7-43 with their lone TDDid Adams play in the first game ?
I'm thinking a slightly closer game and a SOMEWHAT inflated line after their first game... maybe a 9er win by 6 or so...
There's no need to overthink this game. SF is the far superior team. They beat the Packers 37-8 in this stadium earlier and outgained them an incredible 7.5 to 2.8 yards per play. Where does Green Bay make that up? How has Green Bay gotten demonstrably better and San Francisco gotten demonstrably worse to close that gap?
Only case you can make for GB is Rodgers somehow pulls a miracle and Jimmy throws picks all over the place.
The Packers are a giant phony who is only in this game because they played another giant phony Seahawks team. They are going to get smashed again here. Ford, Buckner, Armstead, and Bosa is a front four that is playing at a level we really have not seen in years. Stick Sherman on Adams and how do the Packers score? GB's run defense was like butter against good run teams this year and I expect Sf to carve them up.
Bulaga did not, backup got eaten alive. Then again I dont think Ford, Kwon, Breida etc played for SF.Did Adams play in the first game ?
Good point, chase game...Sunday for the books realistically going to come down whether or not one of the dogs win. Home team favorite moneyline parlays gonna be flooding in.
For that reason if you like SF I’d go now, that’s a line probably due to climb since it’s the later game and liability will continue to grow through the AFC title game.
As Of Now, Sunday Looks Like A Nice Day In Santa ClaraI’m heavily invested in San Fran and have been looking for a reason not to jump on -7. I can’t find one. Maybe SF entire team gets the flu, maybe it’s a torrential downpour, maybe they have 5 turnovers...those are about the only ways I see GB having a chance to win this game. They are outmatched almost everywhere on the field. Niners are deeper. They will replenish at DL and RB with almost zero drop off. The only guy that scares me is Adams but he won’t be able to do it alone.
Mostly Sunny | 62°43° | 10% | N 9 mph | 76% |
The line feels a couple points high but I think Green Bay stinks...their offense does nothing for me this year. Especially going up against the 2000 Ravens D .....I won't be touching them.
I think at least most of you all know where I stand here. I need, and want a Niners win to go to the Superbowl. It is as simple as that.
As far as the game... several factors in SF's favor and just a few in favor of the Packers.
I'll ask those that watched... in this postseason that has had many a rematch... how much value should we put in the first game this year?
It’s harder for me to envision the Pack going in there and withstanding the blows and winning than it was for me to envision the Titans doing it against the Ravens. Not impossible by any stretch but they don’t seem built for this type of game. And they got the best possible matchup with the Sea/Phil winner after Minnesota bounced the Saints.
In the first matchup, the Packers were as healthy as they have been all season and coming off a bye. Only Tonyan, Vitale, and Madison were listed on the injury report.I generally don’t put a lot of stock in it but the way niners demolished them that game is pretty hard to ignore! I just don’t see what has changed all that much? I don’t recall how healthy niners were at that point but I’m assuming if anything they healthier now!!
That game aside I just don’t see many avenues for packers to even cover here. What can they do? Niners d front is too much for packers Oline so they will be able to dedicate as many guys they need to bracketing Adams, then what? Packers don’t have many good secondary options to catch the ball! Niners offense can do pretty much anything so you would expect they come out the opposite of Vikings game and exploit packers suspect rush d.,
In the first matchup, the Packers were as healthy as they have been all season and coming off a bye. Only Tonyan, Vitale, and Madison were listed on the injury report.
Conversely, Kittle, Samuel, and Sanders all were questionable and ended up playing their first games back from missing time. Remember Sanders didn’t play much at all with the bruised ribs...
Staley, Dee Ford, Kwon Alexander, Breida, and Robbie Gould all missed the first matchup. The Packers were by far the healthier team, coming off a bye, and they got destroyed.
I agree with everything said here. It's a game not to overthink. Only way this isnt a romp is if Jimmy G turns it over and Rodgers plays the game legends are made of. I just dont think there's enough talent on GB.There's no need to overthink this game. SF is the far superior team. They beat the Packers 37-8 in this stadium earlier and outgained them an incredible 7.5 to 2.8 yards per play. Where does Green Bay make that up? How has Green Bay gotten demonstrably better and San Francisco gotten demonstrably worse to close that gap?
Only case you can make for GB is Rodgers somehow pulls a miracle and Jimmy throws picks all over the place.
The Packers are a giant phony who is only in this game because they played another giant phony Seahawks team. They are going to get smashed again here. Ford, Buckner, Armstead, and Bosa is a front four that is playing at a level we really have not seen in years. Stick Sherman on Adams and how do the Packers score? GB's run defense was like butter against good run teams this year and I expect Sf to carve them up.
Its gonna dump pretty good here starting tonight and into tomorrow. After that it should be a typical nice January day on Sunday.As Of Now, Sunday Looks Like A Nice Day In Santa Clara
Mostly Sunny 62°43° 10% N 9 mph 76%
Which alt line?Niners.....Niners on the Alt line.....Niners on the Alt line again.....and then the Niners
I wouldn't call that SFs best game of the year, one of the top few for sure though.Guys on VSIN brought up the 2011 divisional playoff game, NYJ at NE. Pats rolled them by the tune of around 50-10 in their last outing. Nobody gave the Jets a chance. 28-21 Jets.
GB played their worst game of the year at SF while SF played their best game of the year.
Just playing devil's advocate here. The first play that jumped out to me was a 7 pt tease or ML parlay on both faves this weekend. But it's never that easy & there's always at least one "oh fuck" game every weekend.
Beat me to it. New Orleans was their best game of the season IMO. The loss to Baltimore in the rain is overlooked, too. All in sequence...I wouldn't call that SFs best game of the year, one of the top few for sure though.
Agreed. I understand that some will counter the high score of the game in NOLA but that game was a mixture of two things: injuries on defense and it was just one of those days when the offenses were clicking. You play that game 10 more times you might see that total over 75 pts once.Beat me to it. New Orleans was their best game of the season IMO. The loss to Baltimore in the rain is overlooked, too. All in sequence...
I wouldn't call that SFs best game of the year, one of the top few for sure though.
The Vikes could not have possibly been in a worse situational spot than last week but they managed to hang around, for a bit, in the first half.
What would we do Sunday Night between the Chiefs/Titans game and the season premiere of Curb your enthusiasm? Spend time with my wife and kids? Let’s just play the game.Surprised they haven’t called off the game considering how nobody in here thinks GB has a right to even share the field with this team
What would we do Sunday Night between the Chiefs/Titans game and the season premiere of Curb your enthusiasm? Spend time with my wife and kids? Let’s just play the game.
Maybe not here, but I am seeing lots and lots of Green Bay love at other sites; more than SF is getting.With that being said, I need to see more GB love on the internets por favor.
Maybe not here, but I am seeing lots and lots of Green Bay love at other sites; more than SF is getting.