CFB Week 4 (9/17-9/20) News and Picks

RJ Esq

Prick Since 1974
2005-06 CFB Record
77-71, +0.52 Units

2006-07 CFB Record
70-48, +51.29 Units

2007-08 CFB Record
53-52, -33 Units

2008-09 CFB Record
15-7-1 +8.9 Units

4-2-1 last week with a couple of lucky wins. We'll see if we can get on more solid footing this week.

Picks

KSU -3 (-110)
Ohio St -20' (-110)
Troy +21 (-110) Buying off tOSU
Penn St -28 (-110)
Utah -7 (-110)
Texas -30 (-110)
Teaser CU +9 and UConn -5'

Leans
BYU -26
Any other fav of 21 or more (LOL)
 
Last edited:
Images from Yesterday...Courtesy tvtanline.blogspot.com

mich.jpg


tvtanline+-0913-1218%28TV52%29%5B2%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0912-2250%28TV54%29.jpg


tvtanline%20-0912-2025%28TV53%29.jpg


tvtanline%20-0912-2143%28TV53%29%5B1%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0912-2143%28TV53%29%5B2%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0912-2231%28TV53%29%5B1%5D.jpg


tvtanline+-0913-1100%28TV52%29%5B29%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-1101%28TV52%29%5B10%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-1122%28TV52%29%5B4%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-1146%28TV53%29.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-1227%28TV52%29.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-1231%28TV54%29%5B8%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-1406%28TV53%29%5B1%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-1415%28TV5%29%5B2%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-1519%28TV5%29%5B3%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-1530%28TV4%29%5B2%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-1654%28TV4%29.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-1747%28TV4%29.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-1752%28TV52%29%5B1%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-1952%28TV3%29%5B13%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-2022%28TV3%29%5B1%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-2034%28TV3%29%5B1%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-2050%28TV54%29%5B1%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-2055%28TV53%29%5B2%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-2144%28TV3%29%5B7%5D.jpg


tvtanline%20-0913-2224%28TV3%29.jpg
 
<table class="card"><tbody class="card-tbody"><tr></tr><tr><td class="ct c">
</td><td class="ctr c">
</td></tr><tr><td class="cl c">
</td><td class="cc c">11:31 AM (11 minutes ago)
Sunday Morning Rewind: Trojan horses, trampled Todd

from Dr. Saturday - NCAAF - Yahoo! Sports by Matt Hinton
ept_sports_ncaaf_experts-276700065-1221412876.jpg
I'm not going to spend a lot of time on the runaway Trojan train that demolished whatever was left of Ohio State's self-respect, because the beating was evident enough to the entire country. The Buckeyes shot themselves in the foot with badly-timed penalties, just as they did against LSU in January, but this was less of a case of OSU taking itself out of the game than USC just overwhelming them on defense. Without Beanie Wells, Ohio State was destined to be one-dimensional, anyway.
I'm not sure which was more disappointing: Ohio State's defense trying to defend Joe McKnight, or the Buckeyes' insistence on Todd Boeckman, who has never been anything but a red siren liability when asked to make plays with the game on the line. To me, it's clearly Boeckman: while McKnight gashed OSU's defense for almost nine yards per carry, the Buckeyes would have been in the game well into the second half if not for a) Boeckman's throw directly into the arms of Rey Maulauga for a USC touchdown in the second quarter, and b) his cement-footed stand in the pocket on the very next possession, when he was sacked on consecutive snaps and stripped (above) on the second just to make a nice picture of his helpless inadequacy. Both turnovers, for the record, followed first down runs by Terrelle Pryor.
But Pryor -- though there's a very good chance he will be (and should be) the top quarterback going forward -- could not save the Buckeyes in the Coliseum. In addition to a couple Young-like gallops in the first half, the freshman was 7 of 9 passing, better than Boeckman, and didn't turn the ball over, even while getting overrun in the pocket at the end of the game. But Pryor's passes were extremely safe; he couldn't throw well enough to back the Trojans up enough to sustain that running room, especially with no additional help from the shorthanded backfield. Repeatedly, OSU was stuffed on first down, or forced to throw because it knew it would be stuffed, and found itself over and over again in 3rd-and-7, 3rd-and-20, 3rd-and-18 (sack/fumble), 3rd-and-6 (sack), 3rd-and-25 (sack), 3-and-9, etc., and this was almost universally ugly. USC -- like Florida, like LSU -- put the game on the quarterback, the one position the Buckeyes had no chance of matching up, and -- like Florida, like LSU -- come out of it looking like monolithic world-beaters. They beat them like they'd beat Arizona or something, or worse, which is both really scary and really sad at the same time.
(Other) Games I Watched ...
Notre Dame 35, Michigan 17
This is not exactly a "Wake Up the Echoes" kind of win: Jimmy Clausen was not very good, the run defense was not very good, and if not for Michigan's butterfingers (four lost fumbles, on top of a pair of interceptions) that led directly or immediately to 21 Irish points, the game would have been very much in doubt in the fourth quarter, if not firmly in the Wolverines' bizarro-strong grasp.
As I wrote immediately after the game, though, Notre Dame got exactly what it needed from this win. It didn't move the ball particularly well, but Clausen did have a pair of touchdown passes, one of them a 48-yard bomb off a fourth down stop by the defense, which created some sense of offensive fireworks and got the crowd involved early in the game; it didn't open many holes for the running game, but the beleaguered offensive line, too porous for contemplation last year (especially against Michigan, which had eight sacks in the '07 shutout), allowed zero sacks for the second week in a row; and the defense was frequently gashed by Sam McGuffie, but was also opportunistic enough to score a touchdown off a fumble in the second half and come up with turnovers to leave Michigan empty-handed at the end of 73 and 58-yard drives. All vast improvements.
ept_sports_ncaaf_experts-397183455-1221412862.jpg
Mainly, it was an actual win, against a respectable, equally-talented opponent, which ND hadn't earned in almost two full calendar years (since the comeback UCLA in October 2006). At least we can say with some certainty that the kids are going to be OK, after all, and see where they take it from there.
For Michigan's part, the Wolverines looked much better on offense than in their first two outings, aside from the whole "holding on to the ball" things; there were multiple big plays from a group that had been completely moribund so far. But if Michigan turns out to be not-so-respectable through the rest of the year, all bets are off for the Irish, as well. I don't think we learned very much here.
South Florida 37, Kansas 34 (Friday)
I'm not sure how good either of these defenses is -- USF has a pass rush, but not much of a secondary, it seems; more on that shortly -- but assuming from last year that they're still competent enough to deserve their top 20 rankings, both quarterbacks in this game were lightning rod-hot, and carried its back-and-forth, to-the-wire drama on their undersized shoulders. Savant-ish Matt Grothe was true to his nature as a scrambling libertine, unrestrained by any bourgeois notions of size, mechanics or strategy, and Kansas coaches channeled Todd Reesing's immense brain power into a quick-hitting, three-step passing game that defied his physical limitations. This was the best game of the weekend entirely because of them, and I doubt either team is anywhere near the polls without a guy it's not afraid to turn loose in the shotgun.
Reesing, especially, was impressive because of the way he adjusted in the fourth quarter to USF's outstanding halftime adjustments. Kansas dominated the first half by exploiting the Bulls' low-pressure zone coverage with quick-release reads for 259 yards and 20 points on four of its first five possessions. USF responded by scrapping the zone for an athlete-on-athlete game, switching to an aggressive, man-to-man approach on defense and a vertical passing game on offense, and its athletes were better out of the locker room: the bump-and-run took away Reesing's quick reads, gave George Selvie time to disrupt the pocket off the edge and ultimately held the Jayhawks to four straight three-and-outs to start the second half, while the KU defense looked slow and overmatched on the other side. USF scored 17 unanswered points and outgained the Jayhawks 216 yards to -5 in the third quarter.
That could have been game, once the Bulls went up two touchdowns in the first minute of the fourth (their fifth straight scoring drive on offense), but Kansas counterpunched: the offense increased its pass protection to let Reesing hang on to the ball a little longer, and his natural elusiveness bought enough time for his receivers to work their way open downfield, most notably on the scramble drill touchdown to Jonathan Wilson that cut USF's lead back to a touchdown.
So as sharp, aware and accurate as he was throughout the entire game, it was just bizarre that Reesing suddenly lobbed up a hopeless duck down the middle of the field with the game tied in the final minute, when the only bad result for Kansas was a turnover that set USF up in good field position. Even without the benefit of the downfield picture, even without heavy pressure, this throw was completely doomed the second it left his hands:
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IRgmmWRm48w&hl=en&fs=1" flashvars="undefined" allowscriptaccess="never" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344">Popout​
They were both great, but one quarterback made a huge mistake that the other didn't. So break out the golden shovel and carry the freshman kicker off the field. And next time, switch to man coverage a lot earlier.
Maryland 35, California 27.
This is one of those games where you keep waiting for the other shoe to drop, it's so ludicrous. Supposedly lame duck Maryland lost four fumbles and had plenty of opportunities to shrink away, but garbage time defensive lapses aside, it did exactly what it had to do to beat the Bears by controlling the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball from start to finish, just like Ralph Friedgen's early, successful Terp squads: who dats Da'Rel Scott and Davin Meggett ran 33 times for 5.1 per carry and three touchdowns, thoroughly outplaying more heralded Jahvid Best, who the UMD defense bottled up for 25 yards on a long run of ten and left, shall we say, sick with his and his team's effort in one of the most appropriate visuals of the day:
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EHt6x19_tw4&hl=en&fs=1" flashvars="undefined" allowscriptaccess="never" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344">Popout​
Cal fans sympathize, Jahvid.
And what to make of Chris Turner? The afro'd junior only had one completion over 13 yards, the 28-yard touchdown to Darrius Heyward-Bey in the third quarter set up by runs on seven of the previous eight plays, but was extremely efficient: 15 of 19, two touchdowns, no interceptions. This is the same kid who was bewildered, sacked and picked last week by Middle Tennessee State. The data points from this game are so far from what we saw in the first two weeks of the season -- for Turner and for Maryland as a team, and Cal, too, for that matter -- the immediate future is hidden behind a wall of inconsistent murk.
Box Scorin'.
Making sense of what I didn't see.
Wisconsin 13, Fresno State 10. I missed the light night game of the week in the afterglow of USC's dominance, but it looks like exactly the grinding cloud-of-dust fest it was expected to be, with blown opportunities -- three missed field goals by Fresno State, an early failed fourth down attempt inside the ten for Wisconsin -- standing out. I don't see anything here that tells me anything unexpected about either team: Wisconsin was just a little bit stronger and little bit more opportunistic, but Fresno's going to be hanging around the polls for the rest of the year. And, hey, at least the Bulldogs will be favored in two weeks at UCLA.
Oregon 32, Purdue 26 (2OT). There was a good amount of praise for the Boilermaker defense after this game, and Justin Roper's line before his knee injury in overtime backs that up: he was 20 of 48 with two interceptions and no touchdowns, which is a terrible game for a quarterback even you factor in the ton of drops that also plagued Oregon's offense. But the Ducks still piled up more than 300 yards rushing and controlled most of the last three quarters after a terrible start, which isn't encouraging in the least.
It was another mediocre effort for Curtis Painter, too, who barely completed half of his attempts (26 of 50) with two picks and no touchdowns, which is par for the course for Painter against respectable defenses but probably won't cost him anything in draft hype.
Auburn 3, Mississippi State 2. My parents attended this game, live, god bless them, and my dad called this morning to ask if I'd watched it. It was "very frustrating to watch" for him, but very entertaining for anyone passing along without a rooting interest. I saw very, very little, only some of the last few minutes at the half of USC-Ohio State, but what I did see was astonishing and sent the Trojan-Buckeye open thread here into overdrive. From about the middle of the fourth quarter on, Auburn was flagged for holding the Bulldogs in the end zone to push MSU's '0' to the truly sublime '2,' and proceeded to give the ball over to the Bulldogs twice on unforced fumbles at midfield, one of them leading to failed 4th-and-1 attempt and the other to an icing interception downfield. They may be completely overmatched, but nobody makes being terrible more interesting than Mississippi State. (The thread was right, of course: MSU would have been better off punting and trying to pin the Tigers deep for the go-ahead safety at the end rather than actually trying to run offensive plays, which only ended in disaster.)
Baylor 45, Washington State 17. More on this game Monday -- particularly on the Bears' freshman quarterback, Robert Griffin, who set a school record for rushing yards on just eleven carries -- but no matter how much improved Baylor may be with Griffin and Art Briles pulling the strings on offense, Washington State is confirmed as this year's version of last year's Minnesota. The Cougars have no identity and no playmakers under a first-year coach, don't know who their quarterback is, and can't play a stitch of defense: not only giving up 45 points to Baylor, but how bad does the 66-point debacle to Cal, at home, look after the Bears' flop in College Park? Baylor may be stumbling toward moderate competence, but it's still Baylor, and Wazzu's not even a lock to handle Portland State this week.
UConn 45, Virginia 10. Wait, can Virginia be last year's Minnesota this year?
BYU 59, UCLA 0. So much for the end of the L.A. football monopoly. Now, I don't really think UCLA is as atrociously bad as all that -- the win over Tennessee did happen, I saw it -- but almost no team could survive giving away multiple fumbles and setting up an offense as potent as BYU's as regularly as the Bruins did: in addition to shredding the L.A. secondary, generally, more than half of the Cougars' epic point total came on drives that started inside the UCLA 40-yard line. This may be an extreme case, but the same kind of thing is going to happen to the Bruins a lot if they can't cobble together some sort of running game: for the second game in a row, the offense's longest gain on the ground was six yards.
UNLV 23, Arizona State 20 (OT). Shocking score of the night, but nothing screams 'weird' about the stats: yardage was almost dead even, and there weren't a lot of turnovers or missed opportunities on either side. Incredibly, the Rebels hung with ASU straight up -- if they did anything particularly well, it was milking the life out of the ball in the second half, particularly on an 18-play, 88-yard, nine-plus-minute drive in the third and fourth quarters that ended in only a field goal but kept Rudy Carpenter cooling on the sideline. Does this make UNLV good? Not likely. But does it make Arizona State bad? That is a distinct possibility -- although still expect a fight next week when Georgia comes to town, when we'll be able to judge with some more authoriteh.
ept_sports_ncaaf_experts-581144086-1221412848.jpg
Missouri 69, Nevada 17. Just ... please, Missouri. Chase Daniel hit four different receivers exactly six times apiece for at least 98 yards apiece. They'll hit 50 again next week against Buffalo, and then maybe the off week will throw some water on this offense. Give me a break.
By the Numbers.
The week in outrageous, eye-popping and head-scratching statistics.
- - -
Quarterbacks Rusty Smith and Brian Hoyer combined to complete 13 of 49 passes (26.5%) in Michigan State's 17-0 win over Florida Atlantic. . . . Iowa had nearly as many penalties (7) as completed passes (9) in its win over Iowa State. . . . Stanford had twice as many punts, sacks, penalties and turnovers as first downs in its loss to TCU. . . . Oklahoma State had three different running backs over 130 yards against Missouri State, all of them on at least 10 yards per carry. . . .
Aaaaaaand your stat of the week: Air Force won a game despite completing zero passes against Houston. The Falcons were still able to run for 380 yards and score 31 points despite going 0 for 7 through the air, which is, like, too old school to even qualify as old school.






