Early lean

[tuck321]

Went over to the Blazers Edge. They were talking about the last bad game and what they would need to do to win today.
Toronto has won at home on Friday 7 in a row and covered 6 of them. They have won 11 in a row at home very good although Boston has won 12 in a row. I just do not see a team that is 18-2 last 20 at home losing to a a team playing 5 in 7 again as well as 9 in 16 surviving

 

[tuck321]

Read this

NBA | NEW YORK at BOSTON
Play Over - All teams where the first half total is greater than 105 after having won 4 of their last 5 games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season
109-58 since 1997. ( 65.3% | 45.2 units )
9-2 this year. ( 81.8% | 6.8 units )
Last 3 games with the Knicks on 2 days rest
Lose at home to OKC 122-128
Lose at Memphis 95-103 total was 187.5
Lose at Atlanta 98-117
Boston on Friday is 8-3 SU and 9-3 over.
Knicks are playing after a 19 point loss at home where they scored 85 points.
Refs very average.
I really do not understand the Knicks. I believe firing Fisher was an error. They seemed to like him and now they are back in the junk team mode. But will try a average bet on the over here
[TABLE="class: statistics_table"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD="class: statistics_table_header, colspan: 10"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH="class: statistics_cellrightborder statistics_cellbottomborder"]Date[/TH]
[TH="class: statistics_cellrightborder statistics_cellbottomborder, align: center"]Pos[/TH]
[TH="class: statistics_cellrightborder statistics_cellbottomborder"]Player[/TH]
[TH="class: statistics_cellrightborder statistics_cellbottomborder"]Injury[/TH]
[TH="class: statistics_cellrightborder statistics_cellbottomborder"]Status[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: otherStatistics_table_alternateRow statistics_cellrightborder"]12/30/15[/TD]
[TD="class: otherStatistics_table_alternateRow statistics_cellrightborder, align: center"]F[/TD]
[TD="class: otherStatistics_table_alternateRow statistics_cellrightborder"]Cleanthony Early[/TD]
[TD="class: otherStatistics_table_alternateRow statistics_cellrightborder"]Knee[/TD]
[TD="class: otherStatistics_table_alternateRow statistics_cellrightborder"]out indefinitely[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: statistics_table_row statistics_cellrightborder"]03/03/16[/TD]
[TD="class: statistics_table_row statistics_cellrightborder, align: center"]F[/TD]
[TD="class: statistics_table_row statistics_cellrightborder"]Carmelo Anthony[/TD]
[TD="class: statistics_table_row statistics_cellrightborder"]Personal[/TD]
[TD="class: statistics_table_row statistics_cellrightborder"]probable Friday vs. Boston[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]

 

[tuck321]

Killersports has a trend against my over in Philadelphia and look
March's NBA Atlantic Division Total of the Month!!!!!
New York/Boston under 210
Its a democracyopcorn:

 

[nbafan88]

Read this

NBA | NEW YORK at BOSTON
Play Over - All teams where the first half total is greater than 105 after having won 4 of their last 5 games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season
109-58 since 1997. ( 65.3% | 45.2 units )
9-2 this year. ( 81.8% | 6.8 units )
Last 3 games with the Knicks on 2 days rest
Lose at home to OKC 122-128
Lose at Memphis 95-103 total was 187.5
Lose at Atlanta 98-117
Boston on Friday is 8-3 SU and 9-3 over.
Knicks are playing after a 19 point loss at home where they scored 85 points.
Refs very average.
I really do not understand the Knicks. I believe firing Fisher was an error. They seemed to like him and now they are back in the junk team mode. But will try a average bet on the over here
[TABLE="class: statistics_table"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD="class: statistics_table_header, colspan: 10"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH="class: statistics_cellrightborder statistics_cellbottomborder"]Date[/TH]
[TH="class: statistics_cellrightborder statistics_cellbottomborder, align: center"]Pos[/TH]
[TH="class: statistics_cellrightborder statistics_cellbottomborder"]Player[/TH]
[TH="class: statistics_cellrightborder statistics_cellbottomborder"]Injury[/TH]
[TH="class: statistics_cellrightborder statistics_cellbottomborder"]Status[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: otherStatistics_table_alternateRow statistics_cellrightborder"]12/30/15[/TD]
[TD="class: otherStatistics_table_alternateRow statistics_cellrightborder, align: center"]F[/TD]
[TD="class: otherStatistics_table_alternateRow statistics_cellrightborder"]Cleanthony Early[/TD]
[TD="class: otherStatistics_table_alternateRow statistics_cellrightborder"]Knee[/TD]
[TD="class: otherStatistics_table_alternateRow statistics_cellrightborder"]out indefinitely[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: statistics_table_row statistics_cellrightborder"]03/03/16[/TD]
[TD="class: statistics_table_row statistics_cellrightborder, align: center"]F[/TD]
[TD="class: statistics_table_row statistics_cellrightborder"]Carmelo Anthony[/TD]
[TD="class: statistics_table_row statistics_cellrightborder"]Personal[/TD]
[TD="class: statistics_table_row statistics_cellrightborder"]probable Friday vs. Boston[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]

