CollegeFootBall Wk Four

bloodhound

bloodhound

Sniffing out wins
Week Three results= +4.64 YTD +67.64

Thursday
Clemson* -13 -130 vs NC State x5 LOSS
Clemson/NC State* Under 66 -115 x2 WIN
Clemson* -7 -110 vs NC State for 1st Half x2 LOSS
Clemson/NC State* Under 34 -110 for 1st Half x2 WIN
Clemson* -3 -120 vs NC State for 1st Quarter x2 WIN
Clemson* -4 -120 vs NC State for 2nd Quarter x2Clemson* -3 -130 vs NC State for 3rd Quarter x2 WIN
parlay Clemson* -6 -143 vs NC State for 1st Half/Clemson/NC State* Under 34 -110 for 1st Half/100/265 PUSH
parlay Clemson* -9 -200/Clemson/NC State* Under 74 -325 200/220 WIN
Live In-Play Football 9303 Clemson* -9 -120 vs NC State x2 WIN
Live In-Play Football 9303 Clemson* -6 -110 vs NC State x2 WIN
2nd half Clemson* -6 -110 vs NC State for 2nd Half 550/500 PUSH
Thur=6-2-2 +4.97

Fri
Fresno State -3* -120 vs Boise State x4 L
Boise State/Fresno State* Over 67 -128 X1 W

Fresno State Over 36 -110* x1 W

Boise State Over 32 -110* x1 W

Boise State* Over 16 -115 vs Fresno State for x1 W

Fresno State* Over 18½ -115 vs Boise State for x1 W

Boise State/Fresno State* Over 34 -125 for 1st Half x1 W

Boise State/Fresno State* Over 14 -125 for 1st Quarter x1 W

Boise State/Fresno State* Over 19 -110 for 2nd Quarter x half W

Fresno State* -1 -110 vs Boise State for 2nd Half x2 W

Boise State/Fresno State* Over 34 -150 for 2nd Half x1 W

Fresno State* -135 vs Boise State for 3rd Quarter x1 W

Fresno State* +168 vs Boise State x1 W


parlay Fresno State* -185/Boise State/Fresno State* Over 61 -275 50/55 W


Total for wk 4 All plays = +1.38
 
Last edited:
Hope you got down on the Ga Tech pick, Blood.

I went 6-0 in week three on college (Colorado was postponed), 12-3 for season since I started posting picks on your thread. You're good luck for me, so I'll keep it up.

Got a rare--for me--early pick this week.

Utah State +7.

Post the rest on Friday.

Good luck this week.
 
Saturday
Georgia* -31 -120 vs North Texas x2 L

Louisville* -41 -110 vs Florida International x1 W

Wake Forest* -3 -1x10 vs Army x1 W

Pittsburgh U* -3 -140 vs Duke x1 P

Michigan* -17 -140 vs Connecticut x2

Ball State* -9 -130 vs Eastern Michigan x5 W

 Penn State* -17 -130 vs Kent State x4 W

Marshall* +14 -150 vs Virginia Tech x1 W

Georgia Tech* -3 -160 vs North Carolina x4 W

Maryland* -3 -150 vs West Virginia x1 W

BYU* -6 -130 vs Utah x4

Utah State* +7 -120 vs USC x7 W

Utah State* +210 vs USC 100/210 L

Texas A&M* -27 -130 vs SMU x4 W

Rice* +4 -120 vs Houston U x2 L

Notre Dame* -6 -130 vs Michigan State x4 L

Arkansas State* -6 -110 vs Memphis x4 L

Alabama* -38 -110 vs Colorado State x4 L






 
Last edited:
parlays 2 teamers
Clemson* -9 -220/Fresno State* -½ 200/235 W

Georgia* -27 -220/Louisville* -37 -220 200/225 L

Vanderbilt* -27 -220/Florida* -9 -240 200/212 L

Wake Forest* -1 -190/Pittsburgh U* -1 -200 100/130 W

Michigan* -14 -200/Wisconsin* -17 -300 200/200

Ball State* -6 -240/Penn State* -13 -240 200/210 W

Marshall* +18 -280/Cincinnati U* -16 -260 100/88 L

Georgia Tech* -3 -170/Maryland* -½ -210 100/134 W

Baylor* -21 -280/BYU* -3 -210 vs Utah 200/210

Utah State* +14 -310/Texas A&M* -21 -300 400/310 W

 Rice* +7 -230/Notre Dame* -3 -220 200/217 W

Arkansas State* -6½ -110/Alabama* -31 -325 200/300 L

Ball State* -6 -240/BYU* -1 -290 200/186

Texas A&M* -21 -300/Alabama* -31 -325 200/150 L

3 team parlays
Clemson* -7 -320/ Utah State* +14 -345/Texas A&M* -20 -400 500/562 W

