Week 8 in the FCS

I chatted with MyBookie on Dll and FCS. I got some receptiveness and understanding on the Dll aspect, the FCS portion may've been unnoticed, so I reiterated in the survey that followed the chat "My Bookie representative was very receptive to my suggestions and understood my position - which I think can make your company better as well as the user experience - expanding the availability of Dll college football games and releasing FCS college football games sooner than Saturday morning. There is opportunity for growth in these areas. Thank you"
 
He also said he knows that those Dll games going up and coming down quick "can be a bit annoying". He blamed it on "site updates" that occur and to message back the moment they are taken down, implying maybe they can do something about it? I wasn't sure there. He said "so that we can check the moment this happens"
 
I play alt lines at MB, but sometimes, you might've noticed it isn't always what you want. It might be Merrimack +30.5 instead of Harvard -27.5...as in they usually offer an alt for the dog and the fav, but sometimes only one. I would say, given the choice, I do like picking my own buy .5, 1 or 1.5 which I usually do at Bovada, but sometimes do at BM. Lately I have really only been playing teasers at BM and a couple stray games here or there.
Appreciate the info man thank you! Bovada cut me off early and I never looked back as them and DK and heritage didn’t want my business so I moved on from those guys and a few others after that season.
 
Appreciate the info man thank you! Bovada cut me off early and I never looked back as them and DK and heritage didn’t want my business so I moved on from those guys and a few others after that season.

It's a shame that happens. Businesses exist to provide a product or service and most of the time make a profit as a return on investment for the owner(s), compensate their employees, pay overhead and hopefully expand to continue offering more and better products and services. There is some naivety on my part, this is just a hobby for me, one I care a lot a lot about and I know there are pros out there and in this world everyone is trying to get over on everyone else. And certainly shady shit happens in this realm and it kind of pits one side vs the other. My local became a friend of mine, not close friends, but we used to relish in the possibility of getting all the money we could from him, cash in that 401k if you don't have the money. Now it's like 'how's the family' 'what's going on with your retirement plan' - he's just a middle man providing a service. Sometimes house wins sometimes we win. Just hate knowing some of us have been cut off simply because we were good at something they were making available for people to try their expertise at. Bunch of nothing right there. Ain't how shit works, just rambling. Been a long day. Time to get back to games.
 
Western Carolina at The Citadel could be tricky and this is a big line considering the WCU D – a D which was very good last week vs Furman, gave up yards, but not scores. Definitely atypical, WCU D has given up 12.9 yards per point in all their other games this year, FurmanO vs everyone else, 12.4…Furman vs WCU last week? 50.9! That ain’t happening again! Last year they gave up yards vs the Citadel, in fact, it was Citadel’s most yardage output of the year! 429 ttl yards (5.6) and 16 pts was about their average vs FCS. And it was just 1 of 2 games that Citadel outgained an opponent (+33 yards). Problem being only 1 TD on 4 RZ trips wasn’t enough. WCU led by 14-17 pts throughout the game and won 30-16. It was also one of the lower offensive output and scoring games by the WCU O (avg 38.7 vs other 7 SoCon opponents, just 30 on Citadel). So mathcup wise, Citadel might have something here. Always tough to back the Bulldogs because of their O. It has gotten better, key being, they must be able to run. And run they did on Valdosta (Dll whatever I guess), but also 2 games ago UTC also kind whatever maybe, but we only have so many teams to compare eachother to. How much better is the WCU D than UTC? Any? Worse? Citadel ran for 336 (5.8) on the Mocs en-route to a 28-10 win and Citadel D been good enough vs teams like that. WCU O not a 'team like that’ they dangerous and high flying, but if they don’t have the ball or if they are forced to dink and dunk (like vs Wofford), maybe can see a way The Citadel hangs in here. WCU is just 2-4 ATS last 2 years as DD fav.
 
