again, so now it does look like it was 5 on 2 for about 30 ticks

It wasn't.

It started with matching penalties and Chicago getting an extra man in the box. Then, just as that PP started, Chicago took another penalty.

The goal is what prevented it. I had a brain fade on a goal ending PPs. The 2nd & 3rd penalty came after the 1st goal.

 

[Joe Public]

These totals need to open with the hook before I'm interested. they're showing no adjustment at all for CHC's games being high scoring. it's as if the line was based on the goalies alone, and that doesn't cut it.

Yeah, they won't adjust unless and until they put up another over or two in a row.

I bit on that plus-money here tonight. Frankly if the game could be rained out right now and declared official I'd be fine with that.

 

[BetCrimes1984]

Still, the thing in your favour is VAN experienced the big comeback last game, so they'll be specifically concentrating on not relaxing again this time.

 

[Joe Public]

Vancouver's retreating to their shell again.

I don't like it.

 

[BetCrimes1984]

<TABLE id=awayGoalies cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=2 enableSort="false" defaultSort="id"><TBODY><TR recordId="{id}"><TH align=left dataType="Alpha" dataInsert="{firstName|substr:0:1}. {lastName}" dataLink="/nhl/players/playerpage/{id}">GOALIES</TH><TH dataType="Alpha" dataSource="save">SV</TH><TH dataType="Num" dataSource="numGoalsAgainst">GA</TH></TR><TBODY id=awayGoaliesData><TR class=rowOdd id=awayGoalies19419 vAlign=top><TD align=left>N. Khabibulin</TD><TD align=left>3
</TD><TD align=left>2
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

I guess the Berlin Wall realises it's post 1990

 

[guaranteeed]

<TABLE id=awayGoalies cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=2 enableSort="false" defaultSort="id"><TBODY><TR recordId="{id}"><TH align=left dataType="Alpha" dataInsert="{firstName|substr:0:1}. {lastName}" dataLink="/nhl/players/playerpage/{id}">GOALIES</TH><TH dataType="Alpha" dataSource="save">SV</TH><TH dataType="Num" dataSource="numGoalsAgainst">GA</TH></TR><TBODY id=awayGoaliesData><TR class=rowOdd id=awayGoalies19419 vAlign=top><TD align=left>N. Khabibulin</TD><TD align=left>3
</TD><TD align=left>2
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

I guess the Berlin Wall realises it's post 1990

If Chicago loses this game i would guess Huet starts game 3, Khabibulin has a terrible record against the Canucks

 

[Joe Public]

Ooh, I don't like Huet very much. I'd love to see him in there.