Week 8 in the FCS

Villanova pretty hot right now. Beat a pretty good Elon team on the road where they had to come back from 11 down early, which they did, then overcome a 4Q Elon 1 pt lead (which they did KO ret TD) and got the game sealing INT in the EZ on the game's final play. Run D has been good since the Monmouth game. Vs W&M, UNH and Elon have not allowed more than 3.8ypc in any of those. Monmouth did run on them well, but Monmout O is a different animal. Nova O can be balanced to run for 250 or pass for 300. They are playing their best football of the season right now.

Hampton was riding high for a week after they beat Norfolk, which everyone is doing. Campbell of all teams came into their house and won 38-21 with a 426-207 yard edge (6.5-3.7)! 21 pts is the only time Hampton has scored more than 20 in regulation vs any FCS this year! And their D sucks...man everyone not named A&T gashes them for 6-7 ypp, everyone! Even Norfolk got them for 415 (6.8)! Hampton is a bad team. They were not bad last year, they were actually sneaky good. That sneaky good Hampton team led Nova 7-0, 7-3, but Nova got up on them 20-7 before winning just 20-14 as 10.5 pt road favs. Hampton just lost so much off that team they are a shell of their former self. And really, Nova O last year wasn't good. It is operating much better right now. Will be a big number I'm sure, probably paying a premium on some of the publicity Villanova has on their 3 game win streak, but laying it is the only thing that makes sense right now. Will see what oddsmakers give us.
 
s--k said:
Villanova pretty hot right now. Beat a pretty good Elon team on the road where they had to come back from 11 down early, which they did, then overcome a 4Q Elon 1 pt lead (which they did KO ret TD) and got the game sealing INT in the EZ on the game's final play. Run D has been good since the Monmouth game. Vs W&M, UNH and Elon have not allowed more than 3.8ypc in any of those. Monmouth did run on them well, but Monmout O is a different animal. Nova O can be balanced to run for 250 or pass for 300. They are playing their best football of the season right now.

Hampton was riding high for a week after they beat Norfolk, which everyone is doing. Campbell of all teams came into their house and won 38-21 with a 426-207 yard edge (6.5-3.7)! 21 pts is the only time Hampton has scored more than 20 in regulation vs any FCS this year! And their D sucks...man everyone not named A&T gashes them for 6-7 ypp, everyone! Even Norfolk got them for 415 (6.8)! Hampton is a bad team. They were not bad last year, they were actually sneaky good. That sneaky good Hampton team led Nova 7-0, 7-3, but Nova got up on them 20-7 before winning just 20-14 as 10.5 pt road favs. Hampton just lost so much off that team they are a shell of their former self. And really, Nova O last year wasn't good. It is operating much better right now. Will be a big number I'm sure, probably paying a premium on some of the publicity Villanova has on their 3 game win streak, but laying it is the only thing that makes sense right now. Will see what oddsmakers give us.
Click to expand...
Lost both Elon and Norfolk last week but willing to lay up to 21 with nova but think it will be 24.5
 
So last week I said that Towson was one of the teams that held Monmouth in check last year and I wondered if they could duplicate that gameplan even though they lost most of the players from that D. The answer, no they could not. Although as I said earlier, Towson O did have their best game of the year providing further evidence just how bad this Monmouth D continues to be.

Stony Brook D had no chance vs Monmouth last year! No sir, SB allowed 55 pts and 690y (9.3ypp)! Damn....but SB only lost by 8!

At this point I don't think anyone can confidently say that Monmouth O will be slowed or stopped. They can run for 250 or throw for 400. Robertson can complete passes in his sleep I feel that is how comfortable he is in this offense.

The Monmouth D is so bad you think that gives you a chance on the dog, and it does if the line is big enough and the dog is good enough - look what Delaware State did! But we had the insurance of a 3 TD spread to fall back on (even though they didn't need it all and only lost by 11).