67% on the under in boston

gl bud

 

[tuck321]

I could use it but not to concerned there. The larger bet is scaring me. Those refs and no movement at all. If I do not see some movement I may reduce the bet. Adding Lakers plus the points. Why?

5-2	10-3
5-2	2-4
5-3	1-0

<tbody>
[TH="colspan: 3"][/TH]

[TH="class: alt"]Spread[/TH]
[TH="class: alt"]Home Fav[/TH]
[TH="class: alt"]Home Dog[/TH]

[TH="class: alt"]0-4.5[/TH]

[TH="class: alt"]5-9.5[/TH]

[TH="class: alt"]10+[/TH]

</tbody>

That looks pretty good for a home dog. I can see 2 sides because Atlanta really wants to win this coming off that loss and might look at the total over.
Lakers at home on Friday

<tbody>
[TD="width: 100%"]LOS ANGELES IS 3-7 SU AND 7-3 ATS IN THESE GAMES.[/TD]

</tbody>

<tbody>
[TD="width: 10%"]DATE[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]HOME[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]PTS[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]AWAY[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]PTS[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]SU RESULT[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]H LINE[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]ATS RESULT[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]O/U[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]O/U RESULT[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]02/26/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]LAL[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]95[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]MEM[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]112[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]5[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]213[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]U[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]02/19/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]LAL[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]113[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]SAN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]119[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]10[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]200½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]01/22/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]LAL[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]95[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]SAN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]108[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]16[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]198½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]01/08/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]LAL[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]113[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]OKC[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]117[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]15[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]212[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]01/01/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]LAL[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]93[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]PHI[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]84[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]-2½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]207½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]U[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]12/25/2015[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]LAL[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]84[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]LAC[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]94[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]12½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]207½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]U[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]11/20/2015[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]LAL[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]91[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]TOR[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]102[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]7[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]203½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]U[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]04/10/2015[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]LAL[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]106[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]MIN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]98[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]-5[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]202[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]04/03/2015[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]LAL[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]77[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]POR[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]107[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]10½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]203½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]U[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]02/27/2015[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]LAL[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]101[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]MIL[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]93[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]6½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]192½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]O
[/TD]

</tbody>

Seem to put up a good fight

 

[tuck321]

Now seeing 207.5 not getting off anything
Have straight bets on Cleveland and Toronto, teasers and ML parlays

 

[tuck321]

Sitting watching myself lose a small bet on the Lakers. Moral here is DO NOT make small bets. It was actually very clear to fade the Lakers and probably bet the game under. Why
I am not sure when Kobe first started to play in a reasonable fashion. Call it in December. and lets track what happened. 8 ATS wins 9 ATS losses. 10 overs 6 unders
January
6 overs 6 ATS wins 4 unders 7 ATS losses
Feb
7 ATS wins 2 ATS losses 3 unders, 6 overs
March 1 over 1 ATS loss
Bottom line here is
They play for Kobe. This is his end and he is the only link they have to a time where they mattered and were not a joke. When he is playing you decide if you want to bet it over and if you want to bet on the Lakers. Otherwise you are going against the odds. I went against the odds and lost. I am very unlikely to bet on the Lakers when he is not playing and if I like the game I may play them any time he is in. Overs definitely look very sound if you can handle arithmetic
Off topic but tomorrow the Pacers are playing away b-b and getting 3 points even though they have lost 13 in a row playing away b-b. And the Wolves are a favorite playing back to back which seems very odd.

