TheGarfather
Pretty much a regular
6 seems like too many in the Oregon game
nopeSo fucking pissed. Such a bullshit cover. Hopefully it costs them their spot in the playoff.
1.Alabama. 2. Oregon 3. TCU 4. OSU
there is zero case for tosu.
TCU shouldn't drop 2 spots because they did what was expected of them
they'd bring in more TV viewers then TCU or Baylor
lol at ohio state being in the conversation. tcu went ooc and beat minny of ohio states conference, played in the tougher conference, has a loss to Baylor compared to ohio states loss at home to vt, and the frogs loss to Baylor was flukey and some would say poorly officiated late. if ohio state makes it ... just a joke
Tcu drops to fourth may happen but the four stay the same
If TCU gets in ahead of Baylor, the committee should be permanently disbanded.
the problem for Baylor is that ksu and wis are about the same ( ksu maybe slightly better but not much ), tosu is ahead of Baylor right now and was WAY more impressive than Baylor. agree with braves ... stays the same
Baylor's only problem is the committee. They clearly should be one of the top 4 teams.
If TCU gets in ahead of Baylor, the committee should be permanently disbanded.
explain how tosu can jump tcu.
explain how Baylor can jump tosu.
I've watched a lot of both teams and I maintain that TCU is clearly a better team. Head-to-head reduces sample size to 1 instead of looking at everything. I personally am not a fan of having added weight be on head-to-head.
After Baylor beat TCU, at no time should anyone have even considered putting TCU ahead of Baylor. Anyone on the committee who did so should be fired for gross incompetence.
I've watched a lot of both teams and I maintain that TCU is clearly a better team. Head-to-head reduces sample size to 1 instead of looking at everything. I personally am not a fan of having added weight be on head-to-head.
Then they should have beaten them.
hope fsu stays at 4 .. I want to see fsu/bama semi
Then Baylor should have beaten WVU like TCU did. Its all cyclical. One begets the other.
hope fsu stays at 4 .. I want to see fsu/bama semi
In sports the #1 tiebreaker is head-to-head as it should be. Despite the Big 12 trying to change the conference tie-breaker rules, Baylor is the conference based on their head-to-head win. And placing the conference runner-up in the playoff over the conference champion is a complete absurdity.
In sports the #1 tiebreaker is head-to-head as it should be. Despite the Big 12 trying to change the conference tie-breaker rules, Baylor is the conference based on their head-to-head win. And placing the conference runner-up in the playoff over the conference champion is a complete absurdity.
I think oregon/tcu no Bueno for ratings , so we see oregon/fsu and Bama/ tcu
In determining conference champion, yes, head-to-head is always the first tie-breaker, and I agree that it should be. But that doesn't mean the conference champion is necessarily the best in the conference for a variety of reasons, and that is what's at issue here. The issue we are addressing here (or at least the issue I am addressing) is finding the four best teams, so that we can have a playoff and sort out who the best one of all is.
jimmy how did you feel about bama getting a rematch with lsu?
no interest in watching Oregon crush fsu. the other game would be quite a battle
marshall need be in there still?four best teams are Oregon, bama, tcu and Baylor
four deserving teams are Oregon bama fsu baylor