CollegeKingRex
CTG Regular
LJC: Tough to say when it goes around pick 'em.
I mean, no one wants to deal 0 as the line. 1/2 point doesn't exist. So a lot of times you see several places using '1' and several others using the other side '1'.
A '3' one way to a '3' the other is closer related to a game opening '3' and moving to '6' or '6.5' than it is '9', if you understand what I'm saying.
There's really not much to it, as far as these bowls go. Everyone has a power rating on these teams that is firmly established by now and there's very little room for fudging.
Doc's number was prolly Ball State 4 or 5, thus a lot of guys opened it higher than maybe they should have.
Billy's people were aware that Hoke had left, Ball had crumbled after the 12-0 start, Tulsa stomped a MAC team 63-7 last year, and the MAC is 0-4 ATS/SU in the bowls.
Those factors prompted the move. It was Walters and basically he alone who made Tulsa move from catching 3 and 2 all the way to the favorite's role. The piling on of Tulsa after that came from his followers.
I mean, no one wants to deal 0 as the line. 1/2 point doesn't exist. So a lot of times you see several places using '1' and several others using the other side '1'.
A '3' one way to a '3' the other is closer related to a game opening '3' and moving to '6' or '6.5' than it is '9', if you understand what I'm saying.
There's really not much to it, as far as these bowls go. Everyone has a power rating on these teams that is firmly established by now and there's very little room for fudging.
Doc's number was prolly Ball State 4 or 5, thus a lot of guys opened it higher than maybe they should have.
Billy's people were aware that Hoke had left, Ball had crumbled after the 12-0 start, Tulsa stomped a MAC team 63-7 last year, and the MAC is 0-4 ATS/SU in the bowls.
Those factors prompted the move. It was Walters and basically he alone who made Tulsa move from catching 3 and 2 all the way to the favorite's role. The piling on of Tulsa after that came from his followers.