One question ... is it possible they are a better team without Love?
I don't think so. It's very tempting to make this claim, but at the minimum, I would prefer to have Love play the 10 minutes that Jones played, instead of Jones.
Blatt tried to used Mozgov to stretch the floor in Game 2. He made one shot, from almost three point line and missed another one, on the other side. Cleveland needs to stretch the floor and it's not an option with Mozgov and Thompson. Cleveland failed to reach their team total in both games so far.
Love can shoot, but also can grab rebounds and he was improving on defense (both him and Kyrie made an improvement in that area).
Also, Thompson shot 3 - 9 his free throws. Game 1, Hawks did hack a Thompson once. If they did the same thing in closer games, Blatt would have faced with very hard choice between sitting him down or hurt his team flow. You can't do that with Love.
Obviously Love isn't the defender that Thompson is nor the shot blocker that Thompson is.
But, he still better defender and shot blocker than Jones and he is a great rebounder. Don't know if he is as good as Thompson or not, but he is at least very veyr close to him in that ability.
Against GSW, with Green and Bogut in the paint, Love's ability to stretch the floor would have been vital imho.
I think we can say that Love's absence isn't felt in the level that you would expect an absence of max contract player to be felt, but he is missed, I'm sure.
You could ask the same thing about Bosh in Miami, back in Bron's days there.