I either missed or forget what Tennessee Tech opened up at? See 26.5 now. High. 10.5/8.9/16.5 are the PR lines I post here. S&P says 36-17.4. So definitely a premium here on the road vs a Lindenwood team that has pulled some upsets..SB and UTM as 'upsets' but technically. So they showed they can compete when maybe they weren't expected to so well. TTU 2 'off' games among their last 3 when their O only put up 384 (7.0) on TSU in the 35-8 win and only gained 397 (5.7) at CSU last week winning just 27-13. Some variables not normally in play happened last week, so maybe just throw that out (weather, 2 INTs + 1 fumble lost). As their O goes, so goes the total. This would be the best team that TTU has played to date right? On the road? I don't see how those pts can be laid. Not saying they can't cover, they certainly can, but is it a worthy risk to get involved needing them to? LW D is not going to matchup well vs them you wouldn't figure. But do I want them vs the potential of TTU? It's not for me.
 
I either missed or forget what Tennessee Tech opened up at? See 26.5 now. High. 10.5/8.9/16.5 are the PR lines I post here. S&P says 36-17.4. So definitely a premium here on the road vs a Lindenwood team that has pulled some upsets..SB and UTM as 'upsets' but technically. So they showed they can compete when maybe they weren't expected to so well. TTU 2 'off' games among their last 3 when their O only put up 384 (7.0) on TSU in the 35-8 win and only gained 397 (5.7) at CSU last week winning just 27-13. Some variables not normally in play happened last week, so maybe just throw that out (weather, 2 INTs + 1 fumble lost). As their O goes, so goes the total. This would be the best team that TTU has played to date right? On the road? I don't see how those pts can be laid. Not saying they can't cover, they certainly can, but is it a worthy risk to get involved needing them to? LW D is not going to matchup well vs them you wouldn't figure. But do I want them vs the potential of TTU? It's not for me.
Lindenwood is on my watch list Saturday as I saw 24.5 and then 26.5 and might be interested if it hits 28.5.
 
Holy Cross at Richmond. An always bad offense vs a sometimes/usually bad offense! We used to think Holy Cross had a good D, until they didn't. Not good when other teams have their best days vs you. HC D vs Yale, Yale had best ypp on the year (5.2), best completion % (72), only game they were 100% RZ TDs (3-for-3). URI has gained 400+ yards on 3 of 7 teams this year, HC is one of them. Fordham's high water mark for ttl offense yards - 422 on HC D and by far their best ypp 7.8 compared to 4.77 vs every other FCS opponent - Fordham ran for 168 (5.1) on HC D...they avg just 2.35ypc vs every other FCS D they played! And last but not least, Harvard 59 pts ... as many as they scored on Stetson! So HC D good? Myth. They did have some moments weeks 1 & 2 vs NIU and UNH, kept URI out of the EZ, but there is a lot of bad on this D as well. And the HC O, it is plenty bad as well - don't need to dig into any numbers to prove that, we've seen it play out each and every week. Can a bye week help that? They get a new QB during the bye, or some new offensive coaches, maybe some better run blocking OL? No.

Richmond has their own issues...like 152 ttl yards home vs Howard! Like losing to Bucknell! Like failing to break 100y rushing last week vs Colgate. Man, this is a rough game here to have to pick a side. Wickersham is back at QB for Spiders so there goes the passing game. Snelsire is out with a knee issue.

Under is the knee jerk, but not liking an Und 44.5. Teams combined 9-4 to the Under. Pass
 
I either missed or forget what Tennessee Tech opened up at? See 26.5 now. High. 10.5/8.9/16.5 are the PR lines I post here. S&P says 36-17.4. So definitely a premium here on the road vs a Lindenwood team that has pulled some upsets..SB and UTM as 'upsets' but technically. So they showed they can compete when maybe they weren't expected to so well. TTU 2 'off' games among their last 3 when their O only put up 384 (7.0) on TSU in the 35-8 win and only gained 397 (5.7) at CSU last week winning just 27-13. Some variables not normally in play happened last week, so maybe just throw that out (weather, 2 INTs + 1 fumble lost). As their O goes, so goes the total. This would be the best team that TTU has played to date right? On the road? I don't see how those pts can be laid. Not saying they can't cover, they certainly can, but is it a worthy risk to get involved needing them to? LW D is not going to matchup well vs them you wouldn't figure. But do I want them vs the potential of TTU? It's not for me.