Clemson* -7 -320/Ball State* -440/Alabama* -31 -400 500/507 L


5 teamers
Clemson* -4 -595/Georgia* -21 -650/Louisville* -31 -650/Vanderbilt* -21 L -650/Alabama* -28 -600 vs Colorado State 500/547


Florida* -3 -800/Michigan* -9 -500/Wisconsin* -13 -650/Ball State* -1 -645/Penn State* -7 -750 vs Kent State 400/416


BYU* -½ -310/Texas A&M* -20 -350/Notre Dame* -1 -320/Alabama* -31 -325/ LSU* -7 -500 vs Auburn 400/1010 L

Clemson* -3 -745/Ball State* -½ -695/BYU* +4 -780/Texas A&M* -17 -650/Notre Dame* +4 -840
500/445

 
Last edited:
CG, Tahoe Thanks and GL fellas

Yep, got GT Tahoe, with my comp messing up there were a buch of plays I didnt get to post but did well
 
Took Marshalll, but not at your number
Took Utah State.
First time I have done this
Lead me to the promised land.
and GL
 
liking michigan notre dame penn state terps at first glance, some interest in utah st though wanted dds

good luck blood, you are relentless
 
Thanks for the comments guys.


MrBull, I am sensitive to all 1st timers LOL :) ...but glad to see u stepping up and capping early. I always root for MrBull and the BullSheet.
On the Marshall* +14 -150 vs Virginia Tech x1 play.
I kept this small and bought this up to hopefully a winning #. As bad as VT's Logan Thomas has looked, he has the skill and he is going to breakout out of this 51 percent % completion rate he is in...I just hope its not this wk. If Marshal can hold on to the ball this wk I think they cover 10 pt but I like the insurance @ +14 much better. Its funny to me that MLB players will lay -150 to win a game but when they come over to the football side of things they shy away from the heavy juice in buying pts. :)
As far as Utah State* +7 -120 vs USC x2, I wish I had hit the ML @ +255. I'm hoping like hell that the UTST Aggies will extract big time revenge for some of the ass whippens that the trogans have put on them.St's O and qb Keeton can put some pts on the board like nothing usc has seen in a while and there is not much I rather see than Kiffin get fired early in the season...he should be trying to sell cars rather than coach football BOL this wk my friend


Tru, Thank U sir I will be reading ur take on the games this wk. GL

Mrob, Thanks and hope everything is going ur way this season GL

Detroit, glad we agree on those. I think all four of those team have the much beeter talent...if on they will show it this wk :) GL







 
Clemson* -13 -130 vs NC State x5
I think this Clemson line is way off. The lines makers must have been thinking only about Clemson 37-13 loss at N.C. State in 2011 and the injuries that they have. The days of ''Clemsoning'' defined 'as the act of losing to an opponent you have no business losing to' is over and this is a much different and better team than 2011.the Tigers 2011 roster was exceedingly young. 42 of the 85 scholarship players were freshmen, and 29 played—the most of any FBS team in 2011.This is a far more experienced, more prepared team. Clemson wide receiver Peake 2nd lead rec, has been lost for the season after tearing a knee ligament at practice this week. And then there is Boyd who looked awfully good against a then # 5 Georgia, accounting for five touchdowns (three passing, two rushing) while throwing for 270 yards and rushing for 42 more in the No. 8 Tigers’ 38-35 victory. Boyd had a field day with N.C. State's secondary last season, and the Wolfpack's back line is younger and more inexperienced than last year. Clemson has yet to get its downfield passing game working this season, but should have no problem Sat.
I like Clemson by 21 minimum
 
HUNT said:
beast mode...gl blood
Click to expand...

LOL HuntDawg, have u noticed the lines are getting tight ...but there are a few deals to be had GL partner


adding
Utah State* +7 -120 vs USC x5 added another 3 U here for a total of 5
Utah State* +210 vs USC 100/210
I dont believe so cal can score enough pts to stay in this game
 
