What would suck is that last years team was so much better than this years team. And Bama would be -27 or so not -14. Sadly if ucf goes this year they likely get steamrolled ( they were outplayed by ecu last week ). While I would love to see them getbtheir chance it could set nonp5 future opportunities after they get destroyed. Last years team was different, thosebold mw tcu teams were different and of course utah was the best team in the nation (maybe) that one year .., even backed up by nfl draft. Luckily i think ucf loses before playoffsI hope Cincinnati and Houston both win all their games except against UCF. That will be two more top 25 wins for them. Not sure how you keep them out after that. Especially when at least 3 of the 5 teams above them have to lose
What would suck is that last years team was so much better than this years team. And Bama would be -27 or so not -14. Sadly if ucf goes this year they likely get steamrolled ( they were outplayed by ecu last week ). While I would love to see them getbtheir chance it could set nonp5 future opportunities after they get destroyed. Last years team was different, thosebold mw tcu teams were different and of course utah was the best team in the nation (maybe) that one year .., even backed up by nfl draft. Luckily i think ucf loses before playoffs
Saw this morning that as of this morning it would be Bama -22 v UCF. After watching them so far tonight I would tick that closer to 25What would suck is that last years team was so much better than this years team. And Bama would be -27 or so not -14. Sadly if ucf goes this year they likely get steamrolled ( they were outplayed by ecu last week ). While I would love to see them getbtheir chance it could set nonp5 future opportunities after they get destroyed. Last years team was different, thosebold mw tcu teams were different and of course utah was the best team in the nation (maybe) that one year .., even backed up by nfl draft. Luckily i think ucf loses before playoffs
Yeah, that was silly, but it doesn't matter. Clemson is on a mission.Just realized that 5 ACC teams made the CFB Playoff initial rankings.
Hmmm...
- Alabama
- Clemson
- Notre Dame
- Michigan
- Georgia
- Oklahoma
- Ohio St.
- West Virginia
- Central Florida
- Washington St.
Alabama
Clemson
Michigan
UGA
Notre Dame
Oklahoma
Ohio State
Washington State
Yeah, we know who I am a fan of and I wouldn't put ND below either of those teams.respectfully MW, i don't see how you can have both Michigan and UGA ahead of ND. ND beat then number 7 stanford by 20ish, then number 24 va tech on the road by the same, then beat 5-3 northwestern on the road by DD. oh by the way they beat Michigan even though it feels like 6 mos ago?
and georgia? they lost by 20 to a team that just got handled at home by 30.
i would extremely surprised if the committee has Mich or GA ahead of ND. i think ND is the clear #3. disclaimer: i am Not a ND fan, in fact i am quite the contrary
Yeah, we know who I am a fan of and I wouldn't put ND below either of those teams.
With that being said...if those 3 teams played today in a round-robin...
Notre Dame defeats Georgia
Michigan defeats Georgia
Michigan defeats Notre Dame
Michigan made their own bed agreeing to open the season down there if it comes down to seeding purposes or if Bama loses to Georgia.
I said that Notre Dame is 3rd. You simply cannot out them lower. Lol. I feel like we posted the same thing.BAR you're my Bro but when i hear fans and media types give these comparisons i cringe a bit. i'll tell you why. i am not concerned with what *would* happen, i am concerned with what *did* happen. and what is the case at this moment in time is one of those teams is undefeated against a decent to good sched and the other two teams are not. that can obviously change if ND loses of course but we are not there yet.
if voters ranked teams based on what they think *would* happen on the field, then why even play the games? upsets happen so often that we should literally throw out the "if team A played team B......etc" scenarios.
i believe Bama and Clemson on a typical day would wipe the field w those 3 teams above. Heck they'd beat my Sooners even worse. but i don't want to live in that hypothetical world. i want to base rankings on actual results, not what I *think*.
sermon over. LOL
I said that Notre Dame is 3rd. You simply cannot out them lower. Lol. I feel like we posted the same thing.
I know it is.No Bud I'm talking about the mention of how the 3 teams would faew against each other. I think it's irrelevant. I hope the committee does too.
The posturing this week is ridiculous. They have their ducks in a row.
As a Clemson fan, I'd rather play Notre Dame than Georgia or Michigan, so those teams get ranked higher. The four best teams. You are free to disagree.respectfully MW, i don't see how you can have both Michigan and UGA ahead of ND. ND beat then number 7 stanford by 20ish, then number 24 va tech on the road by the same, then beat 5-3 northwestern on the road by DD. oh by the way they beat Michigan even though it feels like 6 mos ago?
and georgia? they lost by 20 to a team that just got handled at home by 30.
Correction: I'd rather Clemson play Georgia because that's one of the football team's main raisons d'etre, but I think Clemson would have a better chance of beating Notre Dame.As a Clemson fan, I'd rather play Notre Dame than Georgia or Michigan, so those teams get ranked higher. The four best teams. You are free to disagree.
If Ohio State wins out, things get a bit weird (assuming OU/WVU win out).
.
As a Clemson fan, I'd rather play Notre Dame than Georgia or Michigan, so those teams get ranked higher. The four best teams. You are free to disagree.
CFB is the one sport that doesn't care what matters on the field though. It's politics plain n simple. Bring back the BCS!
I can play transitive. As a Clones fan, I get to use them. They lost @ Iowa by 10 (scored 3), home to Oklahoma by 10, @TCU by 3. That was before Purdy was brought in as the starter. Do I think they'd be undefeated now if he started from the go? No. But I do know the product would have been fun and firmly believe they *could* be undefeated. Is that enough to get them to top 4? Doubt it, they're Iowa f'n State. It's such trash.I don't think that's exactly true, but it is the one sport where historically you're not supposed to get a 2nd chance due to the limited number of games. And it's also the only sport where there's this obsession with determining the "best" team. So many contradictions involved. Either expand the playoff to 8 or 16 with clear qualification criteria, or go back to the old way and everyone with a platform can declare a national champion anyway they see fit