SB off a bye, exploded for 47pts and 473y (5.9) before that vs Albany and 35 pts with 438y (6.5) vs Merrimack the week prior. SB will score, but must assume Monmouth will too. 6.5/7.5 is not enough to take dog. They have been opening totals higher, hard to bite at 70+ on open. Forget what open might've been, I could look, but closed at 79.5 and they only hit 73. Towson turnovers and missed FG hurt. Before that: combined final scores: 87, 84, 77, 77, 81.
 
sleepy said:
Pretty sure Lamar should be favored over Rio Grande
Click to expand...

You know...that is a very interesting game. I do think they should and will be favored. Sagarin has Lamar 9.5, but Massey has small RG-2.5 and Reddit is the one with RG -6.5. I don't know if it will be right or not, but I think I want Rio Grande in this game plus some pts like they were at SLU. Call me unimpressed with Lamar. That O, vs FCS only avg 303 ypg! D is solid, but they allow 326, so being outgained on the year. I don't know. Lamar is ugly. And I guess somebody could say 'but they win', yeah they have won ugly. Mabye UTRGV D will make them look good. Texas Southern D really didn't. Lamar only gained 333 (5.2) on them. They did rush for 252 (6.0). But they had 18y fum ret TD and a punt ret TD in that one that helped boost their pt total to 31. That's what they do. It's a 3 phase game. Punt returns set them up on short fields for 2 TDs vs UCA (had 3 drives under 50y for TDs in that one). Had punt ret TD vs Nicholls. Had 2 fum ret TDs last week. How many times can they do it?!

I came away impressed with what RG was able to do on O vs SLU, and a lot of it was after they trailed by 21 and 25, but they kept cutting into it.

Admit that I might have some prejudice against Lamar and that could be clouding my vision here. I saw a poll had them ranked 13th, in the country! Jesus christ! They are solid team. I might call them a good team if you get me around some beers. But man, 13th!
 
North Dakota State at Indiana State. Has to be Bison or nothing as they say. Don't know who Indiana State will roll out at QB, but NDSU just got done dealing with DJ Williams, don;'t think anything the trees have will result in much of anything. Indiana State was outgained 210-376 (5.0-4.9) last week, what saved them was USD RZ inefficienty (1 TD 5 trips), bad 3rd down O by USD and some penalties that took good plays away and got them behind the sticks and, this is probably more of a USD issue than it is an Indiana State asset, but Ind St straight up harrassed Bouman and were in the backfield a ton (11 TFLs). Indiana State O really was not effective at all vs USD, it's about to get a lot worse this week and any good play the Ind St D had last week is not going to repeat. NDSU likely not pleased with their last performance on the road so I would expect them to want to perform better this time around. Only caution, SDSU trip on deck!
 
Colgate has a 20-1 record vs Georgetown since 2002 and have won 7 straight at Gtown. I feel like my record on-against-over-under in GT games is poor. But fuck it, I'm taking Colgate to win, hoping for a small spread and I will ML them. Like the new coach at 'Gate. He has them playing hard, they are in games they wouldn't have been last year and beating teams worse then them handily. Hate that WR Saunders is injured and I don't know if they will start Stearney or Osborne at QB. And I don't know if GT will have Thomas or Lautner. But it is Colgate for me
 
I wonder if they will make Tenn Tech -31.5

They are starting to play teams with a tiny bit of pulse
 
Feel like finally point spreads might be catching up to what UT Martin is this year, I think. Western Illinois led 31-20 entering 4Q last week. UTM came back on them, W ILL had would-be game winning TD called back by penalty and then had potential game winning FG blk'd. UTM did outgain them 445-403 (6.1-7.9) and ran for 200 (4.5), but W ILL not known for D of course. Two weeks ago UTM was a 2pt road fav at Lindenwood. LW won 30-14 while scoring on all 4 2H posssessions and it took a UTM TD with :15 left for them to lose by 16 instead of 23. So now though, if the spreads have caught up to them, Sagarin says Gardner Webb -12.9 and Reddit -12, has the pendulum swung too far? Two of the last 3 they gained 445 (6.1) and 468 (6.8) with 32 and 41 pts, those games were at home and the game in the middle was the LW game which UTM O was pretty much shut down (298y 4.9ypp 14pts). So then, what can we expect this week? Is it as simple as home/away for this team?

