No idea why ages came into it but maybe even reinforces my point with families on the line....the point is whether you think it's dime a dozen Schenk or Moore getting a breakthru win on the PGA tour and opening themselves up to a wildly different career moving forward for their families one way or another is more compelling than Lee breaking thru against a bunch of guys that get paid regardless. He gets a pile of $ on top of his pile of $....that's awesome.Danny Lee is 32, Adam Schenk is 31. Schenk has been a pro since 2015.
Taylor Moore is 29 and has been a pro since 2016.
Of the three, the best story by far was Lee who was mercurial as a teen, winning the US amateur at a younger age than Tiger, and a becoming the youngest European Tour winner as an amateur. Then he fell on hard times before resurrecting his career in 2015, winning at the Greenbrier and finishing ninth in FexEx Cup points. He kind of hung on in the periphery for a couple of years and then faded back into the wilderness until resurrecting again this week. That kind of rollercoaster ride makes for a compelling story. GPS_3 is right....Schenk and Moore are and have been unknowns kicking around the minor tours for 7-8 years now. Nice story that they contended this week but it's a dime a dozen for those type. They pop up all the time in the lesser Tour events.
One thing I'll agree with is if Lee stuck it out and had that breakthru win on the PGA tour than yes it would be the better story and people would actually be talking about it.