 

[tuck321]

This concerns me.

TEAMPSIC SOCCER AND SPORTS
COMP PLAY PROGRAM (79-46-1 +$2920)

NBA $100 WIN: Indiana +2​

These guys are pretty good. I start out liking Washington. Washington at home off a 20 point loss is 4-0 ATS at home. Washington just rested their players last night. No one even hit 29 minutes. Seemed to be a minor edge with refs as well. Still thinking

 

[tuck321]

Taking some time but definite interest in under in Spurs. To some extent teams know what is going on. The Kings certainly do. They have been blasted the last 8 times they have played a real team. It is convenient for the game to go under for the Spurs so that seems the way to go right now, No bets yet.
ne interesting note has been the presence of former Bulls head coach Tom Thibodeau with the team. At the request of George Karl, Thibs was brought on in a short-term consultative capacity during Sacramento's four-game road trip, looking to impart some defensive wisdom on the woeful Kings. Perhaps more interesting: Thibodeau's next stop is Golden State. Former Spur Marco Belinelli's had a rough year, but his shot has been on in the past few Kings games, with his 16 points contributing to a win in Dallas on Thursday night. The win snapped a 22-game losing streak for Sacramento playing in Dallas that went back to the George W.'s first presidential term.
The Spurs have a couple of streaks they're looking to keep intact, with the current win streak at seven and their homecourt tally now at 29. They had an impressive finish to their win against perennial bugaboo New Orleans, which followed strong wins against Detroit and Houston. They get another talented big man tonight, but it shouldn't be enough to dampen the night for Spurs fans at the T.


Matchup to watch: LaMarcus Aldridge has been solid against Cousins this year, and it might make sense for Karl to attempt a small-ball starting five that might pull LaMarcus away from the basket and leave Timmy to battle Boogie. Sure, they'll get punished under their own basket if Pop decides to keep Duncan in, but it's a gambit that might pay off in a game they're expected to lose anyway.
[TABLE="class: sbn-data-table"]
<tbody>[TR="class: ui-state-even"]
[TD="colspan: 3"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: ui-state-odd"]
[TD]

[/TD]
[TD="width: 20"][/TD]
[TD="width: 240"]

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: ui-state-even"]
[TD="width: 240"]

San Antonio Spurs: 52-9​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 20"][/TD]
[TD="width: 240"]

Sacramento Kings: 25-35​

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: ui-state-odd"]
[TD="colspan: 3"]

March 5, 2016​

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: ui-state-even"]
[TD="colspan: 3"]

AT&T Center, San Antonio, TX​

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: ui-state-odd"]
[TD="colspan: 3"]

7:30 pm, CDT​

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: ui-state-even"]
[TD="colspan: 3"]

TV: FSSW​

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: ui-state-odd"]
[TD="colspan: 3"]

Starters​

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: ui-state-even"]
[TD="width: 240"]

Tony Parker​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 20"]

PG​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 240"]

Rajon Rondo​

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: ui-state-odd"]
[TD="width: 240"]

Danny Green​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 20"]

SG​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 240"]

Ben McLemore​

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: ui-state-even"]
[TD="width: 240"]

Kawhi Leonard​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 20"]

SF​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 240"]

Rudy Yag​

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: ui-state-odd"]
[TD="width: 240"]

LaMarcus Aldridge​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 20"]

PF​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 240"]

Quincy Acy​

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: ui-state-even"]
[TD="width: 240"]

Tim Duncan​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 20"]

C​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 240"]

DeMarcus Cousins​

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: ui-state-odd"]
[TD="colspan: 3"][/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]

Game prediction: Spurs by 13

More from Pounding The Rock

• LaMarcus Aldridge and Kawhi Leonard propel Spurs past Pelicans, 94-86
• San Antonio at New Orleans, Final Score: Spurs break Pelican's curse, 94-86
• The Spurs' excellence turns foes into fans
• Spurs Highlights: San Antonio at Pelicans - first half
• Spur Of The Moment: San Antonio Spurs News and Links March 4, 2016

• <figure><figcaption> </figcaption> </figure>

 