</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
Week 3 Husker Report Card: New Mexico State

from Corn Nation by Husker Mike
Finally, the Huskers play four quarters. While the scoreboard might not show it as much, the yardage statistics show a fairly dominating performance.
Offensive Line: B+ Definitely their best performance of the year, but keep in mind the competition, playing only three linemen.
Running Backs: B+ Marlon Lucky didn't break many tackles, but the offensive line cleared out enough room to spring Lucky into the clear. And oh boy, once he does that, is he electric!
Quarterback: A- See Joe run for a touchdown, see Joe pass for a touchdown, see Joe catch for a touchdown. See Joe not turnover the ball. Well done, Joe.
Wide Receivers: A- Some nice blocking, and a nice catch by Mike McNeill (or should I say a nice acrobatic move at the goal line? Francis Allen would be proud!) I'm starting to wonder if they've run the wide receiver screen into the ground. They're setting something up here.
Defensive Line: B+ Another good day, though I worry about the injury to Pierre Allen. Zach Potter was all over the place again yesterday.
Linebackers: B Against the Aggies, the linebackers were out of the game quite a bit for extra help in the secondary.
Secondary: B OK, they're still thin due to injury. (I wonder how many people asked "Who the heck is Lance Thorell?" in the first quarter!) But they held up reasonably well against the spread offense of New Mexico State. Problem is, they'll soon be facing the spread offenses of Missouri and Texas Tech.
Coaching: A When the Aggies started the game by direct snapping to wide receiver Wes Neiman and started running zone read, the defense was back on it's heels. But after Zach Potter blocked a field goal attempt, the defensive staff spent extra time making adjustments that helped shut that down. That just wouldn't have happened with the previous regime.
Elsewhere in College Football
USC: A+ What else is there to say?
Ohio State: D OK, you're probably good enough to compete in the Big MAC. Terrelle Pryor is going to be a playmaker for you down the line.
ESPN: 0 Please stop hyping up games like last night's before you lose what little credibility you have left.
Pac Ten: F Yeah, you have USC. But what about the rest of the conference? Only other victories were Oregon State (over Hawaii) and Oregon (over Purdue). Here's who beat the Pac 10: Baylor, Maryland, TCU, UNLV, BYU, Oklahoma, New Mexico. Other than the Sooners and maybe BYU, you've got to be ashamed of yourself. USC fans can probably start booking flights and hotels on South Beach.
Big MAC: D- Penn State had a nice win, as did Wisconsin. But a whole lot of ugly.
Buffalo: A Turner Gill's bunch gets a bunch of publicity for a nice last second win...but up next is a date with Mizery.
Poll Rate the Husker's performance against New Mexico State!

  • A+ Couldn't ask for anything more!
  • A Pretty dang solid, if you ask me.
  • B+ Good game!
  • B Good game against an overmatched opponent.
  • C OK performance. At least they were consistent.
  • D Still way too much work to be done.
  • F Horrible
 
The Associated Press Top 25 Poll

<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody><tr class="cnnRow1"> <td class="cnnCol0">Rank</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Team</td> <td class="cnnCol2">Record</td> <td class="cnnCol3">Votes</td> <td class="cnnCol4">Previous</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">1</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> USC (61)</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,596</td> <td class="cnnCol4">1</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">2</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Oklahoma</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,485</td> <td class="cnnCol4">3</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">3</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Georgia (2)</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,437</td> <td class="cnnCol4">2</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">4</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Florida (1)</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,414</td> <td class="cnnCol4">4</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">5</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Missouri</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,389</td> <td class="cnnCol4">6</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">6</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> LSU</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,274</td> <td class="cnnCol4">7</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">7</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Texas</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,140</td> <td class="cnnCol4">8</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">8</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Wisconsin</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,076</td> <td class="cnnCol4">10</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">9</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Alabama</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">982</td> <td class="cnnCol4">11</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">10</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Auburn</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">958</td> <td class="cnnCol4">9</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">11</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Texas Tech</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">904</td> <td class="cnnCol4">12</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">12</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> South Florida</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">801</td> <td class="cnnCol4">19</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">13</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Ohio State</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-1</td> <td class="cnnCol3">800</td> <td class="cnnCol4">5</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">14</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Brigham Young</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">788</td> <td class="cnnCol4">18</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">15</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> East Carolina</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">781</td> <td class="cnnCol4">14</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">16</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Penn State</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">779</td> <td class="cnnCol4">17</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">17</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Oregon</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">679</td> <td class="cnnCol4">16</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">18</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Wake Forest</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">482</td> <td class="cnnCol4">20</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">19</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Kansas</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-1</td> <td class="cnnCol3">445</td> <td class="cnnCol4">13</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">20</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Utah</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">428</td> <td class="cnnCol4">22</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">21</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> West Virginia</td> <td class="cnnCol2">1-1</td> <td class="cnnCol3">179</td> <td class="cnnCol4">25</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">22</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Illinois</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-1</td> <td class="cnnCol3">163</td> <td class="cnnCol4">24</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">23</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Clemson</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-1</td> <td class="cnnCol3">160</td> <td class="cnnCol4">NR</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">24</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Florida State</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">146</td> <td class="cnnCol4">NR</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">25</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Fresno State</td> <td class="cnnCol2">1-1</td> <td class="cnnCol3">121</td> <td class="cnnCol4">21</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow4"> <td colspan="5"> Others Receiving Votes: Vanderbilt 63, Oklahoma State 62, TCU 45, Boise State 38, Arizona State 36, North Carolina 31, Virginia Tech 28, Nebraska 21, Tennessee 15, Connecticut 13, Iowa 12, Kentucky 6, Tulsa 6, Minnesota 4, Northwestern 4, Notre Dame 4, Arizona 2, Ball State 1, South Carolina 1, UCF 1 </td></tr></tbody></table>
 
Division I-A Coaches' Top 25 Poll

<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody><tr class="cnnRow1"> <td class="cnnCol0">Rank</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Team</td> <td class="cnnCol2">Record</td> <td class="cnnCol3">Votes</td> <td class="cnnCol4">Previous</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">1</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> USC (57)</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,518</td> <td class="cnnCol4">1</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">2</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Oklahoma (1)</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,423</td> <td class="cnnCol4">3</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">3</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Georgia (2)</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,393</td> <td class="cnnCol4">2</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">4</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Florida (1)</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,335</td> <td class="cnnCol4">4</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">5</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Missouri</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,294</td> <td class="cnnCol4">6</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">6</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> LSU</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,233</td> <td class="cnnCol4">7</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">7</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Texas</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,128</td> <td class="cnnCol4">8</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">8</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Wisconsin</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">1,027</td> <td class="cnnCol4">10</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">9</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Auburn</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">955</td> <td class="cnnCol4">9</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">10</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Texas Tech</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">887</td> <td class="cnnCol4">12</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">11</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Brigham Young</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">846</td> <td class="cnnCol4">15</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">12</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Oregon</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">783</td> <td class="cnnCol4">14</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">13</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Alabama</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">771</td> <td class="cnnCol4">16</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">14</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Ohio State</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-1</td> <td class="cnnCol3">736</td> <td class="cnnCol4">5</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">15</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Penn State</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">724</td> <td class="cnnCol4">17</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">16</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> South Florida</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">685</td> <td class="cnnCol4">18</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">17</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> East Carolina</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">508</td> <td class="cnnCol4">20</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">18</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Wake Forest</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">498</td> <td class="cnnCol4">19</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">19</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Kansas</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-1</td> <td class="cnnCol3">416</td> <td class="cnnCol4">11</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">20</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Utah</td> <td class="cnnCol2">3-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">400</td> <td class="cnnCol4">22</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">21</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Clemson</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-1</td> <td class="cnnCol3">233</td> <td class="cnnCol4">23</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">22</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> West Virginia</td> <td class="cnnCol2">1-1</td> <td class="cnnCol3">159</td> <td class="cnnCol4">24</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">23</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Illinois</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-1</td> <td class="cnnCol3">127</td> <td class="cnnCol4">NR</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">24</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Arizona State</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-1</td> <td class="cnnCol3">113</td> <td class="cnnCol4">13</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow2"> <td class="cnnCol0">25</td> <td class="cnnCol1"> Florida State</td> <td class="cnnCol2">2-0</td> <td class="cnnCol3">110</td> <td class="cnnCol4">NR</td> </tr> <tr class="cnnRow4"> <td colspan="5"> Others Receiving Votes: Fresno State 93, TCU 76, Nebraska 49, Boise State 43, Kentucky 40, Oklahoma State 39, Tennessee 34, Virginia Tech 31, Connecticut 27, Vanderbilt 20, North Carolina 19, Iowa 14, Northwestern 10, California 7, Michigan State 5, Notre Dame 5, Colorado 3, Georgia Tech 2, Boston College 2, Ball State 2, Tulsa 2 </td></tr></tbody></table>
 
<table class="card"><tbody class="card-tbody"><tr></tr><tr><td class="ct c">
</td><td class="ctr c">
</td></tr><tr><td class="cl c">
</td><td class="cc c">1:43 PM (4 minutes ago)
The Alphabetical: NCAA Football, Week 3

from The Sporting Blog
Tressel.jpg


Each Sunday during college football season, Spencer Hall offers a letter-by-letter analysis of Saturday’s college football games.


A is for Again.
They had time of possession, they had new formations, they had a freshly foaled Vince Young clone in the backfield ... and they still got obliterated. The real shame coming out of the Ohio State/USC game falls on the pollsters, the same ones who have consistently overvalued this Ohio State team for two and a half years running.

The syndrome has repeated patterns: the defensive coaching staff gets outcoached; the offense first loses the run, then their ability to protect in the third quarter, and then the sanity of their quarterback; and in the end, an Ohio State team loses a high-profile game on national television in humiliating fashion.

