Lockout

Joe Public

Gabibbo's Finest
Did anybody see Barkley the other night talking about this? It's just another reason, I think, to love him on TV.

They were talking about free agency and he was making the point that he'd rather have money this year for free agents than next when everybody wants to have money. Because, he says, "quiet as it's kept, there's gonna be a lockout."

And it wasn't like, 'I think,' or 'maybe,' but it was a definite, no question, bolt the doors, lose part or all of a season, lockout. And when EJ said, 'that's your opinion, about a lockout,' Barkley didn't even remotely back off, basically he underlined it all the more.

Yet I've heard no one--I don't really mean here on the site--but anywhere in the media mention this (which doesn't totally shock me).

But, CTG NBA folk, I defer to you, is this thing a foregone conclusion?
 
this is very true...there is almost certainly going to be a lockout, perhaps in NHL too....unless sports get things straightened we are headed for a VERY dark era in sports
 
Well a few things are going on here.

One, Stern and the league sent out the memo in February about the salary cap decreasing next season. This was a major thing for executives to handle. It changes the landscape of the off-seaseon this year and 2010 in particular. Well, apparently from what I read yesterday the decrease isn't going to be quite so dramatic. It was almost sort of a scare tactic. The last lockout in 1998-1999 was nasty. It was to the final hours or the entire season was gone. Obviously, and it can be debated, someone caved more than the other there. This time, if it happens, will be about getting some of that back. Things need to chaange in the landscape of NBA economics. Imagine twenty years ago a superstar was making a few million dollars a year. Now, its 10x that amount. I am no expert but I don't think the sliding scale is proportionate here with inflation etc. The biggest problem right now is the mid-level players making outrageous money. I have no problem with the Bryants and James etc making huge money. Styern markets them as the league and they should be paid accordingly. It's the mid-level guys making 8-12 million a year which is killing teams. The small-markets are all struggling. Basically, things need to change. I'll dig out a few articles and post them in a few.
 
Simmons wrote about this a couple months ago

(didn't reread the article right now, but below is the section on the Lockout)
1. The 2011 Lockout That Hasn't Happened Yet
Oh, but it's coming. Fading power broker David Falk was the first to play it up publicly; hoping to stir interest in his new book, he happily played the doomsday card in a New York Times feature Sunday. (Sadly, none of the chapters in Falk's book is called, "How I Convinced Elton Brand To Stab The Clippers In The Back And Sign With Philly So People Would Think That I'm Not Washed Up As A Super-Agent, Even Though I Am.") But you know what? That conniving has-been nailed it when he called the NBA's current system "broken." The revenue-sharing system dictates specific thresholds for the cap and tax, which is fine as long as revenue doesn't drop dramatically with teams already tied into unsavory player contracts through 2010, 2011 or, in Philly's case with Brand, 2075 (or maybe it just feels that way to Sixers fans).
Think of the arrangement like this: Let's say my deal with ESPN.com were tied directly to revenue pulled in by the Web site. Let's say ESPN paid me $5 million a year for each of the past four years, and I felt pretty good about staying there with that number. Let's say I hired 10 interns and locked them into deals for $100,000 apiece through 2012 (thinking I could easily make those payments because the total each year was only one-fifth of my salary). Then, let's say ESPN told me this coming December, "We got crushed by the economy and our revenue is way down, so your 2010 salary will be $950,000."
Well, what do I do? I already owe more money than I'm making just in 2010. Because I mistakenly projected what salary numbers I THOUGHT I COULD PAY and never anticipated my revenue would drop that dramatically, basically, I'm screwed. (Hold on, three exclamation points coming.) Welcome to the NBA's world!!! Teams are locked into swollen contracts that suddenly make no sense, whether it's non-franchise players making franchise money (Vince, T-Mac, Shaq, Brand, Baron, Jermaine O'Neal, Dalembert, Okafor, etc.) or overpaid role players making six to 600 times what they should be making (Marko Jaric, Nazr Mohammed, Larry Hughes, Radmanovic, Mo Peterson, etc.). In the irony of ironies, the league finally learned something that fans knew all along -- nobody was buying a ticket to see the likes of Luol Deng, Gerald Wallace or Corey Maggette, much less Tim Thomas or Andres Nocioni. With the cap/tax thresholds slipping, teams can't dodge them by dumping overpaid mistakes like when Phoenix bribed Seattle to take Kurt Thomas' contract and two No. 1 picks last year. Someone In The Know told me that 20 of the 30 NBA teams will lose money this season … and we haven't even come close to hitting rock bottom yet. Just wait until next season.
Which brings us to the Lockout That Hasn't Happened Yet. Unless the players' association agrees to major concessions by the summer of 2011 -- highly doubtful because that would involve applying common sense -- the owners will happily lock out players as soon as the current CBA expires, then play the same devious waiting game from the summer of 1998. David Stern will grow another scruffy beard. The owners will plant their feet in the sand, grab the tug-of-war rope and dig in. Only this time, they KNOW they will win. See, we learned a dirty little secret in the last lockout: An inordinate number of NBA players live paycheck to paycheck. Yes, even the guys making eight figures a year. You can play high-stakes poker with them … and you will win.