Gardner Webb has been a pretty good offensive team this year. Avg 475ypg vs FCS + Ohio game and if you take out The Citadel game who played them relatively tough that avg increases to 511ypg. They should've scored more pts on their 446y at E ILL last time out, but they fumbled at the E01, E24 and ended the game at the E19. Pretty good run and pass O. The D...not so good vs most teams. Numbers get better if we take out the two FBS games of course, vs FCS they allow 356ypg which is aided by the Eastern Ill game. They yielded 434y (7.6) and 27 pts to CSU and 454y (5.8) and 45 pts to WCU on their #2 and #3 QBs in game 1.

Think this is probably Over if the total is low to mid 50s. GW 4-2 to the Over and UTM is 1-6 to the Under? Wow. But check it out, 63 pts last week, total 64.5. LW game was solid Under. SEMO game (top 2 SEMO QBs hurt) 55 pts, total 56.5. Missouri St 52 pts, 55.5 total. SIU 47 pts on 53.5 total (DJ Williams fumbled going into EZ taking a TD away). UTEP was their Over and Ok St was a solid Under how that game played out. So see ways that UTM games were close to the totals and just stayed under by a pt or 2 here or there. Will be curious what they release here. I could see myself playing UTM or GW at different numbers and looking for an Over.
 
sleepy said:
I wonder if they will make Tenn Tech -31.5

They are starting to play teams with a tiny bit of pulse
Click to expand...

Man that is a tough question and I don't have a guess. All the PR lines are low. I think there is respect for Lindenwood at home, the St Thomas loss aside, beat Stony Brook at home, beat UTM at home...which like I said, it has taken weeks and weeks for the small national media that covers FCS to start realizing that UT Martin isn't going to be good this year. Somehow hung tight on the scoreboard at App St while being grossly outgained. And they had a couple bad outings (comeback win vs CSU was good, but they got in a big hole down there and Mia O handled them). But LW...are they good? I'd say the D is not good, but they shut down a strong Stony Brook run game.

I have been on Tenn Tech each week as well. Not only are they now going to start playing some tougher league competition, but do we worry about any kind of home - road difference for this team? Talking about their only road game to date, was their only non-cover to date. Led 35-0 with the 94y pick-six and another INT set up a 16y TD drive, but what was up with the O in that game? Just lost interest? They scored 45+ vs all the other bad teams....maybe we give them a mulligan for that?

I don't know if I am interested this week. I don't know, maybe I am. They beat them 52-10 last year. Doesn't mean anything obviously because LW beat St Thomas 64-0 last year and lost this year and that was a fluky result for them to lose that one. I was a little nervous about it, but I did bet SB at LW earlier this year. But I did it becasue I liked the line, not necessarily the matchup as much, I got a -118 ML on SB and figured that was good chance to take. It was home night game and I feared the juice and it happened (LW jumped on them and SB O out of synch from the start). No night game here so juice not the same for LW. But price way higher for Tenn Tech. Feel like I am more likely to sit this one out.
 
Might be a QB switch for Samford and it can't come fast enough. Quincy has been the next in line guy, but he has more INTs than TDs this year...and fumbles too, not sure how many. Guy can't have any confidence. They put in Fr last game before the bye Stober vs Mercer. He went 14-22-234-2-1. Not like I know, but I read somewhere that he wasn't just in vs the backups, but Mercer was up 42-7. Think he led them on the mini-comeback to 42-21. Samford had 6 straight 3-out punts to start that game. They had to do something else on O. Coach Hatcher probably out after this year anyway.