If it makes them feel any better, though: the Big Ten title is wide, wide open, and comes with complimentary bratwursts for each member of the winning team. (Yay!) And if USC drops a game or two along the way, the Buckeyes can face them again in the Rose Bowl, and lose spectacularly.

B is for Bob Griese Is Your Turnover Vulture. I have no problem with Bob Griese waving a Purdue flag out of the booth, since no one who covers college football is “objective,” especially announcers.
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CNR6oIxrJRU&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&fs=1" allowscriptaccess="never" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344">Popout

The objections? The use of “Shout” outside of a Caucasian wedding is some kind of musical fashion foul, and that Bob Griese clearly is a turnover vulture. He roots for a team, and they suddenly cough up the ball. If I were a Purdue fan, from here on out I would have him stuffed in a trunk for the duration of any games on the schedule. He clearly has powers.

C is for Coupon-ball. SEC watchers were waiting for it: the masterpiece of offensive suck that would play out if, on one special moonlit night, a Tommy Tuberville team and a Sylvester Croom team met and decided to play the game both teams had been waiting a lifetime to play, a game with the lowest score possible (with both teams actually scoring, of course.)

Slapstick looks like this, and features Mississippi State going 0-for-14 on 3rd down, 0-for-3 on 4th down conversions, and gaining 116 yards of total offense. Auburn, appearing in a role as a hilarious old man who dances like a pro, went 3-16 on third down and fumbled three times.

Tommy Tuberville has no problem with winning games like this. I suspect it might actually please him since a.) he’s an avowed non-stats guy, and b.) his teams specialize in adding up points in odd, coupon-like strikes. (“I have ads for a free safety, a 2-for-1 field goal block/return for TD, and a two-point conversion return, ma’am.”) Next stop: the elusive 2-0. Make it happen, boys!

D is for Done. The Spurrier Pro-Am is scheduled to begin sometime in the next year or so, and will feature one golfer competing on eleventyzillion beautifully manicured holes forever after deciding that losing consistently at South Carolina hurts more than the paycheck is worth. A 14-7 loss to Georgia at home will do that to a man. So will rushing 16 times for 18 yards on the day.

E is for Excellence in Internet Commenting. From user rico99913 under the Hayes Vs. Hall entry where, with uncustomary moderation and politeness both myself and Matt Hayes decided Ohio State would actually compete for a while in this game.

just in case you didn't know it, you're both idiots (hayes and hall). ohio state will dominate this game from start to finish but i'll bet you a buffalo nickel that they won't jump to number 1 come sunday

Buffalo nickels for everyone!

F is for Finished. Oh, you won’t believe it now, but come November, when Ohio State has rolled through the Big Ten, and sits at undefeated, and we’ve all had conference games to get everyone properly tunnel-visioned into their own little regional college football worlds and lose perspective completely, someone will say it: “Hey, Ohio State early loss better now title shot yes?”

It seems preposterous now, but someone will say it. Then, you will show them this picture.

2855541559_c0a67c09ed.jpg


Remember: when Ohio State plays big games, heads roll. Literally. You don’t want to see that again, and pending a period of probation, neither does the rest of college football. Just remember this when the unthinkable happens

G is for Grothe. The best game of the weekend was Kansas at USF, a manic affair capped off when Kansas qb Todd Reesing saved his one mistake of the night for the last series: tossing a pick on the final series to set up USF for the game-winning field goal. Reesing made one mistake; Grothe made none, going 32/45 for 338 yards and 2 TDs. Usually, Grothe’s good for at least two baffling “pilot error” crashes during a game, but his effort against Kansas was a shining testament to economy and intelligent decision-making. Huzzahs and ovations all around, even if I still miss last year’s “Gro-Hawk.”

H is for Horror. UCLA’s second quarter against BYU: three fumbles, all turned into BYU touchdowns. A blocked field goal, converted into a touchdown for BYU. Kevin Craft, sacked twice. 35 points surrendered in a single, bloody flurry.

I is for Incomplete. Patrick Pinkney is slipping: after completing over 80 percent of his passes against West Virginia and Virginia Tech, he fell to a mortal 68 percent completion percentage against Tulane. Bench him and stop this madness now!

J is for Jokery, Cont’d: Near losses of note: Illinois almost loses to UL-Laf, which I always like to imagine is pronounced phonetically as “you’ll laugh”, 20-17, and that was with the Ragin’ Cajuns giving Illinois three fumbles. Illinois’ post-Rose Bowl letdown: long, extensive, and properly Zook-ish.

L stands for Last Man Standing, Take Snaps. Justin Roper sprained his knee against Purdue, meaning Oregon has lost its second option at quarterback following the injury to Nate Costa in the Ducks’ opener. This leaves freshman Chris Harper as the starter for at least the next two to four weeks. The Ducks schedule over the next three: Boise State, Washington State, and at USC. Yeah, if you could make that two weeks, Justin, that’d be great for us, just super. Yeah.

Speaking of knees that don’t work ...

M is for McGahee-esque. Charlie Weis, flying football player, knee.
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/B6mPYwb1Tno&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&hl=en&fs=1" allowscriptaccess="never" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344">Popout

N is for Necessary. As in this completely conventional triple block against DeMarcus Granger of Oklahoma by three Washington linemen.
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rtXBIRVmEnk&hl=en&fs=1" allowscriptaccess="never" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344">Popout

O is for Obstinate. Wisconsin pulled out their game against Fresno with unbent stubbornness, running headlong at Fresno and pounding away at them for a 13-10 win to remain the lone team of proven sexiness left in the Big Ten.

Okay, sexiness is strong here; how about, “has a great personality,” and “knows how to cook.” For all the crowing about the ACC’s impotence, the Big Ten top-to-bottom is in a sorrier state than previously thought. Only Wisconsin seems like a safe vote now, and safe is as strong a word as we’ll use after a tough but unimpressive showing against the Bulldogs, whose other win came against Rutgers, who we’ll go ahead and just pronounce as terrible after watching them wilt against the Bulldogs and follow it up with a miserable loss to UNC on Thursday.

P is for the pACC-10. The conference with their turn at the “one week humiliation trend:” The Pac-10, who went 0-for-4 against the Mountain West in a disastrous week of nonconference scheduling. UCLA died a thousand deaths in Provo, losing 59-0. Arizona State improbably coughed up a loss to UNLV. TCU forced Stanford to bow down. New Mexico beat Arizona, thus possibly lighting the candle that burns Mike Stoops’ tenure there to the ground. Washington played Oklahoma. You don’t really want to hear what happened there if you want to sleep tonight.

Toss in Cal’s nauseating performance against Maryland, Oregon’s near-miss versus Purdue, and Washington State’s loss to Baylor (yes, Baylor) and it was a humbling weekend in sum for the Pac-10, especially with the SEC kickin’ it and takin’ names against ferocious teams like DESTROYER OF WORLDS, UAB and THE BLOODSUCKING SHARK-MEN OF WESTERN KENTUCKY. Who knows how they survived those games! Astonishing!

Q is for Quantavious. As noted by North Carolina Blogger Mike from Tarheel Mania, the single greatest exchange as determined by name quality occurred in the UNC/Rutgers game with quarterback Jabu Lovelace throwing a pick to UNC’s Quantavious Sturdivant. Awesome score: incalculable by current scientific standards and tools.

S is for Southerland, Brannan. South Carolina was able to keep Knowshon Moreno under 100 yards, and it looked like the first time the team actually missed veteran fullback Southerland (still healing from a broken foot suffered in the offseason.) Fill-in Shaun Chapas has done a good job, but against a formidable Gamecock defense the lack of Southerland’s block-hammering was noticeable. The Bulldog run game stands at excellent to begin with, but with Southerland they thunder into the territory of the superb.

T is for Tarantula Hawk. The current reading on the Syracuse Football Pain Index: a 4.0 on the Schmidt Scale of Insect Stings, described as being “Blinding, fierce, shockingly electric. A running hair drier has been dropped into your bubble bath.” Or you just got the hair beaten off you 55-13 by Syracuse at home. Same thing, really.

U is for Understated Devotion. If Brent Musburger had to weep into the arms of Jim Tressel on Saturday night, he did it off-camera and tastefully: there was little for Musberger to wax poetic enough about on the Buckeyes side, and his bro-mance with Tressel was a quiet presence in the broadcast. ABC did go crazy-go-nuts by putting two sideline reporters on duty, Lisa Salters and Erin Andrews, which paid off with bits of useful information coming in throughout the game.

V is for Violence. The hit of the day: Clay Matthews’ horrific, nasty, no good very bad blindside hit on Todd Boeckman. The hit tallied the holy trinity of tackle requirements: energy (Boeckman’s head shot back on his neck like a palm tree struck by a hurricane-force wind,) effect (the ball shot out of Boeckman’s hands on impact), and terror (the cameras caught excellent angles of Boeckman looking obviously stunned.)

W is for Win, Baby. Missouri, Oklahoma, and USC all tastefully took care of hopelessly overmatched competition. It just so happens that USC’s was hopelessly overrated. Florida beat the Bye with ease, and spent the weekend watching Jonathan Crompton get baffled by UAB’s defense. Charlie Strong is pleased at reading this sentence, and is happier after watching the film.

X is for Xenophilia. Oregon State and Hawaii featured so many islanders it could have doubled for a scene from a particularly lopsided Hawaiian family reunion pickup game. My envy for Polynesian-style surf-afro hair at this point in the season: growing.

Y is for Yes. Or the answer to “Did ABC resort to showing long, luxurious shots of the Song Girls during the slack second half of Ohio State/USC?”

Z is for Zebras. Or a lack thereof; after taking the spotlight in an unfortunate way, there was little in the way of interventionist officiating this weekend. Kudos to a rapid and profession-wide decision not to overlegislate, especially on the “unnecesary celebration” front. Fully expect this positive trend to reverse next week when a player is docked 15 yards for standing up after the ball and clapping following a crucial touchdown.





</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
<table class="card"><tbody class="card-tbody"><tr></tr><tr><td class="ct c">
</td><td class="ctr c">
</td></tr><tr><td class="cl c">
</td><td class="cc c">2:39 PM (4 minutes ago)
PWD Quick Toughts on SC

from Georgia Sports Blog by Paul Westerdawg
I agree with much of what Quinton wrote earlier today. My initial reaction to the game was "most of this is fixable stuff...except the pass rush." We have the coaching staff to fix fixable things. Unfixable things may include:
  • Pass Rush -- We're missing Marcus Howard in a very, very big way. The scheme from Willie Martinez was pretty sound...ugly but sound. He basically looks to have said, "let's force South Carolina's half assed QBs to beat us." The run defense surrendered 18 yards on 16 attempts, and the passing game of SC wasn't able to deliver when it mattered most. That means that his plan was unquestionably a success. However, the lack of a pass rush was exposed. More accurate passers will have a field day against UGA if we don't find a way to get pressure. I say "may be unfixable" because Marcus Howard ain't "walking through that door."
  • Kick Coverage -- This SHOULD be fixable, but we will apparently need a televised A&E Network Intervention to sort it out. To execute the directional kickoffs you need a kicker that can kick the ball inside the 5 yard line...in the corner...very high...and a coverage unit that can contain the returner. We are doing none of that. We gave SC starting field position at the 35, 38, and 30. Our kicks traveled 51, 57 and 58 yards. That means that the SC return actually caught a ball on the 19 yardline. That's ridiculous. By comparison, SC's kickoffs traveled 69 and 70 yards resulting in starting position of the 20 and 25 yard lines. This is not working. It has never worked, and it looks like we're not going to fix it in my lifetime.
  • YMCA Ball -- Some of our substitution patterns drive me nutty. Over the past few years, we have had the tendency to put a less productive player in the game and ask him to make a big play when a more experienced player is sitting on the sidelines. Sometimes it works (See: Henderson, Mikey vs. Bama) But many times it doesn't. AJ Green and Mohamed Massaquoi are performing at elite levels. They need to be the guys running the biggest routes in the biggest moments. Along the same lines, what is with this Logan Gray experiment. There is no way that he's our best option at punt returner, gunner or kickoff coverage. It makes positively no sense to me why he's in there. That's not to speak negatively of him. He's giving 100% and he's a good kid. But it begs the question of the coaching staff? WHY is he in there. There are bigger, faster, more physical guys who are trained and exposed to high impact / collision plays more often.
That's not to be overall negative:
I'm very pleased with the game. I was expecting / hoping that our nail biter days against SC were over. They aren't, but so what. We won, and this is mostly fixable issues.

