Season YTD: 60-52 (+3.13 units)
Week 15 Results: 6-2 (+3.8 units)
This is probably it for me until the bowls as I got all the write-ups done early in the week with the short card - good luck all!
Week 16: (write-ups below)
USC -3 (-106)
Iowa State +5.5 (-104)
Tennessee TT Over 18.5 (-106)
Tennessee +13.5 (+100) .5x
Ole Miss/LSU Over 74 (-110)
ND/Clemson Under 60 (-114)
Wisconsin -12.5 (-107)
Illinois +15.5 (-103)
USC -3 (-106) Risking 1.06 units to win 1 units
Not only is USC playing for an undefeated 6 game season, I would think their team morale is a lot better than Oregon who is still finding their feet after 3 of their top 4 returning tacklers from last year all opted out of the season. They started off the season 3-0 against weak competition with Wash State and Stanford, and keep in mind when UCLA played them they didn't have DTR for the first time. Since then they have dropped their last two against a disheveled Cal and up and coming but super soft defense Oregon State. The biggest surprise this offseason has been USC’s improvement in their defensive secondary as they currently rank 14th in PFF coverage ratings, a big improvement from last year's 64th rating. They have a much better defensive unit then years past and much better than Oregon’s this year on paper as USC ranks an impressive 38th across all FEI categories while Oregon’s ranks a lowly 84th. USC’s explosive offense that ranks 23rd in passing PFF and 29th in receiving PFF, should have a great day against Oregon’s secondary that ranks 53rd in coverage PFF. We also have a significant edge in special teams as Oregon ranks one of the league's worst 123rd and have missed 3 of 6 FGs on the season where USC’s special teams is a middle of the pack unit ranking 62nd and their kicker has hit 8 of 11 FGs on the season. We should also win the turnover battle handedly if this years turnover performance to date is any indicator of how this game will play out as USC has been great at forcing turnovers this season ranking 3rd in the nation averaging 3 takeaways per game where Oregon struggles and have averaged 2.2 turnovers per game ranking #118th. USC had a great come back from behind win against a tough UCLA team last week (and with DTR back) and I think they ride off into the sunset with a soft cupcake undefeated PAC12* covid season under their belt. I bought to -2.5 with my book and you probably should too.
Iowa State +5.5 (-104) Risking 1.04 units to win 1 units
No surprise here if you’ve been following my write-ups. Had Iowa State in the first match-up and see no reason why they should be getting this many points again- It will most certainly be a close one. Sorry no real write-up in this one just go read my Week 5 write-up of this same matchup. Expected rain too which I think favors Iowa State the better running team.
Tennessee TT Over 18.5 (-106) Risking 1.06 units to win 1 units
Tennessee +13.5 (+100) Risking .5 units to win .5 units
A true contrarian pick currently as of Friday morning most consensus sites show a HECK of a lot more gamblers on Texas AM and currently at pickmonitor there are 14 cappers that have selected Texas AM and 0 that have selected Tennessee. Tennessee’s biggest problem the last 3 years has been their QB play as Guarantano is an extremely turnover prone and crappy QB who currently has an absolutely horrid 32.9 handsfumble rating on PFF. His career has almost as many turnovers as it does TD’s and if you count all 16 times he put the ball on the ground he is very fortunate to only have the 7 fumbles lost in his career. After alternating backups and giving both prospects a chance, Tennessee looks to have finally found their man in Harrison Bailey. He sports a nice 67.7 completion percentage on the year and has averaged 8 yards per attempt with 3 TDs and 2 INT’s (both against Arkansas - his first game with real reps). One of Texas AM’s weaknesses this year has been their defensive line - as they rank 72nd in line yards, 74th in opportunity rate, 101st in power success rate, and 43rd in stuff ranking. An area where Tennessee has excelled all season and they outrank them in every category on the offensive line ranking 22nd in line yards, 30th in opportunity rate, 63rd in power success rate and 27th in stuff rankings. The FEI matchups show a strong advantage to Texas AM but QB play should be factored into the horrible offensive numbers for Tennessee and I think they catch Texas AM a little off guard who has been off for two weeks and will be taking their 3-6 conference opponent lightly as this will be the first time each team is matching up against each other since their current coaching staffs took over. Pruitt has also had a history and coached under Jimbo back in FSU in 2013 so he will know his opponent well.