Think I might like Samford here assuming a very small line. Massey is 7.5 but everyone else is much lower. Samford has played like shit just about every game. VMI? Oh boy, they have scored more TDs on D the last two games (2) then they have on O (1). VMI O last 3 games avg just 240.3 ypg! They had 13 3-out punts last week! ETSU D was the reason, and Samford is not ETSU D...might worry that VMI probably views this as one of the rare winnable games they can get given how Samford's season has gone and they are at home. So that is a concern here with a bad Samford road favorite bet that even VMI could beat them. VMI played UTC tough last home game, but UTC sucks too...and, vs the last real bad D they played, Bucknell, VMI showed some O in that one. This is really only a play if I can take Samford like -1 where I just ML them and see if the better players can pull one out after the bye. If VMI beat them I would not be surprised though.
 
Think Penn is one of the better Ivy teams. I had Dartmouth against them and I think the way that game went, Dartmouth led 14-3 and then a whole bunch of stuff started going wrong for them. But I respect Penn as a pretty decent team. They don't blow anyone away on O, 463y was the high water mark last Friday vs Marist (only 28 pts), came in avg just 348ypg. It's like a lot of these Ivy teams. I don't get the love for Ivy playoffs getting 2 teams. Like maybe because the Ivy League is the new thing and they have good players that go to the NFL that people are like, hey Ivy league 2 playoff teams maybe? They don't understand that all these Ivy teams except for usually 1 a year (right now it is Harvard) is kind of pedestrian on O. They are all like 350ypg and 24ppg type teams. Anyway, back on topic. Penn O will struggle to run. I'm sure they will try to run more than anyone who bets them will want. We want them to pass. Good QB, good WRs (not just Richardson, Owens good too).

The D is Ivy average good. Lehigh got them for 539y (7.1) but LH O is excellent vs teams like Penn and everyone on their schedule. Penn won't see that much and certainly won't see that from Columbia. Columbia is the worst O in the Ivy - scoring, total, rushing, passing - everything, the worst. So this should be a Penn win. Columbia beat them last year, but that Columbia team had O and had difference makers on D, they won a share of the Ivy for the first time since 61 or 66 or something. This Columbia team looks like all the other Columbia teams, tough nosed and can make any game a fight, just not enough weapons to do much in terms of winning.
 
OK, well I will have to go to bed now. My wife is having knee replacment surgery tomorrow and maybe I'll post some more games from the hospital waiting room, because, isn't that what you'd expect me to do? ha ha! What are the odds on lines coming out tonight?
 
s--k said:
OK, well I will have to go to bed now. My wife is having knee replacment surgery tomorrow and maybe I'll post some more games from the hospital waiting room, because, isn't that what you'd expect me to do? ha ha! What are the odds on lines coming out tonight?
Click to expand...

100%

1760588267725.png
 
Body clock getting good at this. Might be zero sleep night.

What’s your guys limit? They said 127.14 on a side.
 
Definitely appreciate they opened lower on the big favorites but hate I’m bumping up against limit on sides. They lowered it. Not sure it’s everyone or they adjust that per player?
 
They are slow walking them now. I am going back to sleep but glad I got a few
 
My new strategy was wake up at 4am. Not sure what opens were but took these 3…

Dayton ML 166
Sac State -10.5 113
Illinois State ML 130
 
sleepy said:
to win 227.50 is the max on totals
Click to expand...

carolinablue said:
My FCS ATS sides are max risk 211.87
My FCS totals are max risk 127.17


That’s why I stopped doing FCS totals
Click to expand...

I'm at $127.12 sides and 76.27 total. MLs fav/dog risk depend on the odds. I wanted to put $50 on UNI +ML and was limited to $35.35. WTF For sure I could bet more than that on a side 3 weeks ago as I did 165 on a few and wasn't able to this week. Bullshit
 
I got some of the big favorites at the open, which I am happy about:

Harvard -27.5
PC -25.5
Nova -23.5
NDSU -31.5

I passed on Drake. That was weird, it opened 31.5, it dropped to 30.5, back to 31.5 then up to 33.5 or whatever. Would've wanted that in the 20s, but might regret not taking it.

