Wee 26 & 27 - WIMBELDON

hahaha that was fucked up..the dog shit was bizzare too..lot of good shit could come of this show if they do it right
 
.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/1ghmBInC2N8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Joke just too good. The best in the world, the future best of all-time, showing the current greatest of all-time how it is
 
Joke just too good. The best in the world, the future best of all-time, showing the current greatest of all-time how it is

Future best of all time? Bit of a far fetch. He's got to win a French with or without Nadal, he also probably won't win back to back to back to back to back Wimbledon's or back to back to back to back to back US Opens
 
He'll get to Roger's #. His serve is progressively getting better... doesn't need power to hold serve but he has it.

He'll always be able to break. There's no one on the horizon next 3-4 years that's as good as these big 4 and Murray/Fed might have 1 or 2 more GS's in them combined. So it comes down to Rafa who is truly now a one trick pony.

I might be biased because I think clay is a joke of a surface and do not value it all.

But he's 27 and will get 2-3 GS's/year for the next 2-3 years easy and should still be good in his early 30's to add a few more.
 
Why don't you value clay? Just because you don't like it?

In that case I need to devalue hard courts
 
He'll get to Roger's #. His serve is progressively getting better... doesn't need power to hold serve but he has it.

He'll always be able to break. There's no one on the horizon next 3-4 years that's as good as these big 4 and Murray/Fed might have 1 or 2 more GS's in them combined. So it comes down to Rafa who is truly now a one trick pony.

I might be biased because I think clay is a joke of a surface and do not value it all.

But he's 27 and will get 2-3 GS's/year for the next 2-3 years easy and should still be good in his early 30's to add a few more.

you are mentioning the same things that Fed does, the problem is that he isn't an automatic for hardcourt surfaces, Wawa's win in Aussie Open was no fluke. Joker is the best clay player outside of Nadal there is no doubt about it, but until Nadal decides to retire he is clay court king. The only surface that he can dominate is Wimbledon but his problem is that he is quite susceptible to injuries where else Fed took care of his body extremely well. Also there will come a point in his career he will want to start a family, he just got married so won't be long till fatherhood comes into play. He's got probably another 3 years before he has reached his peak.
Also there are plenty of youngsters who will provide plenty of challenge for him.
 
Because it's been dominated by an overrated one-trick pony. And you could argue Joke is the best after Nadal on clay last 5 years.

Game not over yet. Want Fed to win because every time someone says Rafa is chasing him after he pads on another joke clay win.... man, so disrespectful to the GOAT
 
Youngsters? Been hearing that for awhile. Wawra was a fluke and will never be in that sort of form.

Fatherhood? I think he can be a father and still play tennis.
 
Youngsters? Been hearing that for awhile. Wawra was a fluke and will never be in that sort of form.

Fatherhood? I think he can be a father and still play tennis.

you didn't watch Australian Open did you?
Umm seriously are a bit blinded, Fed game changed when he became a dad. There are other important things in life outside of tennis once you become a dad.
 
you didn't watch Australian Open did you?
Umm seriously are a bit blinded, Fed game changed when he became a dad. There are other important things in life outside of tennis once you become a dad.

Did you see the 2 before that? When he toppled a top form Rafa and Fed
 
Back
Top