[tuck321]

Nets at Minn days rest no rest
[TABLE="class: days_rest"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TH][/TH]
[TH]AF[/TH]
[TH]AA[/TH]
[TH]Total[/TH]
[TH]O/U[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH="class: alt"]BK[/TH]
[TD]2-9[/TD]
[TD]6-5-0[/TD]
[TD]96.0[/TD]
[TD]103.2[/TD]
[TD]199.2[/TD]
[TD]3-8[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH="class: alt"]MIN[/TH]
[TD]1-10[/TD]
[TD]4-7-0[/TD]
[TD]99.3[/TD]
[TD]108.7[/TD]
[TD]208.0[/TD]
[TD]8-2[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]

I do not think Houston has changed in any way. Last game went under because of incredibly bad 3 point shooting but on an incredibly busy day i am just thinking right now

 

[tuck321]

A little puzzled by the total in the Chicago game stuck on 215 when it went as high as 217. Think I am joining Emkee on Detroit. Have a ML parlay set for the Clippers who I lean under on but would never bet. I did play under in the Spurs game. No idea what will happen in most of the games. Debating and have a lean to over in Washington but just sticking with a very small bet on Washington. Might play over in Houston but this is a really important game for both teams who are both desperately trying to be playoff teams. Every game for the Bulls is somewhat life or death. Staying away is good for cowards and mostly just suits me here. The advantage of the under i listed is The Spurs can play elite defense and force the Kings to go along. The Kings are not quite out of the playoff hunt and have shown some recent interest in playing defense. Just not in a mood to try and guess a million games here. Figure me for a very small bet over in Houston

 

[tuck321]

I hate mornings. Agree Lakers have a shot. I will make a below average bet on the first half over based on refs and 2 days rest in the game

 

[tuck321]

Suns over might be right here. Memphis lost last time to Suns. After this game they go to 2 very likely losses. One problem is last 2 Memphis home games went under
OKC game could go over easily but OKC over on 2 days rest is very suspect while it would be nothing for the Bucks

 

[play ball]

thoughts on DAL/DEN over tuck?
Fade Lakers, top 3 scorers are hurt - Clarkson, Kobe, and Lou.

 

[tuck321]

Actually it was an automatic play which I took. I lost internet yesterday and could not come back and post, that was a small total for Denver and Dallas away after a home loss is now 5-1 over this year and the refs were fairly good. Bad day to have internet problems.

 

[tuck321]

Still no ref info at Covers. I did look at who is supposed to be at Dallas and they seemed middle of the road. Clippers away on Monday 7 game win streak 7-3 over
Dallas at home on Monday 5 game win streak 5-5 over under
Dallas b-b 9-5 over
Last 10 between these teams 9-1 over.
Last 6 in Dallas between these teams have all gone over.
Clippers have not lost consecutive games in over 2 months.
I took it over 209.
Hello Covers put the information up
Suspect I will be on Chicago over but right now fairly tired of this BS

 

[tuck321]

Locking in the Kings as a side

 

[tuck321]

I am playing a few more totals but none are must bets. I think Warriors go over the 225. but its not got good refs. Its just a spot. Leaning Kings under. May play

 

[tuck321]

Minn looks very good as a side today
Spurs are playing 5 in 7 with at least 2 revenge games coming up with little rest vs Chicago and OKC and very reasonable refs

 

[tuck321]

Getting up late has penalties. For reasons I do not understand they started Toronto at 207 and it is now 210 and I may bet it over there but I need to read more.

 

[tuck321]

I may flip out looking at the Denver game. Knicks believe it or not away on Tuesday are 9-1 over. Only 2 in 2016. They are 6-4 over last 10 away.
The total they have up is 206 which is tiny for the site. 2 major over umps and the under is 5-0 last 5 games between these teams. Closing my eyes. Last 10 home games have gone 7-3 over vs this number.
Denver at home on Tuesday has not been dynamite

DENVER IS 1-9 SU AND 3-6-1 ATS IN THESE GAMES.

