This is the exact line of thinking that has cost bettors a metric ton from that game until today betting against LSU. LSU had multiple defensive starters on suspension and were very thin in both the secondary and at LB. DELPIT played on very wobbly wheels and up 3+ scores a lax approach set in coming out of halftime. Plumlee will reek havoc under Kiffin for years to come. If you haven’t accepted that the defensive effort in that one half up 20+ against an amazing talent was an outlier you are destined to throw away money one last time versus LSU. To appease BAR I’ll try to leave it alone but it’s truly mind blowing that a game and a half carries so much weight while 8 others versus extreme team talent get thrown aside. For the past two weeks it was that Hurts would run for 250+. Not to mention our most versatile and dependable LB will be back for the ship (See above - Divinity). Very Disappointed Clemson isn’t at least +4 or more but under a TD has to be laid in a game with so much at stake in a building that so many of our players have already won multiple titles in while in high school. Joe’s quick release and next level game intellect will neutralize any pass rush and if Venables is dumb enough to bring those blitzes the Under has zero chance unless Clemson can’t score on our handicapped elementary school defense 44 - 27 Bayou Cats. Running the home state product relentlessly may limit Joes touches but TOP does not equal points. And I’ll go ahead and say it while I bet on Ohio State my heart wanted Clemson to win. Call me Trader Joe if you must I’m just sharing relevant facts that I hope minimize the amounts of losses incurred based on stale, uninformed and useless information that gets recycled week after week by supporters that leave the game bamboozled and BROKEnhearted. GEAUX TIGERS! P.S. BAR I aim to be respectful and quieter until the season has ended with yet another SEC champion remains as the last men standing. #SorryNotSorrybar, I’ll be loookg at Etienne props as well. That ole piss game keeps replaying in my head. Hate Dabo, but he’ll find a way to get Etienne going
A good exercise for all would be to list the 100 yard rushers vs LSU this year. My guess is PlumLee and ........maybe one more. MaybeI like the Under here a lot. Dabo and Venebles know they aren't stopping them consistently but they can certainly run on them. I expect Clemson to chew the clock and Etienne to have a huge day. FG game either way depending on which QB makes a late key play.
This is the exact line of thinking that has cost bettors a metric ton from that game until today betting against LSU. LSU had multiple defensive starters on suspension and were very thin in both the secondary and at LB. DELPIT played on very wobbly wheels and up 3+ scores a lax approach set in coming out of halftime. Plumlee will reek havoc under Kiffin for years to come. If you haven’t accepted that the defensive effort in that one half up 20+ against an amazing talent was an outlier you are destined to throw away money one last time versus LSU. To appease BAR I’ll try to leave it alone but it’s truly mind blowing that a game and a half carries so much weight while 8 others versus extreme team talent get thrown aside. For the past two weeks it was that Hurts would run for 250+. Not to mention our most versatile and dependable LB will be back for the ship (See above - Divinity). Very Disappointed Clemson isn’t at least +4 or more but under a TD has to be laid in a game with so much at stake in a building that so many of our players have already one multiple titles in while in high school. Joe’s quick release and next level game intellect will neutralize any pass rush and if Venables is dumb enough to bring those blitzes the Under has zero chance unless Clemson can’t score on our handicapped elementary school defense 44 - 27 Bayou Cats. Running the home state product relentlessly may limit Joes touches but TOP does not equal points. And I’ll go ahead and say it while I bet on Ohio State my heart wanted Clemson to win. Call me Trader Joe if you must I’m just sharing relevant facts that I hope minimize the amounts of losses incurred based on stale, uninformed and useless information that gets recycled week after week by supporters that leave the game bamboozled and BROKEnhearted. GEAUX TIGERS! P.S. BAR I aim to be respectful and quieter until the season has ended with yet another SEC champion remains as the last men standing. #SorryNotSorry
A good exercise for all would be to list the 100 yard rushers vs LSU this year. My guess is PlumLee and ........maybe one more. Maybe
A good exercise for all would be to list the 100 yard rushers vs LSU this year. My guess is PlumLee and ........maybe one more. Maybe
Playing any under at this point in an LSU game seems like capping suicide.
Yet it will hit this time.Playing any under at this point in an LSU game seems like capping suicide.
I must admit I submitted bowl pools and was Clemson/Under up until the week of the game. I consistently overthink plays and it costs me 90% of the time. As for the desired opponent IMO Ohio State was the most talented team on both sides of the ball. Despite the at times questionable calls I still believe OSU lost that game by not being more open and creative offensively. The last drive showed that Clemson could’ve been driven on throughout if OSU wasn’t so determined to run with a hobbled stud RB. CLEMSON had the experience edge at QB and that likely made the difference. In essence, I think LSU matches up better with Clemson. They appear to need to blitz to get to the QB vs OSUs ability to disrupt with their DL without blitzing. Joe has gotten the ball out quickly and actually does better vs the blitz. The run all over LSU angle may be true when trailing by 2-4 scores but I don’t recall the run d being as big a liability as outsiders seem to believe. The suspensions throughout the season are ignored and what you will face now is the starting defense minus maybe one original starter that missed most of the year at S. I’ve thrown out the Auburn game since it occurred based on the sloppy field conditions. They did get pressure and played great D but ignoring the role the field played cost many when they played Georgia. I was all over Georgia because I knew they were overvaluing Auburn (who was limited by Nix - most of the season). I can’t commit to a number I’ll lay vs Clemson but up to 7 feels safe at this point given Clyde is able to play at 90+%. I’m just a fan that factors in the variables that matter IMO. I’m not making excuses I’m just sharing what I’ve seen as the season has played out. To say I was not impressed by last nights game doesn’t tell the full story. I just don’t see Clemson holding LSU Under mid 30s to mid 40s without a sizable turnover difference. Personally, I hope Clemson does go the pound the run game route as I have great faith in a healthy fully available LSU defense.Great post.
