CTG Fantasy Football League 4 -2 QB....

People should just vote how they feel.. no questions asked.. is a majority needed for it to pass?
 
I think its fine, Fitz is struggling and Carson Palmer isn't getting any better and nether is that oline. S Smith has been ok but has struggled as well. So basically trading Vick for Rice. Vick can go down at a moments notice so hes not a sure thing, Ray Rice is gonna get his. Plus Pinstrp didn't have a QB to start this Sunday so he got that too.
 
Not only do you have Vick as an injury risk, he's freaking hurt now. It's not like I give up Benjarvis Green useless here. Rice was the sixth overall position player taken. This is ridiculous. Nugzz and bob need to manage there team how they see fit, the same way I/and David can manage ours. Each person can value a player how each person values a player. Unreal.
 
There's no blue print is basically the point...whatever were both 2-3 and the 4-1 team wants ya to stand pat...go figure...gotta roll the dice at that position
 
JumpOnBoard said:
Not only do you have Vick as an injury risk, he's freaking hurt now. It's not like I give up Benjarvis Green useless here. Rice was the sixth overall position player taken. This is ridiculous. Nugzz and bob need to manage there team how they see fit, the same way I/and David can manage ours. Each person can value a player how each person values a player. Unreal.
Click to expand...

I only say it how I see it. We can just agree to disagree.
 
Also the Def for starting QB is garbage as well. Even if he will only start for 1 week. Just my opinion. What was he gonna use NE D this week against NO?? No chance in hell of that happening.

You have to keep in mind that this is a 2 QB league and QB's hold alot more value than position players because without QB's every week you lose no matter what. Good luck this week Jump!!!
 
I'm never using Cassell this week and he'll have no value going forward...NE is an upgrade for me...there's two sides to each trade which I feel you are ignoring...whatever....agree to disagree
 
the rosters here are a problem along with bench.

the 2 qb + no TE and multiple flex...meh.

And why do people want to veto a trade? No one should ever veto any trade unless it's blatantly one sided or there was collusion. Otherwise you shouldn't care what another team is doing.
 
I've seen worse trades. . But my question remains why shouldn't I care what otyer teams are doing? Isn't my goal to beat every other team?

I agree and would like to vote on roster expansion for next year if we continue this fantastic league.
 
Vetoing a trade is a dick move unless it is clear collusion or so lobsided that it threatens the integrity of the league, which this obviously does not. Agreeing on a clear winner or loser is one thing, vetoing a trade (especially in a pay league) is something I strongly disagree with.
 
P1NSTR1PEZ said:
the rosters here are a problem along with bench.

the 2 qb + no TE and multiple flex...meh.

And why do people want to veto a trade? No one should ever veto any trade unless it's blatantly one sided or there was collusion. Otherwise you shouldn't care what another team is doing.
Click to expand...


No one has a problem with rosters. The bench is a little short considering the amount of teams in the league and we will fix that next year.

No reason to complain about the rosters when it was like that when you joined, don't like it don't play next year.
 
Troutman said:
No one has a problem with rosters. The bench is a little short considering the amount of teams in the league and we will fix that next year.

No reason to complain about the rosters when it was like that when you joined, don't like it don't play next year.
Click to expand...

We can expand the bench for next week if everyone wants to.
 
I think we hang where we are for this year. I've been hanging into a couple turds all year in case I needed em don't think it's fair to change anything midseason.
 
Jump I've got 1 other offer out there to Chuck Norris if he doesn't accept I'll be pulling the trigger on your deal. Slightly worried about Manual coming back week 8 and that is the only week I need a guy.
 
Well that didnt take long for my season to go down the crapper; lost my qb2 and rb1 for the year.
 
Wow I can't get a qb on a waiver to save my life. Btw. Carrying 5 on your roster is something that should not be allowed imo. Congrats to whomever I'm playing bc ill be playing one qb...
 
Nugzz said:
Wow I can't get a qb on a waiver to save my life. Btw. Carrying 5 on your roster is something that should not be allowed imo. Congrats to whomever I'm playing bc ill be playing one qb...
Click to expand...
this is absurd IMO...you can manage your roster however you see fit...if a manager wants to stash to make trades with owners in need it's a viable strategy, esp considering the smaller rosters...will be more difficult next year with a larger roster but it's certainly their perogative. You knew your byes all year. You have to plan accordingly. It's part of managing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

mogo
Fantasy Football League #2 (2024-25)
2
Replies
58
Views
479
T-Squared
T-Squared
mogo
Fantasy Football League #2 (2023-24)
2
Replies
77
Views
714
reNew Orleans
reNew Orleans
jimmymo
Week 6 Junk
Replies
6
Views
175
KJ
KJ
R
Hall of Fame teams in game 2
Replies
3
Views
80
B.A.R.
B.A.R.
ScopeY
DFS/Props Week 2 2024 Discussion
Replies
48
Views
389
2daBank
2daBank
Back
Top