Also got
Wofford +3.5
Butler +6.5 (was sleeping when 7.5 first appeared)
Fordham +17.5 (had wanted Dartmouth under TD, but I got baited with this line and had to take it)
Colgate ML -230 (I usually play several weekly up to 2.5:1)
Penn ML -235
Samford ML -132
ETSU ML -188
UNI +14.5 & ML +460
St Thomas -28.5 (not sure what this open was)
YSU +4.5
CSU +5.5
Mercyhurst +10.5 even though I have no idea on Urena and would not want it if he doesn't play, I'm just assuming

Need to solidify opinions on most of the mid-afternoon and later day games.
 
Some thoughts on UNI. I have pretty much abandoned dog MLs these days. Played a few earlier in the year. I determined it just wasn't worth it and I am satisfied enough taking the dog + ATS now if it wins and don;t need the thrill of the outright upset money.

But UNI is a good shot I think. I do think that, as I said last week, South Dakota can still be a problem for lesser teams and UNI is a lesser team. Still, USD has degraded capabilites, but it's not like they are bad. They are way off vs the best teams, can still win by decent margin vs the bad teams, it's these middle teams that they aren't that much better than: such as Lamar -lost (and I don't believe Lamar is all that), Northern Colorado - won in OT, Indiana State - won by 5. Arguably they played better than the final score last week at Indiana State. But that's part of it too, they shoot themselves in the foot, they do enough things wrong that prevent them from pulling away from some teams they are big favorites against. And I am banking on UNI putting up a fight.

This Northern Iowa D, it might be pretty good. SDSU only scored 31 on them and 382ttl yards 5.3 ypp on their Hobo Day, that is the worst offensive numbers since Jacks played Montana State! Pretty good. UNI limited the SDSU run O to just 120y 3.1ypc! Which, Mercyhurst did the same...weird...but when SDSU is at their best they run for 200+ with a 4-5ypc avg. So encouraging effort from this UNI D. Pretty good game vs UND also, Hawks put some yards on them and 35pts, but 7 of those was from a fum ret TD by UND, so UNI kept them below 30. And then prior to that UNI did well vs some lesser Os.

It;s the UNI O that is questionable and might sink my bet. Only scored single digits in last 3 FCS games and 17 vs EWU was a little misleading as the scores were big plays instead of the payoff from productive drives. It was ugly on O vs Utah Tech, no way to get around that. They are a little better on O at home. Only vs Butler, EWU and UND, UNI avg 23.3 FD per game with a 54% 3rd down rate compared to just 12.6 FDs per game and 25.9% 3rd down rate vs Wyo, LIT and SDSU on the road. Their toughest opponent at home, UND, the O did stay on the field and move it, only had 1 3-out, bunch of 20-40y drives, not many pts obviously, but not totally inept in terms of moving chains either.

Making no mistake, UNI is not a good team, might be a good D, but overall they struggle. But betting the situation, some perceived strengths at home vs on the road vs a team that isn't what they once were and show it with frequency. Panthers just played 2 of the best teams in the country. UND might not be ranked as such with their 2 losses (at FBS K St and at Montana), but I believe they are among the best. UND was only -16.5 at UNI...so how is (was) USD going to be -14.5?
 
Last edited:
Played that ETSU ML. Biggest concern with them was mental at this point. Just a rough go of it. Had 4Q leads at West Georgia, vs Mercer and at Furman - lost all 3. I am taking the dominent VMI win that their heads are right and they want to play football still. So then, they should be superior to UT Chattanooga who is way way worse than what anyone is used to from this coaching staff. Just lost a ton and have struggled to replace it. Might not be easy with UTC off a bye at home, but betting the better team to do what they should do, be better and win.

