i should have said never won an NBA finals...that's what I meant...getting there and playing in a game is meaningless...soo i assume you all know what i meant....
about the kobe lebron thing...
I watched Kobe with an IV at halftime half dead on the court face up on Lebron late in the fourth and hit a ridiculous shot up and over the strong defense of Lebron...that shot was huge at the time...and when Lebron had his opportunity to match it...he fell short...
this is just one game, but it was VERY hyped...James gave a press conference before the game talking about his preparation for this final regular season battle with possible home court implications...(Lakers now have the tiebreaker over Cleveland and that's somthing they did NOT wanna give up on their home court. Odem was obviously the reason LA won...but Kobe was still there for some meaningful low percentage shots...and won the battle of the two superstars while guarding one another...
one game? I'd take Kobe....my reason is simple...James has to win a final before his confidence reaches that new level...the day he wins a final...i might be singing another tune...but there is obviously a confidence factor with superstars...Once you know you can win gold...you never turn back...until Lebron breaks through that door...I want the guy who is 100% confident with every shot he puts up, and never hesitates, and always wants the ball....right now? that's Kobe...
obviously this is a very subjective and hard subject due to the fact that they're both incredible talents and play different positions...
I feel that at the end of their careers James will most likely be marked as the better player in the history books....maybe even the best ever....but until he breaks through...I want Bryant please...twice on sunday
Hey Broadway,
Did you lose a bet?
He can simply do things with the ball in the final minutes and seconds that Kobe cannot do.
Like what? Get called for travelling?
^ killa, dont forget to post the highlights of the final seconds in last nights game against the pacers.
You mean the game in which he scored 47 points, almost single-handedly took the game to OT, and hit two free-throws to tie it with less than a second left before a shockingly bad call cost them the game? You mean that game?
Rather odd choice of game to employ in an argument against LeBron James.
especially when he had a crucial 3 pointer, a crucial assist, a crucial rebound, a crucial defensive lockdown on a guy he had no business being able to defend all in the last 2 minutes down 7 and hit two free throws on the road to tie with .80 secs left. not to mention the rest of the game where he had 47 and the rest of his team shot 30%. haha---yeah he played terrible
you wouldn't want a guy that's going to do ALL of those things for you to get and keep the game out of reach? you would rather hope the game is close so kobe can have that killer instinct at the end? well, that's your choice, but i'd take the former.
I like how after Sunday Kobe has had 14 votes to one for LeBron...
which is correct, but funny still.
what you just said makes no sense. Lebron doesn't play for highlights he makes them happen. Lebron dominated that game last night and everyone on the team was mostly a no show. Kobe gets to play less minutes because his team goes 10 deep and has more scoring talent on it. when you get into a talk about putting a game out of reach you need to look at the whole team rather than just the best player
it seems like lebron has to stay in the whole game because he cant take it out of reach. last nights game, game against the knicks, game against the lakers. these are the last couple games. so what are you talkin about?
....
point of the game = to win
I like how after Sunday Kobe has had 14 votes to one for LeBron...
no im not a kobe dick rider im just honest and i actually know about basketball. im starting to question the knowledge of others in this forum after reading this shit. thank god the people i tailed (bar, billivy, and a few others) are smart and know kobe is better, or not stating their opinion at all.
this is truly funny to me that its even this hard for people to realize...
:36_11_6: maybe i should post another:36_11_6:
:smiley_abcs:However, you're going along as though almost half the posters that chose to answer this poll are idiots.
kobe has 3 rings...lebron has 0. yea kobe had shaq, thats cool, shaq had kobe. no point in sayin that Yag shit, kobe still has 3 rings.
to be honest i am a lakers fan
Well that pretty much explains your entire position on this issue.
And your championship talk is irrelevant in this context. I have two simple questions.
1. Do you think Kobe would have any NBA titles if he had had the teams LeBron has had for his career?
2. Do you think LeBron would allow his team to blow a 24-point lead at home in the NBA Finals, like Kobe did last year?
USA Today asked nineteen NBA general managers who they thought was better; Kobe Bryant or LeBron James?
Twelve of the GMs picked Bryant, while seven preferred James.
Kobe is the NBA's reigning MVP, and has three NBA titles to his credit.
"Kobe's basketball IQ, competitive spirit and skill set make him, unquestionably, the best closer in the game," former coach and current ABC analyst Jeff Van Gundy said. "But James is younger, and nobody outplays him over the first 44 minutes."