The Miscues (Penalties, Drops, Screw-ups Etc.)
I'm currently charting the miscues from the game. Overall, I feel better the more I watch. The next post will be the 1st half offensive miscues. When you look at them, you can see how close we really were to pulling away. As I finish sections of the game I'll post some thoughts.

BTW -- Quinton is right. Stafford made some great audibles in this game and a few throws that saved our bacon. Yes, he also blew some plays, but there aren't 5 QBs who can hit that pass to AJ Green, and there aren't 10 QBs who have the autonomy to check out of bad plays as much as Matthew does. I like what we have there.

The drive chart / miscue comments are coming shortly.






</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
<table class="card"><tbody class="card-tbody"><tr></tr><tr><td class="ct c">
</td><td class="ctr c">
</td></tr><tr><td class="cl c">
</td><td class="cc c">3:07 PM (5 minutes ago)
Seriously, Auburn... 3-2?

from The FanHouse - NCAAfootball
Filed under: Auburn, Mississippi State, SEC
tuberville.jpg
On Saturday, the "offensively-challenged" Auburn Tigers won by a single point over the nearly-but-not-quite-as-offensively-challenged Mississippi State Bulldogs.

(Never before has a single point seemed like such a large margin.)

A win is a win is a win, they say.

This game? This win? This one challenges that notion. There was a victor, but a national television audience was left listless and reeling in throes of boredom. And of course, two young punters were given the grueling task of launching nearly two dozen combined punts downfield. Surely it's dangerous in some way to kick that many balls that far in such a short time. (If not dangerous, it's unnatural, anyway.)

To be fair, Auburn's new offensive coordinator Tony Franklin has his hands full trying to transform Auburn from their ground 'n pound, run-heavy offense into a modern-day spread. Much like trying to mold an option-oriented team into a West Coast offense, it simply takes time to make it happen. (Then again, Franklin had Auburn looking pretty good against Clemson in their last game of 2007.)

But still... 3 points? Against Mississippi State? Sly Croom's team doesn't usually strike fear into the hearts of SEC opponents, but their defense is generally decent, or even "pretty good" by conference standards.

Auburn managed 315 yards, but that number is more than slightly deceptive. The Tigers managed to convert only 3-16 on 3rd down and turned the ball over three times. Even so, Mississippi State's only points came from a safety... two points gifted to the Bulldogs thanks to a holding penalty called on an Auburn lineman in the Tigers' end zone.

Here's a really scary way to look at Auburn's offensive production: the net output of the Auburn offense is 1 point -- deduct the safety given up by the offense from the 3 points their kicker put up. That's the lowest net scoring production an offense can provide... so it's all the more stunning that they won the game.

The casual SEC fan's take is that Auburn has a tough row to hoe with their 2008 SEC tilt, fielding such an historicaly inept offense. (The last time Auburn won a game with 3 total points? 34 years ago.) And FanHouse's take mirrors that of the aforementioned casual SEC fan. Al Borges was sent out after years of running a less-than-powerful offense, but surely Auburn's traditional offense could have put up more than 3 points... right?

3 minus 2 aside, Auburn's performance against Mississippi State was sufficient to get ESPN College Gameday to pay a visit for next week's showdown against the Bayou Bengals of LSU.

Dare we hope for an over/under exceeding 10 points?





</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
Idiot. It's very clear he does not like doctors, hospitals, or modern medical care.

<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td class="col0">Weis plans to wait for knee surgery

</td><td class="col1">Story Highlights
  • Weis will delay knee surgery for at least a month and may not have it at all
  • He said if he has it, it would be an Irish bye week or after the season
  • On Sunday, he had a brace on his knee and walked with the aid of a cane
</td></tr></tbody></table><table class="cnninlineright" align="right" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td>
</td></tr></tbody></table>SOUTH BEND, Ind. (AP) -- Notre Dame coach Charlie Weis will delay undergoing surgery on the knee he injured during Saturday's game against Michigan for at least a month and may forego it altogether.
Weis said Sunday that if he decides to have the surgery it would be on a bye week for the Irish or after the season. He said he's not in a rush to do anything.
A Notre Dame player crashed into Weis during a punt return during the game, which the Irish won 35-17. Weis remained on the sideline throughout the game on crutches.
On Sunday, he had a brace on his knee and walked with the aid of a cane. He said he plans to be on the sideline for Saturday's game at Michigan State.
 
I like kansas state a little bit too.

What do you think of baylor getting over two td ?

That game could go either way. I'm not a big fan of Baylor away from home in that spot. I made UConn -17 but I think that could be way too many.

Added:

Utah -7 (-110)

Thinking of adding BYU -26 too.
 
Pretty funny. Greek came out with their lines and in some cases their lines were 2 points lower or higher than BC's. So BC made immediate changes to only be 1/2 pt off.
 
Guru: PAC-10 sucks

Our friend Sam, the BCS Guru says the PAC-10 sucks. Well, not exactly but if you read between the lines that's the impression that you get:

In the last six years, USC has won the Pac-10 title every year. Went to a BCS bowl every year. Dominated the conference with a 44-6 record. And while USC finished no worse than 4th in either poll over those six seasons, no other Pac-10 team has been in the top 8 in the same span. No other Pac-10 team has been to a BCS bowl since 2002.

While USC was busy pummeling the Buckeyes on Saturday night, the rest of the Pac-10 just laid a giant egg. The Nine Little Dwarfs went 2-7 on the weekend, going 1-4 against non-BCS teams and 1-3 against BCS conference opponents, snatching a single victory when Oregon survived at Purdue.

UCLA made the biggest splash by getting mauled by Brigham Young, 59-0. The last time the Bruins lost that badly - in 1929 - the stock market crashed and the Great Depression began shortly thereafter.
Here's the thing, if USC is playing in a league of its own, how do we know how good they really are? We don't and we won't until perhaps the BCS Championship. Unless something unforeseen happens USC will be cruise to that game and there's about 15 teams vying for the other spot. Still think we don't need a playoff?
 
If you guys aren't reading Matador and Garf's blog, you should (oh, and Horses writes there occasionally too--beers on Wed or Thurs, bro):

Matador’s Week 4 Notebook

from underdogsofwar.com by Matador
Very early it looks like the linemakers are catching on. A lot of potentially good plays taken away by sharper lines. But it does look like a good week for upsets. I’ll probably end up playing at least 6 dogs on the ML. I hope this is the week I break out with a .500 record. Keep firing, and eventually it will happen. Only one early play so far:
North Carolina +1
I couldn’t see that line being available for long, so I took it. Others I’m seriously considering are FSU still under 6 (5.5) and Ball St. still over 3 (3.5). Ball might be better as a ML, but if the line movement gets rolling against you, they could be +1.5 and +105 when the ML finally comes out. I’d rather have the 3.5. I haven’t done it because I’m not sure what the public sentiment is.
Also, I’d take CSU if it went back up to +6. I can’t figure out how UH gets favored on the road against anybody.
 
<table class="card"><tbody class="card-tbody"><tr></tr><tr><td class="ct c">
</td><td class="ctr c">
</td></tr><tr><td class="cl c">
</td><td class="cc c">3:32 PM (1 hour ago)
Pollin': Down go the Buckeyes (one more time)

from Dr. Saturday - NCAAF - Yahoo! Sports by Matt Hinton
ept_sports_ncaaf_experts-894806642-1221428283.jpg
Ohio State is the first serious mythical championship favorite to bite the dust, but if nothing else, OSU's fall has served to unite warring factions in the polls around a single, golden Trojan idol. In the preseason, Georgia, Oklahoma, Florida and LSU shared 32 first-place votes in the AP poll (to USC's 12) and 33 in the Coaches' poll (to SC's 14); three weeks later, Southern Cal has taken over all but seven No. 1 votes in both polls, one of the most rapid consolidations of disparate power since, well, Ohio State beat No. 2 Texas waaaay back in 2006, when the current seniors were untested sophomores and, you know, there was still an actual football program in Columbus. And the Buckeyes? Down, down, down, of course, almost ten spots in both polls, from fifth to No. 13 in the AP (just ahead of BYU, East Carolina and Penn State) and No. 14 by the coaches (in front of Penn State, East Carolina and South Florida). Notice the Buckeyes remain tentatively in front of the Nittany Lions on both scores: struggling against Ohio U. of Ohio and spectacularly spitting the bit against USC is apparently more impressive than routing Oregon State (finally a winner Saturday, against Hawaii) and Syracuse (no comment). So in the pollsters' minds, anyway -- and nobody else's mind really matters, unless you can program a computer -- OSU remains the second-best team in the Big Ten behind Wisconsin, whose California trip went a little better Saturday night.
Otherwise, there are few surprises -- Georgia falling from second to third in both polls in favor of Oklahoma after struggling with South Carolina is perfectly predictable -- except that Vanderbilt is touching the poll -- the Commodores come in first in the "Also Receiving Votes" section of the AP tally, a scant 58 points behind No. 25 Fresno State. And Irish haters can relax: even after its biggest win in many moons, Notre Dame is far from the gate, coming at No. 40 on both tallies with just four points in the AP and five from the coaches. But they're coming on!






</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
Sunday knee-jerk isn't talking about the "Auburn Tigers"

from The Joe Cribbs Car Wash by Jerry Hinnen


Proposed: we stop talking, right now, today, about the "Auburn Tigers."

Because it's impossible. After last night's 3-2 win, there's nothing coherent to write or say about the Auburn <strike>baseball</strike> <strike>soccer</strike> <strike>field hockey</strike> football team. Trying to address the "Auburn Tigers" as a whole is like calling both heads and tails on a coinflip, like rooting for both teams at the Iron Bowl. You can't do it.

Because the "Auburn Tigers" we saw last night weren't a football team. They were two separate football teams, two unique sets of Auburn Tigers, two subspecies of what our more scientifically-minded readers might call Auburna tigris: namely, Auburna tigris defensis and Auburna tigris offensis. Both subspecies have identical markings and are indistinguishable to the naked eye, but the comprehensively divergent behavioral patterns of each--and the differing projected long-term survival rate and success of the two subspecies--are irreconcilable with them sharing a unified classification.

In short: there's no way to discuss the "Auburn Tigers" without either selling the Auburn defense's accomplishments short or failing to fully address how broken the Auburn offense appears to be. So I'm not going to try. There are two teams here who happen to be joined by one uniform, one sideline, one school, one nickname and one scoreboard: thus there are two posts here, joined in a single URL.

1. Names


As per the official box score, these are the men who played defense for Auburn against Mississippi St.:

52-Antonio Coleman, 93-Mike Blanc, 94-Sen'Derrick Marks, 49-Michael Goggans, 46-Craig Stevens, 10-Tray Blackmon, 59-Chris Evans, 26-Mike McNeil, 4-Zac Etheridge, 8-Jerraud Powers, 6-Walter McFadden, 11-Mike Slade, 15-Neiko Thorpe, 17-Josh Bynes, 25-D'Antoine Hood, 31-Adam Herring, 33-Christian Thompson, 39-Spencer Pybus, 45-Antoine Carter, 55-Merrill Johnson, 56-Courtney Harden, 83-Gabe McKenzie, 91-Jake Ricks, 98-Zach Clayton, 99-Tez Doolittle.

This is what they accomplished: 6 first downs allowed. 38 rushing yards allowed. 79 passing yards allowed. 116 total yards allowed. 1.3 yards a rush, 3.1 yards a passing attempt, 2.1 yards a play allowed. 0 third-down conversions in 14 attempts. 15 possessions faced, 0 points allowed. 1 game won, single-handedly. On the road. Against an SEC team.

So I list their names because they deserve to be listed. They deserved to be named. (It's possible a couple of them only played special teams, I'm not sure: whatever, Pegues never got loose.) Part of me thinks it's too soon, too over-the-top to say whatever hope we Auburn fans have of this season living up to our, well, hopes lies with them--I'd have said the same after the South Florida game last year, only to see Good Brandon ride in and save the day against the Gators. But most of me thinks that's where we are. Whatever hope we Auburn fans have of this season living up to our hopes lies with them.

That's almost OK, because it's a hell of a hope. Walt McFadden was supposed to be something of a question mark: he only made, particularly given the timing, one of the best interceptions I can ever remember by an Auburn player. Sen'Derrick Marks has shouldered the burden of being a potential first-round draft pick and the best player on one of the country's best defenses, the one that seemed to haunt Q. Groves all season long last year: instead he's been even better than expected, the wrecking ball around which everything else our opponents have attempted has crumbled. Blackmon finally looked liked Blackmon. Tez Doolittle, back from the football dead. Powers. Stevens, Johnson, and Evans. Gabe friggin' McKenzie.

