bingoThey have kind of been doing it all year though... NCst cover -7 and under 61, USC cover -4 and over 61.5 (49-14), UNC cover -12 and under 63.5.
But they also have a 49-20 game to BC where they cover 14 and obviously go over. Cover -21 agaist MiaOH and go way over 53.
The BC game being a cover and over would deter me a little from both as I think BC O is not as good as Wake O.
not a bad strategy but also comes with risk right? i have been way more confident in the under lately then them covering. I honestly don't think they are correlated. They are favored by 13.5...not 41. There is plenty of margin for both to hit but sort of a insurance just in case one of them doesn't hit in having the 2 separate bets.To take it a step further, if you really really like ND - points and under, that seems you should take Wake team total under...parlays both of those notions into one wager
thank you sir! hope all is well with you!Good post ksimp. Totally agree on your Irish GoIrish. Good luck!
I think it is too late in the season to take Wake lightly. Film doesn't lie. Wake is a much better team than their record indicates. Kelly is smart enough to realize this. If this was game 2, maybe. But week 10, nah.
Don't think I understand where you are going with this. I am saying ND will not take this game lightly. Regardless of personnel, I don't think this is a letdown spot.Bur what was Wolford doing last season without Dortch. Also without leading tackler Bates replaced by freshman. First game without top playmakers
Don't think I understand where you are going with this. I am saying ND will not take this game lightly. Regardless of personnel, I don't think this is a letdown spot.