Took Charleston Southern last week in the rain and wind

Looks like a wet day again this Saturday

1760657336815.png
 
So Marist is a DD road fav! Wow. Marist has won by DD twice this year, home vs New Haven week 1 (were outgained by 92y +3 TOs) and at Wagner week 3 (were outgained by 26y were +4 TOs and had KO ret TD all to win 21-10). They won by DD but were dogs in both! Each week as a Stetson beats a new team they fall to the bottom in the nation, so tag Morehead now your're it! Morehead did cover +9.5 home vs Dayton. Maybe shouldn't have, but is Marist on par with Dayton? Not sure yet. I would have to think this game is close than 10 if a normal game between these two is what they play. Marist has needed turnover help to get their DD wins, a combined +7 in those games. Seems like this game would be competitve, who the hell is Marist to lay 10.5 on the road?
 
Took Charleston Southern last week in the rain and wind

Looks like a wet day again this Saturday

Under 58.5? TTU ran more than normal last week and CSU handled that generally well. Visperas did not like the rain it seems. They will have that experience to lean on now in building a game plan having gone through it knowing what they liked and didn't like playing in weather. Nobody has ran with success on TTU, but LW is going to try. Were 68.5% run vs UTM, were 58% run vs SB.
 
Dog has covered the last 3 and won 2 of 3 outright last 3 weeks in Grambling games. Grambling +3 beat ETSU despite trailing by 14 twice and Grambling led for first time with 2min left. Grambling -3 lost vs PV 28-13 (Grambling never led). Grambling -3.5 lost vs Tx Southern with a -3 TO ratio and they fumbled at the T04 after an 85y drive 5min left in the game and never saw ball again. Arkansas PB is really bad. Bad Alcorn put up 479y (7.0) - they avg just 308y in their other 3 FCS games. PB beat Alcorn however. Tx Southern put up 557y and 51 pts on PB... TSU avg just 270ypg and 18ppg in their other 4 FCS games! This is a rough game and Grambling -7.5 does feel pretty rich, but this PB D figures to be giving it up if Grambling O can exploit it and Grambling D isn't all bad.
 
Surprised by the UND -6.5 spot at SIU. But I'm not persuaded to take SIU, or am I? A lot of respect for UND game that got away from them at Kansas State. They wish they had a few plays and situations back in Missoula because they were very close to beating the Griz. I would call the last 2 weeks dominant wins at UNI and vs YSU, but certainly very much in control even though yardage vs YSU was even the flow of the game was not even. A pretty balanced team offensively and defensively. Good enough to be nearly TD road fav? I don't really want to doubt them, but just surprised. SIU was a lot of people's darlings and I don't think those people actually thought they would beat NDSU, many figured a better game would've been in order as SIU O figured to do some things...and they kind of did, but they finished a couple key drives with fumbles instead of points and once Bison got rolling they could not be stopped. SIU D played well in the 1H and just 10-10 late 2Q with SIU ball at N18 when QB fumbled and NDSU scored before the half, and then coming out of the break SIU fum first possession of the 2H at the N28 and Bison scored 35 straight from there. 2 weeks ago, hard to imagine UND would be nearly TD fav here. Actually...S&P based on week 7 PR SIU would've been -1.9 home fav, but now UND is -2.1 on the road, which isn't a huge swing...it's not -6.5. I don't know, this Fan Duel line is higher than all the PR numbers. SIU D isn't the best, but not sure UND is a terrible matchup for them. Think I have to take some SIU just on this home dog line for them. If we flipped this line to SIU at UND...just using generic 3 pts for homefield/neutral/homefield, would mean the PR for this spread thinks UND would be -12.5 home vs SIU? Something is off here.
 
Don't believe I have any feel for Eastern Illinois or SEMO right now. EIU has 2 QBs that one week it's LaCrue as the guy and the next week it;s Wolfe. SEMO is on QB #3 and I am not sure what they bring to the table right now either.

Sacred Heart is tough, but Montana figures to be an incredibly tough matchup for them and this line is high and feel like it should be. SHU has won 4 of the last 5 games, all as dogs and the one loss was in OT. But the opponents have been, Howard, CCSU, DSU, Norfolk and LIU. CCSU and DSU deserve some respect, but these are not teams anywhere close to what Montana is going to be. And factor in that SHU has been outgained in 3 of those last 5, not like they have just dominant, well maybe they were in the 2H vs HU. CCSU went for 509y on them, DSU ran for 253 (7.4) on them, Norfolk 550y! I mean this D figures to be in deep trouble. Montana a little inconsistent. They were shutout 1H last week, crazy. Same thing happened last year at Portland State. That's really not acceptable out of a top flight team with plenty of weapons on O. Montana has trailed at HT 3 of the last 5. Can't imagine that happening and after last week, it should've been a spirited week of practice I would think. SHU wasn't this good last year, was thinking maybe their trip to Delaware last season is the closest they've come to playing a team of this caliber...Delaware won 49-0. See the line has dropped has it as people are buying some Pios on the spread, was it 28.5 down to 26.5? Keep dropping. I guess you could say because Griz have played B games vs Cal Poly and Idaho State? I don't know, if SHU covers it is going to be close to the number I would guess. Montana probably wins with some cushion unless SHU can just bleed clock and keep Griz O on the sideline must of the game.
 
