Then again
m of the Day
PLAY ON: Starters who went at least seven
innings last start while striking out no more than
three batters, if their opponent struck out no
more than four times last game
442-398 (0.22, 52.6%) +3.9% ROI
The opponent here did a great job avoiding
strikeouts last game but the starter here was able to
find success last outing without relying on strikeouts
and that often happens again here while the
strikeouts also regress up toward the mean.
s:SSO<=3 and s:SIP>=7 and op:strike outs<=4
Active on Detroit and Matthew Boyd.
Lot of conflicting trends
Berrios and Mikolas ML parlay +124 for me
Cardinals RL at first glance I like Mikolas and they trying to avoid the broom.
Hess due for regression
will be hot in TEX and since going to Rangers, Cole is 10-1 at night when temp > 90
Blake Swihart is finally getting his chance to catch.
For the first time this season Swihart gets the nod as the Red Sox' starting catcher, serving as the team's backstop with Jalen Beeks getting the start. Swihart has caught two innings this season after getting six starts at the position (including Opening Day) in 2016.
The rest of the Red Sox' lineup is also a bit out of the ordinary with J.D. Martinez moving to right field, Sam Travis playing left and Christian Vazquez serving as the designated hitter. Here is the Sox' lineup against Detroit lefty Matthew Boyd:
Andrew Benintendi CF
Xander Bogaerts SS
J.D.Martinez RF
Mitch Moreland 1B
Eduardo Nuñez 2B
Sam Travis LF
Rafael Devers 3B
Christian Vazquez DH
Blake Swihart C
Glad you mentioned that. He was on 5 and the ump was Greg Gibson I just lost it but Gibson is another long time great ump for himHOU at TEX had same matchup on April 13 and stros won 3-2 as both cole's pitched very well. Also Hamel beat Verlander at HOU on 5/11 spinning 6 shutout inn. Lost to Verlander 4-1 on opening day but in 3 starts vs HOU: 17.2 inn 4 runs 12 hits 9 walks 19 K's and 3 unders.
Glad you mentioned that. He was on 5 and the ump was Greg Gibson I just lost it but Gibson is another long time great ump for him
Flyer on O's +110
Away dog less than 150 when both teams have lost at least 7 of last 9 in division is 25-14 over 10 years https://goo.gl/meiu9P
AD and tS(L, N=9)>6 and oS(L, N=9)>6 and season > 2007 and DIV and line < 150
I strongly disagree with saying Hess is due for regression. There is hardly any statistical significance to a four game sample. In my experience (e.g. mistakenly betting on Jordan Montgomery last year for similar reasoning), his FIP being higher than his ERA has zero meaning for such a young pitcher. FIP and ERA tend to align over career so regression only becomes statistically meaningful later in a pitcher's career. I see pitchers who go season after season with FIP higher than ERA or vice versa (not to speak of four games) before regression starts happening for them.
Late steam seems to agree with you. BOL
I really like Detroit today but Not the under