<tbody>
</tbody>

DATE	HOME

<tbody>
[TD="width: 10%"]PTS[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]AWAY[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]PTS[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]SU RESULT[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]H LINE[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]ATS RESULT[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]O/U[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]O/U RESULT[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]02/23/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]DEN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]110[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]SAC[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]114[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]-2½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]222½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]01/19/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]DEN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]104[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]OKC[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]110[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]9[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]213[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]12/29/2015[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]DEN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]87[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]CLE[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]93[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]6[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]P[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]195[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]U[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]12/22/2015[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]DEN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]107[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]LAL[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]111[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]-5[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]204½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]12/08/2015[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]DEN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]74[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]ORL[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]85[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]4[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]199[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]U[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]11/24/2015[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]DEN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]94[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]LAC[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]111[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]7[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]204½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]03/03/2015[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]DEN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]106[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]MIL[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]95[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]5½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]196½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]01/20/2015[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]DEN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]99[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]SAN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]109[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]9[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]204[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]12/30/2014[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]DEN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]103[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]LAL[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]111[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]-5½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]214½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]U[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]12/02/2014[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]DEN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]103[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]POR[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]105[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]3[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]211½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]U[/TD]

</tbody>

But 6 of the last 8 have gone over. minimum bet over.
Make that small as I just saw Knicks on the road 0-8 under in road games over 205-209.5
Just crazy stuff but Smith 12-5 over 205 and Anderson is 14-5 over and the third guy is 8-9 over.
Get this with these 3 refs Denver at home is 4-8 under. This will be a small bet for me you do what you think best
Just noticed Denver is 10-1 over as a favorite???
Just saw a 10-0 over trend listed at Killersports as well as agreement for a lean I currently have for the Nets

 

[tuck321]

Refs in the Portland game like the home team a lot.
Preview from Portland Blog



<header> [h=2]Portland Trail Blazers vs. Washington Wizards Preview[/h] By Brian Freeman
</header>

<header> @BrianFreeman24 on Mar 8, 2016, 9:14a 2
</header>
<source type="image/webp">

Damian Lillard is becoming one of the best point guards in the league, and other players are taking notice - Geoff Burke-USA TODAY Sports


After finishing up their longest road trip of the year with three wins followed by three losses, the Blazers look to bounce back Tuesday at home against the Washington Wizards.





Tweet Share (17) Pin

Portland Trail Blazers (33-31) vs. Washington Wizards (30-32)
Tuesday, March 8
The Moda Center | 7:00 p.m. PST | Local TV/Radio: CSNNW; 620 AM
Portland injury report: None | Washington injury report: Bradley Beal (Out - Hip), Gary Neal (Out - Thigh)
SBN Affiliate: BulletsForever​

Sometimes after a long trip, there is nothing like coming home. The Blazers finally get back from their longest road trip of the year, to face the Washington Wizards Tuesday night at the Moda Center.


Coming into their six-game road trip, the Blazers had won 11 of 13 games and were playing their best basketball of the season. They managed to pick up wins in the first three games out East against the Chicago Bulls, the Indiana Pacers and the New York Knicks. However, fatigue played its role as the Blazers entered their fourth game in five nights and fell to the Boston Celtics. They then followed that loss with two more losses, consecutively, to the Toronto Raptors and Detroit Pistons.
The Blazers take on a Wizards team coming off a devastating 100-99 loss at home to the Indiana Pacers. The game came down to two Paul George free throws with 3 seconds left to win it for Indiana. A win for Washington could have brought them back to .500 and within a half game of the No. 8 seed in the Eastern Conference. With the loss, the Wizards sit at No. 10.
Back on Feb. 18, the date of the NBA trade deadline, the Wizards sat at 23-28 and were a long shot to make the playoffs. Instead of waiting out the year to make their inevitable Kevin Durant free agency pitch, the Wizards decided to be proactive and make a run at this year's playoffs. In doing so, they sacrificed future cap space and a protected first round pick to bring in disgruntled power forward Markieff Morris from the Phoenix Suns.
There were many questions surrounding Morris as a person and teammate. From legal troubles, to trade demands, to altercations with players, and even throwing his towel at his coach, Morris was as versatile negatively off the court as he was positively on the court. But the Wizards ultimately decided that his talent made him worth the risk. At 6-foot-10, Morris is not only a good low post player on the block, but a very capable floor spacer as well. With an aggressive mindset and decent mobility, Morris can play power forward or even center in a smaller lineup. Although Morris is still trying to find his role with the Wizards team, only averaging 9.1 points on 42 percent shooting, the Wizards won six of their first eight games after the trade before dropping their last two games.
The Washington Wizards' offense relies heavily on All-Star point guard John Wall. This season he is nearly averaging a double-double at 20 points and 9.8 assists per game to go along with 2 steals. With Wall, the name of the game is speed. He is arguably the fastest player in the NBA and he uses his speed well. Whether it's either a made or missed shot, Wall will look for an opportunity to push the ball and get to the rim. He has an explosive first step, unmatched rim-to-rim speed and good vision on the move as well.


