Buffalo (other than players like Diggs that stayed at hospital) got the heck out of dodge. I said it then and have since. That was a bit shocking to me how quickly they left.
Buffalo had no reason leaving Cincinnati until at least Tuesday.
Not trying to get in the middle, he sourced it one post after (Pro Football Talk).Where did this come from? Is there a link to an article, or some other type of verification? Bottom line is THE NFL made all the decisions. Again, there was absolutely no way the game was being played Tuesday or Wednesday. I realize you're a KC fan, so I get your upset about the possibility of a neutral site game, but unless you have some actual proof backing the above statement, I'm done arguing the point.
Dramatic about what? That he might have died? My point was that if the Bills were lobbying for favors, as MusicCityGambler was inferring, then they obviously were doing so prior to Hamlin being out of the woods health wise. The NFL made the official decision Thursday, but that would have required Buffalo to be pushing for that outcome prior to the decision. Again, I'll say that the fairest thing would have been to play the game this weekend & push the playoffs back & skip the bye week between the conference championships & Super Bowl. The NFL either decided that would damage their bottom-line, or perhaps one or more of the stadiums would have been unavailable. There's no way anyone can say that a 7-3 game in the 1st quarter was already determined.In fairness to bengals they actually get better as the game gets deeper, unlike the packers who have become known for folding when the going gets tough. im not gonna say 100% they were gonna win cause who freaking knows, either team coulda ran off the next 20+ but I think the odds were better than not since they had early control and bengals tendency of being excellent after halftime. I’m certainly not co-signing anything bout bills having anything to do with it, I’m sure they didn’t, I just think nfl kinda hosed cincy in the deal. It was really about forcing them to win last week to avoid a coin flip w ravens where my problem lies, had they not did that and simply went by win percentage then I’d be fine with bills 2 cincy 3 and their potential gane in Buffalo. Then if bills were to meet kc it be in kc based off win percentage. It feels like nfl gave bills concessions or benefit of the doubt where they did no such thing for the bengals. I think that why you hear some bitterness but I agree with you it’s misguided to aim it at Buffalo as I doubt they had any say other than voting on what the league came up with.
FYI: by time they came up with this everyone knew Hamlin was gonna be ok, you being a tad dramatic.
Thanks for pointing that out. Still doesn't make it factual though. I believe the NFL made decisions that were in its own best interest here. If Buffalo had anything to do with it & were trying to get out of playing the game & that's proven to be the case later, I will admit my error.Not trying to get in the middle, he sourced it one post after (Pro Football Talk).
Yeah, I don't know what the Bills intentions were at all other than not playing that night.Thanks for pointing that out. Still doesn't make it factual though. I believe the NFL made decisions that were in its own best interest here. If Buffalo had anything to do with it & were trying to get out of playing the game & that's proven to be the case later, I will admit my error.
ypp the sameBox from first meeting Jags n Chargers
16-7 at halftime.
15-3 in third and it was over.
James Robinson had 17-100 for Jags, Etienne 13-45.
Zay had 10 for 85.
View attachment 71607
End of the game, LAC had two drives end in Jags territory (32 and 11). There was 21 plays on those drives and I remember then wondering why he was letting Justin get abused. The OL was really rough then.ypp the same
2 turnovers and 0 for 2 on 4th down vs 0 and 2 for 3
Seems the difference
Good analysis.It was 16-10 in the third, Jax had 4th and 1 at midfield and went for it...50-yard touchdown run. Who knows what happens if Jax doesn't convert there?
Jax possessed a ton, so certainly the Charger D was worn down. Herbert is healthy this time and so is Allen. So the Charger O will possess a lot more.
Also Bosa left the game, but he's been logging full practices. With him and Mack (who was curiously quiet in Week 3) plus Van Noy surging (five sacks in last five games), Trevor won't have the same comfort in the pocket.
The plan for Trevor is obvious...he doesn't throw deep as well -- #31 in catchable pass rate -- and he's gonna wanna get the ball out fast, anyways, to escape Charger pass rush. So lots of short and medium passes from him (part of an argument for the under).
Can Charger cornerbacks play tighter coverage or are they going to yield a cushion and let Trevor throw easy short, quick-release passes? Yes, see the Dolphins game, they have the corners to excel in press man coverage.
That FG bet looks great.Anyone think the Ravens keep it close?
I know lw the Bengals were in full control so they were just looking to get out with the w. Looking at the second half drive chart from lw still makes me think twice about laying 2+ scores. I know most would correlate Ravens cover to the under, but I think they need 20+ to cover here. I really wish Lamar was healthy because it would be so good for the game.
Bengals 1sth tt o12.5-124 looks like an auto bet once you look and see they've scored 13+ in every home game outside of week 1. I have a hard time seeing the Bengals coming out flat here, but again I can't get that 2ndh drive chart out of my head.
As of right now I haven't bet a thing but in order of my leans
Cincy 1sth tt o12.5
fg o40-122
Ravens+8.5
I might be wrong but I don't think Cincy just blows Balty out of the water. They are covering machines but lines have been adjusted- granted I think they may be better this season but they won close playoff games last year. They aren't sneaking up on anyone- I think a 26-20 / 30-23 type game here is very possible.
Hey, why not. Nobody will call it square if it hits. If you're still alive up to the Minn game you could hedge a bit with some NYG ML cause I can't imagine Cinci losing SU.Might do the squarest thing possible and parlay all home teams sat & sun around +520.
77.5 still low end of what I thought it would be.I dunno if I’ll even bet the side, I assume Etienne number be what 70ish?
77.5 still low end of what I thought it would be.
Rushing attempts sitting at 16.5....If Jax gets a lead late I feel like this is golden, but I may actually opt for rush & rec o95.5.