added a couple of 3 team parlays

Clemson* -7 -320/ Utah State* +14 -345/Texas A&M* -20 -400 500/562


Clemson* -7 -320/Ball State* -440/Alabama* -31 -400 500/507

 
bloodhound said:
Clemson* -13 -130 vs NC State x5
I think this Clemson line is way off. The lines makers must have been thinking only about Clemson 37-13 loss at N.C. State in 2011 and the injuries that they have. The days of ''Clemsoning'' defined 'as the act of losing to an opponent you have no business losing to' is over and this is a much different and better team than 2011.the Tigers 2011 roster was exceedingly young. 42 of the 85 scholarship players were freshmen, and 29 played—the most of any FBS team in 2011.This is a far more experienced, more prepared team. Clemson wide receiver Peake 2nd lead rec, has been lost for the season after tearing a knee ligament at practice this week. And then there is Boyd who looked awfully good against a then # 5 Georgia, accounting for five touchdowns (three passing, two rushing) while throwing for 270 yards and rushing for 42 more in the No. 8 Tigers’ 38-35 victory. Boyd had a field day with N.C. State's secondary last season, and the Wolfpack's back line is younger and more inexperienced than last year. Clemson has yet to get its downfield passing game working this season, but should have no problem Sat.
I like Clemson by 21 minimum
Click to expand...

The "Clemsoning" moment would be 10/26 @ Maryland following their home game vs FSU. I have a hard time seeing it happen this week. I agree Clem by 20 or more seems logical.
 
Silky, s-k Thanks guys and GL this wk

s-k, it sure is good to have U seeing the Clemson game the same. Looks like most favoring NC St.
 
I like Clemson as well. Have'em at -13.5.

That Army/Wake total is interesting to me as well. I had OVER 55 in that game last season, and it went OVER with 10 minutes remaining in the 3rd quarter. Neither team has shown much ability to light up the scoreboard thus far, but Tanner Price did chuck it 47 times last week so maybe there's potential there. Despite the anemic offensive production from both teams thus far, for some reason I think both teams will at least get into the mid-20s here. I like OVER the very pedestrian 48 total as well.
 
adding 1 half plays

Clemson* -7 -110 vs NC State for 1st Half x2

Clemson/NC State* Under 34 -110 for 1st Half x2

parlay these two
Clemson/NC State* Under 34 -110 for 1st Half Clemson* -7 -110 vs NC State for 1st Half/ 100/265
 
Jimmydafreak said:
I like Clemson as well. Have'em at -13.5.

That Army/Wake total is interesting to me as well. I had OVER 55 in that game last season, and it went OVER with 10 minutes remaining in the 3rd quarter. Neither team has shown much ability to light up the scoreboard thus far, but Tanner Price did chuck it 47 times last week so maybe there's potential there. Despite the anemic offensive production from both teams thus far, for some reason I think both teams will at least get into the mid-20s here. I like OVER the very pedestrian 48 total as well.
Click to expand...

Thanks Jimmy There must not be many of us that see the Tigers with an easy win as I thought the line would move up drastically...but thats ok. I just dont see the Wolfpack be at the stage in their game to trade pts with Clemson.And I like their D to slow down CSU transfer QB Pete Thomas.
The Army total not moving either but I capp it @ 52-55 and I know I'm in the minority here but Like Wake by 7

Thanks for the feedback and GL Jimmy
 
bloodhound said:
Clemson* -13 -130 vs NC State x5
I think this Clemson line is way off. The lines makers must have been thinking only about Clemson 37-13 loss at N.C. State in 2011 and the injuries that they have. The days of ''Clemsoning'' defined 'as the act of losing to an opponent you have no business losing to' is over and this is a much different and better team than 2011.the Tigers 2011 roster was exceedingly young. 42 of the 85 scholarship players were freshmen, and 29 played—the most of any FBS team in 2011.This is a far more experienced, more prepared team. Clemson wide receiver Peake 2nd lead rec, has been lost for the season after tearing a knee ligament at practice this week. And then there is Boyd who looked awfully good against a then # 5 Georgia, accounting for five touchdowns (three passing, two rushing) while throwing for 270 yards and rushing for 42 more in the No. 8 Tigers’ 38-35 victory. Boyd had a field day with N.C. State's secondary last season, and the Wolfpack's back line is younger and more inexperienced than last year. Clemson has yet to get its downfield passing game working this season, but should have no problem Sat.
I like Clemson by 21 minimum
Click to expand...

A friend of mine has N. Carolina State season tickets and I normally go to a Raleigh home game with him once a year. It is a loud, rowdy crowd. I'll never forget the Tarheel game, when two fans hollered, "go to Hell, Carolina, go to Hell, ..." the entire game.

I think bookmakers are also thinking about the FSU game, last year. But, State's starting QB was hurt in the first game. So, Thomas is not thier first choice to be taking snaps. The entire offense is very young and they don't have a very good offensive line. That can be trouble.

