Central Florida
Had marked UCF as a play around 10 and am more interested now with it over 2 TDs.
Last week considering Rutgers, I was worried that with limited opportunities to impress the nation that LV and Bridgewater would put the hammer down. I was reminded that 'need to' and 'want to' doesn't mean it
will happen. Rutgers provided enough resistance to keep them from impressing much of anyone. So this week, they will again 'need to' and 'want to' have a good game in front of the national TV audience, one problem for them is they play a better team in UCF and the spread is getting close to what they laid vs Rutgers. This week I'm in.
UCF probably could have used a bye after the S Carolina game. Instead they survived vs Memphis, undoubtedly UCF had some hangover effects from jumping out on SC and a late comeback bid fell short. And Memphis continually is proving to be quite the defense themselves. So no problem for me to look past their 24-17 win at Memphis. UCF got their bye, just in time for arguably their most important game of the year, the game that will determine whether or not they can win the All American Conference. Games vs BCS level schools are big, but winning the conference is THE goal, it's what they expect. They've competed in the CUSA title game 2 of the last 3 years (winning in 2010).
Examining the UCF vs Penn St and S Carolina
at Penn St 34-31 (+4')
UCF's most yards gained on the year (507), it was also however, the 2nd most yards allowed (455).
UCF jumped out 21-7 and led 21-10 halftime, extending it to 28-10 in the 3rd before PSU made it 28-17. UCF had 1st and goal at the 5, but settled for 22y FG. 31-17. PSU outscored UCF 14-3 in the 4th, one of those TDs came with under 1m left. There is no question that UCF controlled the game throughout and was clearly the better team on the field no matter what just a 3 pt margin implies.
While UCF sacked Hackenberg just once, PSU did not record any sacks (only game they didn't have atleast 2 sacks) and just 2 tfl (a fraction of their season avg).
UCF 58% 3rd down O (2nd best on the year) and vs Syracuse, Indiana and Michigan PSU D only allowed 26.3% conversions!
PSU 25% 3rd down O (typical for their avg).
Bortles 20-27-288-3TD-1INT
Hackenberg 21-28-262-TD
Johnson 17att-117y (6.9) TD
*PSU 3 RBs 31-196y (6.3) 3 TD
Worton 7r-101 (14.4) TD
vs S Carolina 25-28 (+7)
UCF's 3rd highest yardage output on the year (427), but also their most allowed yards (490).
UCF takes opening drive for TD (75y 4 FDs on drive, two 3rd down conversions), then gets 2nd qrt FG (80y 4 FDs, two 3rd down conversions) for 10-0 lead at half. SC got their O going in 2nd half, UCF started slow including a big INT and fumble on back-to-back possessions that set SC up for 34y & 31y TD 'drives', 28-10 SC. With the score 28-17 SC had 1st and goal at 3, but fumbled and UCF got their 2nd 70+y TD strike of the quarter to only trail 28-24 before SC took a knee.
UCF 54.5% 3rd down O - vs the 5 other BCS teams that SC played they allowed just 34.7%
SC 55.5 3rd down O, about avg for them.
SC had a 2-1 sack advantage, 6-5 tfl
Bortles 25-36-358-2-2
SC QBs 16-34-265-0-1INT
Johnson 16att-64y (4.0)
*SC top 2 RBs 31-198y (6.3) 3TD
Hall 8r-142y (17.8) 2 TD
Perriman 3r-109y (36)
In those two Bortles was combined 71.75% for 546y and 5-3 ratio. If we look back to 2012 vs tOSU and Mizzou he went 54 of 84 for 516y and a 4-1 ratio. He did struggle with compl % in two games vs Tulsa’s very good 2012 D, but he did have 3 TDs and 0 INTs in those games. Bortles won’t beat you with his legs, but he will run. He ran for 80y vs Ball in the bowl and ran for 60 in the ECU and one of the Tulsa games as well. He's run for just 35y this year, 10 combined vs PSU and SC, but atleast it wasn't negative yardage vs those two.
Johnson's run for 181 (5.45) vs these two teams. In 2012 Johnson ran for 75y (6.25) vs tOSU and also 93y (6.2) vs Mizzou. He can get it done.
And they have a host of WRs to throw to, they are all capable of getting open and making plays.
If there's any concern it would be UCF D
Looking at the games vs PSU and SC it is clear that UCF isn't going to stop many good running teams. They ran for 394 on the Knights. If LV wants to run it a bunch, they will find alot of success.
UCF D also isn't especially good at getting to the QB with just 10 sacks on the year and 5 of those vs Memphis last week...take those away and they avg just over 1 pg. 1 sack and 0 hurries vs PSU and 2 sacks with 3 hurries vs SC isn't great. LV's improved in their protection this year.
Contrast that with LV's sack production...8 last week vs Rutgers plus 5 more hurries. While that number is an outlier, LV does have 3 other games this year with 4 sacks (vs poor teams albeit). UCF has held up well in the sack allowed department so far, their OL pretty good with 3 players receiving CUSA honors in their career. How this equation ends up will be a big determining factor.
The secondary has done well, but I'll say that Bridgewater does present perhaps their toughest test (with or without Parker). UCF is ncaa 34th pass eff D (by comparison Bama 30th, LV 11th) The top 2 CBs are good, rFr J Glenn and Jr J Ozerities, but the next 2 are tFr.
Conclusion (kind of wrapping up quick running out of time)
You wouldn't think the UCF D is good enough to beat Louisville, especially on the road. But Bridgewater hasn't been great in games vs Rutgers and Kentucky and UCF D should be similar to those teams.
On the other hand, the UCF O should certainly be good enough to hold up their end of the bargain...potential QB pressure from LV being a large x-factor.
I think UCF warrants a 1u play with my line of thinking. Maybe they win SU, I tend to doubt it though, and am very aware that LV D stepping up and Bridgewater being on his 'A' game could lead to a comfortable win vs UCF, but even in that scenario the backdoor could be open unless some unforseen blunders befall UCF. I'm not a big totals guy, infact I might play a half dozen a year...my mind just doesn't seem to work that way, but an over might be a good play. Like I said, I'd be surprised if UCF D stops LV and UCF O should have success. Maybe a 35-27 type game?
Opinions on the total?