YSU...it's confusing to try and know how good they are. They are better this year. The 1H of the SDSU game shows some evidence the D is better. Now, SDSU kind of 'woke up' in the 3Q and made adjustments after HT and YSU D was exposed for a bit. But I am also not sure Illinois State any better than last year? They were good last year, but also had a lot of closer than expected games, just 4-6 ATS as favorite last year and 0-4 ATS this year. All those were larger spreads, but all those teams are also worse than YSU is. Their best game on the season was a 17pt loss home vs NDSU. This Illinois State is just...underwhelming? Every game as a favorite, not good. Allowed Murray St 471 yards? North Alabama should've beat them, were some claims of officiating assistance helping Redbirds in their 2pt OT win. Beat EIU 42-30, but was just a 28-23 game 4Q. I guess Morehead State was a good game for them...yippie! I was hoping for 7 with YSU, not sure if it was ever there, but I bet lesser numbers alot and sometimes they still win so I decided to take the 4.5. YSU and Illinois State play a lot of tight games, 12 of 21 have been one-score games. Dog has covered the last 5 with 2 upsets among those. I wouldn't be surprised if Illinois State won the game of course, but would be surprised if they win by something other than a close game. A 6 or 10 pt game is still qualify as a close game and +4.5 doesn't cut it there. Out on a limb here.

CSU, Charleston Southern, another small dog. Can find positives with both these teams. W ILL did beat them last year, but think that in some ways W ILL a little worse than last year and CSU a little better. CSU had a 431-329 yardage edge in that one. W ILL as a favorite? Rare. Zero last year. Twice so far this year, -2.5 hosting Eastern Ill and Eastern beat them 31-23, yards even 329-326 but EIU with a 6.5-4.1 ypp edge. Then -15.5 hosting Valpo and won by 21, but allowed Valpo 30pts on 315y (5.4). Valpo's ssn scoring average vs teams not named Lynchburg is only 4.8ppg with a high mark of 10, and they trippled that vs W ILL. Valpo O avg 206 in other games (agin not counting Lynchburg) and they go for 315 on W ILL D. So that is how W ILL plays D. I won't sell the W ILL O short though, they are good vs lesser teams and could be good here. CSU O did have some issues vs TennTech last week and at W&M a few weeks back, but were productive vs GW, SC St and LW so they have some ability that should show vs W ILL D. CSU D has had moments, made things a little tougher than expected for TTU, the weather and turnovers played a bigger role perhaps. D is worse than last year overall. but O is better. This should be competitive game that can go either way, taking pts.
 
OK so that is what I got so far. Wife in operating room. Will see how rest of the day goes. Need to dig on more games
 
s--k said:
I'm at $127.12 sides and 76.27 total. MLs fav/dog risk depend on the odds. I wanted to put $50 on UNI +ML and was limited to $35.35. WTF For sure I could bet more than that on a side 3 weeks ago as I did 165 on a few and wasn't able to this week. Bullshit
Click to expand...
Knew it was only a matter of time as we have been talking about this for a while
 
Debating jumping back into MB to try and catch some variances and first thing I see is Southern Nazarene Crimson Storm vs SW Oklahoma State, but of course no FCS.
 
I contacted Fan Duel on the max limit which I know they changed. He had to escalate it said they might restore previous limit (from 2024) or remove. Hopefully I didn’t hurt myself somehow by bringing it to their attention to address. I’m a small player that has been fortunate with some success. How do big time players do it? Multiple accounts I guess. What a pain in the ass.
 
I have to say honestly, MyBookie is my favorite offshore and I am happy to be playing there even with their issues. Now, if they were my only outlet I wouldn’t like it quite as much. Bovada would be #2. I dropped BOL and may drop BM next year.
 
I thought about messaging MB again to encourage their Dll market. It’s just so cool that somebody offers it, really is an edge for them to appear as a leader with such a unique offering. They just need to improve upon it.
 
