And why doesn't the NFL play till there's a winner? That tie last night was stupid. Play till you have a winner.
Because we should not be subject to that torture for another second. Think about how much has to happen for there to be a tie. Im ok with. Neither team deserved to win. The NFL is becoming a shittier and shittier product as each week goes by.
Because we should not be subject to that torture for another second. Think about how much has to happen for there to be a tie. Im ok with. Neither team deserved to win. The NFL is becoming a shittier and shittier product as each week goes by.
Posted at blankets, so who knows how accurate it is...
Road teams off a tie are 0-7 SU & ATS, losing by 19.3 PPG
alright now, i agree with your overall sentiment and i think the ratings show that, but come one, its not roger goodell or the leagues fault that those kickers missed the fgs and the teams played so poorly in what should have been a good NFC West rivalry game. That just sucks.
Its one thing to schedule crap games every Thursday, that is on the league. but the tie isnt.
<tbody> [TH="align: center"]SU:[/TH] [TH="bgcolor: F8F8F8, colspan: 4, align: center"]Teaser Records[/TH] [TH="align: center"]ATS:[/TH] [TD="bgcolor: F8F8F8"] +6: 0-6-1 (0.0%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
<tbody> [TH="align: center"][/TH] [TH="align: center"]Rushes[/TH] [TH="align: center"]Rush Yds[/TH] [TH="align: center"]Passes[/TH] [TH="align: center"]Comp[/TH] [TH="align: center"]Pass Yds[/TH] [TH="align: center"]TOs[/TH] [TH="align: center"]Q1[/TH] [TH="align: center"]Q2[/TH] [TH="align: center"]Q3[/TH] [TH="align: center"]Q4[/TH] [TH="align: center"]Final[/TH] [TH="align: center"]Team[/TH] [TH="align: center"]Opp[/TH] </tbody> | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[TABLE="class: dataTable no-footer"] <caption></caption><thead>[TR] [TH="class: sorting_asc, colspan: 1, align: center"]Date[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]Link[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]Day[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]Week[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]Season[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]Team[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]Opp[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]Site[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]Q1[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]Q2[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]Q3[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]Q4[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]Final[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]Line[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]Total[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]SUm[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]ATSm[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]OUm[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]DPS[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]DPA[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]SUr[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]ATSr[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]OUr[/TH] [TH="class: sorting, colspan: 1, align: center"]ot[/TH] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5-2-0 (-2.36, 71.4%) | avg total: 43.6 |
which would make Saints +3 a good wager...already did. Now it's +2.5Posted at blankets, so who knows how accurate it is...
Road teams off a tie are 0-7 SU & ATS, losing by 19.3 PPG
How does he get away with that? Funny but damn
I like Philly +4.5 initially. I like how their defense can get after it. But Wentz needs to protect the ball better. I give credit to that great Viking defense for creating them. Points will be a premium in this game. Anything over a FG will be huge.
Posted at blankets, so who knows how accurate it is...
Road teams off a tie are 0-7 SU & ATS, losing by 19.3 PPG
Just cause they played 15 extra minutes of fb the week before? Surely something else to it than fatigue? Any theories or simply fatigue?
Is it Possible in most cases both teams walk away feeling like they squandered a winnable game and have bit of hangover? I pose this question cause despite fact sea had chip shot at end of ot I have to believe they are ecstatic to the point this had to feel like a W to them. On road against division rival and get severely outplayed to the point they not only should have lost they should've got blown out! Sea didn't cross midfield till blocked punt for Christ sakes. Had more punts than 1st downs entering ot, more penalties than 1st downs! Offense shouldn't be fatigued cause they were barely on the field. Sea should feel really good today.
Maybe I'm just trying to convince myself but that 0-7 means very little to me when most likely none those 7 were as talented as sea and I'm quite sure none those 7 got to face the disgrace that is the aints defense. This a get right game for what should be a well rested Seattle offense..
How talented is Seattle really though? And why is it "most likely" that none of the other 7 were as talented as Seattle, especially if you're talking about their offense? This isn't some great offense that we're talking about, so it seems odd to assume none of the other 7 teams were as talented as this group. Their defense we know is fantastic, but their offense is nowhere near as talented as their defense. Without Lynch, this team is pedestrian on offense, and without that running game they can count on every game we're all seeing Russ as not much more than an above average game manager, which many people have been saying all along.
