Home dogs less than +140 in FRI-SAT games vs opponent they beat last time they played have shown almost 20% ROI on straight moneyline action over last 3+ years.
--- MLB ---
2023 [333-349 -214.99u]
LAST [5-8 -16.32u]
TUESDAY 3/3.69 Diamondbacks +123 3/4.02 NATIONALS +134 3/2.65 Dodgers o8 -113 4/3.96 Mets -101 3/4.71 Mets -1½ +157 4/3.23 Marlins -124 5/4.10 GUARDIANS -122 3/4.86 Rays -1½ +162 5/7.65 Orioles +153 3/2.65 M'S -1½-113 3/1.96 Rangers -153 3/3.51 Astros -1½ +117 3/2.73 Twins u8 -110 Believe it or not, it's just as hard to pick this many losers as it is winners...unbelievable 37 day run (227-265 -232.46u since 4/17) :shocked:
ANGELS...After leaving COL teams tend to struggle (1-3 this year) -- no reason that won't continue with struggling Marlins, who were without leading hitter Luis Arraez(leg) and is ? today. Also with star Jazz Chisholm on the IL this offense stinks. LAA was off THUR, so their pen is fully rested behind Detmers, who's only good for 5inn regardless. LAA is 15-10 @home and won 4 straight.
10 years and 2 kids later, Anna still holding up well. :assshake:
Off a win as a dog over +150 vs same team and not a dog over +150, these teams are 3-14 SU over last 10 weeks, Fade for +46% ROI :holycow:
Crazy thing is this is a trend I've played quite often over the years with success, but I've always played the other way since the 7-year record is +8.4% ROI for the team coming off the dog win, even including the debacle that is 2023! It was even stronger going back for at least 2012-2016...
I’ve come to the conclusion chisox are just straight losers w a bad mix but I’ve had this perception they better vs lhp, surprised to see their record vs them is so poor. Goes to show even if you paying close attention still gotta check your perception at times! Lol. I don’t understand how the hell they keep being lined as decent size favs this series? Gl today