I opened the Hard Rock account because they were the next to post FCS and they had variance from Fan Duel. Haven’t played much there because the last 2 weeks have been pretty irregular for me in terms of travel and day of game betting. But I expect they’ll have some FCS up before Saturday as they have before.
 
I asked MB about FCS line release timing, here is the response…


Thanks for reaching out. We're happy to help you with our betting markets.





Rest assured, we will add the lines for this market, once we have information on the odds from our official sources.


Thank you for your patience during this time. We hope you continue to enjoy our currently available markets.
 
I might drop a grand in there this weekend but not sure yet. At least I won’t have to worry about rollovers since they deem me a pro who isn’t allowed to have promo bonuses anymore haha
 
carolinablue said:
I asked MB about FCS line release timing, here is the response…


Thanks for reaching out. We're happy to help you with our betting markets.





Rest assured, we will add the lines for this market, once we have information on the odds from our official sources.


Thank you for your patience during this time. We hope you continue to enjoy our currently available markets.
Click to expand...

LOL "official sources"
 
It seems to me that a lot of these books do get their numbers from some third party. Because I chase lines sometimes on Saturday, once a line starts moving if I'm interested I start looking to see who else has or hasn't changed it at the other spots. And a lot of times they are all in lock step, sometimes not. It just seems when one book moves from 47.5 to 44.5, I start looking around and most of them have also moved to 44.5, so they are using and displaying third party odds, not necessarily odds at their book with action moving it. Right, or wrong?
 
s--k said:
It seems to me that a lot of these books do get their numbers from some third party. Because I chase lines sometimes on Saturday, once a line starts moving if I'm interested I start looking to see who else has or hasn't changed it at the other spots. And a lot of times they are all in lock step, sometimes not. It just seems when one book moves from 47.5 to 44.5, I start looking around and most of them have also moved to 44.5, so they are using and displaying third party odds, not necessarily odds at their book with action moving it. Right, or wrong?
Click to expand...
I have found opportunities between offshores (BM) and FanDuel as I usually have both open when BM launches Sunday afternoons. If I had unlimited funds and time I would play the various books off each other and just make money off the opportunities but I have neither, plus my ego likes the thrill of the hunt
 
s--k said:
I thought about messaging MB again to encourage their Dll market. It’s just so cool that somebody offers it, really is an edge for them to appear as a leader with such a unique offering. They just need to improve upon it.
Click to expand...
You should ask about releasing fcs earlier like FanDuel as I asked them the same so maybe if they get a few asks back to back it might make them take notice…or just send you a form letter response like they did with me haha
 
Debating adding to BM vs giving MB another shot…mainly for fcs rest of the way. Does MB typically open before BM does on Saturday mornings?
 
Curious to see if Harvard and St Thomas have alt lines at 27.5 or less. Also curious if any other fav lines give alts that make sense vs FD. You guys think MB would be more likely or BM?
 
carolinablue said:
Debating adding to BM vs giving MB another shot…mainly for fcs rest of the way. Does MB typically open before BM does on Saturday mornings?
Click to expand...

MB will put up FCS lines very early Saturday I've seen, like before they get into the Dll or intertwined maybe. But they are up and then they are down until they put them back up later in the morning. So yes, but you have to catch them in a small window of time.
 
carolinablue said:
Curious to see if Harvard and St Thomas have alt lines at 27.5 or less. Also curious if any other fav lines give alts that make sense vs FD. You guys think MB would be more likely or BM?
Click to expand...

I play alt lines at MB, but sometimes, you might've noticed it isn't always what you want. It might be Merrimack +30.5 instead of Harvard -27.5...as in they usually offer an alt for the dog and the fav, but sometimes only one. I would say, given the choice, I do like picking my own buy .5, 1 or 1.5 which I usually do at Bovada, but sometimes do at BM. Lately I have really only been playing teasers at BM and a couple stray games here or there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top