Ole Miss/LSU Over 74 (-110) Risking 1.10 to win 1 units
First play I locked in after organizing all the numbers and comparing all the games. This one screams over and although it has shot up 3.5 points already I still like the over as this one seems primed for another 2020 100 point shootout. According to PFF, both offenses outrank their defensive counterparts by over 55 ranks. Ole Miss’s defense is absolutely horrible ranking 108th overall, 108th in coverage, and 106th in Run defense. Their offense on the other hand ranks 23rd overall, 11th in passing, 6th in receiving, and 25th in the run game. They should run all over this LSU defense that ranks 106th according to PFF. Both teams can’t tackle as LSU is ranked 83rd in tacking and Ole Miss 69th. According to FEI, we have more of the same gross mismatches, across all categories Ole Miss’s offense outranks LSU’s defense by 53 ranks. LSU’s offense (which now is much more potent than their season numbers suggest due to injuries/breaking in new guys) outranks Ole Miss’s defense by 28 ranks across all FEI categories. LSU should also run all over the Ole Miss defensive line who ranks in the bottom 5% of all categories, ranking 123rd in line yards, 114th in opportunity rate, 107th in power success rank, 106th in stuff ranking and 102 in sack%. Both teams are in the Top 10 of plays per game, with Ole Miss ranking 3rd and ranking 98th in average time off possession (insane stat on pace of play) The last 3 years in this matchup the game went well over the projected total and the numbers weren’t nearly as skewed in the offenses favor as this year. This should be an easy and fun one to have money on.
ND/Clemson Under 60 (-114) Risking 1.14 units to win 1 units
Love this under as when teams face each other twice in one season it seems to favor the defense (especially defenses of this caliber) in the 2nd matchup in the few times this has happened in the modern-era (post 2000). I found 7 instances where teams faced off twice in one season and in 5 of the 7 games the totals were significantly under or under the projected total, excluding a few outliers like UCF/Memphis in 2018 where neither program has coached defenses for generations. These are two defenses that are in the top 10 of almost every advanced statistical category you could measure. The defensive lines are massive, with Notre Dame’s ranking 1st in line yards, 1st in opportunity rate, 4th in power success rate, 1st in stuff ranking, and 27th in sack%. Of course Clemson’s defensive line is also in the Top 15 of all d-line categories except one and is the norm for a Venables defense. In FEI, Clemson's defense has an average ranking of 5th across all categories and Notre Dame’s 17th. In PFF, Notre Dame’s ranks 9th in overall defense, 18th in coverage and 10 in run defense. Clemson, in PFF, ranks 4th in overall defense, 15th in coverage, and 3rd in run defense. The offenses get a lot of hype but they aren't nearly as high in each statistical category as their defensive counterparts. The best thing about this one was the fact the first matchup was an 87 point OT shootout which I think is driving this number higher, and I think this one stays well under the total, given the numbers of these two defenses.
Wisconsin -12.5 (-107) Risking 1.07 units to win 1 units
Too much weight is being held on Wisconsin's recent poor offensive performance only averaging 7 points in the last 3 games but that was against the best 3 defenses in the Big 10 outside of Ohio State. This Minnesota defense will be a much easier opponent for them to throw around as they are ranked 112th in overall PFF defense, 96th in coverage, and 122nd in rush defense. Wisconsin’s offense that is typically great in the run game yet struggled the last three should have a great day opening up the entire offense and giving some relief to Mertz who looked excellent in his first two games as well. Minnesota’s offense lives and dies by their run game (rushing for 60% of the time) but unfortunately for them that is the strength of this Wisconsin team. They are currently ranked 12th in opponent yards per rush allowing only 3.2 ypc. Wisconsin’s PFF rush defense ranks 5th and none of the previous teams Minnesota has played had nearly as good of a run defense (except Iowa which blew them out 35-7) and I expect the final to be very similar to that one.
Illinois +15.5 (-103) Risking 1.03 units to win 1 units
Really love this play as I think Penn State’s being overvalued after beating 3 crummy teams down in Michigan State, Michigan, and Rutgers. Illinois looks much better since Brandon Peters returned to the starting role as he was injured the first half of the season after being knocked out in the first game against Wisconsin. He’s an experienced veteran who spent two years at Michigan under Harbaugh before transferring to Illinois. Although not the best QB, his PFF grades have increased every season in every category - he seems to be the type to do well against soft defenses and struggle against tough defenses like he did last week against Northwestern's 5th best ranked secondary. This Penn State secondary is very exploitable and are currently ranked 81st in PFF coverage ratings. Illinois’s struggles on defense have come in the run game allowing 5.2 yards per carry on the season, but that’s not an area where Penn State excels as they rank 92nd in yards per carry only averaging 3.8 on the season. On paper, the one area we do have a huge significant edge on is the FEI offensive/defensive turnover rate as Illinois has been great at protecting the ball and forcing turnovers ranking 34th in offensive turnover rate and 7th in defensive turnover rate. Penn State has been the opposite as they are ranked 110th in offensive turnover rate and 111th in defensive turnover rate. As long as we win the turnover rate like we should and considering Penn State's defensive secondary woes this season I see no reason why Illinois can’t keep this game within two TDs.