Maybe in your mind, but I'll bet the Niners arent hearing that or they should just go home.. Youre bringing up adage's that never ever predicts a final score.
Go back and find games with teams that come from behind... If you believe thats a reason for a KC win - then check Tom Brady's GREAT come from behind record.
But Mahiomes come from behind record is different? Maybe his come from behind streak is going to end Sunday? Not Purdy's. WOW!
SF came from behind twice and now they're gonna die from it? But its ok for you to say KC will come back from behind?
That because they are who they are. Playoff games arent as reliable as they seem./ Miami was frozen and they new it when they got off the plane.
The KC loss to GB was a good indicator when an opposing team has a running game. That was a game when Jones was playing and he had 108 yds.
Everyone was in for KC, - Mahomes, Kelce, Pacheo and PORK FRIED Rice. No excuses - they were beat.
They should have won that game. Maybe not the others when Kelce was out -but to discard the season results with starters playing is a significant indicator of who's coming the dance.
This is Mahomes lowest passer rating since he was a starter in the last 5 years.!
Losing Hill was vivid all season. Thats why the Chiefs scoring averages dropped a full TD on offense tis year..
Also didnt we all hear about Mahomes complaint about receivers not running the right routes - unable to get open - or dropping passes?
Do you know that these two teams were in the SB 4 years ago but KC had a young Kelce and Hill with Mahomes...???
But SF didnt have Purdy or McCaffrey then,
Now look at the comparison! Kelce is retiring after this game according to reports. SF has players at the peak in their careers.
Lastly - the Ravens SHUT OUT KC in the second half and Balt had 3 game changing turnovers - while KC had none and the Ravens out yarded KC!
There is a statistic available that shows a true scoring fact when teams have turnovers and have more yards in a loss.
KC would have lost 22-21 in Baltimore. They would have lost in Buffalo 25-24.
While SF who had 5 turnovers vs Balt in week 14 would have won 29-23 ,instead of losing 33-19.
The Chiefs are on the wrong side of this number after the last two PLAYOFF games - which is what you say matters the most.
If anyone has been lucky in come-from-behind theory - then the Chiefs are due to get beat with those facts in the last 2 games. They should have lost BOTH to Buffalo and Baltimore.
I bet KC in both games and was lucky to win them and I know it.
Being out gained and benefits from turnovers in KC's last 2 games - is unlikely to hold up vs SF.
IM posting in your thread so the readers can see capping points.
Im not sure your entire writeup and analysis is complete, when all youre going on is the few intangibles and "adage's".
Im just sharing info to show a reason for the play.
BOL.