Noms out and SAG's out of the way means major precedents are done. SAGs are important as the acting bloc is the biggest for the Academy Awards
9 of the past 15 SAG Ensemble winners have gone on to win Best Picture. 13 of the past 15 Best Picture winners were nominated for the SAG Ensemble. 13 of the past 15 winners also had a major acting nom. Hidden Figures - SAG Ensemble winner, major acting nom (Best Supp Actress). Fences, Manchester by the Sea, Moonlight - SAG Ensemble noms and major acting noms. Makes the -500 La La Land a bad price. Fences (7-1), Hidden Figures (12-1) and Manchester by the Sea (25-1) are bet worthy. Some of the biggest upsets were when the SAG winner upset the very short priced favouritte - Shakespeare in Love over Saving Private Ryan and Crash over Brokeback Mountain
For Best Actor there could be another upset. Every winner since Jamie Foxx in 2004 has won the double. Affleck has won everything so far except the SAG. Denzel now into 6-4 at some places. 9 of the 12 winners played real people, but neither Affleck or Denzel fall into that category, only Garfield this year does
Best Actress is a similar story. 13 of the past 16 have won the double. There was a big run on the winner also playing a real person, but that has gone away the last 4 years. That puts Stone ahead of Portman
Best Supporting Actor goes to the Actor that is far and away the best in the movie. 9 of the last 12 have done the double. Ali wins, and its reflected in the price
Supporting Actress has another strong double precedent, with 12 of the last 14 doing the double. It's also important that there is no nom from thst movie up for Best Actress. Davis is bank interest odds here, and will win
If you are a conspiracy theorist and think this will be payback for the "oscars so white" campaign of last year, then you can have Fences winning Best Picture, Denzel Best Actor and the 2 shoe-ins for Supporting.
So, if you want a bet, Denzel for Best actor, and the three movies next in the market against La La Land for best picture