Can they beat the likes of LSU by themselves? Could they beat Georgia? The Tide? I don't know. But after what they did in Starkville, I don't think it's only my burnt-orange-and-navy-blue glasses that makes me think they might. They're that good. They offered us all a lifeline last night, and I'm going to cling to it this week--and probably longer--like a football-crazed man drowning in his worry.

2. Mirage?

Remember how optimistic we all were after the Clemson game? Remember?

As false a prophet as Tony Franklin appeared to be last night, I swear he gave us more than ample reason to believe last New Year's Eve. We'd asked all season for someone to get more of our talented running backs on the field: he did that. We asked all season for someone to find a way to use the unique and unquestionably valuable talents of Kodi Burns: he did that. We'd asked for someone to construct an Auburn offense that felt like it could do something more than grind out four yards a carry and then pray that Brandon Cox would throw to someone wearing the proper color of jersey, an offense that felt like it attacked rather than hung on by its fingernails as--let's be honest--Borges's had for two seasons: Franklin did that in that Clemson game, and he did it in only nine practices.

So why in the bloody hell is that Clemson game still the sharpest Tony Franklin's offense has looked at Auburn, with:

1. an entire spring and fall camps' worth of practice and three more games in which to continuing develop said offense

2. every player of significance who took the field on offense against Clemson, save Brandon Cox, back this season

3. even more versatility available at running back (with Davis's health) and wide receiver (via recruiting, health, etc.).

It defies logical sense. Why was Fannin worthy of touching the ball eight times against Clemson and all of twice last night? The running backs--still, without question, the most talented unit on the offense--caught 11 balls against Clemson; they caught five last night. Against Clemson, after nine practices in the new system, Auburn's quarterbacks completed 60 percent of their passes; after bringing in a QB who we all know KNOWS THE SYSTEM and giving the line, receivers, etc. all the time necessary to find their grooves in the offense, that completion percentage has increased to ... 53.8 percent. Nine practices yielded three offensive penalties; an entire year's worth of work yielded nine. How?

The relative strength of State's defense compared to Clemson's obviously changes the numbers around a bit, but it doesn't change the fact that all the creativity, the attitude of surprise, the damn spark that Franklin brought to Auburn last December seems utterly leached away. There was no better symbol of this than ESPN's repeated shots of an interested-but-hardly-engaged Kodi Burns on the sideline, re-reduced to hoping (or least I'm hoping he was hoping) he'd get a snap or two here or there but otherwise consigned to spectating ... even as the Auburn offense could not cry out more loudly--particularly inside the red zone--for the kind of unpredictable explosiveness he could bring to the field. Burns's inclusion in the Clemson gameplan was the single biggest sign, we thought, that Franklin had committed to finding a way to use every weapon Auburn could offer him; seeing Chris Todd take every snap of last night's game was likewise the single biggest sign that Franklin has apparently forgotten that commitment or never genuinely made it.

From Burns's absence to the avalanche of penalties to Todd's inabililty to hit a crossing pattern to the continuing, maddening fumbling issues--Auburn has handed the ball to four different tailbacks the past two games and all four of them have fumbled at least once--there's no point in soft-selling the fact that Auburn's offense was poorly prepared for last night's game. They were poorly coached. After Auburn has gone four of the six halves they've played without scoring an offensive touchdown, it's neither unfair nor sensationalist to say than as the offensive coordinator Tony Franklin has done a poor job to date.

But I'm not ready to say Franklin is a poor coach, not ready to leap off the cliff and declare his offense incapable of functioning at an SEC level. The Clemson game continues to stand as a testament to what he can do when he's willing to be creative. When Franklin is willing to put the ball in the hands of his best playmakers via the system rather than stubbornly letting the system (or god knows what other demands) dictate where the ball ends up, he should be smart enough to make this work. He coached the Clemson game as if he was proving he deserved the job; this Saturday he'd best coach the LSU game as if to prove he deserves to keep it. Or past whatever New Year's Eve game Auburn lands in this year, he may not.

Three Stars

Tray Blackmon. Team lead in tackles, several pounding hits, the critical 4th-and-1 stop in the fourth. Maybe there was something to that bit about Blackmon regaining his old Little Ball of Hate form once he faced a team that, say, had use for a fullback?

Clinton Durst. As in (mostly justifiable) awe as Davis and Davie and an awful lot of Auburn fans were of State punter Blake McAdam, his net punting average was 35.9. Durst's--facing a returner of equal ability with Pegues as McAdam faced with Dunn--was 35.1. In a game in which Auburn couldn't afford to give up field position via an exchange of punts--obviously--Durst made sure they didn't.

Walt McFadden. Honestly, there's not a guy on the defense that wouldn't fit in this spot, but we'll go with the guy who made the most spectacular defensive play of the season so far.

Three Opportunities for Improvement

Wait ... just three?

Red zone scoring. As Will pointed out, after wheezing across the goal line vs. USM and then looking as abjectly hopeless inside the 10 as they did against State, it's time for Auburn's offense to either abandon the spread entirely whilst in scoring position or maybe, I dunno, bring in the quarterback whose proven time and again he can get the ball in the endzone without having to throw it amidst an inevitable thicket of defenders.

Byrum. Auburn: your home for placekickers capable of stone-cold brilliance and mind-melting chokery within the same calendar year since 1999! (See: Duval, Damon, and V****n, J**n.)

Oh geez, I don't know, the multiple unforced fumbles in the final dying minutes of a one-point game in which our defense has already been on the field for way too damn long? Maybe that could be improved? Sorry ... maybe taking this “knee-jerk” thing too far. On the other hand … seriously, what the hell?

Numbers of importance

11. Auburn’s yards-per-completion. Peculiarly, after getting basically nothing going down the field through the first two games, the Tigers’ only semi-successful ploy on offense last night (well, aside from the occasional rushing opening) was to air it out. Some gentle kudos to Billings for his efforts in this, uh, effort, and considering that Todd was asked to stretch the field a bit more, it’s worth noting that …

0 is the number of interceptions Todd threw. So he’s got that going for him. Then again, when the best thing you can say about a quarterback is that he didn’t completely screw things up, perhaps it’s an indication he could have accomplished a bit more, no?

3-for-46. The combined success on third-down conversions of Auburn’s three opponents to date. Yep, 3-for-46. I’ll live with that.

Your bottom line

As stated, Auburn’s defense sure seems like the last hope of our Tigers surviving LSU’s visit. It’s hope enough: win that one 3-2—or 7-3 or 10-9, neither of the latter completely out of the question—and we’ll all be dancing down Yag Street regardless of whether Tate holds on to the ball or Todd runs a fully-committed option this go-round.

But as a wise man once said when told there was a single hope: No. There is another. And that’s this, the other silver lining in the black cloud the Auburn offense created in Starkville: no one will expect Tommy Tuberville to win the game he’s coaching this Saturday. No one, save for a handful of Auburn diehards that, deep down, can never bear to think otherwise anyway.

After nearly 10 years of watching Tubby walk the Auburn sideline, I doubt I have to explain why no one expecting Tommy Tuberville to win a football game is reason to think he just might win it anyway. The question is whether the offensive coordinator he hired is going to give him enough support to pull it off regardless of what upset-minded rabbits he pulls out of his hat this time.
 
RJ

KSU? I couldn't tell you one player on either team. But one thing I have noticed is the dog trend on Thursday nights....this year 2-0, not sure on the exact # from last year, but I know it was pretty prevalent.

I'm pretty sure you were discussing this with someone in LVSC openers thread....but you do you think Vegas accounts for this?

Talk to me because I have played the Dog blindly dating back to last year.
 
RJ

KSU? I couldn't tell you one player on either team. But one thing I have noticed is the dog trend on Thursday nights....this year 2-0, not sure on the exact # from last year, but I know it was pretty prevalent.

I'm pretty sure you were discussing this with someone in LVSC openers thread....but you do you think Vegas accounts for this?

Talk to me because I have played the Dog blindly dating back to last year.

First, game is on Wednesday and not Thursday. Not sure if that matters or not.

Second, I'm not 100% sold on the play myself. KSU has had a bye week and hasn't played anyone of note and typically plays not so hot away from home in non-confs. Also, L-ville is still pretty bad this year but not as bad as the game against Kentucky indicated.

Still, I side with the Big XII in this matchup and Ron Prince coached team with plenty of skill players on both sides of the ball. Also, KSU has a slight revenge angle from when L-ville came into Manhattan 2 years ago and beat them.

I'll take a FG fav when I made the line a TD.
 
<table class="card"><tbody class="card-tbody"><tr></tr><tr><td class="ct c">
</td><td class="ctr c">
</td></tr><tr><td class="cl c">
</td><td class="cc c">6:07 PM (10 minutes ago)
Big Ten Market Letter #3

from The FanHouse - NCAAfootball
Filed under: Iowa, Ohio State, Penn State, Wisconsin, Big 10
todd-boeckman-240-sm.jpg
They got their bachelor's degree from Florida and their master's from LSU, but Saturday night Southern California handed Ohio State a brand-new degree: the Doctor of Failosophy. Yeesh. What a curbstomping. If you really need me to tell you what to do with the Buckeyes now, I'll be happy to do so, as long as you tell me something first: Who turned the computer on for you?

Don't just sell, pards; eject. There are at least two teams in the Big Ten playing better football than the Buckeyes right now.

I saw a distant early warning last Saturday, and it's wasn't the Ohio-OSU game. It was the fact that South Dakota State beat Youngstown State almost as badly as the Buckeyes did. Sure, Jim Tressel rested his starters when the game was in hand and probably didn't want to show up his former employer too badly. Even if Tressel had rested his starters for the whole game, they ought to be able to out-perform a squad that was playing Division II ball four years ago. You've got problems on offense, Coach, and they're not all in Beanie Wells's shoes.

So where does the savvy investor in the non-existent football futures market go now?

I can't tell you for sure, of course, but I'm putting a strong buy on the Penn State-Wisconsin game October 11. Penn State hasn't necessarily played anyone decent yet, but their offense is scary good, and when have you ever known a Penn State team to have anything less than a great defense?

Wisconsin, meanwhile, has played somebody decent. They had a much better California swing than the Buckeyes did, beating Fresno State in front of an amped-up crowd, and doing it with their standard operating procedure. They're starting to look like Tom Osborne's old Nebraska teams. You know exactly what's coming, but good luck stopping it. I'm not saying the winner of this game wins the conference (especially since Wisconsin will have played Ohio State the week before), but the outcome of that game will definitely help sort some things out.

(Note to the Buckeye fan who's already composing a nastygram for me: I'm not taking your team seriously until I see some evidence that I should.)

Meanwhile, I say hold the Iowa Hawkeyes. Getting over on Iowa State is wonderful, but the quarterback situation is holding me back from saying "buy." What if there comes a day when neither Ricky Stanzi nor Jake Christensen is playing well? However, I'm willing to believe that, if Gene Chizik says your defense is "something else," then it probably is. Eight wins looks a little more achievable than it did before the season, especially if Shonn Greene keeps running well.





</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
First, game is on Wednesday and not Thursday. Not sure if that matters or not.

Second, I'm not 100% sold on the play myself. KSU has had a bye week and hasn't played anyone of note and typically plays not so hot away from home in non-confs. Also, L-ville is still pretty bad this year but not as bad as the game against Kentucky indicated.

Still, I side with the Big XII in this matchup and Ron Prince coached team with plenty of skill players on both sides of the ball. Also, KSU has a slight revenge angle from when L-ville came into Manhattan 2 years ago and beat them.

I'll take a FG fav when I made the line a TD.

Shit, looked at the first game and not the date. Thanks for the response.:shake:

Great thread, love the pictures.
 
Rice trying to get back today

from Bevo Beat
The Rice Owl football team was stuck in Nashville on Sunday.
With Houston still trying to recover from Hurricane Ike, the Owls spent Sunday trying to do what they normally would do, they just did it in Tennessee.
Players studied. Coaches met and tried to start preparing for Texas. There were team meetings.
The Owls are going to try and get back to Houston today, but as of late yesterday evening, they weren’t sure if that would be possible.
But the Owls really weren’t feeling sorry for themselves.
“I think everybody understands that what we’re dealing with doesn’t really compare to what a lot of other people in Houston are going through right now,” Owls media relations representative Chuck Pool said.
 
