WNBA plays

RBD

Active Member
WNBA record: 0-0

Nothing in any of tonight's games fits any of the handicapping methods I use to find sides and totals, so I went hunting for a prop bet.
(It's been a month since I had any WNBA action, I gotta have something tonight.)

I'm thinking that Natasha Cloud is going to have a good night vs Chi.

Just some basic stuff:

She avg's 12.4 PPG.

The books hung an 11' on this one.

She's surpassed that # in seven of her last ten games.
Of the three where she fell short, she landed on 11 twice, missing by a hook.
On the other one, she landed on 10, and that was vs Connecticut, the best D in the league.
I like those #'s.

With 3 of 5 Phoenix starters coming off of playing in the Olympics and not getting the rest the other players have, I'm looking for 35+ minutes for Natasha and maybe a few extra plays called for her, enough to get me past the 11' I need tonight.

Good luck to all with your play today.
 
Oops, was surfin' around the forum and just saw the rule re: units/$ must be added if you post records.
GREAT rule by the way, keeps the touts and cheater boys out, and keeps the forum clean and professional.

I always post a record, an honest one, beecuz:
1) It's my nature.
2) I have integrity.
3) How else will posters know whether to ride with me or Fade?
4) I'm not a tout chumming for losing bettors who are desperate to recoup losses (so I can take advantage of their situation via my fake "winnings.")
5) I'm not a needy attention 'ho seeking kudos or attention.
6) I loathe cheaters and frauds.

I'll use a standard $110/100 for all bets, makes it easy to track.
And I'll post accurate prices when I play something with extra juice, which I avoid as much as possible but is often difficult to do with props though.
My play today is Natasha Cloud Ov 11' points, -115.
 
Last edited:
"I'll tag along on the Cloud over."

Nooooo.

In the first quarter she took ONE shot.

It's halfway through the second quarter and she's taken . . . ONE shot in the entire game.
Ugly.

Griner had the ball under the basket, she was covered so she kicks it out to a wide open Cloud and she . . . passes the ball.

I was counting on her getting more time and shots in the fourth quarter when hopefully some of the starters will be benched. Now I'm going to need her to go off in the 3rd and 4th.
But I can't get the points if she doesn't start shooting her normal per game average.
 
"I'll tag along on the Cloud over."

Nooooo.

In the first quarter she took ONE shot.

It's halfway through the second quarter and she's taken . . . ONE shot in the entire game.
Ugly.

Griner had the ball under the basket, she was covered so she kicks it out to a wide open Cloud and she . . . passes the ball.

I was counting on her getting more time and shots in the fourth quarter when hopefully some of the starters will be benched. Now I'm going to need her to go off in the 3rd and 4th.
But I can't get the points if she doesn't start shooting her normal per game average.
Skunker.

That happens though. Looking back at her boxes this is obviously out of the ordinary.

Good capping pays off, looking forward to the next play.
 
Thanks, B.A.R. And CPA-hole.
Chipnotized - I owe ya one.
Yeah, I know, we're all big boys, nobody forces us to bet, we make our own choices and live with them, but I want to repay and say "thanks" to the first guy who stepped up here at CTG and said, "I'll ride with you on this one."
So, next time I have a play that grades out at my highest % I'll post it here with a note calling your attention to it in case you'd like to play it.

WNBA Record: 0-1, -115.
Review: Natasha Cloud Ov 11', -115
I study my losses.
I try to learn from my losses.
One of many components that go into winning at sports betting is not making mistakes. But it's inevitable that we will, so the key is not REPEATING mistakes.
I'm the first to say "I blew it on that call" when I miss something in my 'capping, or I make a mistake.
I'm not about ego, I'm about learning, and you can learn from some of your losses.
I took an L with Cloud last night but I can't fault my read on the play, there's nothing to learn, my #'s were okay. Early on I thought the problem was that she wasn't taking any shots, but then she started shooting and the real problem became clear - she wasn't just having an off night, she was having an off-ful (awful) night.
She was 1-7 awful. She was the-coach-benched-her-for-a-while-awful. She had a bad night. It happens.

The question is . . . does she bounce back? Do I use her again tonight?

On the "DON'T DO IT" side is this - will she get her usual allotment of game time, 33 minutes or will Tibbets reduce her playing time after a poor performance?
On the "GO FOR IT!" side I have:

In the previous two games vs Indiana she scored 15 and 0 (she didn't play in the second game.)

Tonight is the second time Phoenix has played in B2B's (Back to Back nights.) The previous time it was back to back road games, the same sequence as tonight.
And in then the second game she scored 21.

Bounce back opportunities?
The 3 pts she scored last night was tied for her lowest score of the season in a game where she played her normal amount of minutes.
After that game, Tibbets played her for 33 minutes in the next game (lessening the concern he might cut into her playing time tonight.)
She scored 11. And that game was against the first place Liberty, the third best D in the league.

I believe in redemption (or I just talked myself into it anyway.)
The # was at 10', -135 earlier today. That # got jumped, 11', -111 now.
I'm on it.

Also, as I mentioned in Chip's post yesterday, "Teams in Gm 2 of B2B's' in 2024 are at 9-3 Over." I'm on it again tonight.
Also I like The Caitlins, going for the series sweep.
As with the total, I bought it early, got -2' (and 173') but -3, 174 are the common #'s now so that's what I'll use here.
(Posting picks with #'s that aren't readily available to most bettors is not helping anyone. It's the vanity ploy of an attention craving wanker.)

And I have the Sun.
I have a handicapping method I use to identify teams that should be the Favorite.
It says Dallas should be the Fav tonight.
It also sucks, with a record of 2-5 this season, a decent Fade.
Dallas also sucks, so as Spackler would say, "So I got that going for me."
And it doesn't hurt that Con has the best D in the league.
Only thing I don't like about this is Con is one of those nemesis teams for me, you know, the ones that win when you bet against them and lose when you bet on them.
I'm a data hound, I track all kinds of stats, including my record for my bets on every team. And I lost more Con games in the first half of the season than any other team.
Hoping the second half treats me better.

Ind -3
Phx/Ind Ov 174
Sun -5'
Cloud Ov 11'. -111

GOOD LUCK to all on your plays tonight.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, B.A.R. And CPA-hole.
Chipnotized - I owe ya one.
Yeah, I know, we're all big boys, nobody forces us to bet, we make our own choices and live with them, but I want to repay and say "thanks" to the first guy who stepped up here at CTG and said, "I'll ride with you on this one."
So, next time I have a play that grades out at my highest % I'll post it here with a note calling your attention to it in case you'd like to play it.

WNBA Record: 0-1, -115.
Review: Natasha Cloud Ov 11', -115
I study my losses.
I try to learn from my losses.
One of many components that go into winning at sports betting is not making mistakes. But it's inevitable that we will, so the key is not REPEATING mistakes.
I'm the first to say "I blew it on that call" when I miss something in my 'capping, or I make a mistake.
I'm not about ego, I'm about learning, and you can learn from some of your losses.
I took an L with Cloud last night but I can't fault my read on the play, there's nothing to learn, my #'s were okay. Early on I thought the problem was that she wasn't taking any shots, but then she started shooting and the real problem became clear - she wasn't just having an off night, she was having an off-ful (awful) night.
She was 1-7 awful. She was the-coach-benched-her-for-a-while-awful. She had a bad night. It happens.

The question is . . . does she bounce back? Do I use her again tonight?

On the "DON'T DO IT" side is this - will she get her usual allotment of game time, 33 minutes or will Tibbets reduce her playing time after a poor performance?
On the "GO FOR IT!" side I have:

In the previous two games vs Indiana she scored 15 and 0 (she didn't play in the second game.)

Tonight is the second time Phoenix has played in B2B's (Back to Back nights.) The previous time it was back to back road games, the same sequence as tonight.
And in then the second game she scored 21.

Bounce back opportunities?
The 3 pts she scored last night was tied for her lowest score of the season in a game where she played her normal amount of minutes.
After that game, Tibbets played her for 33 minutes in the next game (lessening the concern he might cut into her playing time tonight.)
She scored 11. And that game was against the first place Liberty, the third best D in the league.

I believe in redemption (or I just talked myself into it anyway.)
The # was at 10', -135 earlier today. That # got jumped, 11', -111 now.
I'm on it.

Also, as I mentioned in Chip's post yesterday, "Teams in Gm 2 of B2B's' in 2024 are at 9-3 Over." I'm on it again tonight.
Also I like The Caitlins, going for the series sweep.
As with the total, I bought it early, got -2' (and 173') but -3, 174 are the common #'s now so that's what I'll use here.
(Posting picks with #'s that aren't readily available to most bettors is not helping anyone. It's the vanity ploy of an attention craving wanker.)

