Sorry bro. I didnt see that post . I do not know who the ump is .
I played SF and SF 1st 5 inn ML though just see Cain's last 2 starts as excusable and his prior history is very decieving vs SD. Also thought SD bottomof the order was weak . The kid Greer has gone 5 inn twice and one would expect middle relief to play a role ....at -115/-120 even though its SF as road chalk taking a stab at it ....
As for Seattle and LAA . I dont think LAA lineup is all that bad and just cant past the feeling like they are baitiing you on LAA . I mean clinching means this much to make SEA road chalk ? King Felix wouldnot be laying -120 @ LAA vs Weaver so whyis Morrow .....tough decision because I think Morrow has to struggle abit here...so sticking with SEA-over leans but havent played the total yet .....
Already on Oak ....
What did you tail Action ? I had over in both of those and split ? Saved by the b5th in one... need some sort of explosion @ Chicago ....you never know anything can happen...
BOL
I played SF and SF 1st 5 inn ML though just see Cain's last 2 starts as excusable and his prior history is very decieving vs SD. Also thought SD bottomof the order was weak . The kid Greer has gone 5 inn twice and one would expect middle relief to play a role ....at -115/-120 even though its SF as road chalk taking a stab at it ....
As for Seattle and LAA . I dont think LAA lineup is all that bad and just cant past the feeling like they are baitiing you on LAA . I mean clinching means this much to make SEA road chalk ? King Felix wouldnot be laying -120 @ LAA vs Weaver so whyis Morrow .....tough decision because I think Morrow has to struggle abit here...so sticking with SEA-over leans but havent played the total yet .....
Already on Oak ....
What did you tail Action ? I had over in both of those and split ? Saved by the b5th in one... need some sort of explosion @ Chicago ....you never know anything can happen...
BOL