that's good. i didn't play it. just insane how fast those 2 TDs popped up.
So fast I checked the log to make score the time was correct ....
that's good. i didn't play it. just insane how fast those 2 TDs popped up.
we got it, vandy su. grats
^^^^
Nut I wouldnt touch them, i expect some kind of half time adjustments...but right now I would pass on that especially at -3.
Nut LSU looking good early.
Thoughts on the total in the Minny game? Minny gotta play catch up
Opening Drive is huge for Minnesota
2nd H Kansas game :
Under 28.5 {Level1}
Parlay : Kansas -3-125 and Under 28.5 ...{Level1}
Just dont like this HALFTIME line....the parlay serves as a hedge I guess as well :cheers:
28.5? I got 30...GD local...
and I took the OVER.rayer
nice hit bro, how u feel about tigers 2h? jackets just arent doing anything...credit to LSU, imo..
i hear yah...gonna stick with my game over53, probably just end the night with a win, gl tomorrow dude
Sticking to the format of Level 1 = 0.50 % of bankroll , Level 2 =1.25% and Level 3 = 2.50% for the BOWLS because thats how I started...
1.31 Bowl Plays :
Houston -2.5{Level3}
Houston ML -160 {Level3}
Houston ML -175{Level1}
Houston -3-130 {Level1}
Teaser : Houston +0.5 and 59 {Level1}
TT: Over Houston 34.5 -115 {Level2} Ends on 34 !
AF Over 30.5 -115{Level1}
2ndHalf AF +3 +115 {level1} HEDGE the -3 -130 play to just vig out
2nd H Over 31.5 {Level1}
1st Half Pitt +0.5 -115{Level2}
Pitt +1 {Level2}
Teaser -120 : Pitt +11 , Minny +17.5 and Vandy +14.5{Level2}
Over 50.5 -120 {Level3}
2nd H : Over 23 {Level1}
2nd H : oregon State PK {Level3} PUSH
Vandy bought to +7 -130 {Level3}
Vandy +7 -130 {Level1}
Under 42 bought at -130 {Level1}
1st H Vandy +3 {Level3}
1st Q Vandy +0.5 -120 {Level2}
Teaser: Vandy +12 and Under 47 {Level1}
Vandy ML +200 {Level1]
Prop Vandy 1st to score +110 [Level1}
2nd H BC -3 {level1} Hedge
2nd H Over 19 {Level1}
Minnesota +8.5 -120 {Level3}
Minnesota +10 -120 {Level2}
1st H Minnesota +5.5 -120 {Level2}
1st H Minnesota +6 -120 {level1}
1st Quarter Minny +3 -115 {Level1}
Under 60-120 {Level1}
1st H Under 29.5 {Level1}
TT Under Kansas 34 -115 {Level1}
2nd H KU -3-120 {Level1}
2nd H Under 28.5 +110{Level 1 }
2nd H Parlay KU and Under {Level1} win Level 2 play
1st H Under 27 GaTech {Level1}
teaser : LSU +10.5 and Over 47 {Level3}
Prop: Lsu 1st Score +105 {Level1}
LSU +4.5 {Level2}
Over 53 {Level 2}
1st Q +0.5 -125 {Level1}
1st H +2.5 +100 {level1}
LSU TT Over 24 -115{Level1}
2nd H Under 24.5 {Level2}
Like to see you on the Bearcats, even if it is in 6 point font.
Good luck today, SN.
Got to your question over in my thread.. Lean the game under but like your thoughts on the USC TT under also.. Think there is more outs on the game under IMO.. Lots of punts and long fields is what I am thinking:cheers:5 PM: Rose Bowl USC vs Penn State
USC minus FB Havili , lost their OC to Washington so the WR coach Johnnie Morton is calling plays . Penn State will have Paterno in the press box not on the sidelines......
Bottomline is take away the bad defenses that USC played and the offense has been medicore .
@ UCLA , @ Zona , @ Oregon State vs ASU , Cal and Ohio State at home.
The new OC morton said he is not changing anything which means Mark Snachez's role is more game manager then anything .
@ UCLA which is a decent defense they had 480 yds but also ran 80 plays . Sanchez was 54.5% completions on 33 attempts as well. They did miss 3 makeable FGS though . However clearly FG KICKING is as an issue then. SO they moved the ball consistently in a somehwta grinding fashion but UCLA defense is just okay ...
not finished..
SN,
not sure about the side, probably leaning against you on USC, but i'm very interested in the under in the Rose Bowl. Last year USC's defense destroyed Illinois, albeit a much bigger difference in talent than this year's agme, but i think they can shut down PSU to an extent. Meanwhile, PSU's defense was great in the 'Shoe against Ohio State in what seems to be a more telling match-up between common opponents than the Oregon St game which i think USC lost because of circumstances and not actually being inferior. I will say i'm not a fan of playing totals much, as i haven't in a while due to being scared of defensive scores (BC-VAN yesterday although that woulda been an easy winner) and also because i don't have umpires to rely on (MLB) or a system to deal with (CB).
...i would like to hear your thoughts on the under, as i think it will keep moving up over the next few hours 'til gametime
Probably have a Penn State / Under teaser for large ...as well as at least medium plays om Penn State (already posted but added some others) , Under 45.5 -120 , Under USC Team Total .....1st H Under and maybe 1st Q Under ...
Be back shortly! GL
Love the silent killer angle..so overlooked by so many..UGA almost lost the cover today due to silent killer.
Let's get this PSU cash bro.
1.01.09 Play List(L1 0.50% , L2 1.25% , L3 2.50%)
Iowa ML -165 {Level3}
Over 41.5 -120{Level2}
Team Total Over Iowa 23 -115{Level1}
Under 57 Clemson{Level2} & Under 56-120 Clemson {Level1}
1st H Under 28 Clemson {Level2}
1st Q Nebraska +0.5 -160{Level1}
Georgia -9{Level2} and -9.5 {Level2} which makes it a Level 3 play
Under 57 Georgia {Level1}
1st Q -0.5 Georgia -145 {Level1}
Still Pending:
Penn State +10 -130 {Level2}
Cincy ML -130 {Level3}
Over 41.5 -120 {Level2}
Teasers :
Georgia -2.5 and Under 62.5 {Level3}
Georgia +1 , Penn State +19 , and Cincy +7.5{Level3} and {Level2}= 3.75% of roll
Under 63 and Neb +7.5 {Level1}
2nd Half Hedges :
Clemson +1 {Level1}-was a hedge on my teaser but not a good one value wise
Mich State +7 -120 {Level2}
Interested in Under Penn State and USC along with the Nittany Lions and well already played Cincy and Over ..
Good Luck !:cheers: