******2016 CFB In-Game******

M.W. said:
No, it's not targeting. Takes more than helmet-to-helmet contact.
Click to expand...

Forcible contact to the head of a defenseless player is targeting. That is essentially a prime example of it. Though, like I sai, I don't like the rule.
 
Dollaz said:
Forcible contact to the head of a defenseless player is targeting. That is essentially a prime example of it. Though, like I sai, I don't like the rule.
Click to expand...

The rule is more complicated than that. There needs to be "at least one indicator of targeting".

"Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to:



  • Launch—a player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area
  • A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
  • Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
  • Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet
 
Pitt had 52 red zone possessions before today. They scored 43 TDs and 5 FGs. Just 4 trips without points.

Today they have five trips: 1 TD, 1 FG, and three trips without points.
 
ASU kicker Gonzalez will likely be drafted

Kicking game (not just the kicker, but snapper and holder) cost the Cardinals 3 games this season (NE, Rams, SEA)...kickers are going to be drafted and paid before too long
 
CrimsonK said:
You know what Pitt returns next year? If they can fix the secondary and make good OC hire they should be real good
Click to expand...

Wont miss a beat offense. Even with Connor leaving they are loaded at RB. I think with an improved secondary they are gonna make some noise.

shit even with a bad secondary look at there 4 losses. UNC and V tech won on the last plays of the game. lost by a td in Stillwater that was an 80 yd td with less then a minute left. Got crushed by Miami. Should be 10-2 with 2 huge wins on the resume
 
~1987 said:
Wont miss a beat offense. Even with Connor leaving they are loaded at RB. I think with an improved secondary they are gonna make some noise.

shit even with a bad secondary look at there 4 losses. UNC and V tech won on the last plays of the game. lost by a td in Stillwater that was an 80 yd td with less then a minute left. Got crushed by Miami. Should be 10-2 with 2 huge wins on the resume
Click to expand...

The loss to Miami was caused by the loss to VPI. So a win over VPI means 11-1, not 10-2.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PappyOSU
Pappy's Picks CFB Week 3
Replies
3
Views
214
PappyOSU
PappyOSU
Frank Costanza
Week 4 Discussion Thread
2
Replies
98
Views
1K
BiffTFinancial
BiffTFinancial
B.A.R.
Summer CFB Discussion-- Texas RBs dropping like flies
2 3
Replies
109
Views
3K
B.A.R.
B.A.R.
bookieassassin
WEEK 3
Replies
34
Views
2K
bookieassassin
bookieassassin
PappyOSU
Pappy's Picks CFB Week 5
Replies
2
Views
232
PappyOSU
PappyOSU
Back
Top