Big conversion. Boom nice ht
Watch Bama/jorja score 100 after I said that
Still need it. Just need an onside and FG to get to OT. Stranger things have happened.Need an OU FG and then a Texas TD and 2pt conversion to get this to OT
Still need it. Just need an onside and FG to get to OT. Stranger things have happened.
just screaming that. no need for it there eitherblock in the back of course
Me too TT over 17 2HI need a trash TD!
I think they play hard and force the committees hand. Of course, Bama must win.I still think Ohio State has a shot at the 4th spot as OU didn't shut the door on em with this performance in my opinion
Nice TT. That hook come in handy.I have Bama over 37.5 and game over 62
Nice TT. That hook come in handy.
I still think Ohio State has a shot at the 4th spot as OU didn't shut the door on em with this performance in my opinion
I still think Ohio State has a shot at the 4th spot as OU didn't shut the door on em with this performance in my opinion
Completely disagree. There is not a single rational basis for ranking Ohio State above Oklahoma, not even a 100-point win over a shit team like Northwestern. That said, as long as the Buckeyes cover the spread today, it matters not to me.
I’m in AL playing with a local. Line is still 13.5. Seeothers getting 11. Laid -20.5 (+190)Alabama TT over 37.5 just dropped to 107 and the under is now at 123
Is there anything rational about the process though? My statement is based on how I think the thought process of the committee could go. I don't think for a second that they have Oklahoma locked in if Georgia loses. I think the OSU performance will matter in their decision making. One can argue whether that is right or wrong, but I think that it will most definitely matter.
I’m in AL playing with a local. Line is still 13.5. Seeothers getting 11. Laid -20.5 (+190)
ESPNs systems gave them 59% w/ both OK and tOSU winning.When the selection committee is intentionally politicized, then the process is not trustworthy. But I believe the political winds are blowing against Ohio State.
Is there anything rational about the process though? My statement is based on how I think the thought process of the committee could go. I don't think for a second that they have Oklahoma locked in if Georgia loses. I think the OSU performance will matter in their decision making. One can argue whether that is right or wrong, but I think that it will most definitely matter.
While I think Ohio State would have had a chance to beat Texas today had they played, I don't think they would have pulled it off. So how do you penalize Oklahoma for a beating a good Texas team by double-digits that Ohio State probably would have lost to?
While I think Ohio State would have had a chance to beat Texas today had they played, I don't think they would have pulled it off. So how do you penalize Oklahoma for a beating a good Texas team by double-digits that Ohio State probably would have lost to?
OU worse failure than OSU, that's criteria numero uno for meWtf? So your logic involves your assumption that OSU woulda lost to Texas?