Intentional grounding has never taken into account whether the QB is under duress, far more egregious calls than that one have existed. And I disagree with the call. But that's been called that way every time whether we agree or not.
Intentional grounding has never taken into account whether the QB is under duress, far more egregious calls than that one have existed. And I disagree with the call. But that's been called that way every time whether we agree or not.
Well depends. It's clearly intentional but a RB is almost always in the area. We gonna go to the FG holder who's knee is down too?
Boise is the better team just a matter of if fresno can luck out a win
I hope so
There's a specific rule that says it's legal for the holder to have his knee on the ground while he possesses the ball.Well depends. It's clearly intentional but a RB is almost always in the area. We gonna go to the FG holder who's knee is down too?
Ya and 2.5 in a contest
So we can go another routeThere's a specific rule that says it's legal for the holder to have his knee on the ground while he possesses the ball.
Men vs boys
It was already overWonder if that affected the 3rd quarter total