From ESPN: The Wolfpack's less-experienced 2013 offense is much more of a work in progress. Colorado State transfer Pete Thomas has thrown three picks without a touchdown in his first two starts, and N.C. State's leading rusher (Matt Dayes) and receiver (Marquez Valdes-Scantling) are both true freshmen.Doeren's team overcame four turnovers to beat FCS program Richmond 23-21 on Sept. 7 after trailing by double digits.
"Coach always preaches you have to be able to handle adversity," Thomas said. "It's not what happens to you, it is how you come back. I feel like our team handled adversity very well."
 
Silkydiamonds said:
Liking this & the under
Click to expand...

Thank U Silky...I am seeing way more pep showing love for MidTennSt when I think they should be looking deeper into a really good FAU D. Through FAU doesnt have much O, they have a damn good D which is due to Carl Pelini’s from Nebraska whose defensive expertise has helped make FAU 11-2 last 13 vs. line. And now that juco QB Johnson feels more comfy in the lead, Owls become a lookat play in dog role. MTSU is a bit thin on DL and QB Kilgore only 2 TDP vs. 4 picks in first three. I look for 2-3 interception by the Owls in this game
I give MTSU a slight advantage in rushing but FAU has the passing and defensive along with speiacl teams
I won on FAU last wk and the wk before and will ride them again this wk.

GL Silky
 
bloodhound said:
LOL HuntDawg, have u noticed the lines are getting tight ...but there are a few deals to be had GL partner


adding
Utah State* +7 -120 vs USC x5 added another 3 U here for a total of 5
Utah State* +210 vs USC 100/210
I dont believe so cal can score enough pts to stay in this game
Click to expand...

Lines are definitely tight..been tight all year imo
 
bloodhound said:
Thank U Silky...I am seeing way more pep showing love for MidTennSt when I think they should be looking deeper into a really good FAU D. Through FAU doesnt have much O, they have a damn good D which is due to Carl Pelini’s from Nebraska whose defensive expertise has helped make FAU 11-2 last 13 vs. line. And now that juco QB Johnson feels more comfy in the lead, Owls become a lookat play in dog role. MTSU is a bit thin on DL and QB Kilgore only 2 TDP vs. 4 picks in first three. I look for 2-3 interception by the Owls in this game
I give MTSU a slight advantage in rushing but FAU has the passing and defensive along with speiacl teams
I won on FAU last wk and the wk before and will ride them again this wk.

GL Silky
Click to expand...

FAU has been a covering machine. Been looking at this game as well. I think FAU's defense should be able to keep them in this one until the end. May put a little on the ML.
 
Huntdawg...find us some winner my friend I need a big week before the line really really get tight and I want be able to find more than a double handful of plays.

Jimmy...always good to see we agree. Hope u have that killer week. and that ML sounds good, lets do it

adding
Florida Atlantic* +160 vs Middle Tennessee x1...I dont think this line gets any better now that Jimmydafreak like it
 
Marsski said:
On the Ramblin Wreck with you, good luck this week Hound
Click to expand...

Mars, I think GT wins by at least 9. GT D is improved this yr. I said this last wk and I will say it again, X DC Groh's stale schemes have and ill-advised 3-4 has been replaced by the respected new DC Roof’s 4-3 looks and he is attacking instead of laying in wait..and it working

GL Mars...btw, I thought u would at least give me an atta-boy for last wk :)
 
bloodhound said:
Mars, I think GT wins by at least 9. GT D is improved this yr. I said this last wk and I will say it again, X DC Groh's stale schemes have and ill-advised 3-4 has been replaced by the respected new DC Roof’s 4-3 looks and he is attacking instead of laying in wait..and it working

GL Mars...btw, I thought u would at least give me an atta-boy for last wk :)
Click to expand...

My apologies, attaboy...helps when you knock out Butgers QB...but never in doubt...I assume you are on them BIG this week vs. Ball State...:cheers:
 
Marsski said:
My apologies, attaboy...helps when you knock out Butgers QB...but never in doubt...I assume you are on them BIG this week vs. Ball State...:cheers:
Click to expand...
I played Ball State* -9 -130 vs Eastern Michigan x5
RB Edwards still sidelined with concussion symptoms suffered in opening game vs. Eastern Illinois.Banks has assumed his duties and has done well and gained 141 YR on 11 carries last Sat at No Texas, but the majority of his yards cameon an early 77-yard TD run.Ball State rushing was ineffective in the second half as Williamson, effective the previous week vs. Army, gained only 1 yard in six carries vs. the Mean Green. Hopefully Edwards get to play this week vs. EMU.EMU outgained Rutgers by 99 yards last week, but wasted a 335-yard passing day by QB Benz because the defense couldn’t stop RB James. I still give BallSt a slight advantage in the rushing game and a little better in passing but they have a much better special teams.Eagles can't run, rank 110th in total "O", & have been held below 14 pts 8 times since LY. I like BallSt up to 14 but can see more if ......
 
added

Clemson* -3 -120 vs NC State for 1st Quarter x2

Clemson* -4 -120 vs NC State for 2nd Quarter x2

Clemson* -3 -130 vs NC State for 3rd Quarter x2
 
question about your Bama pick.