Soooo many bootlegs in that offense and if the coverage is there downfield Etienne might get some checkdowns. He has 6 20+ yard catches this season
I guess I should head on over to the prop thread with these posts.....
With you on Ravens +10. Harbaugh underdog playoff numbers must be respected.Anyone think the Ravens keep it close?
I know lw the Bengals were in full control so they were just looking to get out with the w. Looking at the second half drive chart from lw still makes me think twice about laying 2+ scores. I know most would correlate Ravens cover to the under, but I think they need 20+ to cover here. I really wish Lamar was healthy because it would be so good for the game.
Bengals 1sth tt o12.5-124 looks like an auto bet once you look and see they've scored 13+ in every home game outside of week 1. I have a hard time seeing the Bengals coming out flat here, but again I can't get that 2ndh drive chart out of my head.
As of right now I haven't bet a thing but in order of my leans
Cincy 1sth tt o12.5
fg o40-122
Ravens+8.5
I might be wrong but I don't think Cincy just blows Balty out of the water. They are covering machines but lines have been adjusted- granted I think they may be better this season but they won close playoff games last year. They aren't sneaking up on anyone- I think a 26-20 / 30-23 type game here is very possible.
Let’s suit up and play all our fragile players in a meaningless game so we can stay hot! Donks score more points than they had all season and he gets one his guys hurt! Lol
You don't think the players themselves had anything to say about it, or any impact in the decision?
Your strange hatred for a man who doesn't even coach a team you're a fan of has impacted your ability to think rationally with respect to anything Chargers related. It's really odd, but also fun to watch I guess?
It has made me win a lot of money betting chargers games, fading their run d. Players decided? Lmao. That says what a garbage coach he is, players play, coaches make those choices. A team I don’t root for? I don’t root for any team, fans are bout the lowest life form. I’m here to make money and it helps knowing when a team overrated cause the talent good but they coached by trash. I don’t hate him, he just a awful coach, now that I think bout it I prob do hate him cause he one those weasels who gets a job he wasnt deserving of
I didn’t say the players decided, I asked if you thought the players had any input in the decision on playing last Sunday. I would imagine they did, you seem to be assuming Staley and his staff made them play.
He’s not an awful coach, that’s silly. You don’t like him, that’s fine…but to say he’s an awful coach is silly and makes you look more like “the fan” you just lamented as opposed to someone making and having reasoned takes.
The players wanted to play so bad they gave up 31 points to a team who struggled to score 20 all year: lol
Saying he not awful makes you look a certain way too but I’ll keep it civil. Go throw a parade for him, does less with most in the league; worst coach in the league and it not close. Get a clue
Him being an awful coach is not exactly an unpopular opinion. He famously often makes awful decisions…like that game with all the fourth down attempts and having his players risk injury in a meaningless game, to give two quick examples. Why don‘t you actually try defending him instead of engaging in ridiculous condescensions like by calling Bank a „fan“?I didn’t say the players decided, I asked if you thought the players had any input in the decision on playing last Sunday. I would imagine they did, you seem to be assuming Staley and his staff made them play.
He’s not an awful coach, that’s silly. You don’t like him, that’s fine…but to say he’s an awful coach is silly and makes you look more like “the fan” you just lamented as opposed to someone making and having reasoned takes.
Seems very rational to criticize him for indulging in meaningless risks when his already banged-up guys get hurt. Again, you quibble about what is rational or whatever and engage in fatuous speculation instead of making actual points…quit provoking and actually be „reasonable.“Nah, don’t hold back. I’d love to know what not jumping to irrational conclusions and wanting to have a reasoned discussion makes someone. Do tell.
Him being an awful coach is not exactly an unpopular opinion. Why don‘t you actually try defending him instead of engaging in ridiculous condescensions like by calling Bank a „fan“?
Seems very rational to criticize him for indulging in meaningless risks when his already banged-up guys get hurt. Again, you quibble about what is rational or whatever and engage in fatuous speculation instead of making actual points…quit provoking and actually be „reasonable.“
Who said the players wanted to play so bad? Talk about twisting words…good grief.
One game is absolutely indicative of the entire season and will certainly be very valuable in predicting the next game. Ugh.
Seems very rational to criticize him for indulging in meaningless risks when his already banged-up guys get hurt. Again, you quibble about what is rational or whatever and engage in fatuous speculation instead of making actual points…quit provoking and actually be „reasonable.“
Care if I use your link from earlier to make a point about Staley? Bank has mentioned many times it’s Staley’s defense and schemes that lead to his awfulness, and not the 4th down decisions/gambles/etc.
Chargers' Brandon Staley is polarizing, but his defensive game planning is elite
You can question Staley's fourth-down and playing time decisions, but not his defensive prowess.theathletic.com
And yet teams continue to run all over them. And speaking of trusting words you little shit, you didn’t just ask me the stupid question about the players, then you went on to imply shit about me and call names, I know you can’t help it, I’ve seen enough your post to know what kinda coward you are.
But hey sone jerkoff at the athletic says he good so it must be true! Way to think for yourself!!
I did ask you the question though. You didn’t answer it.
I didn’t imply anything, I was pretty clear with what I was saying…I feel your hatred of Staley is a bit odd for someone who isn’t a fan of the Chargers. That was the point. Apparently you missed it because your feelings got hurt. I’m sorry.
So ppl should only care about a coaches chops if they a fan of a team?
Again, I’m not taking that jerkoffs word as gospel…it’s just another viewpoint that he backs up with actual facts/stats/images/videos. Outside of you saying you’ve made money betting props against the Chargers, what evidence have you come with on the Staley topic ever (over the dozens and dozens of posts in which you’ve lambasted him)?