Quick tangent: You're asking yourself, "Wait, how can a dude making $8-10 million a year live paycheck to paycheck?" Easy. First, he's only banking 40 percent once the IRS and agents are done with him. Second, he's probably overpaying for multiple houses and luxury cars just to keep up with everyone else. Third, he's buying expensive clothes and dinners, chartering planes, buying expensive TVs, going to casinos, and paying for friends and family at every turn. Fourth, there's a decent chance he's supporting a bunch of people back home -- family and extended family -- and not just that, but he might have gotten roped into funding at least one dumb "investment" by a loser family member. ("Uncle Lenny, I thought you told me this nightclub couldn't miss?") Fifth, he is, um, "dating" frequently -- even if he's married -- and if you "date" frequently, mistakes might happen that lead to hospital bills and child support payments. (If you catch my drift.) And sixth, he's not adding these numbers up in his head because he's thinking, "I don't need to worry about money, I'm making $10 mil a year!" I know it sounds farfetched, but I've heard the Inexplicable Tale Of Financial Woe with NBA stars too many times to count … and that doesn't include stars such as Scottie Pippen who were screwed by their financial advisers. It's a long and inglorious list, and if you don't think we're headed for 15 "Real Sports" segments in the next decade with Bernie Goldberg catching up with Broke Former NBA Superstar X, you're kidding yourself. Remember the lessons of the '99 lockout -- the players HAD to come back. And it wasn't because they missed playing.
Team Stern and the owners know this better than anyone. They will pick the next fight, and again, they will win. When the players' union waves a white flag and the lockout finally ends (2012? 2013?), I predict a raise of the individual salary max (to $24-25 million), a softer salary cap, a restriction on long-term contracts (can't be more than three years unless you're re-signing your own star), the elimination of opt-out clauses and the midlevel exemption, and the rookie age limit rising to 20. That's seven predictions in all … and I bet I'll end up nailing six. Will the league survive a yearlong disappearance? What about two years? We're less than 29 months from starting to find out. If you think it's a good idea to disappear for even six months in shaky economic times, ask any Writers Guild member how that turns out. These wealthy or used-to-be-wealthy owners don't want to keep losing money just to feed their ego by continuing to own a basketball team. They will make other arrangements, the same way they would arrange to sell their favorite yacht because they didn't feel like splurging on gasoline anymore. These guys don't want to fix the system; they want to reinvent it.
(And by the way, nobody loves basketball more than me. I mean, NOBODY. But when an NBA player with two years remaining on his contract for a total of $44 million shows up for the season out of shape, complains most of the year, lets down his teammates and fans again and again, lands in some trade rumors and decides, "Instead of getting traded to a team I don't like, I'm going to announce that I'm getting microfracture surgery four days before the trade deadline and kill any potential trade, and even better, I'll be healed by next spring, just in time to showcase myself for another contract," and successfully pulls this off -- with no repercussions from anybody -- then yes, the system is broken and needs to be fixed. Because that was disgusting. Tracy McGrady, you are officially indefensible for the rest of eternity. Even your cousin Vince wouldn't have done that. And that's saying something.)
 
But when an NBA player with two years remaining on his contract for a total of $44 million shows up for the season out of shape, complains most of the year, lets down his teammates and fans again and again, lands in some trade rumors and decides, "Instead of getting traded to a team I don't like, I'm going to announce that I'm getting microfracture surgery four days before the trade deadline and kill any potential trade, and even better, I'll be healed by next spring, just in time to showcase myself for another contract," and successfully pulls this off -- with no repercussions from anybody -- then yes, the system is broken and needs to be fixed.

This was my favorite part of the article when I first read it.
 
when TBaby said that, I was like what a fukn puss!! They were going crazy on the radio stations here and they all know he did that because of trade reasons. Its not like anyone would be dumb enough to take tmac's contract with one leg and how often he got injured!! When I went to game 3, they didnt even acknowledge his ass because they would hear nothing but boo's. But they did show Mutombo and we were all on our feet for a few minutes applauding!! Great moment there.
 
Not a huge Simmons fan but that was a superb article. Thanks for sharing, sportjunky.

Ditto. Great post, great read.
 
Simmons is always good with his nba articles he knows the sport like no one else.

The biggest change thats needed is the guaranteed contracts it has killed that sport. They have to get rid of them then the sport can start to turnaround.
 
Yea the make wayy tooo much money and some most contracts are just crazy!! Maurice Taylor got like a $40 mil contract, Kelvin Cato was making like $50 million. Other players deserve it, but its only a handful. Kobe is one that deserves what he makes. He trains harder than any other NBA player in the off season that I know of. But same thing needs to get done with NFL and rookie contracts, that is driving me crazy!!
 
Rashard Lewis getting a max contract is beyond stupid. Along with Kenyon, Jermaine Oneal, etc. I think the owners need to take some of the responsibility for this. Before he got traded, Shaq was pouting because Buss would not give him an extension worth 30 mill/year! He ended up settling for 20 mill/year with Miami and was still overpayed. Back to Rashard, there is no excuse by the Magic for giving him anything over 10 mill/year even if there were other offers for him. He had proven during his time with Seattle that he was not a "#1" but Orlando felt the need to overpay him by atleast $20 mill. You cant blame the players for taking the dough or the GMs for trying to sign the best available talent. The owners put themselves in this position, but the players and fans will most likely feel the pain of the repercussions.
 
Owners cant control themselves, the rich will continue to get richer and the small markets cant compete.

But, if the owners decide to control salaries, then the players union scream bloody murder and collusion. Players dont give a rats ass, they just want to get paid. Boozer is the poster child of todays NBA player. AL Jefferson is what the NBA should be about.

MLE is the problem and bird rights is a problem. IMO, there are only about 6 franchise players in the NBA, but mediocre players on bad teams are also commanding min. 20 mill a year contracts.

Bird rights was created to allow teams to retain their players, now its used as an excuse for a player to make more money.
 
Add the NBA to the list of human institutions being ruined by greed.

It's so sad that we did this to ourselves. Greed is systematically and ruthlessly destroying the world.
 
Back
Top