skanless13
Fly, Eagles, Fly!
Does anyone have the current strength of schedule rankings for this current season? I know there are a number of pretty strong trends having to do with SOS especially in the Wild Card round.
Where’d you get those 2dabank?
Anyone know the Sagarin SOS? I couldn’t find it.
From another sight. SOS rankings
1. Rams .567
2.Arizona .543
3.Bengals .536
4.Tampa Bay .535
5. 49ers .533
6.Raiders .528
12. Steelers .512
12.Bills .512
16. Patriots .498
22. Packers .478
24.Titans .471
30. Eagles .464
31. Cowboys .462
Damn. These things are freaking all over the place!! Lol. How the hell ya supposed to use them for any historical trends if we have 12 sets of numbers that way freaking different?!??!?
He initially asked for Sagarin so that's what I went with. Seems he's been around the longest and been doing this before most of these sites were even operational, so I think you can safely put more weight in his that any others.
9ers finished in last place and had a last place schedule I think is the reason.ill just go in order of games:
raiders 13th/cincy 29th
pats 20/buf 21st (same div so basically identical)
eagles 25th/bucs 10th
san fran 14th/dal 3rd (i dunno how the hell this right considering niners play in great div and dal plays in worst? looking at who both played this seems crazy to me)
pitt 6th/kc 1st
cards 7th/rams 5th (same div again so pretty similar)
9ers finished in last place and had a last place schedule I think is the reason.
No shit I just came on here to post this same question. I see them all over the place too. One I'm looking at now is based on number of wins of opponents & has LV 1, TB 29, SF 32. This is not in line with the trend I heard on the radio today...teams who are 10 pts higher than their WC opponents are 28-6 ats since 2002. That guy was on TB & SF so no fucking clue what algorithm he is using to get SOS.
The big fallacy I'm hearing right now is that you can't run on Tampa. That was the case last year, but they are vulnerable on the ground this year.
The big fallacy I'm hearing right now is that you can't run on Tampa. That was the case last year, but they are vulnerable on the ground this year.
So based on the SOS from the site I posted, no lower rated team beat any higher rated team during wildcard weekend. And per the trend I had heard, the teams 10 spots or more higher than their opponents covered easily with one SU dog. This weekend five of the remaining teams are in the top 5, the others are Buf 12, GB 22 & Ten 24. Gives me concerns on the GB/Ten ML parlay I already played.
2D I heard that also, that the trends were for WC weekend. Just a very big separation with the two games today also, be very curious to see if it holds water this weekend. I will be sure to not make notes of it in the notebook I don't keep notes in, but I should start.
2D I heard that also, that the trends were for WC weekend. Just a very big separation with the two games today also, be very curious to see if it holds water this weekend. I will be sure to not make notes of it in the notebook I don't keep notes in, but I should start.
I agree. I removed the common opponents when comparing those teams and the combined record of the remaining four teams is 26-41 for Cinci & 40-28 for Pit. I think whoever put those tallies together on that site fucked something up. I do agree with the methodology in general though. SOS based on the previous seasons performance for opponents means dick. The true test should be based on current season. Well I'm sure as shit not going to go through & recheck the remaining teams but I feel better about my Tenn bet now, haha. Good catch.
2-0 yesterday, correct? Looks like Rams today. Where were Chiefs in the rankings?