Yeah hard to back multiple goals in this one , think it will probably be fairly tight , if somehow Croatia could find a somewhat early goal and go up that would make this game really really interesting
This post actually exists for a million reasons3rd Place Game????
For what??
I ask to the fellas here.....why? O why?
Sucks
PutinWho won?
I've some historical WC stats to post in due course for those who do care about them, but I'll be on France and goals to be scored in various ways for this final. What's about to happen here for me is what's eventually going to happen to Kevin Anderson after beating Federer 13-11 in the 5th set at (of all places) Wimbledon. It's called a letdown off a peak performance (and by dint of having played 3 x 30 min ET periods, the Croats have played the equivalent of 4 knockout games prior to this final as well as endured 2 emotionally taxing penalty shootouts: it's just nuts to expect that kind of output to continue while at the same time avoiding experiencing a letdown, as if they were robots instead of being human). England was horrible offensively from the run of play throughout this WC (a huge % of their goals came from set pieces), thus they failed to kill Croatian hopes off in the 1H when a couple of golden run of play chances presented themselves. The French have demonstrated a ruthlessness from the run of play that England (& Russia & Denmark) lacked.
As I see it, in this final fatigue meets one opponent with the wood on the other meets 'just happy to be here' meets direct big tournament final experience vs. utter inexperience. A 2/3/4-1 final score is my expectation. Anyway, my other thoughts will follow my posting the stats that underpin them.
Hahaha, YESSSSSSSSS3rd Place Game????
For what??
I ask to the fellas here.....why? O why?
Sucks
Good post.y'all are really gonna die on the run out of gas mountain? Off a taxing penalty shootout, shouldn't that have happened against the doping home team? Or the youngest team in the knockout stage with all the speed coming in off a blowout victory?
The team is fit, Vrsaljko looked great despite nobody thinking he'd play and Strinic seemed to be the only injury concern (and he's gone down in almost every match).
They clearly weren't gassed making no substitutions until ET, y'all should be careful because confirmation bias is harmful to a bankroll
y'all are really gonna die on the run out of gas mountain? Off a taxing penalty shootout, shouldn't that have happened against the doping home team? Or the youngest team in the knockout stage with all the speed coming in off a blowout victory?
The team is fit, Vrsaljko looked great despite nobody thinking he'd play and Strinic seemed to be the only injury concern (and he's gone down in almost every match).
They clearly weren't gassed making no substitutions until ET, y'all should be careful because confirmation bias is harmful to a bankroll
I don’t think you can totally discount it , 3 games in 8 days is a lot and they certainly were pushed harder than France has been
They also have been through a lot and have won in several different ways.They’ve played an entire game more than France when you take into account ET.
I agree it was overused vs England , but it’s something to consider for sure .
You must like parking lots with no food or drinkMates, it’s Qatar for me. Must go
Why would a team lack emotional energy in a final? What‘s the magic number of games that they have to play before „running out?“ why didn‘t it happen against England?
The letdown scenario typically happens when a team pulls off a huge upset and then plays a weak team. Like two years ago Titans upset the Chiefs then „fell flat“ in Jacksonville
In a final i can only imagine total adrenaline. And they have nothing to lose, it‘s France that‘s expected to atone for 2016. And when both teams are on the ropes, isn‘t Croatia the team that will benefit from having been on the ropes in every knockout game?
Why would any athlete come out flat for a big match? It's a big match, they "should" be up for it. Yet it happens all the time. There are far more scenarios for letdowns than what you mention here. Why was England fatigued in the 2h against Croatia? They had no mental/emotional or physical excuse to be (they were up 1-0 in a SF with a WC final spot looming), yet they were/played like it. Cumulative experiences take their toll, athletes are human beings not robots. But if you disagree with my take, fine. I'm not betting your money, you are.
I have a very similar take BC. Of course I posted in the wrong thread. Looking forward to the stats!
It somehow reminds me of the Euro 2012 final between Italy and Spain.
A superior team then Spain now France against a good team but running on empty. Italy reached that point early in the 2nd half down 0-2 with 10 men due to injury. I think once Croatia goes down this one is over.
Yes, that early goal led to their negative play in the 2h which is partly what allowed Croatia back into the game, but that early goal doesn't fully explain why England fatigued when the other team had the greater excuse to suffer that particular fate. That video beyond the first 4 mins (but ignoring all the BS Roy Keane says) goes quite in-depth about what those pundits perceived happened to England. It's worth listening to imo, because what they discuss are things that comparatively France will not suffer for, at least as I see it.
Two of those outside of keane are probably the worst pundits in england
Neville the only one worth listening too
You missed the main point Rio gives there, the issue was they didnt know how to play that way because of the teams they came from, who dominated play
Outside of a few players, modric and rakitic
y'all are really gonna die on the run out of gas mountain? Off a taxing penalty shootout, shouldn't that have happened against the doping home team? Or the youngest team in the knockout stage with all the speed coming in off a blowout victory?
I'm not talking physically, I'm talking emotionally. When athletes come out and deliver a flat performance, their 'lack of fitness' isn't leading the way. The body follows the mind. Flat performances are grounded in a lack of emotional energy to give. I'm fully expecting a flat Croatian performance. And it doesn't matter what you want from yourself mentally when you're emotionally flat. Thoughts can't generate emotional energy out of nowhere when it isn't present. If France score the 1st goal, and do so inside the first 25 mins, you watch how quickly Croatian heads drop & lethargy sets in. They MUST score 1st to have any hope in hell of competing in this final.
Speaking to your two rhetorical questions:
Russia's penalty taking was fucking horrible: I've never seen a worse collection of attempts (though I have seen worse individual attempts). That's the sole reason they lost that QF. Their most clinical, unstoppable attempt I believe was delivered by their 4th taker, a bald headed guy. If they had all been as nasty as his, Russia would've played in the SF.
England's players, well the first 4 minutes of the vid below sums up well for me why England blew their golden chance against a vulnerable opponent...