Alan Tongue
Pretty much a regular
you mean that you would take Johnny over Romo?
even at this point?
really?
romo's body is like he's greg hardys girlfriend and not greg hardys QB
you mean that you would take Johnny over Romo?
even at this point?
really?
I don't even know why the players get drug tested for anything besides steroids to be honest. If someone wants to do some blow or smoke some bud let them, why does it matter if it isn't enhancing their ability? Mark Grace used to smoke cigarettes in the dugout, no one cared and it didn't make him a better player, and if Josh Gordon wants to roll up a J after a game, who fucking cares? It is their own time....
I don't even know why the players get drug tested for anything besides steroids to be honest. If someone wants to do some blow or smoke some bud let them, why does it matter if it isn't enhancing their ability? Mark Grace used to smoke cigarettes in the dugout, no one cared and it didn't make him a better player, and if Josh Gordon wants to roll up a J after a game, who fucking cares? It is their own time....
I agree/disagree
most places drug test now before you start a job
LOL at not wanting a company test for drugs. Even if it is just weed. You try starting a company and apply those rules. You're insane d-woww.
So you think that a dude that takes a hit before bed every night, harming nobody, should immediately be disqualified from a job? That is significantly more insane than what I said. Sure, if a guy tests positive for meth then sure I'm not going to hire him, but weed? Come on man. What the hell should I care if the guy smoke some weed when he's not working ( doing it on the clock is a different story)
Who's Pete? Did I miss a coming out thread?for the love of pete
Society's devolved, to a large extent, thanks to the "laws and rules that are in effect today". How much further down the rabbit hole do you want to go?true, but that needs to stop as well. its insane that companies still think that the fact that a dude who smokes a joint at night has any impact on his value as an employee. if anything, test for heroin or worse but petty drugs are nto a big deal and as a society in all jobs we need to move away from the puritan mindset that led to the laws and rules that are in effect today
This debate has nothing to do with Manziel, since he's supposed to be in early recovery after inpatient treatment for substance abuse, and he has a pattern of being a disruptive jackass. But at least D-Woww has managed to sound ridiculous on a separate issue. See, these private business owners, D-Woww, they sort of have a hang-up with employees breaking state laws.
Society's devolved, to a large extent, thanks to the "laws and rules that are in effect today". How much further down the rabbit hole do you want to go?
Heres what we don't know; was he showing up late for practice? was he not learning plays? If that is the case, he should be benched, but for those reasons. Not because he was out partying. Us at our 9-5 jobs are teh same way. We can get shitfaced every night as long as at 9am through 5pm we do our jobs well. However, if the alcohol makes us suck at our job, then well get fired. So I guess what i am saying is i support Petine if it was affecting how he does his job. If he just didnt like that he was out partying on an off week, thats being too hard on the kid
its his personal life. If he wants to be an alcoholic that's on him and that's his choice, its perfectly legal. As long as it doesn't affect his performance on the field I don't care. If you bench him for sucking that's another story. The debate for drugs is different to me because its pretty much a nationwide standard. Gordon would have been fired from his job if he was just a 9-5 guy.
With McCown out, does he get the start this week?
e.g. TuckfexasYou're just wrong, Alex. Employers discipline and dismiss employees all the time for alcohol abuse, especially if the employer thinks it's hurting or embarrassing the business, in this case the NFL team. People in this guy's corner can have him, he's a toxin.
They need to let Johnny go out on Sat night and just get fucked up, let it roll into Sunday and see how he plays. Maybe it opens up his creative juices and he turns Cleveland into the next QB factory.
JFF as Earnest Hemingway?
People in the Sunday night in-game were joking around about how Gronk gets away with public partying, and Manziel doesn't. Let me explain the way the world works. Gronk is a tight end. Manziel is a quarterback. Gronk is a fucking awesome football player. Manziel is terrible. The rules are different.
JFF as Earnest Hemingway?
