With the layoff, I'm thinking it might go Under.
I agree. Maybe getting it a bit higher live but that's just sounds like a very unhappy Monday night.Under may be the correct side but I just don’t think I could sit there and watch this game with that under. Would be torture with these two offenses.
I’ll def be lighter on the total than Clemson but think I gotta play it.
I agree. Maybe getting it a bit higher live but that's just sounds like a very unhappy Monday night.
Looking forward to seeing 4 quarters of aggressive offensive football from LSUs offense. The total hasn’t factored that in and by the end of the 3rd quarter it will be obvious.
Yeah, it was interesting having the starters in and still going tempo in the 4th quarter vs Oklahoma.LSU has played aggressive offense into the 4th quarter of every game I’ve watched them play this season.
No idea. If it touches 7... You'll see it get hit right back down IMO.Any insight on what we anticipate the game line doing over the next 48 hours...?
Burrow played one play in the 4th quarter against Oklahoma on a drive that began in the 3rd.Yeah, it was interesting having the starters in and still going tempo in the 4th quarter vs Oklahoma.
I said it then and I'll say it again. It was foolish he was out there after the first series of the 2nd half. They kept going uptempo with Brennan in the 4th quarter. That's all that's being noted.Burrow played one play in the 4th quarter against Oklahoma on a drive that began in the 3rd.
With that said I don’t necessarily agree with the premise by PNG. They played in the 4Q against Ole Miss and Alabama to keep them at arms length, or beyond in the case of Ole Miss. But at other times Burrow being in and throwing 5 yard hitches while snapping the ball with under 10 seconds isn’t really aggressive either compared to how they play the rest of the game.
LMAO. I guess I should’ve said it will be nice to see first half Joe deep into the second half. Obviously, I don’t want it to be too deep but both teams scoring in the 40s will not be a surprise. Neither team reaching 40 will be much more shocking. This will not be a short football game.I said it then and I'll say it again. It was foolish he was out there after the first series of the 2nd half. They kept going uptempo with Brennan in the 4th quarter. That's all that's being noted.
He was out there for one additional drive beyond that and all but two snaps with Brennan in the 4th quarter were with less than 5 seconds on the play clock, and one of those two was still with less than 10 seconds. That’s not uptempo by any definition, which is with the general theme I’ve attempted to point out throughout this thread.I said it then and I'll say it again. It was foolish he was out there after the first series of the 2nd half. They kept going uptempo with Brennan in the 4th quarter. That's all that's being noted.
I don't even consider them crazy tempo. They are kinda like OKLA with the slow no huddle tempo. I'll try and find coverage of it because I was discussing with 2 other people at the time... That's all. If they truly took the clock under 2 seconds each time then my apologies.They were absolutely sitting on the clock. Again, what you saw and what you think you saw aren’t the same thing. Just because there were no huddles doesn’t mean they were going tempo.
A year ago Clemson destroys an arguably better team in Bama (than LSU this year) and goes undefeated and now is almost dogged a TD. Crazy.
And I say that comparison based on LSU playing on par with multiple teams this year who ended up being so so at best in Texas, Florida, and Auburn.
That same Clemson team a year ago played on par with a couple of so so teams. It didn’t mean anything in January. Just like this year’s Clemson playing on par with a so so North Carolina won’t mean anything tomorrow either.A year ago Clemson destroys an arguably better team in Bama (than LSU this year) and goes undefeated and now is almost dogged a TD. Crazy.
And I say that comparison based on LSU playing on par with multiple teams this year who ended up being so so at best in Texas, Florida, and Auburn.
No surprise on the one-sided action at all...
It’s being bet hard and fast every time it moves to 7 and vice versa down below 6 from very deep pockets (sharp groups). The line has moved a lot (both the side and the total) over the past week. It’s stuck between 5.5 and 7 and 68.5 and 70. If you’re into +EV Clemson +6 provides 3-4 free points at minimum. The public is on LSU clearly which is not comforting. The Total is another story. Will take a lot of things to allow it to go under. Including a lopsided game that isn’t likely to happen.Why isn’t the line moving?
down to -5 nowWhy isn’t the line moving?
What book?I see a 67 at an offscreen book that usually has the sharpest line and is a good indicator of where the line will head in the short term fwiw.
What book?
No, that's actually incorrect. Clemson won every game Lawrence stared and finished by 20+.That same Clemson team a year ago played on par with a couple of so so teams.
It’s correct by the transitive property, teams are static logic that was previously posted.No, that's actually incorrect.
A+ post.Nobody can “predict” the outcome of sporting events. As a gambler, it’s all about finding value in the line - or at least it is for the successful gamblers. Unfortunately, the vast majority of gamblers, including myself, can’t do this successfully in the long run, because we fall in to the the trap of trying to “predict” outcomes too often and get emotionally attached.
This line would be 3 if it weren’t for the Oklahoma rout, which too much stock is being put into by most people. At 5.5 or 6, everyone, yes everyone, should be playing Clemson. Win or lose, it’s the only play to make in this game, regardless of what anyone thinks they can predict. A 2.5 or 3 point inflation is a giant inflation gap in the world of sports betting. This all comes down to line value, and this line is inflated.
Remove emotion....remove what you think of LSU’s offense or Clemson’s defense, remove your annoyance of Trevor Lawrence’s hair or your love for LSU’s cheerleaders. It’s as simple as this...you bet Clemson. If it wins, that’s fantastic. And, if it loses, you move on and do the exact same thing next time in this kind of betting scenario because these are the types of opportunities that the wise gamblers don’t pass up on.
(in my opinion)