If you're going to play the ECU and ODU game, get off the half making it -12. Something I'm in favor of is buying a half-point so I'm working with a whole number. While this will decrease one's overall chance to cover, it will also reduce the chance losing. But one has to think, aren't there better games to disect?
why bother with anything other than the over 77 in that game? Seriously ... ODU gonna run a ton of plays and toss it around and they will be trailing the whole game. If they aren't then ECU just does the same thing. Game should fly over any reasonable total that most books are willing to line in a week 1 game, barring weather.
I think I like USC more than most. I think people are too down on the QB based on his play vs. UCLA and the windy bowl game vs. Ga Tech. A lot depends on the QB though, but they have the best receiver in country, legit running game, and an improved O-line. Defense switching to a 3-4 could take some adjustments, but they have talent in the 2 deep all around. The have little depth after that though if they run into injuries.
They did lose a starting stud wr, lost Barkley, and like u said d goin from Tampa 2 4-3 to tha 3-4. U really think they have improved from where they ended last year before tha bowl game?
No. I can understand buyin down from 21.5, 14.5, 7.5 and so on but no need to buyin a half point at 12.5. Not worth tha extra juice.
If you're going to play the ECU and ODU game, get off the half making it -12. Something I'm in favor of is buying a half-point so I'm working with a whole number. While this will decrease one's overall chance to cover, it will also reduce the chance losing. But one has to think, aren't there better games to disect?
I appreciate your thoughts. You asked if there were better games to dissect, I jokingly responded with no.
There is a very good chance that this is a bloodbath and I'm shocked by the 12.5. As for VT/Bama, does VT give up 28+ to Bama?
Wr core, RBs, o-line all should be better. Defense, I'm worried about transition, but have talent. Nose tackle is key in 3-4 and they are young there
Downgrade at qb and disagree wit wr core gettin better after losin woods. Agree wit online improvement and agree on rb, but tha d makin tha change is tha question, and I don't see rite now it improving from 60th last year.
Downgrade at QB I agree but how good was Barkley last year?
Defense is a big unknow.
WR-aglohor is really good and they have two very good tight ends coming back. Plus, 2 four star true freshman WR.
I like Woods, but I think he's a bit over rated. Woods is the only one not back and I think they will have more than enough to replace him.
Where is Bull? I'm lost in FCS
Well damn share bro, at least pm me lolgod is findin value rite now:shake:
:shake:Where is Bull? I'm lost in FCS
Well damn share bro, at least pm me lol
Still gotta look at tha overall product all years of barks. Look at his jr season, its a big drop off to what they got now. Where do u have them in tha pac12?
2/3. Probably 3.
I don't have access to espn the insider, but apparently Phil Steele is real high on USC as BCS title contender?
Wow, eerie timing with me posting that...
LSU under 8.5 wins +150
^^ I think there is a very good chance they win 8.