Why did you bet OSU but want Clemson to win? Is it safe to assume you will be on LSU minus the points? If so, how high? I am on them for anything under 10.
I must admit I submitted bowl pools and was Clemson/Under up until the week of the game. I consistently overthink plays and it costs me 90% of the time. As for the desired opponent IMO Ohio State was the most talented team on both sides of the ball. Despite the at times questionable calls I still believe OSU lost that game by not being more open and creative offensively. The last drive showed that Clemson could’ve been driven on throughout if OSU wasn’t so determined to run with a hobbled stud RB. CLEMSON had the experience edge at QB and that likely made the difference. In essence, I think LSU matches up better with Clemson. They appear to need to blitz to get to the QB vs OSUs ability to disrupt with their DL without blitzing. Joe has gotten the ball out quickly and actually does better vs the blitz. The run all over LSU angle may be true when trailing by 2-4 scores but I don’t recall the run d being as big a liability as outsiders seem to believe. The suspensions throughout the season are ignored and what you will face now is the starting defense minus maybe one original starter that missed most of the year at S. I’ve thrown out the Auburn game since it occurred based on the sloppy field conditions. They did get pressure and played great D but ignoring the role the field played cost many when they played Georgia. I was all over Georgia because I knew they were overvaluing Auburn (who was limited by Nix - most of the season). I can’t commit to a number I’ll lay vs Clemson but up to 7 feels safe at this point given Clyde is able to play at 90+%. I’m just a fan that factors in the variables that matter IMO. I’m not making excuses I’m just sharing what I’ve seen as the season has played out. To say I was not impressed by last nights game doesn’t tell the full story. I just don’t see Clemson holding LSU Under mid 30s to mid 40s without a sizable turnover difference. Personally, I hope Clemson does go the pound the run game route as I have great faith in a healthy fully available LSU defense.
Just discussed this last night. Imagine if they hadn't wasted a half+? LSU still better but would have been a tight one.Najee had about 150. Would’ve had near 200 if he’d had more than 3 touches in 1H. Sark gonna Sark though
I respect those stats and points of view. However, I contend you are facing a much different defense when trailing by double digits. The old NFL prevent mindset is the best comparison with obvious variables that don’t match up exactly but should get the point across. If JOE didn’t answer score for score the majority of the time then yes we would’ve found ourselves in some much tougher situations. I would guess Najee found room to run cause we were willing to give up yards and let time burn versus giving up 80 yard bombs in seconds As we did late in tht game. I’m more interested in the results of teams that came out running and just ran in down our throat from start to finish. If you score a TD on every possession and keep Joe on the sideline throughout we are in a very tough spot. I just don’t recall seeing anything close to that this season. Florida and Texas mixed run with lots of passing and outside of Auburn were the only games I recall being in jeopardy for more than a quarter to a half.Just discussed this last night. Imagine if they hadn't wasted a half+? LSU still better but would have been a tight one.
Would love to see the breakdowns by half. Ole Miss we know was due to 3+ score lead at half and lack of depth and mobility of the safeties as well as several starters suspended.Ole Miss X 2
Vandy
Auburn - This was a game. Will always contend the field conditions dictated the closeness on the score board and Nix ineptitude being the only reason we won.
Bama
I respect those stats and points of view. However, I contend you are facing a much different defense when trailing by double digits. The old NFL prevent mindset is the best comparison with obvious variables that don’t match up exactly but should get the point across. If JOE didn’t answer score for score the majority of the time then yes we would’ve found ourselves in some much tougher situations. I would guess Najee found room to run cause we were willing to give up yards and let time burn versus giving up 80 yard bombs in seconds As we did late in tht game. I’m more interested in the results of teams that came out running and just ran in down our throat from start to finish. If you score a TD on every possession and keep Joe on the sideline throughout we are in a very tough spot. I just don’t recall seeing anything close to that this season. Florida and Texas mixed run with lots of passing and outside of Auburn were the only games I recall being in jeopardy for more than a quarter to a half.
I assume they would have scored however many they wanted to in order to win the game comfortably. But does that mean they blow through their established TT in the first half while still holding OU right on their mark in a non competitive game?Something to chew on... Just in general... How many points does Clemson score vs OU and the same for OSU be OU if the seeding were different? (This is not to slight LSU you guys...I know it will be taken that way). Before and after the game I would have said 48-56 with either team. There was this weird myth going around about the OU defense going into the game.