<table class="card"><tbody class="card-tbody"><tr><td class="ct c">
</td><td class="ctr c">
</td></tr><tr><td class="cl c">
</td><td class="cc c">5:21 AM (3 hours ago)
Leach: "Right now, we're nothing special."

from Double-T Nation by Seth C
Most of the articles this morning are focusing on Captain Leach being unhappy with the offense for 2 1/2 games. We have Don Williams from the LAJ, Kate Hairopoulos from the DMN, and DT's Alex Ybarra with essentially the same story, and most of them one or more of these quotes:
"What we've done, quite honestly, for 21/2 games I don't consider acceptable,'' Leach said. "I don't know at what point they think we arrived. This group of quarterbacks and receivers, we haven't done anything impressive. I don't think it's impressive at all other than some numbers inflated by some explosiveness and the efforts of others. As far as any steadiness, there's nothing impressive. "How can (receivers) drop the ball when you throw it as much as we do? When you come away from a practice where you throw 270 to 300 balls and drop two? The fact that we've had a little success in the past, it gets candy coated. Oh, they'll come along.' Baloney.
"When it hits you in the hands and you drop it, when you get re-routed out of bounds. When you throw the ball short and out of bounds all the time. ... Right now, we're nothing special, not at quarterback or receiver.
"We've got big heads and we're not tough enough to go out there and make plays," he said. "I don't know if it's big heads or we're scared. I'm kind of curious; are they scared or do they have big heads? Right now they're nothing special. And it's a byproduct of my coaching and other people's coaching. We're nothing special, not at quarterback or receiver. We can pretend we are."
As I said yesterday, it's somewhat comforting that he sees the same thing that we see, a quarterback who looks uncomfortable, and receivers who are dropping passes.
There's so many delicious things here, I'm not sure where to start. This is going to be a bit of a ramble:
  • For those of you who have criticized this team and coaching staff for what could be termed as a lack of urgency, Leach sees it too.
  • Leach is obviously tired of seeing receivers knocked off their routes, something that has plagued this offense for some time (see Missouri v. Texas Tech) and now he's calling them out.
  • So, dropped passes are inexcusable?
  • I'm trying to remember who dropped all of those passes, and the early Britton passes stand out to me as well as a Todd Walker drop (I think?), which makes sense because at halftime, Leach said that he didn't have an X-Receiver who could catch the ball. According to the last depth chart that we did before the start of the season, which I think is still holding up, Rashad Hawk was 3rd string behind Britton and Walker. As of Saturday, that may not be true. Both Hawk (4 receptions for 44 yards) and Tramain Swindall (4 receptions for 31 yards) are more than capable receivers, but more importantly, I don't recall them dropping any passes.
  • Leach wants Harrell to act like a senior quarterback. It's obvious to us that Harrell is taking way too many chances down the field, he's got to do a better job of taking what the defense gives you. I watched quite a bit of the first half of the Missouri/Nevada game and that's all that Daniel did, took what the defense gave him. Of course this works in conjunction with the receivers staying on their routes and not getting knocked off early. In order for Harrell to be efficient, the receivers have got to get to their routes as quickly as possible.
  • I think Leach is saying all of this now because last year, against Missouri and Colorado, all of these things happened. Harrell pressed, receivers weren't getting into their routes, and the offense struggled. Leach sees those things now, but rather than wait for a really bad game, he wants to address it now.
  • I've got no problem with Leach doing this publicly. I'm guessing that he's done it in the locker room and in film sessions for the past two weeks, but obviously, things haven't changed. Perhaps this will.
  • Remember how when you were a little kid and you were fighting with your brother or sister in the back of the car, your mom turns around and says, "Don't make me stop the car and come back there and spank you." I get the feeling this same type of conversation is going on right now in a much different setting and circumstance.
Link Dump: DT's Texas Tech v. SMU slidshow . . . DT with fans enjoying RaiderGATE . . . Texas Tech legend Dave Parks is recognized at halftime for his induction into the College Football Hall of Fame . . . KCBD11 with highlights from the win against SMU . . .






</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
<table class="card"><tbody class="card-tbody"><tr><td class="ct c">
</td><td class="ctr c">
</td></tr><tr><td class="cl c">
</td><td class="cc c">3:00 AM (5 hours ago)
Can Auburn Turn Its Offense Around In A Week? Don't Bet Against Tuberville

from Track Em Tigers by Jay Coulter


Tristan Davis will need to hold on to the ball better to beat LSU.

By Jay Coulter
jccoulter@gmail.com
Perhaps the best line of Saturday night's game came from ESPN 2 analyst Bob Davies. Watching the Auburn offense raise up out of their stances and look to the sidelines for the next play, Davies commented, "If they (the coaches) keep calling those kinds of plays they are going to quit looking over there."
That's funny because I was thinking the same thing. I wanted to stop looking myself. But like watching a train wreck about to happen, I couldn't look away.
I've reached way back in the recesses of my brain to find a worse offensive performance than Saturday's 3-2 win over Miss State. Maybe we had one during the days of Doug Barfield or Terry Bowden. If so, I've had way too many beers over the years to remember. The only thing close to comparison is maybe Tennessee's 42-0 throttling of the Tigers in newly expanded Jordan-Hare Stadium in 1980.
Instead of collecting a workman like win against the Bulldogs, Auburn finds itself in a similar situation to last year's squad prior to the Florida game. It's an offense without an identity or leader. On this Monday, the prospects of Auburn beating LSU Saturday night appear to be nothing more than a pipedream. Fortunately for Auburn fans, Tommy Tuberville has a good track record in those pipedream games.
Much of the criticism of Auburn by fans centers on quarterback Chris Todd. If you watch the game again, you'll see that it goes much deeper. Tommy Tuberville was vocal after the game about the blame falling on him. I couldn't agree more.
Tuberville is rarely out-coached. Sylvester Croom took him to the woodshed. He talked throughout last week about using quarterback Kodi Burns in situational plays. With a first and goal from the seven you have to wonder if there was ever a better situation to put Burns in the game.
"I know everybody wonders why Kodi didn't play, a lot of that had to do with me," Tuberville said. "I thought putting him in a situation where our back was to the wall a lot, I wanted it to be a positive note when he goes back in the game. He was ready to go. He's a team player. We've got to find the right situation."
Kodi has been down this road before. He's not a freshman. Something tells me he could be an asset inside the red zone. Auburn has faced 13 opportunities inside the 20 yard line this year and has come away with only five touchdowns. You can't beat LSU, Georgia or Alabama with those stats.
After a night to sleep on it, Tuberville appears to be more determined than ever to make this offense work. "I've told everybody all along that this is going to take a while," Tuberville said. "This is a lot more execution from a lot more people. You've got three wide receivers on the field. The offensive linemen are more vulnerable because people are going to be getting off the ball on you because you're in shotgun. The little things add up in this offense a lot more than when you line up and pound it.
"I like this offense. You can take advantage of people more but you can't beat yourself. Right now that's what we're doing. We're basically beating ourselves and putting ourselves in a hole. You can't fumble the ball eight times in two games and expect a whole lot."
Lost in the ugly win was the performance of Auburn's defense. How quickly have fans forgotten Will Muschamp? This may be the best three game stretch for an Auburn defense in school history. You'd have to go back to the defenses of the 1950's and the unit that lead Auburn to its national championship in 1957.
The question is, can they keep it up? Will there be enough gas left in the tank to beat a stout LSU offense? Teams always say that you feel it after playing Miss State. They are as physical as any team in the conference.
Defensive coordinator Paul Rhoads will have to walk a tight rope this week getting his guys mentally and physically prepared to go another 15 rounds. The Tigers head into the game with the tenth-ranked unit in the country, allowing just 213 total yards a game. The bad news is LSU's defense ranks 12<sup>th</sup>, allowing only 219 total yards a game.
Offensive coordinator Tony Franklin is sure to have many sleepless nights this week. Auburn obviously has big problems offensively. Luckily, they all appear to be fixable. Franklin must find a way to cut down on the fumbles and get out of second and long situations.
It won't be easy. But Tommy Tuberville has overcome worse. Let the countdown begin...






</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
Nice cheap shot OU:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rtXBIRVmEnk&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rtXBIRVmEnk&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 
GT vs. VT Analysis

from In The Edge by xenoabe

Believe me, I was not happy after this one. It hurt. It was just a rough loss to swallow. However, after a few days to cool down the sun is coming back out and I still love this team. So here’s my breakdown of the game.
Special Teams
Not terrible. A lot of people were worried about this part of our game and it really wasn’t all that bad. Yes, we did have an extra point blocked, but we made up for it with the 2-point conversion later in the game. Honestly, you can’t really expect to play VT and not have them have something big happen on special teams. Scott Blair hit his only field goal try of the afternoon. No spectacular returns, but we also held on to the ball during the returns. Coverage on kicks was pretty good. Overall, I’d say we showed improvement in this area this week.
Defense
Our inexperience at linebacker showed and VT showed how to neutralize our dominant D-line. Honestly, the Hokies didn’t have much beyond Taylor’s scramble ability. He made a few good throws and Darren Evans broke a couple nice runs, but their offense really came down to T-Mobile’s feet. I think with Glennon playing we win going away. The D-line got good push, but if any lane at all opened up Taylor got through it quick and made people miss to get some crucial first downs for the Hokies. I said this was going to be a key and we just didn’t stop it. Part of it was Taylor’s quickness and speed but part of it was linebackers not being in a position to slow him down either. We are young at linebacker and this type of thing will improve with experience. Our LB crew will be stacked for the next couple of years.
One thing that surprised me is we didn’t get a single turnover. They didn’t really pass all that much so there wasn’t many chances for interceptions, but give VT credit for holding onto the ball and not giving it away on any fumbles.
Oh well, at least Tyrod doesn’t seem like as much of a thug as another VT quarterback who most recently wore #5 before him.
Offense
JoshPissed.jpg
Josh and Heart

While my heart bleeds for this team it is also wrung dry by it at the same time. So, the good? This team shows an uncanny will to fight and scratch and will NEVER give up. Josh Nesbitt is a man and he will give his all to get this team a win. I’m seeing an attitude about this team that I haven’t seen since I arrived on the Flats in 2003. The reads are looking better and Josh is timing his pitches better. The A-backs had a much better day as Roddy grabs a huge reception for a TD and Lucas Cox showed his abilities. Josh also set a record with over 150 yards on 28 runs. This team is obviously improving and showing flashes of ability and glimpses of a very bright future.
The bad? Turnovers. No, not of the apple form. Those are delicious, but this kind is hard to swallow. We put the ball into the Hokies hands too many times. VERY rarely are you going to go into Blacksburg, give them the ball three times, and come out with a win. To keep it as close as we did was remarkable and a testament to how dangerous this team can be. The fumble right before halftime proved to be the dagger in GT fans’ hearts. Without that fumble, which setup a Hokie touchdown on a Taylor scramble, the Jackets probably win this game. It was just a mixup between the minds of Dwyer and Nesbitt. These will become less frequent as familiarity with the system grows. Remember, this is just the third game running Coach Johnson’s offense. Cut down on the turnovers and we are going to be very difficult to beat.
The ugly? In my opinion, the O-line play has got to get better. VT blew up a lot of plays as soon as the ball is snapped. That is simply unacceptable on any level. The O-line has got to get some push so we can run the dive better to really see the brilliance of the option offense. Gardner has been good, but the interior of the line has not been very good and to top it off we seem to get costly penalties at inopportune times. I’m not sure what the problem is here, but it’s got to get better to have this offense run the way it needs to. On the plus side, we did seem to have pretty good pass protection.
Coaching
vt4.jpg
Coach Johnson trying to flag down an eye doctor for these guys

What can I say? It’s been solid all year. You can see that this team is mentally prepared and that mistakes are not a product of coaching. Problems we have are mostly contributed to inexperience, which is what we all expected. Coach Johnson knows how to adjust and have his kids in the right mindset. The thing I really like is Coach Johnson has such a fire about him. He showed that he was just as mad about that helmet-to-helmet call as the rest of us. You could clearly read his lips when he was yelling at the refs that they gave the game-winning field goal to VT on a bullsh*t call. It might be a matter of time before he’s fined by the ACC for calling out the incompetance of ACC refs that we all view week in and week out, but it needs to be said.
Loss 1 - Where to now?
The future is bright Yellow Jacket fans. A loss always sucks, but we certainly showed promise. I doubt we play another QB that is as mobile as Tyrod Taylor and our LBs will be more experienced by the time we do. This offense will continue to get better. The Jackets are favored in their next three contests and if they take care of business will be 5-1 going into Clemson. We did well splitting the BC-VT monster of a start and the option offense should be much improved for the more difficult second half of the season. All I know is that the second half of this season is going to be VERY exciting. This offense should have started to click and the inexperienced defense will have experience.
Coach Johnson has this program headed in the right direction and opponents are going to hate to play us. We just lost by three to the Hokies in Blacksburg, that is nothing to be ashamed of. Especially when you consider that take away the fumble before the half and/or the helmet-to-helmet call and I think we win that game. We show considerable promise and I love the attitude of this team.
Mississippi State comes to town this week. A horrid offense, but a very respectable defense. Turnovers will again be key, but I’m excited and certain that TOs will start to dissappear with experience in this offense.
Prayers go out for Jonathon Dwyer’s hip and to Virginia Tech losing two ACC games. We need Jonathon. I think he will be ok and the training staff will do all they can to help out that contusion. Since the Hokies now own the head-to-head with us, we need them to lose two ACC games and us win the rest. Can we do it? Yes. Will it be easy? Absolutely not. But we can always hope, right? Coach Johnson and this team has certainly inspired hope in this GT fan. Go Jackets! Bring on the other Bulldogs!
 