And I have the Sun.
I have a handicapping method I use to identify teams that should be the Favorite.
It says Dallas should be the Fav tonight.
It also sucks, with a record of 2-5 this season, a decent Fade.
Dallas also sucks, so as Spackler would say, "So I got that going for me."
And it doesn't hurt that Con has the best D in the league.
Only thing I don't like about this is Con is one of those nemesis teams for me, you know, the ones that win when you bet against them and lose when you bet on them.
I'm a data hound, I track all kinds of stats, including my record for my bets on every team. And I lost more Con games in the first half of the season than any other team.
Hoping the second half treats me better.

Ind -3
Phx/Ind Ov 174
Sun -5'
Cloud Ov 11'. -111

GOOD LUCK to all on your plays tonight.
Great great stuff.

I'm rolling with your card.
 
Thanks, B.A.R.
But tread lightly please, WNBA is the smallest betting unit I use.
On the season, I'm down (about 1 unit and minor juice after last night), 10-9 in June, 10-10 in July, and I'm off a loss in my last play. (Yes, I know the rule - no records for plays not given here - but somehow I don't think anybody's going to accuse me of fake records or bragging about a being .500! A few dog prices have kept my head just about at waterline level.)
WNBA are TV action/fun, small $ bets for me.
College football is where I do my best, though previous success does not guarantee future success - it's sports betting, ANYTHING can happen.
I'll start my season-long post for college asap, no hurry, the line has already moved against anyone who might want to try the play, Oklahoma.
Yes, a LOT of points, but I have some stats to support it as I'll note when I post it.

Luck to us all tonight...
 
Last edited:
Thanks, B.A.R.
But tread lightly please, WNBA is the smallest betting unit I use.
On the season, I'm down (about 1 unit and minor juice after last night), 10-9 in June, 10-10 in July, and I'm off a loss in my last play. (Yes, I know the rule - no records for plays not given here - but somehow I don't think anybody's going to accuse me of fake records or bragging about a being .500! A few dog prices have kept my head just about at waterline level.)
WNBA are TV action/fun, small $ bets for me.
College football is where I do my best, though previous success does not guarantee future success - it's sports betting, ANYTHING can happen.
I'll start my season-long post for college asap, no hurry, the line has already moved against anyone who might want to try the play, Oklahoma.
Yes, a LOT of points, but I have some stats to support it as I'll note when I post it.

Luck to us all tonight...
What a night so far!

Halfway home in the last one.
 
Thanks for the kudos, guys, much appreciated.

WNBA Record: 4-1, +285

Last time I was here, Natasha Cloud had me singing Bob's "Redemption Song."
She sailed Over her point total of 11', scoring 19, coming back off a poor performance that cost me a loss the night before.

The Sun covered the -5' winning by 18, and the Indiana Caitlins KO'd the Griners, winning by 9 laying 3, and topping the Over by 13.
I caught Indy at the beginning of their current hot streak that has them winning 6 of 7 since returning from the Olympic break, solidifying a playoff spot to the delight of fans (and the league offices.)

Got one for tonight.
Don't mistakenly interpret the weeks between picks to mean I was waiting for something good, or that tonight's play is really strong, that's not the case.
I've just been busy and spending most of my 'capping time on football. Tonight is just a regular pick I think I have a slight edge on, normal bet size (BIG advocate of bettors not varying unit size.)

Two of the four different formulas I use to identify totals to buy say that the Wash/Dal game tonight stays Under.
One says it's a 50-50 shot, the other says the game has a 65% chance to stay Under. The 50-50 one has a long history of doing well on Unders so I'm hoping tonight's game gets the play heading back into it's normal W% territory.

These two have met twice this season, and the games landed on 166 and then 176.
In the second game they were playing in back to back nights, and the game went Over by 13 points.
I've mentioned that spot (game two of back to back nights) in a previous post.
B2B's are common in the NBA but rare in the W, and the ladies (?) don't seem to be able to play good D in game twos.
The current record is 16-7, 69% for the Over.
There is one spot left for this scenario this season in case you want to mark your calendar.
It's not a definite play but worth taking a look at for a possible Over, depending on other factors.

The current number on tonight's game is 174.
That's 8 points more than their first meeting, and just 2 points fewer than their second, but that second meeting was game two of back to back, which, as noted, tend to have higher scores. Both teams are rested tonight.

The main concern here is the Dallas defense. They're lifting their skirts for a league worst 90.7 per game.
Countering that ugly stat for playing the Under in this one is the fact that Wash only scores a near-the-bottom of the league avg of 79 per game.

The game opened 170', is up to 174' right now, and I see 175 starting to show up.
It's moving in the right direction for playing the Under, no hurry, monitor your screen(s) and wait to buy it.
But don't wait until too close to tip off in case guys who took the opening number Over do a buy back to try for a middle.
I'll drop in later with the number I get, if I get busy and can't I'll use the WAN.

Wash/Dal Un (wait to buy)

GOOD LUCK to all on your plays tonight.

Update: 4:42 pm. Still an odd 175 or two out there but the common number is 174'. And that's my number for this game.
 
Last edited:
Nice info as always.

Interesting that 16-7 on b2b overs.

In the notebook for next year!
 
And THAT is one of the things that separates winning sports bettors from the overwhelming majority - ones who lose.
Keep a logbook where you chart plays and reminders. Make notes for future use, don't rely on memory.

And at the beginning of each new season look back on your notes from last year to see what worked then, and just as importantly what didn't work.
 
Recap: 0-1
Record: 4-2
Review: Howard sinks one, the last basket of the game with 46 seconds left, and my Un goes Ov by 1'.
Sometimes life be that way.

WNBA Championship Play

“Give me Liberty or give me Death!”
Patrick Henry

“Give me the Liberty or give me . . . the Lynx?”
RBD

Here's how I'm playing it this post season.

Eight teams make the playoffs but realistically only four of them have a chance.
Let’s do the easy work first and eliminate the bottom feeders.

Atlanta (15-25) and Phoenix (19-21) have zero chance.

Two down, six to go.

Next up, the Indiana Caitlin’s (odds +1500.)

I wish they had a realistic chance (and the networks do, too) but they don't.
Clark certainly did make it an exciting season and the league owes her a HUGE debt of gratitude for all the sellouts across the country and increased revenue from merchandising and commercial advertising sales. But everyone knows defense wins in the postseason and out of 12 teams in the league only one team has given up more PPG than Indiana, the Dallas Wings (9 wins, 31 losses.)
Out of eight teams in the playoffs the Clark's have the worst PPG defense, which is why the finished the reg season at 20-20.

They were hot down the stretch, but the Fever has subsided.

Which brings us to the fifth place Seattle Storm (+2500.)

A solid record at 25-15 as of this writing but they’re just 4-10 vs the top four contenders. In a money game on the second to last day of the season they had a chance to move up in the standings by beating the team that was one game ahead of them, Las Vegas.
They lost that game.
Just like they’re going to lose in the playoffs.

Thus, squelch the Storm.

And then there were four.
Only four teams enter the post season with a realistic chance of winning.

According to the odds makers, the Las Vegas Aces (+250) are the second choice to repeat and win this season’s championship trophy.
According to me they’re not going to even make it to the championship series.

In the playoffs, you have to hold on to your home court advantage and while Las Vegas looks solid at 12-7 their opponents are better.
Connecticut came in at 13-5, and Minnesota and New York, were both 16-3.
Plus, the defending champs haven’t fared so well against the other three top contenders.
Las Vegas is 4-6 vs the top three teams.
The only team they have a winning record against is Connecticut, and they’re not going to see Connecticut because the Sun will be knocked out by the Liberty.
They WILL very likely see Minnesota, who they are 1-3 against, with all three losses coming by double digits.
Las Vegas may get past Seattle in round one but I see them getting KO’d in round two vs. Minnesota.

The Aces will be cracked.

Next up, the Connecticut Sun (+1000.)
They can defend home court, 13-5. They can win on the road, 14-6. But head to head against top contenders their weaknesses show.
They have the best defense in the league, and they do match up well with Minnesota, but they’re not going to see Minnesota.
To do so they’d have to get past New York, who they’re 1-3 against this year.
To my way of handicapping, the Sun just don’t have the heart required to win it all, an opinion formed by remembering them folding in the fourth quarter of a couple big games this season.

Blot out the Sun.

And then there were two.

I see the championship series as being between the Minnesota Lynx (+300) and the New York Liberty (+140.)
But who comes out on top?
I’m leaning towards the New York Liberty but their loss to Minnesota in the Commissioner’s Cup game deserves much 'capping consideration.
The playoffs bring the opportunity for additional cash. They’re all about who’s going to step up when the money’s on the table.
The Commissioner’s Cup game was worth $40,000 per player to the winner. And in it, the Lynx kicked Liberty butt. In New York.

Head to head in the regular season Minnesota also had the edge, taking three of four games; more numbers in favor of the Lynx.

But if 'capping was merely a matter of correctly reading the numbers more bettors would win. Most don’t.
So it’s intangibles that allow a team to finish on top of the mountain. Intangibles like heart and hunger.

There are four different components you need to win the championship.
The ability to hold on to home court advantage, the ability to win on the road, and heart and hunger.
I only see one team that has every one of those – the New York Liberty.

They have the best record overall.

They’re tied with Minnesota for the best home record.

They have the best road record.

As to heart and hunger, it’s their 3-0 season sweep over Las Vegas that has me convinced this is the Liberty’s year.
In last year’s championship series New York lost to Vegas.
Watching those three games this season I saw a team with a chip on their shoulder, a team determined to prove they’re the best.
I saw heart and hunger.
And I grade the hunger factor very highly in my handicapping.

There’s always a chance that the reigning champs from Las Vegas will step up their game in the playoffs and show their championship form.
And the Lynx enter the playoffs as the hottest team in the league and have that 3-1 regular season edge over New York as a cause for concern, not to mention their win in the Commissioner’s Cup. But New York has a much deeper bench and they have that look of destiny about them. And hunger.
And I rate hunger very highly . . .

I may have some plays for individual games during the postseason, but strategically, for the championship series, I’m looking to lock up a small profit.
I’m putting one unit on both of my choices, NY at +140 and Minnesota at +300.

Eliminating the four lower tier teams leaves me with the top four.
Connecticut has no heart, and last year’s champs, Las Vegas, seem to be lacking hunger.
Placing a unit on both of the other two leaves me with what I see as a 50/50 chance among the only four teams capable of winning.
And a strong opportunity for adding a little bit more to my bankroll.

Championship Plays:​

Minnesota +300
NY +140
 
Last edited:
Recap: 0-1
Record: 4-2
Review: Howard sinks one, the last basket of the game with 46 seconds left, and my Un goes Ov by 1'.
Sometimes life be that way.

WNBA Championship Play

“Give me Liberty or give me Death!”
Patrick Henry

“Give me the Liberty or give me . . . the Lynx?”
RBD

Here's how I'm playing it this post season.

Eight teams make the playoffs but realistically only four of them have a chance.
Let’s do the easy work first and eliminate the bottom feeders.

Atlanta (15-25) and Phoenix (19-21) have zero chance.

Two down, six to go.

Next up, the Indiana Caitlin’s (odds +1500.)

I wish they had a realistic chance (and the networks do, too) but they don't.
Clark certainly did make it an exciting season and the league owes her a HUGE debt of gratitude for all the sellouts across the country and increased revenue from merchandising and commercial advertising sales. But everyone knows defense wins in the postseason and out of 12 teams in the league only one team has given up more PPG than Indiana, the Dallas Wings (9 wins, 31 losses.)
Out of eight teams in the playoffs the Clark's have the worst PPG defense, which is why the finished the reg season at 20-20.

They were hot down the stretch, but the Fever has subsided.

Which brings us to the fifth place Seattle Storm (+2500.)

A solid record at 25-15 as of this writing but they’re just 4-10 vs the top four contenders. In a money game on the second to last day of the season they had a chance to move up in the standings by beating the team that was one game ahead of them, Las Vegas.
They lost that game.
Just like they’re going to lose in the playoffs.

Thus, squelch the Storm.

And then there were four.
Only four teams enter the post season with a realistic chance of winning.

According to the odds makers, the Las Vegas Aces (+250) are the second choice to repeat and win this season’s championship trophy.
According to me they’re not going to even make it to the championship series.

In the playoffs, you have to hold on to your home court advantage and while Las Vegas looks solid at 12-7 their opponents are better.
Connecticut came in at 13-5, and Minnesota and New York, were both 16-3.
Plus, the defending champs haven’t fared so well against the other three top contenders.
Las Vegas is 4-6 vs the top three teams.
The only team they have a winning record against is Connecticut, and they’re not going to see Connecticut because the Sun will be knocked out by the Liberty.
They WILL very likely see Minnesota, who they are 1-3 against, with all three losses coming by double digits.
Las Vegas may get past Seattle in round one but I see them getting KO’d in round two vs. Minnesota.

The Aces will be cracked.

Next up, the Connecticut Sun (+1000.)
They can defend home court, 13-5. They can win on the road, 14-6. But head to head against top contenders their weaknesses show.
They have the best defense in the league, and they do match up well with Minnesota, but they’re not going to see Minnesota.
To do so they’d have to get past New York, who they’re 1-3 against this year.
To my way of handicapping, the Sun just don’t have the heart required to win it all, an opinion formed by remembering them folding in the fourth quarter of a couple big games this season.

Blot out the Sun.

And then there were two.

I see the championship series as being between the Minnesota Lynx (+300) and the New York Liberty (+140.)
But who comes out on top?
I’m leaning towards the New York Liberty but their loss to Minnesota in the Commissioner’s Cup game deserves much 'capping consideration.
The playoffs bring the opportunity for additional cash. They’re all about who’s going to step up when the money’s on the table.
The Commissioner’s Cup game was worth $40,000 per player to the winner. And in it, the Lynx kicked Liberty butt. In New York.

Head to head in the regular season Minnesota also had the edge, taking three of four games; more numbers in favor of the Lynx.

But if 'capping was merely a matter of correctly reading the numbers more bettors would win. Most don’t.
So it’s intangibles that allow a team to finish on top of the mountain. Intangibles like heart and hunger.

There are four different components you need to win the championship.
The ability to hold on to home court advantage, the ability to win on the road, and heart and hunger.
I only see one team that has every one of those – the New York Liberty.

They have the best record overall.

They’re tied with Minnesota for the best home record.

They have the best road record.

As to heart and hunger, it’s their 3-0 season sweep over Las Vegas that has me convinced this is the Liberty’s year.
In last year’s championship series New York lost to Vegas.
Watching those three games this season I saw a team with a chip on their shoulder, a team determined to prove they’re the best.
I saw heart and hunger.
And I grade the hunger factor very highly in my handicapping.

There’s always a chance that the reigning champs from Las Vegas will step up their game in the playoffs and show their championship form.
And the Lynx enter the playoffs as the hottest team in the league and have that 3-1 regular season edge over New York as a cause for concern, not to mention their win in the Commissioner’s Cup. But New York has a much deeper bench and they have that look of destiny about them. And hunger.
And I rate hunger very highly . . .

I may have some plays for individual games during the postseason, but strategically, for the championship series, I’m looking to lock up a small profit.
I’m putting one unit on both of my choices, NY at +140 and Minnesota at +300.

Eliminating the four lower tier teams leaves me with the top four.
Connecticut has no heart, and last year’s champs, Las Vegas, seem to be lacking hunger.
Placing a unit on both of the other two leaves me with what I see as a 50/50 chance among the only four teams capable of winning.
And a strong opportunity for adding a little bit more to my bankroll.

Championship Plays:​

Minnesota +300
NY +140
GREAT stuff!
 
Thanks guys, for the comments and thumbs up. (Although "thumbs up" isn't always necessarily a good thing. I was watching an episode of Deadwood the other day. Swearengen had a "problem." To alleviate it, one of his whores had to stick her thumb... well, never mind, on second thought it's not a very good story for this time and place. Or any time or place actually.)

Correction - I thought WNBA Rnd two stays in conference (I'm new to this sport.) Apparently not.
If my Rnd one picks are correct NY will face LV in rnd two, NOT Con.
The Sun will get the Lynx.
No matter, my picks are unaffected.

Added play:
Carrington Ov 13' pts, +100

As noted above, Indiana does not play defense.
Well, they play it, they just suck at it.

It looks like the books have set this number just a hair above DiJonai's PPG season average of 12.7.
I don't think they factored in enough for her particular opponent in this game. Against the Caitlin's this season she's put up 16, 14, 22, and 19.

Sometimes teams come out a little tight in the first game of the postseason, with first game jitters and nervousness, but this Connecticut team are regulars in the playoffs, they've been here before. Indiana hasn't been in the playoffs in 8 years. Which team do you think is going to come out tighter?

Indiana plays at one of the fastest paces in the league so DiJonai's going to get plenty of opportunities to take her shots.
And hopefully, hit this number.