Manziel has had no chance to blossom because of the mishandling of him. I think he could really BLOOM given the chance
Hemingway and Mark Twain came to mind, and maybe even tip with his current book writing endeavor
Like a poppy flower?Manziel has had no chance to blossom because of the mishandling of him. I think he could really BLOOM given the chance
Of all the things that have happened to him, the one thing that I can not defend is fighting with his girl. Apparently he was all up in her face. I am completely against any kind violence towards women and feel like he got off light with that one. But if he is playing well, then let him go out on weekend nights. It's fair to say that he cant be wasted yelling at people at 4am in hotel lobbys, but for instance, the pics from last weekend did not look like anything he shouldnt be doing
The problem is perception, and the perception is, whether fair or not, is that he hasn't put in enough time studying the playbook or breaking down film. Nothing wrong with winding down after a hard day's work, but I think most people believe he isn't putting in the kind of effort it takes to succeed at this level, and just trying to do it on talent alone. And, quite frankly, he isn't that talented...If the team wants him to be sober and in his hotel room studying the playbook on a Saturday night, then its just not gonna work out with him. You ever see Major League 2? When they try to change Sheen's image by making him all clean cut, and he sucks? Its like that. There has to be something in between; u cant ask him to abort his social life completely, its part of who he is. At the same time, he needs to not be getting in trouble with the cops. So why can't it be agreed that he can go out, drink, do his thing, but not get in legal trouble and not be hungover at practice?
And as far as him lying about it; I get why that looks bad but he probably felt like he had to. Its just a bad fit. The Browns seem to want him to be something he isnt, on and off the court
The problem is perception, and the perception is, whether fair or not, is that he hasn't put in enough time studying the playbook or breaking down film. Nothing wrong with winding down after a hard day's work, but I think most people believe he isn't putting in the kind of effort it takes to succeed at this level, and just trying to do it on talent alone. And, quite frankly, he isn't that talented...
If the team wants him to be sober and in his hotel room studying the playbook on a Saturday night, then its just not gonna work out with him. You ever see Major League 2? When they try to change Sheen's image by making him all clean cut, and he sucks? Its like that. There has to be something in between; u cant ask him to abort his social life completely, its part of who he is. At the same time, he needs to not be getting in trouble with the cops. So why can't it be agreed that he can go out, drink, do his thing, but not get in legal trouble and not be hungover at practice?
And as far as him lying about it; I get why that looks bad but he probably felt like he had to. Its just a bad fit. The Browns seem to want him to be something he isnt, on and off the court
Charlie Sheen himself isn't a bad comparison from my vantage point
Don't you think the football people realize there isn't much there though? I mean, what was Tebow's record as a starter, and yet no one else will touch him as a QB. Besides, wasn't it ownership that pushed to draft him, and yet Pettine's still allowed to demote him? I'd say they've already made up their mind, which is why playing him wouldn't make any sense (if he plays well, they're stuck with a guy they don't really want anymore). At least this way they can just wipe the slate clean and move on.Ok, but when you are the Browns, still why not play him. IF this perception is accurate and he is not doing what he needs to do, maybe losing the last 5 games by 30 will make him realize that. it could be the best thing for his career. I just don't see what this team has to lose. I am not saying that if they were 5-6 and even barely in the playoff hunt, they should play him, but this team is garbage. you could argue that if he is terrible, it would help both him as a player, and the browns as a franchise in the long run. and if hes not, then maybe they have something in him. either way, starting austin davis does nothing
the thing that is abundantly clear in these threads; i just don't think weed and alcohol used by guys in their 20s is that big of a deal, provided they arent harming anybody. let the on field stuff determine who plays and who doesnt, unless the athlete commits a violent crime. people are welcome to disagree; the legality or lack thereof of weed in most states shows that you have the popular opinion and I dont
the thing that is abundantly clear in these threads; i just don't think weed and alcohol used by guys in their 20s is that big of a deal, provided they arent harming anybody. let the on field stuff determine who plays and who doesnt, unless the athlete commits a violent crime. people are welcome to disagree; the legality or lack thereof of weed in most states shows that you have the popular opinion and I dont