Hard Rock has their FCS up. No totals, just sides and ML. Spreads are all within a point of Fan Duel. I have just a small balance there, but I can put a few hundred on anything without being restricted. I have no history there so don't know how they operate, but another early outlet with FCS has to be a good thing
 
One of the keys to the Wolves’ offense paving the way will be the status of normal starting quarterback Davin Wydner, and as of Monday, Coach Taylor was still unsure if he will be able to play this weekend.

“It’s still early,” Taylor said. “We’ll see. He’ll get out there and throw today, and hopefully he’ll be fine, but if he’s not, we’ll go with Colton (Fitzgerald). I thought Colton had a pretty good game last week — didn’t turn the ball over and gave us some opportunities.”
 
Hard Rock has their FCS up. No totals, just sides and ML. Spreads are all within a point of Fan Duel. I have just a small balance there, but I can put a few hundred on anything without being restricted. I have no history there so don't know how they operate, but another early outlet with FCS has to be a good thing
Unfortunately for us here in NC, Hard Rock didn’t get approved for a license so I’m limited on options
 
Just did a comparison of BM vs MB in terms of FBS and in every instance I checked, BM is 4-6 cents cheaper on alt lines than MB. Given this, until MB starts coming out significantly earlier than BM on FCS openers, doesn't make sense for me to move off of BM at this time.
 
Will be up late tonight watching my Heels play Cal in a west coast special kickoff off at 10:30pm and not wrapping until around 2am. Gonna set my alarm so I don't oversleep on Saturday. Will work to hit the BM FCS openers on Saturday, as they seem to come out between 10-11:30am most weeks.
 
I did talk to BM about D2 lines and how MB offers them, and BM said they have no plans to ever offer lines on those games.
 
Interesting that Harvard line dropped to 27.5. Maybe it is the fact people see Merrimack playing in sometimes close and always low scoring games. Maybe it is the fact that Harvard disappointed last game and people are gun shy to lay these kind of pts. Maybe it is the proximity of the two schools leading to potentially a competitive game such as it was in 2022 when Harvard was -28.5 hosting Merrimack and the game went to OT! Merrimack was transitioning from Dll back then, but they were actually a pretty good team at that time.

I care less about those aspects. I see a Merrimack O that really struggles to score as I touched on in post #35. I think I mentioned the Merrimack - Stony Brook game in that post and I think that could be a good comparision. SB only won 35-10 and while a score like that is possible here (which would mean no cover for Crimson), I think that if Harvard spent the week focusing on how to finish their drives they will do better than Stony Brook did. SB gained 438y (6.5) and were in scoring position on their first 6 of 7 possessions of the game. That drives netted just 27 pts as SB had a drive stall at the M21 (FG) and the M26 (SOD 4th-1) and M22 FG. This could be a concern given what Harvard went through vs Cornell last week when they had 3 empty drives into scoring position and then settled for 2 RZ FGs. If Harvard is anything close to the team that we, or anyone, believes they are and can be, this had to be a highly motivated week of practice and I would expect their best this week. And finishing will be key as well, something Harvard's D did do last week (Cornell gained only 11y on last 4 possessions). Merrimack got 42% of their total yards on their final 2 drives in that SB game. Again, I think Harvard can be counted on to finish strong.
 
Last edited:
Urena is expected back for Mercyhurst. Big line drop so that news must've filtered out earlier
 
Just scrolling back through the games I already considered to see if anything else is interesting.

