Rams look like a trap but thats a trap im willing to fall into
so much bad juju around the WAS locker room, but this is the Rams we're talking about backing on the road as a favorite
Think Mariota will be able to repeat his performance?
heard they ran some funky stuff that TB didn't expect with the UO style zone reads, anybody?
Giants played pretty solid overall.... I think that's lost in the shenanigans that took place. Atlanta played well at home. As usual..... Will their road play be different this year? Huge huge huge game for the giants.
Love the steelers with the niners flying out east after a MNF game for an early start on the east coast. The Vikings made them look better than they are. They'll get crushed in Pitt IMO.
Chargers also flying east for an early start in cincy. Lean cincy
agree with all of this
Peyton in prime time.... Does that angle still hold true? KC is the better overall team IMO
DEN has to be the most likely team to score points, even with the great atmosphere that will certainly be there. I'm leaning to the points, even if it's square as hell
thought Jameis would be a stud in the NFL, but did not see a second of that game last week and from reading the box score it did not sound good at all. Agree that NO laying that much is insane
Damn Titans getting all kind of love.. Mariota going have some real bad games this year, it's bound to happen.
Browns should be a great play except for Johnny, so maybe Browns
not sure they can be played in anything besides contests with the current QB situation
I'm really liking this card...
Thoughts on the Bills guys?
Think Bills came out playing tough for Rexy & Indy laid an egg as they often do on the road. Buff was picked to be last in their division by the books (or maybe 3rd) & after one week we're supposed to think they should be a pick to NE? NE D is still sketchy at best but I'm not drinking the Buffalo Kool-Aid. I got Pats -1 on Bovada.
BUF was only +1 at home in October last year in this one? I don't seem to remember that and feel like I would because it was so low, but then NE was -4 at home when I'm almost certain the game didn't matter so there was the debate whether Bellichick would sit his starters or not. I think the -4 indicated that the theory was that he'd sit the big guns, but you never know with BB so the books seemed to take a cautious approach
The table below displays ATS records for Pacific Time Zone teams, coming off an ATS victory in their most recent game, dating back to 2005:
[TABLE="class: tablepress tablepress-id-31, width: 300"]
<tbody>[TR="class: row-1 odd"]
[TH="class: column-1, bgcolor: #D9EDF7"]GAME TIME ZONE[/TH]
[TH="class: column-2, bgcolor: #D9EDF7"]ATS RECORD[/TH]
[TH="class: column-3, bgcolor: #D9EDF7"]ATS WIN RATE[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR="class: row-2 even"]
[TD="class: column-1, bgcolor: #FFFFFF"]Mountain[/TD]
[TD="class: column-2, bgcolor: #FFFFFF"]6-8[/TD]
[TD="class: column-3, bgcolor: #FFFFFF"]42.9%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: row-3 odd"]
[TD="class: column-1, bgcolor: #F9F9F9"]Central[/TD]
[TD="class: column-2, bgcolor: #F9F9F9"]16-26[/TD]
[TD="class: column-3, bgcolor: #F9F9F9"]38.1%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: row-4 even"]
[TD="class: column-1, bgcolor: #FFFFFF"]Eastern[/TD]
[TD="class: column-2, bgcolor: #FFFFFF"]16-38[/TD]
[TD="class: column-3, bgcolor: #FFFFFF"]29.6%[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]
For the record, this added wrinkle is not related to the teams’ actual travel, but is instead a reflection of betting market overreaction. The betting public tends to focus on recent results and will back teams that covered the spread in their latest game. In turn, oddsmakers react by shading lines, forcing bettors who like these teams to take them at bad numbers.
SD, SF fit this
If Tennessee are legit, it will take 3 consecutive games of them proving so before lines will adjust...it happens, but they were considered such shit before the season that anyone with a pulse wouldn't adjust off one game...win at Cleveland then the next week, you get to see how the adjustments are made
Before last weekend this is Cleveland -6 I think, be an entertaining game to see how JFF and Marcus perform, wouldn't bet shit on it personally
how do you feel about this now KJ? I think the Super Contest has it 1 and to me that was a major overreaction so the 6 sounds insane, but that may have been with CLE QB injury stuff as I'm not caught up on what the deal is there just yet
Phi/Dallas
road team is 8-2 SU L10
underdog is 8-2 ATS L10
i like DAL and think their best strength was always running the ball even with Dez, but not having him as a threat is a really big problem. Not sure if I'll jump in here because I'm really worried his absence will have the AJ Green effect on DAL like it did/does on the CIN offense when he's out because they become absolutely anemic
Chiefs have lost about a million in a row to Denver....I know Manning looked bad last week but Denver D is legit. Winds will be 20+ mph on Thursday night so KC's short passing game should work well. Arrowhead will be rocking but Denver +3 even money might be tough to pass up given Manning's owning of the Chiefs.
i was originally looking to back KC here, but think this is a class war and if there's one team you'd trust to score it'd be Peyton by a landslide. The three will be very tempting for me with DEN, though it probably would be best to just stay far away
during the den game i believe i heard them mention balty would not be flying home and instead staying in cali all week. cant say 100% but that is what i heard.
so smart
Can anybody make a case for Washington? It baffles me that this line is not over a touchdown
major let-down, StL can't be expected to get another special teams TD and lost 34-7 in KC last year the week after beating SEA. Gotta prefer Morris to Cunningham/Mason and there aren't many weapons in that StL offense making the QB advantage (which I don't think is huge) less important
can't imagine they're changing any sort of travel plan like BAL