T
tipyerbartender1
Guest
If we change the name of the championship game next year to the Super Duper Bowl, do we erase the Patriots, Steelers, Cowboys, Niners, Packers?
I'll take that :cheers3:Browns/Raiders in the AFC ship to meet the Lions in the Bowl
If we change the name of the championship game next year to the Super Duper Bowl, do we erase the Patriots, Steelers, Cowboys, Niners, Packers?
But when the AFL and NFL merged, they just adopted the NFL name. If they had changed the name for the new league they formed, this wouldn't be as debatable. The "NFL" Championships the Browns won were before the "real" NFL began. But you're more than welcome to claim them as NFL titles...we understand...Cleveland.
AZ is ornery because his Spurs died of old age on the court.
Only Cleveland fans with their massive inferiority complex claim championships before the Super Bowl...you never hear Detroit Lion fans demanding their momemt of ancient glory be counted.
The Browns were not the Jets because the Jets actually beat the champion of the other pro league unlike the Browns.
Seriously, San Antonio has 1 fucking team but 5 more Titles than Cleveland has. WTF is wrong with Cleveland sports...that's pathetic.
Basically, your argument is that, hypothetically, if the NFL were to merge with the CFL next season, still call itself the NFL, and play off the two league champions in the Super Duper Grey Bowl next season, Bengals beat the Argonauts ... End result is Cowboys have never won a title. Not in the modern era of the Super Duper Grey Bowl.
The Bears, Colts, and Giants don't mention their ancient NFL championships and you know why ? Because their too busy polishing their Super Bowl trophies.
You never hear Buffalo fan clinging to their 2 AFL championships...they only talk about losing 4 Super Bowls in a row because Super Bowls matter. Rams and Lions fans don't bring theirs up, only the Cleveland fanbase grasps at those pre Super Bowl era Titles because they literally have nothing else to celebrate.
Congrats, in a 12 team league the Browns essentially won their division and a first round playoff game but in no way do they belong in the same pantheon as legendary Steelers, Cowboys, and 49er teams whose Super Bowl trophies signify achievement in the modern NFL.
The Bears, Colts, and Giants don't mention their ancient NFL championships and you know why ? Because their too busy polishing their Super Bowl trophies.
You never hear Buffalo fan clinging to their 2 AFL championships...they only talk about losing 4 Super Bowls in a row because Super Bowls matter. Rams and Lions fans don't bring theirs up, only the Cleveland fanbase grasps at those pre Super Bowl era Titles because they literally have nothing else to celebrate.
Congrats, in a 12 team league the Browns essentially won their division and a first round playoff game but in no way do they belong in the same pantheon as legendary Steelers, Cowboys, and 49er teams whose Super Bowl trophies signify achievement in the modern NFL.
You don't have a solid grasp of the history of professional sports. I'm not clinging to anything, just correcting your mistakes. You're clinging to an arbitrary name of a championship game, like a child or an ad executive might. The Browns have four NFL championships, more than most NFL teams. The NFL recognizes these as, oddly enough, NFL championships. No one said anything about the AFL or any other rival professional league. Yes, there were fewer teams in professional sports then. So fucking what. Their last NFL championship was in 1964, perhaps you've seen a recent sappy ESPN documentary about this. The NFL had 14 teams then (not 12). The Detroit Red Wings won the NHL championship in 1964, in a 6-team league. The Boston Celtics won the NBA championship in 1964, 10 teams, 2 divisions. The St. Louis Cardinals won the MLB championship in 1964, 20 teams, 2 leagues. These were the 1964 champions of your four major American sports leagues.
You can argue it all day and all night, you'll still be wrong.
This all started because I corrected teed. He mentioned something about the Raiders' "titles" and implied they have more than the Browns. Just not true. The Browns have many more titles, and have earned one more NFL championship than the Raiders.
These are facts.
Cleveland tried to screw ole Artie over so he got some balls n left
good for him
Didn't mean it on a legal basis tip
The franchise left
They their history with them whether or not legal papers say so
Much like Baltimore cannot claim the old browns titles but the ravens can
At the time of the Cardinals' last championship the population of Phoenix was < 100,000 but the franchise still claims it
You guys can argue this until you're blue in the face and can no longer breathe, but the facts will always get in your way. If the Ravens can claim the Browns' titles, why don't they? Four more titles would be a cool thing to claim. The legacy and the laundry stayed in Cleveland.
Because no one cares about titles before the super bowl.
Las Vegas Raiders .. hello season tickets
False.
Take us the the Broncos games please
Because no one but Tip and JFF care about titles before the super bowl?
The NFL itself, people old and young who appreciate history and sports and innovation, old timers, the Giants, the Bears, the Colts, the Redskins, the Browns, the Packers, the people who realize the NFL didn't begin in 1967 ... these are all groups who care about NFL championships.
Do you celebrate July 4th? I have to ask, why? You weren't around in 1776, the United States weren't the United States, we didn't even have any states. I don't understand why something that happened 240 years ago is a source of pride for you.
seriously this is an easy question
if the Dallas Cowboys leave Dallas, Jerry is taking the superbowl trophies with him, the city isn't keeping them
Cleveland was left, congrats on keeping the name, but it's a brand new franchise, with new owners, a new record etc.