Just because they didn't play well vs. Ari also doesn't mean they're "well rested." They played the game, so they certainly aren't rested simply because they didn't move the ball. Just playing devil's advocate, but it certainly does sound like you're trying to convince yourself that Seattle should be a play this week in the face of what we've seen of them thus far this season. They've beaten the Dolphins, 49ers, Jets, and Falcons. They scored 37 pts vs the Niners, which doesn't mean much when TB just lit them up (and most other teams that have faced them), but scored 12 in the Miami win, 27 in the Jets win (again, most teams have lit up the Jets this season), and 26 in the Falcons win (another pretty weak defense). In their loss they scored 3 points, and then just scored 6 this past week. As you mentioned, they are playing the Saints this week, so they certainly could put up some points, but that would seem to be more on the defense than their offense...at least from what we've seen thus far this season.
I don't disagree w Seattle probably feeling like they came away with a win in Zona....but that D was on the field for 75% of the game. They could not get off the field. It was amazing. No way they can come back from that, and having to go against a good O in NO.
Would expect max effort from Pats this week. They already dropped one to Buff and Rex making those ridiculous comments about someone from NE leaking the starting QB info to him after last game. Couple that with McCoy injury and that spells trouble for the Bills.
How talented is Seattle really though? And why is it "most likely" that none of the other 7 were as talented as Seattle, especially if you're talking about their offense? This isn't some great offense that we're talking about, so it seems odd to assume none of the other 7 teams were as talented as this group. Their defense we know is fantastic, but their offense is nowhere near as talented as their defense. Without Lynch, this team is pedestrian on offense, and without that running game they can count on every game we're all seeing Russ as not much more than an above average game manager, which many people have been saying all along.
Just because they didn't play well vs. Ari also doesn't mean they're "well rested." They played the game, so they certainly aren't rested simply because they didn't move the ball. Just playing devil's advocate, but it certainly does sound like you're trying to convince yourself that Seattle should be a play this week in the face of what we've seen of them thus far this season. They've beaten the Dolphins, 49ers, Jets, and Falcons. They scored 37 pts vs the Niners, which doesn't mean much when TB just lit them up (and most other teams that have faced them), but scored 12 in the Miami win, 27 in the Jets win (again, most teams have lit up the Jets this season), and 26 in the Falcons win (another pretty weak defense). In their loss they scored 3 points, and then just scored 6 this past week. As you mentioned, they are playing the Saints this week, so they certainly could put up some points, but that would seem to be more on the defense than their offense...at least from what we've seen thus far this season.
Hags' O-line is 5 fat guys plucked from the queue at Arby's.
The well rested thing was just because they barely ever had the ball against Zona. Wasn't serious.. it's 7 teams over how many years?. I have no clue how talented any of them
were I just have a hard time buying it means a whole lot that 7 teams after a tie get destroyed means the hapless saints will win this game..
I don't think lynch all that much better than Michael, the oline more the problem than rb imo and don't see that mattering vs saints. Wilson been banged up and they played lots of good defenses early on, time will tell but he damn sure didn't look like a game manager when he was slicing and dicing league 2nd half of last year. Now graham finalky becoming part of offense, just a matter of time till locket starts stretching field as he gets healthy. Ultimately I think the same I thought bout this team coming into year and that is the potential the passing offense and Wilson started to show last season will continue to evolve into a potent more passing base attack. Poor oline, mix of injuries, and circumstance may have slowed them early on but I still believe it coming and I doubt yesterday's tie game going to influence them more than playing a pushover on a fast track.. don't really gotta convince myself it almost always fade aints or pass, thinking the tie just gave me a better line to do so.
Agreed. If that's what THE issue is with their offense, then that's what it is. But their offense isn't anywhere near what the insinuation was, and it isn't going to change unless they get a new OL regardless of how talented anyone thinks they are. Russ is a great game manager though.
Issue with the offense is that O-line and Russell's inability to move due to that nagging ankle injury.
If Russ was healthy that offense would improve dramatically.
Stopping the other team wins football games, doesn't matter how 'rested' your offense is.
Again, I don't disagree. The fact they weren't on the field much this past week and "well rested" isn't going to be the reason for some offensive breakout was the only point. He said he thought he may be trying to talk himself into a play, and it certainly seems that he was (as 3 people have told him as much).
Would expect max effort from Pats this week. They already dropped one to Buff and Rex making those ridiculous comments about someone from NE leaking the starting QB info to him after last game. Couple that with McCoy injury and that spells trouble for the Bills.