Feel ok about the pass on Drake. Remember it opened 31.5, dropped 30.5 and now up to 33.5. Just a huge line for them...were only -24.5 hosting Valpo. It's not a blow you away type offense. A team with a sieve for a D can make it so...just I don't know, Valpo's D didn't. In the end, Drake won that 41-0 which is a big enough win and that can certainly happen here. Just the spread to have to clear makes it harder to justify.
 
Interesting that Harvard line dropped to 27.5. Maybe it is the fact people see Merrimack playing in sometimes close and always low scoring games. Maybe it is the fact that Harvard disappointed last game and people are gun shy to lay these kind of pts. Maybe it is the proximity of the two schools leading to potentially a competitive game such as it was in 2022 when Harvard was -28.5 hosting Merrimack and the game went to OT! Merrimack was transitioning from Dll back then, but they were actually a pretty good team at that time.

I care less about those aspects. I see a Merrimack O that really struggles to score as I touched on in post #35. I think I mentioned the Merrimack - Stony Brook game in that post and I think that could be a good comparision. SB only won 35-10 and while a score like that is possible here (which would mean no cover for Crimson), I think that if Harvard spent the week focusing on how to finish their drives they will do better than Stony Brook did. SB gained 438y (6.5) and were in scoring position on their first 6 of 7 possessions of the game. That drives netted just 27 pts as SB had a drive stall at the M21 (FG) and the M26 (SOD 4th-1) and M22 FG. This could be a concern given what Harvard went through vs Cornell last week when they had 3 empty drives into scoring position and then settled for 2 RZ FGs. If Harvard is anything close to the team that we, or anyone, believes they are and can be, this had to be a highly motivated week of practice and I would expect their best this week. And finishing will be key as well, something Harvard's D did do last week (Cornell gained only 11y on last 4 possessions). Merrimack got 42% of their total yards on their final 2 drives in that SB game. Again, I think Harvard can be counted on to finish strong.
If the 27.5 is there in the am I will probably be on it at BM
 
William & Mary off bye. I don't know what to make of them. I don't think they are really that good, and frankly when they had all their star players the last couple years, they proved not to be very good then either. NC A&T was up on them 24-14 at HT last game! Wow. WM never led that game until 2min left in the 3Q...vs A&T! I did play W&M at the open +8.5 and 7.5 at Nova and was fortunate to get the open as Tribe lost by 7. Nova missed a 36y FG in the final minute that would've extended it to 10. Nova ran well on them (232 6.4) and were very productive with their O (just 2 punts). W&M O just 4.7 ypp. CSU has been a tough out at times this year, but W&M handled them with ease. Throw out the UVA game...getting kind of far away from current now, but Maine was the superior team vs them. W&M took their first and only lead of the game with 3min left! It's really hard to feel great about anything W&M has put out there this year.

Elon on the other hand, Elon has some impressive games I think. Interesting enough, Villanova returned a KO for the lead vs both W&M and vs Elon. But while I think that Nova could've or should've won by a little more vs W&M, Elon could've (won't say should've) tied the game late had they scored (INT's from the V16) and gone for 2 in the final seconds of that one. Elon led 14-3 HT and handled the Nova rush O much better, and Nova QB McQuaide was sharper, actually was McQuaide's best game, not by yardage, but his most efficient game which might've been the result of how the Elon D played the run leaving themselves vulnerable to the pass. McQuaide is an experienced guy and has been better than everyone expected after transferring into Villanova, so credit to him and them. But I don't think that W&M passing game has that ability. Hughes hasn't thrown an INT since week 1, but he also has completed just 50% passes the last 2 weeks. I see Elon O have more balance and like Clark's arm better for Elon in terms of creating plays downfield and the D should matchup well.

Second year in a row Elon has to travel to W&M and Elon beat them 40-36 as 7.5pt dogs last year. Don't necessarily like that since W&M has had 2 weeks to get ready for the revenge game. Elon outgained them 493-405 (6.8-6.1) and they scored the winning TD with :05 left. A lot different for both teams this year though.

I thought Elon was shaping up like a potential playoff team and never considered W&M in that conversation. So maybe that creates my initial lean of Elon in this one. I would like them a little more if they were at home, but they have won 2 on the road this year with a strong D showing at Towson (allowed just 3 pts) and at Western Carolina (without Dickens). ETSU did beat them soundly. Think I would rate ETSU over W&M. Elon 2.5 road fav...big adjustment from the W&M 7.5 pt fav of last year. Elon would be my pick, not sure I like the spread or value aspect of it.
 
