Breeders Cup 2016 11/4, 11/5 @ Santa Anita

please don't be sorry about questions...this is great, we are here to help others...and this is the best game there is so would love to help the ctg community understand it... I win bet as well but tough to come up with just one on a day like today...when I multi race wager it's numeric order, not preference...I'll post preference if curious about any particular up coming race. GL on the action.

For this play...
[TABLE="width: 64"]
<colgroup><col width="64"></colgroup><tbody>[TR]
[TD="width: 64"][/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]
Pk4 #4,7,10,12/3,8,12/3,5,9,10/4,6,10

You are saying in race 9 the 4,7,10,12 to win...race 10 3, 8, 12...etc. Or is it for race 9 that is your superfecta play?
 
For this play...
[TABLE="width: 64"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD="width: 64"][/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]
Pk4 #4,7,10,12/3,8,12/3,5,9,10/4,6,10

You are saying in race 9 the 4,7,10,12 to win...race 10 3, 8, 12...etc. Or is it for race 9 that is your superfecta play?

Yes, I need 4, 7, 10 or 12 to win Race 9, then 3, 8 or 12 in race 10, etc
 
Obviously Flintshire gotta be included on anything here, and I like Ulysses, but what am I missing on Ectot? Why currently 13-1 after the impressive performance against Flintshire?
 
Loaded to the gills on the 4 here, Flintshire. Got a pick 3 and a big double...

If it's not the 4, look out for the 5. That trainer won earlier today w a longshot...also 2/2 at the distance, 4/7 @ SA
 
Obviously Flintshire gotta be included on anything here, and I like Ulysses, but what am I missing on Ectot? Why currently 13-1 after the impressive performance against Flintshire?

Probably because he seemed to favor the soft going of the yielding turf, where as Flintshire did not, as Play2Win correctly pointed out to me before that race
 
Probably because he seemed to favor the soft going of the yielding turf, where as Flintshire did not, as Play2Win correctly pointed out to me before that race

thanks, makes sense :beer4:

like running in sand compared to hard clay
 
My first ever pick 4. Clearly copying from you all haha.

R9 pick4 - 4,7,10,12/3,8,12/5,8,9/4
 
Race 9
Pk4 #4,7,10,12/3,8,12/3,5,9,10/4,6,10
Pk4 #4,7,10,12/3,8,12/5,9,10/4,10
Survived 1st leg
R10 need #3,8,12 to cash pk3
#3 is sneaky one and is taking money, won 2 prior times when cutting back...exits race vs Beholder and Stellar Wind
 
Does it make sense to hedge pick 4 by playing the 2 at +375 odds? Or an exacta boxing the field?
 
Does it make sense to hedge pick 4 by playing the 2 at +375 odds? Or an exacta boxing the field?
I liked #2 all year but not today...NY hasn't shown up in dirt races thus far, price isn't right and track playing against her running style
 
Back
Top