"Griffin vs. Jackson II" is the only real fix
Never let the fight go to the judges.
It is a mantra repeated by all MMA fighters, regardless of organization. This past Saturday night's UFC 86 main event gave us yet another example of why the motto rings so true.
Quinton Jackson and Forrest Griffin's light-heavyweight title clash was the type of contest destined to give any judge fits. Griffin's constant activity was a stark contrast to Jackson's willingness to look for powerful counter-shots.
Griffin undoubtedly scored with greater volume, but he never seemed to have the former champion in any real danger. Even in the one-sided second round, Griffin dominated position throughout but was unable to really hurt Jackson -- aside from the initial sting of an early-round leg kick.
For his part, Jackson did indeed land several solid blows, dropping Griffin in the first round while wobbling the eventual victor on several other occasions throughout the 25-minute affair. But the attack was never sustained long enough to make a real impression with the judges.
At the conclusion of the fight, conspiracy theorists across MMA cyberspace immediately took to their keyboards. The fight has provided nonstop fodder for MMA columnists and radio hosts. Even Jackson's trainer and manager Juanito Ibarra plans to protest the decision with Nevada State Athletic Commission.
A quick study of the judges' official scorecards for the bout can, of course, neither confirm nor disprove any speculation of a predetermined outcome. But it does present another question: how can three trained professionals watch the same fight and record such different observations?
While ringside judges Adalaide Byrd, Nelson Hamilton and Roy Silbert did indeed agree on a victor, each took a very different route to reach their final conclusion:
Round 1
- Adalaide Byrd: 10-9, Griffin
- Nelson Hamilton: 10-9, Jackson
- Roy Silbert: 10-9, Griffin
Round 2
- Byrd: 10-8, Griffin
- Hamilton: 10-8, Griffin
- Silbert: 10-9, Griffin
Round 3
- Byrd: 10-9, Griffin
- Hamilton: 10-9, Griffin
- Silbert: 10-9, Griffin
Round 4
- Byrd: 10-9, Jackson
- Hamilton: 10-9, Jackson
- Silbert: 10-9, Jackson
Round 5
- Byrd: 10-9, Jackson
- Hamilton: 10-9, Griffin
- Silbert: 10-9, Griffin
Fight Results
- Byrd: 48-46, Griffin
- Hamilton: 48-46, Griffin
- Silbert: 49-46, Griffin
A mixed bag of opinions to say the least.
In light of this past week's decision by the Association of Boxing Commissions to ratify the unified rules of mixed martial arts to add an assortment of weight classes for which nobody was really clamoring, perhaps those officials' time would be better spent on correcting a judging system that has its flaws exposed on a near-weekly basis.
Instead, the heartwarming, rags-to-riches story of good ol' boy Forrest Griffin's meteoric rise to the top is being ignored in order to debate the validity of his victory -- not to mention the prevalent questioning of the integrity of the UFC as an organization, and the sport of MMA as a whole.
In the end, the process by which MMA judging operates will take some time to revamp, but there is a simple, quick solution to resolve the confusion of Saturday's proceedings.
Despite the myriad of interesting match-ups now available for both fighters in the UFC's light-heavyweight division, there is really only one that matters. With no disrespect to current contenders Lyoto Machida, Chuck Liddell, Rashad Evans, Wanderlei Silva and others, new title-holder Griffin and dethroned ex-champion Jackson need a definitive ending to Saturday night's epic battle.
If not for them, then for the vast MMA community forced to discuss and debate the decision of Saturday night rather than revel in what should be one of the year's greatest storylines.