Keys to a Blazers victory
Cut the Head off the Snake: The Blazers need to be able to contain John Wall. If he is allowed to run wild, he can win games by both getting to the basket, as well as finding teammates and getting them open shots. Of course, slowing down someone with as much speed and athleticism as Wall, is much easier said than done. Wall does, however, have some weaknesses that can be exploited.
The use of data and analytics by NBA teams to get a more advanced look at what is happening on the court is becoming more common in the NBA. But there are still a few people and coaches within the NBA who are not quite on board with the analytics movement. Wizards coach Randy Wittman is one of them. Midrange jump shots, especially unassisted, are often regarded by the analytical data as the least efficient shot in basketball. With coach Wittman at his back, Wall shoots more long 2-point shots than anyone in the NBA, by a considerable margin. Wall makes those long 2-pointers less than 36 percent of the time, with only 7 percent of those shots being assisted. Although Wall has improved his 3-point shooting considerably since early in his career, he is still a below average 3-point shooter.
So, what does this all mean? Any guards defending Wall or any big man helping out on a screen-and-roll need to give Wall space. He's too quick to pressure, so the Blazers can live with Wall shooting 36 percent shots all night. But they cannot let him get speed and get to the rim. Giving Wall space will also allow defenders one pass away to stay out on shooters as well and not have to help. This all sounds good and easy in theory but executing it is a different story. Wall is a special athlete

 

[tuck321]

Neither Young nor Lopez played last game. I have no idea why.

 

[STEED]

GL dude

 

[nbafan88]

Neither Young nor Lopez played last game. I have no idea why.

just rest...

 

[tuck321]

Excellent. Over and nets both look good

 

[tuck321]

Stopped posting because my winning was slowing down. Have won the last few days.
Hornets at home last 10

<tbody>
[TD="width: 100%"]CHARLOTTE IS 9-1 SU AND 7-3 ATS IN THESE GAMES.[/TD]

</tbody>

<tbody>
[TD="width: 10%"]DATE[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]HOME[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]PTS[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]AWAY[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]PTS[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]SU RESULT[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]H LINE[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]ATS RESULT[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]O/U[/TD]
[TD="width: 10%"]O/U RESULT[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]03/09/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]CHR[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]122[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]NOH[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]113[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]-8½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]209[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]03/07/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]CHR[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]108[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]MIN[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]103[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]-10[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]215[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]U[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]03/04/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]CHR[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]108[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]IND[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]101[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]-3½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]202½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]03/01/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]CHR[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]126[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]PHO[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]92[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]-12½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]209½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]02/08/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]CHR[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]108[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]CHI[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]91[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]-7½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]199½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]U[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]02/06/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]CHR[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]108[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]WAS[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]104[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]-5½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]210½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]02/05/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]CHR[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]95[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]MIA[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]98[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]-4[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]L[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]194½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]U[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]02/03/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]CHR[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]106[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]CLE[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]97[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]8[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]202[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]01/23/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]CHR[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]97[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]NY[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]84[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]1½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]200[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData1, width: 10%"]U[/TD]

[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]01/18/2016[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]CHR[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]124[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]UTA[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]119[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]-3½[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]W[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]186[/TD]
[TD="class: AlternatingData2, width: 10%"]O[/TD]

</tbody>

Detroit is outside looking in and Hornets are trying to stay in. These teams Do not like each other. Refs are fine and i took the over late at 202.5 Tomorrow will start another thread if I post.

 

[tuck321]

FYI Hornets play Houston tomorrow. They are 2-18 against them and have lost 10 in a row. I really think they WANT this game