UT offers practice location to Rice

from Bevo Beat
As the Rice football team tries to get back to hurricane-ravaged Houston today after Saturday’s game in Nashville, Mack Brown said Monday that Texas has offered to let the Owls practice in the Longhorns’ facilities, should the Owls need them.
“This is a time that’s bigger than football. You try to reach out and help,” Brown said.
He said his staff began game-planning for Rice last Thursday morning, after the announcement that Texas-Arkansas would be postponed.
The Longhorn players were given Friday and Saturday off. Brown said that he asked his players to watch Kansas’ and Missouri’s games this weekend.
 
Adding:

Texas -30 (-110)
Troy +21 (-110) (Jump talked me off tOSU)

OK, lots of points for Texas which had an inadvertent bye week to rest up and get mean and now has proverbial punching bag Rice coming into town to kick off 9 straight games. Texas usually scores 50+ in this game and wins by more than 40. The only exception in recent memory is 2003 where the Horns only scored 35 and won 35-13.

Rice is off to a bad start this week and reminds me a bit of Tulane after Katrina (ok, not that bad). First, they couldn't fly back to Houston until Monday and now don't have a practice field due to Hurricane Ike. They are a team without a home and they needed all week to have any shot of scoring and moving the ball against Texas.

Chase Clement will put up good numbers but look for the defense to respond in the 2H and shut them down.
 
Any chance texas shows rice mercy in the game with the hurricane situation ?

See above.

If Texas was ever going to show Rice mercy it would be this year. However, if they REALLY wanted to show Rice mercy, they'd take Rice off the schedule.
 
Negative Nancy.

Best Rice team in years, yep. 30 is a ton, yep. But when Texas usually wins by 40+ and Rice is homeless and distracted. I'll take it.


Yeah they dont mind putting it on rice usually ......

2007 58-14
2006 52-7
2005 51-10
2004 35-13
2003 48-7

saw galveston on the tv today ... trashed. agree rice should be distracted.

sorry for negative nanciness ( is that a word ? )
 
Yeah, my wife has been looking for word on Galveston (her hometown) all weekend. DirecTV added the CBS Houston channel for everyone to watch over the weekend.

She said a very un-Republican thing to me today and asked if we should go down there and build homes with Habitat for Humanity. I, of course, laughed.
 
<table class="card"><tbody class="card-tbody"><tr><td class="ct c">
</td><td class="ctr c">
</td></tr><tr><td class="cl c">
</td><td class="cc c">10:34 AM (5 minutes ago)
Thoughts on the QB situation

from Addicted To Quack by jtlight
All offseason I talked about how Oregon would be very tough to beat if we got B+ play out of our QBs. On Saturday, we got D- play, and we should have lost that game. If this QB play continues, we'll be lucky to go .500 the rest of the season. And I say "QB play" because we will not see Roper for a few weeks. And I don't see this as a bad thing for 3 reasons:
1) In the Purdue game, he was awful on the spread option. His decision making was flat out terrible. When Jeremiah Johnson was in, the Purdue defense was keying on him, hard. Roper had multiple opportunities to tuck and run, and did not, and Purdue did not respect the play.
2) Ken Woody talked about this in his game recap, but Roper did not have a good pocket presence. He had a tendency to run out of the pocket rather than stepping up. And he cannot throw on the run. He loses whatever arm strength he had, and is not accurate.
3) He cannot throw the ball deep. Jaison Williams (who in my opinion is getting too much blame thus far) had one-on-one coverage on the outside most of the day, but we were never able to take advantage of that, because either Roper cannot throw deep, or the coaches will not let him throw deep. This flaw has been apparent since the UCLA game last year. He has consistenly had low yards per attempt, and the only reason that has gone over 6 in any game is because receivers have taken short passes and made more out of them.
These three flaws were serious problems in the Purdue game. They can be corrected, especially with the rocket that Masoli has, but who knows if he was the decision making/consistency that is necessary to run the offense well.
Honestly, I'm excited to see what Masoli/Harper can do. They have the talent to make this offense succeed, and will be playing (at least for the next 2 weeks) against very beatable teams.
So, I'm optimistic for the next few games. There is talent at the QB position, and we'll see how it grows over the next few weeks.






</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
<table class="card"><tbody class="card-tbody"><tr><td class="ct c">
</td><td class="ctr c">
</td></tr><tr><td class="cl c">
</td><td class="cc c">9:44 AM (56 minutes ago)
Dan Hawkins Is Motivational. Or Insane. One or the Other, We Aren't Sure Which.

from The Sporting Blog
hawkinsdanwr6.jpg
"I think of myself as indigenous," he says finally. "When people ask where I'm from, I like to say I'm from Earth."

That's just one good quote from page one of Robert Andrew Powell's interview with Colorado football coach Dan Hawkins, who apparently just let Powell roll in and interview him about anything whatsoever, up to and including the following topics: the mystical role the color blue has played in his life, why his wife had a massive video system installed in their house (to keep Hawkins from staying at the office 24/7,) and your nightmare fuel for the week, a tale of a wind-chapped Hawkins running around in short-shorts in brutal cold.
"One day when we were practicing for the playoffs, it was freezing outside. And everybody was freezing and were kind of moaning and griping about it. He comes out in short shorts and a short-sleeved shirt, hollering and hooting and getting everybody fired up. He made it a fun atmosphere."​
There's also plenty in there about Hawkins' texting players tales of long-distance runners triumphing over adversity, his endless references to self-help and motivational books, and him making linemen field punts to determine whether the players leave early. All of what is becoming an increasingly clear picture that if you met Dan Hawkins, it would be a lot like meeting Tony Robbins, but if Tony Robbins looked just like a big, excited toddler with a headset on and the ability to hang clean 300 pounds.

Whether or not he'll take Colorado anywhere remains murky at best, but one thing is certain: he makes writing a profile piece a breeze. You just turn on the mike, record what he says, and then write it down. Journalism in three easy steps! Dan Hawkins makes it just that easy, brother, and if you don't believe it...GO PLAY INTRAMURALS, BROTHER!!! [/obligatoryrantreference]





</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
<table class="card"><tbody class="card-tbody"><tr><td class="ct c">
</td><td class="ctr c">
</td></tr><tr><td class="cl c">
</td><td class="cc c">9:34 AM (1 hour ago)
Monday Headlinin': Bowden throws Harper to the wolves

from Dr. Saturday - NCAAF - Yahoo! Sports by Matt Hinton
ept_sports_ncaaf_experts-518209085-1221483259.jpg
That's why we have insurance, son. Is there a quarterback controversy brewing at Clemson? No, that would be ridiculous ... but then again, no inferred spat should go unexamined, so The State's Paul Strelow goes out of his way to get behind the simmering tension between Tommy Bowden and Cullen Harper, which began when Bowden "criticized" (i.e. "mentioned") a couple underthrown balls in last week's otherwise easy win over The Citadel. Harper, who'd been nursing a sore shoulder from a long night underneath Alabama defensive linemen, balked at the public quasi-diss: “I don’t mind being coached. Just come to me and say it.” Whatever. But when Harper ducked out of bounds short of a first down on a third down scramble Saturday against N.C. State, Bowden and a couple coaches were "visibly upset," according to Strelow, and not particularly concerned with his starter's status in an easily winnable game when a few feet are at stake:

“… my point was to him, if you don’t get it, you’re in four-down territory, go lower your shoulder and try to get it. If you’re short, I’ll go for it, but give me something better … I thought he could have made it.”​
When pointed out Harper would have needed to use his sore shoulder, Bowden replied bluntly: “Yeah, lower the shoulder. We’ve got another quarterback. Go ahead and lower the sore one and go win a conference game. So take the sore one, lower it, run over him and get us close to it. And make them both sore.”
- - -
Emphasis added

Overblown, manufactured non-issue? Probably: Willy Korn has thrown all of eleven passes, all in garbage time of the Citadel game. Moderately interesting subplot in a wide-open ACC race if remotely true? Yeah: all-conference quarterbacks are precious commodities.
Hop back on the horse, big guy. (Do we have a backup horse?) Charlie Weis is in no hurry to have surgery for the nasty ACL/MCL tear he suffered on the sideline Saturday, what with memories of his last surgery -- the botched gastric bypass that left him in intensive care in 2002 and in malpractice court five years later -- fresh in mind, and in walking aide: he'll be on the same four-pronged cane he used in '02 until at least the end of the week. Undeterred, though, he expects to be back on the sideline this weekend against Michigan State, presumably followed by a Berlin Wall-like facade of freshmen between hobbling coach and field at all times.
Missing in action, non-coach division. Biggest injuries of the weekend among actual players: LSU linebacker Darry Beckwith, a victim of an injured left knee in a meaningless game against North Texas that will keep the all-SEC senior out of Saturday's game at Auburn. This is, to quote Les Miles' understatement, "an injury of significance" to the Tigers' defense, although Miles thinks Beckwith will be back in "the short-term."
ept_sports_ncaaf_experts-841013338-1221483271.jpg
It's harder to lament the loss of Oregon's starting quarterback Justin Roper -- himself a second option after the preseason injury to Nate Costa -- since Roper's injury came on a very significant run in overtime of the comeback win over Purdue. Final diagnosis is a partially torn MCL, which will keep him out four to six weeks and put the Ducks in a bind between meh Jeremiah Masoli and scrambly true freshman Chris Harper.
Quickly . . .
Shockingly, Mark Richt says he isn't concerned with the polls, where Georgia dropped to No. 3 Sunday. For now, anyway. . . . South Carolina is lamenting its broken running game, but who's on hand to do anything about it against a team like Georgia? . . . Paul Johnson thinks Georgia Tech was its own worst enemy in the narrow loss to Virginia Tech. . . . Suspended Noles Preston Parker and Budd Thacker will be in FSU's lineup against Wake Forest, after sitting out a pair of games against I-AA teams. . . . Minnesota tripled its 2007 win total Saturday, but the Gophers aren't getting carried away with their cupcake schedule. . . . A few Sooner fans got to ride into Husky Stadium from Lake Washington to watch OU easily drown the Huskies. . . . Texas fans made their own game on an unexpectedly Longhorn-less Saturday in Austin. . . . Note just one but two articles on Pat Devlin's heroics against Syracuse. . . . And Temple has come a very long way under Al Golden: the Owls might even score Saturday at Penn State.