My thinking here is with McElwain being a former Bammer coach that Saban has a good relationship with and the Tide off a big emotional road win that they've been thinking about / planning for a while.... Saban calls off the dogs in the 2nd half and they run their way back into the locker room getting a lot of young guys work with another SEC game on deck. I could see Bama 1st half bet cruising but CSU covering the game. If CSU can manage 1 TD, the chance of them covering looks pretty good to me..Looking back to last season, Bama beat WKU 35-0, FAU 40-7, and Western Carolina 49-0. I am waiting for +40 to appear on my book and then I think I will play.
 
E.T.G. said:
question about your Bama pick. My thinking here is with McElwain being a former Bammer coach that Saban has a good relationship with and the Tide off a big emotional road win that they've been thinking about / planning for a while.... Saban calls off the dogs in the 2nd half and they run their way back into the locker room getting a lot of young guys work with another SEC game on deck. I could see Bama 1st half bet cruising but CSU covering the game. If CSU can manage 1 TD, the chance of them covering looks pretty good to me..Looking back to last season, Bama beat WKU 35-0, FAU 40-7, and Western Carolina 49-0. I am waiting for +40 to appear on my book and then I think I will play.
Click to expand...
ETG I fully agree with ur take on Bama and Saban Not running the score up against McElwain. Saben likes him a lot and will go out of his way not to show him and his team up. Now the question is can Col St beat Bama 2nd, 3rd and 4th string. I have seen ColSt play two times this yr and I have to believe that Bama can score and defend everything they have. The only time Saban will tell his players to lay off is the last series on the 4th qrt in order to not rub it in. Bama is 3 or 4 deep in most all positions so I thought Alabama* -38 -110 vs Colorado State x4 was a good play but I would not play it over 38. Now, do u want to put ur coin on Colorado St or maybe find another game with better odds of covering is the question one need to consider. I personally think this is a 48-7 game, maybe a bit higher if Bama takes advantage of any turnovers. CSU’s has a big 6-2 jr. QB Grayson & his quick RB duo of Nwoke 236 YR & and a Bibbs 201 Y/ 5.9 ypc will move the ball some but scoring is something I think they will have trouble with even with Bama's backup in the game they will want to please their coach to keep from getting yelled at :) I may be wrong and I wish u the Best of Luck if u decide to play it :cheers:
 
bloodhound said:
ETG I fully agree with ur take on Bama and Saban Not running the score up against McElwain. Saben likes him a lot and will go out of his way not to show him and his team up. Now the question is can Col St beat Bama 2nd, 3rd and 4th string. I have seen ColSt play two times this yr and I have to believe that Bama can score and defend everything they have. The only time Saban will tell his players to lay off is the last series on the 4th qrt in order to not rub it in. Bama is 3 or 4 deep in most all positions so I thought Alabama* -38 -110 vs Colorado State x4 was a good play but I would not play it over 38. Now, do u want to put ur coin on Colorado St or maybe find another game with better odds of covering is the question one need to consider. I personally think this is a 48-7 game, maybe a bit higher if Bama takes advantage of any turnovers. CSU’s has a big 6-2 jr. QB Grayson & his quick RB duo of Nwoke 236 YR & and a Bibbs 201 Y/ 5.9 ypc will move the ball some but scoring is something I think they will have trouble with even with Bama's backup in the game they will want to please their coach to keep from getting yelled at :) I may be wrong and I wish u the Best of Luck if u decide to play it :cheers:
Click to expand...
:shake:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B.A.R.
Week #1 Discussion
Replies
31
Views
1K
B.A.R.
B.A.R.
steponaduck
NCAA FB RSW DISCUSSION
2 3
Replies
104
Views
3K
spottie2935
spottie2935
R
Saturday's College Football bets:
Replies
1
Views
228
B.A.R.
B.A.R.
VirginiaCavs
NC State vs. Kansas State Preview Article
Replies
1
Views
218
B.A.R.
B.A.R.
VirginiaCavs
UCLA vs. Boise State Preview Article
Replies
1
Views
201
wiseplayer
wiseplayer
Back
Top