**************Super Bowl Ingame***************

One great passing drive and Garrett abandons zeke

Left Rodgers a minute and 2 timeouts

Could have wasted another 30-40 secs or at least timeouts
 
He was still hurt

Jdr said he was only available in cook got. injured

Can you please point me to a report on that? I would love to see some support as everything I find says he was practicing on Wednesday with the second string (open to reporters) and if he practiced on Thursday as well he was fine and active. However they had decided on Tuesday to go with Cook because they didn't want to wait to make a decision and wanted their guy to have the full week of reps.
 
Interesting, with 3 seconds left he actually kicked the ball in play, and Beasley actually called for the fair catch
 
I mean, if you're not going to return it then run to the sideline and let the ball land wherever.
 
Because he was injured. We talked about this. He was active because they needed an emergency QB. That is nowhere near the same thing as the guy being able to start and execute the gameplan. There is zero chance Cook would have started if McGloin wasn't injured and couldn't start.

I apologize, but just because you say it's true does not mean it is true. Please post some support. I can find these that seem to support me, and I can find nothing to support your side of the argument.

http://www.csnbayarea.com/raiders/injury-report-penn-out-raiders-practice-mcgloin-limited

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...nfidence-with-connor-cook-despite-first-start

AND AGAIN... TEHY WERE GOING TO LOSE WITH EITHER ONE OF THESE DOUCHEBAGS.
 
I apologize, but just because you say it's true does not mean it is true. Please post some support. I can find these that seem to support me, and I can find nothing to support your side of the argument.

http://www.csnbayarea.com/raiders/injury-report-penn-out-raiders-practice-mcgloin-limited

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...nfidence-with-connor-cook-despite-first-start

AND AGAIN... TEHY WERE GOING TO LOSE WITH EITHER ONE OF THESE DOUCHEBAGS.

Teed can answer you. He's the Raiders' fan and will know more about it than most. I'm done with the convo as I'll be accused of something.

:shake2:
 
line 2H? I bet boys -2.5


[TABLE="class: table table-bordered table-condensed date-header, width: 810"]
<tbody>[TR="class: upcoming-time-row"]
[TH="class: upcoming-time-league, colspan: 2, align: left"]13:40 PST[/TH]
[TH="class: upcoming-handicap, align: center"][/TH]
[TH="class: upcoming-total, colspan: 2, align: center"][/TH]
[TH="class: upcoming-more, align: center"][/TH]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]


[TABLE="class: table table-bordered table-condensed, width: 810"]
<tbody>[TR="class: away"]
[TD="class: match live, bgcolor: #ECECEC"]Green Bay Packers[/TD]
[TD="class: live-indicator, bgcolor: #ECECEC, align: center"]+205[/TD]
[TD="class: moneyline, bgcolor: #ECECEC, align: center"]+4.5
-100[/TD]
[TD="class: handicap, bgcolor: #ECECEC, align: center"]Over 27.5
-105
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: home"]
[TD="class: match live, bgcolor: #ECECEC"]Dallas Cowboys[/TD]
[TD="class: moneyline, bgcolor: #ECECEC, align: center"]-230
[/TD]
[TD="class: handicap, bgcolor: #ECECEC, align: center"]-4.5
-110
[/TD]
[TD="class: total, bgcolor: #ECECEC, align: center"]Under -105
[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]



[TABLE="class: table table-bordered table-condensed, width: 810"]
<tbody>[TR="class: away"]
[TD="class: match non-live, bgcolor: #ECECEC"]Green Bay Packers[/TD]
[TD="class: moneyline, bgcolor: #ECECEC, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: handicap, bgcolor: #ECECEC, align: center"]+8
-180
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: home"]
[TD="class: match non-live, bgcolor: #ECECEC"]Dallas Cowboys[/TD]
[TD="class: moneyline, bgcolor: #ECECEC, align: center"][/TD]
[TD="class: handicap, bgcolor: #ECECEC, align: center"]-8
+153
[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]
 
Teed can answer you. He's the Raiders' fan and will know more about it than most. I'm done with the convo as I'll be accused of something.

:shake2:

Yea... being able to provide support for the side of an argument you are so dearly tied to.

:cheers3:
 
I apologize, but just because you say it's true does not mean it is true. Please post some support. I can find these that seem to support me, and I can find nothing to support your side of the argument.

http://www.csnbayarea.com/raiders/injury-report-penn-out-raiders-practice-mcgloin-limited

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...nfidence-with-connor-cook-despite-first-start

AND AGAIN... TEHY WERE GOING TO LOSE WITH EITHER ONE OF THESE DOUCHEBAGS.

why was mcgloin the next in line all year n not cook?
 
Here are my tennis plays for the early matches

Lauren Davis -1.5 sets -160 1u
Almagro EV 2u
Nishikori -2.5 sets -125 1u
Duan (Ying Ying) -150 1u
Siniakova -135 .5 u
 
No, that's not it at all. I told you why. I'm pretty honest...which seems to be a problem for most.

You can SAY why all you want... what I'm asking for is support. Just because I say Aaron Rodger is Yag because he has dreamy eyes does not mean he is Yag.

Think of yourself back in geometry class and pretend you need a proof.
 
You can SAY why all you want... what I'm asking for is support. Just because I say Aaron Rodger is Yag because he has dreamy eyes does not mean he is Yag.

Think of yourself back in geometry class and pretend you need a proof.
Why was mcgloin the 2 all year and cook the clipboard scout team dude..... do tell
 
You can SAY why all you want... what I'm asking for is support. Just because I say Aaron Rodger is Yag because he has dreamy eyes does not mean he is Yag.

Think of yourself back in geometry class and pretend you need a proof.

I didn't say I didn't need proof. I said I was done with the convo because I don't feel like getting accused of whatever and having this back and forth.

:shake2:
 
I think take getting banned would have been a good CTG April Fools back in the day.
 
Back
Top