</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
<table class="card"><tbody class="card-tbody"><tr><td class="ct c">
</td><td class="ctr c">
</td></tr><tr><td class="cl c">
</td><td class="cc c">11:34 AM (seconds ago)
Profiles in Disillusion: Ohio State, Michigan and half the Pac-10 were totally prepared for this to happen

from Dr. Saturday - NCAAF - Yahoo! Sports by Matt Hinton
ept_sports_ncaaf_experts-990520563-1221500039.jpg
Conquered favorites and other notables picking up the pieces of shattered ambition this week: Go ahead and collapse amongst yourselves. You have to go out of your way to find someone not piling on Ohio State after Saturday night's worst-case debacle -- just scanning the big national sites, even ignoring the vitriol of the blogs, the Buckeyes were "embarrassed," "don't deserve BCS hype," "desperately seeking a clue," "lifeless," and "keep humiliating themselves" against top national competition. Hard to argue with any of that. The locals were just kind enough to limit their criticism to "vanilla" and "soft" and only give the coaches near-failing grades, rather than an outright F.
But aside from the completely predictable backlash of everyone with a keyboard, there's the worst indictment imaginable, from tackle Alex Boone:

But beyond all of that, Boone sees an even more ominous sign, that maybe this Buckeyes team doesn't have the requisite heart.​
He said it hit him at halftime, when OSU still had a sliver of a chance, down 21-3 and having just intercepted USC quarterback Mark Sanchez.
"When we walked in at halftime, nobody was saying anything," Boone said. "I mean, what the (heck), we're Ohio State -- we should be screaming and swearing and saying everything evil you can think of.
"And guys are hanging their heads, and you don't know what to say to them. You try screaming, and they just put their head down even more. We can't play like that, and if we play like that the rest of the season, we won't be anything."
Boone is the same guy who said he tried to calm down his brawling teammates at halftime of the mythical championship loss to LSU, so who knows what he wants except to call out his comrades in public -- coupled with his DUI arrest after his freshman year, Boone comes off exactly like a few of the "tough guys" I played with in high school, who screamed, swore and talked evil till their hearts were content, to no effect in any phase of their life -- but aside from the big, disgruntled guy beckoning them to his locker, the Dispatch chronicles some further confusion/dissension over exactly what was going on with the quarterback rotation; per guard Ben Person: "I think it kind of shocked everybody a little bit." Ah, that's what OSU fans were hoping to hear.
Men of the Scarlet and Gray sums it up nicely. On Buckeye message boards: Transference, Sour grapes, Acceptance.
You're only as bad as you feel. OK, so the Pac-10 went 0-4 against the Mountain West Saturday, including one ranked team (UCLA) suffering its worst loss in 80 years and another (Arizona State) losing at home to the team that's finished dead last in the MWC three years running. I mean, that's not so bad, right? It's not like, uh,

“It was a nightmare,” Arizona State coach Dennis Erickson told reporters after the No. 15 Sun Devils were upset by UNLV in overtime in Tempe.​
ept_sports_ncaaf_experts-150157515-1221500112.jpg
Uh, yes. Not to rub it in, but aside from ASU, UCLA, Arizona and Stanford laying eggs against their non-BCS brethren, Washington was obliterated by Oklahoma, Washington State was obliterated by Baylor (!) and Cal, of course, dropped a nationally-televised game across the country to the same team that had been left for dead after losing to Middle Tennesse in a game that was probably less competitive than the ten-point margin indicated. If not for the Evergreen State overcoming rampant Purdue homerism and getting off the schnide against Hawaii, respectively, the non-Trojan factions of the conference would have sent the whole league tumbling off into the Pacific by themselves.
Given all that, Arizona State's Jeff Metcalfe is weirdly optimistic after ASU choked against the Rebels:

Remember the Trojans. Southern California lost to Stanford in a shocker last season and three weeks later lost to Oregon but made to the Rose Bowl and finished No. 3 in the nation.​
USC also beat Arizona State 44-24, one of three ranked teams to trounce the Devils in lopsided, not-as-close-they-looked games last year. But, hey, keep those eyes on the prize, guys.
UCLA, too, is all about positivity these days, but its 59-0 nosedive in Provo -- no doubt to the horror of the Doc's go-to Bruins blog, the Neuheisel-feting Bruins Nation -- drew the worst possible insult a local outlet could conceivably dish from the Orange County Register:

Coach Rick Neuheisel's "relentlessly positive" theme was sucked out of a lifeless UCLA bunch, floating somewhere among dropped heads, confused faces and disbelieving bodies.​
Two weeks worth of talking about UCLA's changed attitude gave way to the realization the Bruins are, well, maybe not the same.
Maybe they are worse.
Not even during Karl Dorrell's five years was there a debacle of this magnitude, a blowout loss so embarrassing it paled in comparison to previous egg-laying performances after big wins.
Wait a second: this may be the worst L.A. loss in any conscious person's lifetime, to a team from a mid-major conference that the Bruins vastly out-recruit on an annual basis. But how about a little patience, huh?
And Cal? California Golden Blogs asks, "Who is this 'Cal'? We're Chase Daniel fans!" On the message boards: Unsolicited advice, Wishful thinking, Swinging at the big picture, and missing.
Don't tell me -- I prefer my own reality, thanks. Wait a minute -- Michigan lost? But the Wolverine Liberation Army Bureau of Information assured us the Irish were disemboweled by Comrade Threet's deft passing and the sure-handed consistency of the instantly capable freshman running backs! What are these lies of the capitalist media, who shamefully fail even to report the suicide of despairing domers upon encountering the Wolverine lines?
ept_sports_ncaaf_experts-425784966-1221500204.jpg
Among the most desperate of the propaganda reporting a Michigan "defeat" when in fact South Bend was left in smoking ruins is the sinister Jim Carty of the capitalist Ann Arbor News-Rag, who ludicrously claims Premier Rodriguez lacks the resources to meet the glorious standard of our past supreme leaders:

They looked rattled - the kids during the game and the coaches afterward.
[...]
Say what you will about the Lloyd Carr era, but there was never a hint of doubt. Michigan was Michigan, and one game wasn't going to change that.​
One game still won't change that, not even as Saturday's mistake-filled 35-17 loss at Notre Dame hammered home the fact the Wolverines are in danger of their first losing season since 1967.
But Rich Rodriguez put the present moment into perfect context when he blurted out a pretty much unsolicited promise in his postgame press conference.
Michigan football will be back, the first-year coach said.
Michigan football will be back, he added a second time.
With that came the unspoken acknowledgment that Michigan football somehow needs to be back.
And that its coach viewed it that way.
- - -
Emphasis added

Well, Rich is a realist, and Carty's OK with that. But Carson Butler's ejection for starting a fight with the loss sealed in the fourth quarter? Assistant Tony Dews getting into a shouting match with a 20-something fan? This is not the behavior of dignified Michigan Men, even in rain-soaked defeat to a team no one is sure will have a winning season itself. What's worse: Carty tries to defend the mistakes of the Wolverines' mewling babes by comparing Rodriguez to Charlie Weis. Just how badly do you want to be rid of this guy, Carty? Are you trying to get him "disappeared," or whacked, or what?
On the bright side: the glorious women's volleyball team remains undefeated! On the Wolverine message boards: Irrational hope, Second-guessing, Blame games.






</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
No changes to depth chart

Monday, September 15, 2008, 12:24 PM
Longhorn coaches today did not release a depth chart for the Rice game. Instead, they said that the depth chart remains the same as a week ago. That includes tri-starters at running back — Fozzy Whittaker, Vondrell McGee and Chris Ogbonnaya, not necessarily in that order.
 
Masoli, Harper get ready

Posted by John Hunt, The Oregonian September 15, 2008 17:40PM

Categories: Football

So the Ducks will go with Jeremiah Masoli and Chris Harper at quarterback against Boise State (2-0, 0-0 Western Athletic Conference) on Saturday. The Ducks insist this is a much different scenario from last season when they lost Dennis Dixon, and the remaining fairly shell-shocked players were shut out at UCLA the following week.

"Dennis was a whole different athlete," rover Patrick Chung said. "But guys have to step up. We have two quarterbacks who have to step up, but I think they're going to be good."
The injury to Roper serves as a reminder of the risks a quarterback assumes in the spread option, but there are as many differences as there are similarities between Roper's and Dixon's injuries and the surrounding circumstances.
First, Dixon was lost for the year; Roper should return. There was the harder-they-fall factor, as last year's team was No. 2 in the nation; this time the Ducks (3-0, 1-0 Pacific-10 Conference) are No. 17. Also, a year ago, the Ducks already had lost backup running back Jeremiah Johnson and starter Jonathan Stewart (13 rushes, 33 yards) was banged up at UCLA. This season, Johnson (now the starter) has a dislocated shoulder, but a healthy LeGarrette Blount is coming off two consecutive 132-yard games.
Perhaps most importantly, the gap between Dixon, a Heisman candidate, and his replacements was vast. Masoli and Harper, who led the Ducks on their winning drive against Purdue, do certain things as well or better than Roper.
"We have one of the best passers (Masoli) and one of the best runners (Harper)," Bellotti said.
Masoli can run and throw, but the junior college transfer is still feeling his way in the offense. He did not play at Purdue, but offensive coordinator Chip Kelly said that was just a situational thing.
"We had a lot of negative first-half plays," Kelly said. "We weren't on track. It wasn't like we were trying to hold him out or anything like that - the situation just didn't really dictate it."
The situation now dictates that Harper, who is the Ducks' third-leading rusher with 102 yards on 20 carries, must throw the ball.
Harper threw no passes against the Boilermakers. In the season opener against Washington, he ran 12 times but didn't throw the ball then, either. His only passes this season came in Oregon's 66-24 win against Utah State, where he was 4 for 6, and his receivers dropped both those incompletions.
"It's just me getting the timing and the whip back," said Harper, who had to shut down his throwing for two weeks of fall camp while battling a strained rotator cuff but said his shoulder is 100 percent. "It's just me letting it go, not short-arming it."
Harper has thrown sparingly games, in part because of the injury, and in part because coaches have been working on his thrown motion. The Ducks will continue to work with Harper on passing technique, but without the luxury of doing it solely on the practice field.
Harper, and to a slightly lesser extent Masoli, have the potential to give the Ducks that pick-your-poison option combination they had last season with Dixon and Stewart. And Roper's performance against Purdue left the door ajar for either Harper or Masoli to lay claim to the job no matter how quickly Roper returns.
Roper, who is off crutches and wearing a brace that he will shed by the end of the week, will miss the Boise State game and will probably miss the next game in Pullman against Washington State (0-3, 0-1 Pac-10). He could, however, be ready for the Oct. 4 trip to Los Angeles to face USC (2-0, 0-0).
Notes: The Ducks are now fourth in the nation in total offense (562 yards per game) and rushing offense (323 yards per game). ... Boise State, with wins over Idaho State and Bowling Green, are seventh in the nation in scoring defense (7.0 points per game).
 
<table class="card"><tbody class="card-tbody"><tr></tr><tr><td class="ct c">
</td><td class="ctr c">
</td></tr><tr><td class="cl c">
</td><td class="cc c">5:35 PM (2 hours ago)
Meme watch: Trojans bring back that lovin' feeling

from Dr. Saturday - NCAAF - Yahoo! Sports by Matt Hinton
ept_sports_ncaaf_experts-422325981-1221525505.jpg
Dream with me, fans, allllll the way back to those heady days of December 2005. If that month was a conscious one, you might recollect some buzz about the "unbeatable" USC Trojans, Number One in all relevant polls from their first conception in the summer, and about their place among the greatest teams of all time. Versus the undefeated 1997 Michigan Wolverines? USC, 49-14. Versus the undefeated 1991 Washington Huskies, an outfit that outscored its opponents by a 42-9 average? "There's no way that defense could stop SC ... It wouldn't even be close." And so on, etc., right up to the point they were beaten by Texas in the Rose Bowl. Matt Leinart didn't have to accept it, but the apparently invincible Men of Troy were, in fact, quite vincible. You'd have though their last-gasp win over Notre Dame, 24-point halftime deficit at Arizona State and close call against Fresno State would have given some idea.You might also remember the next year, 2006, when USC rose to No. 2 in the polls, seemed unbeatable until a stunning loss at Oregon State, then rose to No. 2 again by December and seemed unbeatable until a stunning loss at UCLA. Or just last year, when every major outlet and 107 of 125 major poll voters ranked the Trojans No. 1 in the preseason and declared them unbeatable after a physically dominant, lopsided blowout in Nebraska. Right up until John David Booty broke his hand, threw four interceptions, and the world came to an end against Stanford. Again, the Men of Troy were, against the odds, quite vincible.
If any of these scenarios ring a bell, it's a dead certainty you're not writing for a major national Web site after the Trojans' wipeout win over Ohio State, or you could never bring yourself to decide, after just two games, that ...
"They are the best team I've seen in many years."
"The way Southern California whipped up on Ohio State suggests that the next three months will serve as an extended process of determining whether the best team in the SEC or the best team in the Big 12 will earn the right to face the Trojans in Miami for the national championship on Jan. 8."
"It felt a whole lot like 2004 at the L.A. Coliseum Saturday night. This year's Trojans carry so many parallels to that undefeated team ... But this team is already far ahead of where that team was at the beginning of its season."
"... the Trojans sent an ominous message to the rest of the college football world: let the race for No. 2 begin."
"That dominant showing now raises questions: Do the Trojans have any weaknesses? Can anyone on their schedule beat them? Is this coach Pete Carroll's best Trojans team to date?"
Could be, pundits, could be -- there's only two-and-a-half months, ten games and four other still-unbeaten teams that also earned first place votes in the preseason (two of which are averaging 50+ points through three games) left to go. Really: what could possibly happen between now and then?






</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
Back
Top