New Hampshire as a road favorite isn't very appealing. They did play good game at URI last week. Had several leads throughout the game until URI took the 31-27 lead with 2:12 left. From there UNH was driving on short passes when Vezza was sacked/fumbled and URI scoop-scored for the 11 pt win. The UNH O was still a little limited, as tehy have been all year. Just 320y (4.7) and only had 2 drives over 50y all game. 3rd down wasn't great, as it hasn't been great vs other opponents this year too. Not a team you feel good laying points with. Campbell O, they have kind of come around. 301y rushing with 426 (6.5) total yards and 38 pts vs a weak Hampton team and their D played well, but that was only Hampton. Chandler attempted his most passes of the season (12) I believe as previously it was Sixkiller as the primary thrower (only 6 att vs Hampton). Then two FCS games before that, O showed some ability again. Now, WCU was up on them 28-3 and 35-10 before Campbell started coming back on them so Campbell gained 186 of their 437y on the last 4 drives where they scored 17pts to make that final 42-35. But UNH O is not WCU. Campbell put up 557y (6.1) and 35 pts in regulation in their OT win vs Bryant. Lots of big plays by both teams in that one.

So....I'm not sure why I'd want to lay pts on the road with UNH. WCU was only -6.5 at Campbell. And UNH would say plays better D, but obviously WCU is much better on O (Dickens pass 4 TDs vs Campbell). Maybe the Campbell D makes UNH O look better than it is (WCU won by 7). Furman was -3 at Campbell. Not sure UNH is any better than Furman. (Furman won by 4).

Think I want to take the 7.5 here. Can see this being a one score game. Chandler as the QB I think works better for their O rather than having him line up here or there with Sixkiller at QB. Sixkiller wasn't that good at McNeese, they should've just built an O around Chandler really. Sixkiller was hurt 1H last week, so that might be what they are doing now after seeing how it can be. I don't think that super WR King has played since week 4 (8rec-142y-4TD last game played), don't like his absence. Might want to find out what is going on there. Feel better if he is playing, but wouldn't stay away without him (not listed on current depth chart for this game). In this day and age I would hope that he didn't opt out after week 4 and intends to RS and transfer or something.
 
Post #105 has anything I came up with on that game and I ended up taking Citadel +15.5. I would hope it is not Over because that is likely bad for The Citadel.
Just read it good stuff thanks! Wife all good after the knee surgery?
 
Just read it good stuff thanks! Wife all good after the knee surgery?

Yes thank you. It went well and she’s better than expected today so all good. I told her I won’t be much help to her tomorrow between 12:00 and about midnight though!
 
Yes thank you. It went well and she’s better than expected today so all good. I told her I won’t be much help to her tomorrow between 12:00 and about midnight though!
Great to hear man! We have a couples massage followed by dinner scheduled for date night tomorrow starting at 5 so will be around for the noon games and the late stuff, but will miss all the 330-730 action.
 
Line moves just since when I left the house a few hours ago to now!

WCU/Citadel down to 11.5 from 15.5/14.5
- Hard Rock has 11.5

TennTech/Lindenwood down to 21.5 from 26.5
- Hard Rock has 23.5

New Hampshire/Campbell down to 3.5 from 7.5
- Hard Rock off the board

Charleston Southern/Western Illinois was the recent line 3.5? down to 1.5
- Hard Rock 1.5

CCSU/Wagner dropped below 14
- Hard Rock 13.5

East Texas A&M/UIW dropped below 20
- Hard Rock doesn't offer this game

Northern Colorado/Sac State up to 13.5, honestly forget what it was earlier...12.5?
- Hard Rock is 13.5
 
Great to hear man! We have a couples massage followed by dinner scheduled for date night tomorrow starting at 5 so will be around for the noon games and the late stuff, but will miss all the 330-730 action.

You are a good husband! I prioritize football too much, but have a supportive marriage and understanding family LOL! I am looking forward to tomorrow of a full day of being home without having to leave, which is almost always the way it is, but the last 2 weeks haven't been.
 
Line moves just since when I left the house a few hours ago to now!