HahahahahaClemson getting no credit. Lawrence is damn warrior. It will be much easier for Lawrence to throw on LSU than Tosu...Burrow had a great year, but he's always the backup to haskins, martell and would have been to fields in my eyes.
Bro I know Lawrence can compete. I’m laughing that he said Tate Martell and the backup QB stuff.Twink, you are fooling youraelf if you think this kid cant compete.
Anyone have insight as to how many tix Clemson sold? I mean is thia crowd gonna be 80 peecent LSU?
Same myth going about LSU defense I think BAR.....Something to chew on... Just in general... How many points does Clemson score vs OU and the same for OSU be OU if the seeding were different? (This is not to slight LSU you guys...I know it will be taken that way). Before and after the game I would have said 48-56 with either team. There was this weird myth going around about the OU defense going into the game.
The defense does have holes. Ideally there would be another pass rusher to compliment Chaisson and another safety to both free up some flexibility for Stevens/Delpit and kick Vincent down to the dime, so it isn’t difficult to see this going over. But it also isn’t difficult to see the differences between now and earlier in the season and that it may now be good enough for LSU to be favored in two weeks.Same myth going about LSU defense I think BAR.....
Apparently Clemson total frauds who very lucky to have won 29 in a row against mostly nobody. Im gonna be a sucker and take the plus money anyways and watch them get crushed im sure.
Sharp,,postI like the Under here a lot. Dabo and Venebles know they aren't stopping them consistently but they can certainly run on them. I expect Clemson to chew the clock and Etienne to have a huge day. FG game either way depending on which QB makes a late key play.
That’s an element that exists but hasn’t been needed or used often. Most of his running has been on scrambles to extend drives but they did use the option game a couple times when they needed to ice the win at Alabama. This is a great angle if you think Clemson will mix it up enough to slow down the usual stuff.Awesome matchup...
Can see both arguments...think my favorite angle and anticpated prop is Burrow rushing yards. Brady going to spread them out and use CEH for dumpoffs and Burrow is going to get a lot of ground yards as a result. If the number is reasonable, that's definitely going to be a play I make on this game.
That’s an element that exists but hasn’t been needed or used often. Most of his running has been on scrambles to extend drives but they did use the option game a couple times when they needed to ice the win at Alabama. This is a great angle if you think Clemson will mix it up enough to slow down the usual stuff.
Around what # would you consider A lot?Clemson will score. A lot. They have to.
Around what # would you consider A lot?
This isn’t correct, several had LSU as a small fave over one or both.This Oklahoma game is getting way too much overreacting. Every sports book on the planet had ohio state and Clemson as a fave prior to Saturday. And both by more than 3 points.
Lol maybe YOU ARE crazy! I know that I am! Your assessment on a likely score is very realistic though. LSU has scored 36 or more in all but the Auburn game and 40+ in 10 or 11 of their games to date. I’ve see many suggest running and controlling TOP will be Clemson’sMaybe I'm crazy but see a 45-41 type game
Can understand where you're coming from but I still think they can be had Williams (auburn), Vaughan (vandy), plumlee and ealy (piss) all eclipsed the 100 mark and a few others 60+... But none of the teams LSU faced had someone like Lawrence who helps open up the run game for etienne alot and keeps them honest with that RPO.... and I think 2/3 (uga/auburn come to mind) of the teams they faced this year were in top 50 for rushing offence....we'llThis is the exact line of thinking that has cost bettors a metric ton from that game until today betting against LSU. LSU had multiple defensive starters on suspension and were very thin in both the secondary and at LB. DELPIT played on very wobbly wheels and up 3+ scores a lax approach set in coming out of halftime. Plumlee will reek havoc under Kiffin for years to come. If you haven’t accepted that the defensive effort in that one half up 20+ against an amazing talent was an outlier you are destined to throw away money one last time versus LSU. To appease BAR I’ll try to leave it alone but it’s truly mind blowing that a game and a half carries so much weight while 8 others versus extreme team talent get thrown aside. For the past two weeks it was that Hurts would run for 250+. Not to mention our most versatile and dependable LB will be back for the ship (See above - Divinity). Very Disappointed Clemson isn’t at least +4 or more but under a TD has to be laid in a game with so much at stake in a building that so many of our players have already won multiple titles in while in high school. Joe’s quick release and next level game intellect will neutralize any pass rush and if Venables is dumb enough to bring those blitzes the Under has zero chance unless Clemson can’t score on our handicapped elementary school defense 44 - 27 Bayou Cats. Running the home state product relentlessly may limit Joes touches but TOP does not equal points. And I’ll go ahead and say it while I bet on Ohio State my heart wanted Clemson to win. Call me Trader Joe if you must I’m just sharing relevant facts that I hope minimize the amounts of losses incurred based on stale, uninformed and useless information that gets recycled week after week by supporters that leave the game bamboozled and BROKEnhearted. GEAUX TIGERS! P.S. BAR I aim to be respectful and quieter until the season has ended with yet another SEC champion remains as the last men standing. #SorryNotSorry
yep I saw -3 for LSU against "any team"This isn’t correct, several had LSU as a small fave over one or both.