WCU/Citadel down to 11.5 from 15.5/14.5
- Hard Rock has 11.5

TennTech/Lindenwood down to 21.5 from 26.5
- Hard Rock has 23.5

New Hampshire/Campbell down to 3.5 from 7.5
- Hard Rock off the board

Charleston Southern/Western Illinois was the recent line 3.5? down to 1.5
- Hard Rock 1.5

CCSU/Wagner dropped below 14
- Hard Rock 13.5

East Texas A&M/UIW dropped below 20
- Hard Rock doesn't offer this game

Northern Colorado/Sac State up to 13.5, honestly forget what it was earlier...12.5?
- Hard Rock is 13.5
Sac State went from 10.5 (what I got) to 13.5
 
You are a good husband! I prioritize football too much, but have a supportive marriage and understanding family LOL! I am looking forward to tomorrow of a full day of being home without having to leave, which is almost always the way it is, but the last 2 weeks haven't been.
I have to fly to Maine on business Monday morning and will be gone for three days. We had a heart to heart about a week ago in terms of prioritization of date night once a month so I picked couples massage (hey not many opportunities to get a full body at an Asian spa (she says the non Asian ones are too expensive so who am I to argue!) without getting heat from the wife!) and dinner this Saturday (knowing my boys play tonight).

She will be in bed tonight by the time my Heels kick off at 1030pm so I get that game and all the noon games in peace so can’t complain haha
 
You are a good husband! I prioritize football too much, but have a supportive marriage and understanding family LOL! I am looking forward to tomorrow of a full day of being home without having to leave, which is almost always the way it is, but the last 2 weeks haven't been.

I’m at Grand Falls casino tonight which has an Elite Sportsbook. Typically they suck with late lines, no props, no diravatives. I jumped on their kiosk and they had all of the early and mid afternoon FCS games available for betting. Don’t know if you have Elite available where you are at but they are all over Iowa.
 
South Dakota / UNI took another hit, down to 10.5 from 14.5 pt open and sat at 12.5 for about the last 36 hours.

Surprised the Under hasn't moved much yet, I took some 49.5, only down to 48.5. I'm on UNI and the rather obvious concern is the kind of production they generate on O...coupled with their D not allowing a ton and USD's offensive struggles vs average-to-good teams, think that all equals a lower scoring game.
 
I’m at Grand Falls casino tonight which has an Elite Sportsbook. Typically they suck with late lines, no props, no diravatives. I jumped on their kiosk and they had all of the early and mid afternoon FCS games available for betting. Don’t know if you have Elite available where you are at but they are all over Iowa.

Elite! nice. I will look into that. Is is a better drive for you?
 
I’m at Grand Falls casino tonight which has an Elite Sportsbook. Typically they suck with late lines, no props, no diravatives. I jumped on their kiosk and they had all of the early and mid afternoon FCS games available for betting. Don’t know if you have Elite available where you are at but they are all over Iowa.
Man I am so deprived here in NC as you guys have so many options!
 
Looks like Elite is only in Colorado and Iowa according to their App
 
SEMO
Cape Girardeau MO Hourly Weather Forecast Saturday 10-18-25.png

SIU

Carbondale IL Hourly Weather Forecast Saturday 10-18-25.png

Murray State

Murray KY Hourly Weather Forecast Saturday 10-18-25 time change.png

Illinois State

Normal IL Hourly Weather Forecast Saturday 10-18-25.png

Ark Pine Bluff

Pine Bluff AR Hourly Weather Forecast Saturday 10-18-25.png

Lindenwood

St. Charles MO Hourly Weather Forecast  Saturday 10-18-25.png

Precip in blue, cloud cover % and humidity % in gray
 
Last edited:
1760783241905.png

1760783273566.png

1760783308698.png

1760783344960.png


I don’t have time to look at them yet
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3699.jpeg
    IMG_3699.jpeg
    254.9 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_3700.jpeg
    IMG_3700.jpeg
    297 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_3701.jpeg
    IMG_3701.jpeg
    303.9 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_3702.jpeg
    IMG_3702.jpeg
    46.3 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Wheeling at West Virginia State seems interesting. 3-3 vs 4-2. S&P has WVSU 33.6-25.8 and REddit WVSU-6. Massey is the one that has it closer -2.5 which reflects the -117 ML. So seems like WVSU is cheap compared to the other two PRs. Wheeling has won the last 2 though. 2 and by 7. Hmmm
 
Back
Top