A decent number at a good price.
I'm on it.

Carrington Ov 13' pts, +100
 
Last edited:
Thanks guys, for the comments and thumbs up. (Although "thumbs up" isn't always necessarily a good thing. I was watching an episode of Deadwood the other day. Swearengen had a "problem." To alleviate it, one of his whores had to stick her thumb... well, never mind, on second thought it's not a very good story for this time and place. Or any time or place actually.)

Correction - I thought WNBA Rnd two stays in conference (I'm new to this sport.) Apparently not.
If my Rnd one picks are correct NY will face LV in rnd two, NOT Con.
The Sun will get the Lynx.
No matter, my picks are unaffected.

Added play:
Carrington Ov 13' pts, +100

As noted above, Indiana does not play defense.
Well, they play it, they just suck at it.

It looks like the books have set this number just a hair above DiJonai's PPG season average of 12.7.
I don't think they factored in enough for her particular opponent in this game. Against the Caitlin's this season she's put up 16, 14, 22, and 19.

Sometimes teams come out a little tight in the first game of the postseason, with first game jitters and nervousness, but this Connecticut team are regulars in the playoffs, they've been here before. Indiana hasn't been in the playoffs in 8 years. Which team do you think is going to come out tighter?

Indiana plays at one of the fastest paces in the league so DiJonai's going to get plenty of opportunities to take her shots.
And hopefully, hit this number.

A decent number at a good price.
I'm on it.

Carrington Ov 13' pts, +100
Late, but nice write up.

I see she had 14, so glad to see this one cash.
 
ilovetobet,
Thanks for stopping by, sorry for not responding sooner, just saw your msg.
I had no plays yesterday.
I 'cap every day, run every game on the card through the different scenarios. formulas, methods I use to isolate a game that fits the parameters I need for something to qualify as a play for me. But I don't always get one.
And even when I do I don't always buy or recommend them. I'm pretty selective.
With so few games left on the schedule, there's not much to choose from, but if I get one I'll post it.

Recap: 1-0
Record: 5-2

Review: Banked a W with the D'Jonai prop, Ov 13' pts.

Needed 14.
She only has 2 at the end of Q1.

Same for Q2, just 2 pts, sitting at 4 at the half, 3 short of where I want to be, worst case. Not good.

Q3 she puts up 7, total now at 11. I need 3 pts in the fourth Q to get the W. The $ is in reach.

Mid-Q4 the coach has her on the bench for a rest and I'm in trouble. CAN'T SCORE IF YOU'RE NOT ON THE FLOOR.
She's back in at the 5 minute mark but only half a quarter left on the clock and I still need 3 pts.

Four minutes left, three minutes left, two minutes left. Nothing.

The clock shows a minute and change left. she's not going to get two shots, I need her to get open for a trey AND hit it, something she hasn't attempted all game.
She gets the ball on the perimeter and . . . she passes it to a teammate. I'm screwed.
But . . . Carrington's defender leaves her to double team the ball carrier who passes it back to a wide open D'Jonai.
I check her feet - she's just beyond the arc. I'm thinking, "don't pass the ball again - SHOOT IT!"
I stare intently at my TV, willing her to take the shot.
I yell the punch line to the old joke about the ant and the elephant - "TAKE IT, BITCH!"
She takes the shot.
Nuttin' but net.
Victory is mine.

It was thisclose.
But isn't that half the fun of making a bet? The thrill, the rush, the excitment and exhuberation of a close, last minute win?
The other half - knowing your 'cap beat the book's number, and, obviously - cashing that ticket. (Okay, THREE things, so the rush is technically one third of the fun.)

Post season update: First round ended as expected. no surprise upsets from the second tier teams. Sweeps in all four series.
I now have the 50-50 chance I wanted, two of the four teams left to get me the two I want in the championship series and a guaranteed profit.
Still a bad 'cap on my part not knowing the next round doesn't stay in divisions, so I didn't get the matchups I prefer.
I'm okay with NY getting LV (NY -167 for the series) though Conn is an easier match for the Liberty. (LV had a single digit quarter at home, NO excuse for that in the reg season much less post season.)
I wanted Min/LV though. a better matchup for the Lynx (-240) as Conn took two of three in the reg season.
But Min has the hot hand and Hm court advantage, so not too concerned.
 
Last edited:
Record: 5-2
Current bets:
Minnesota +300
NY +140


I've been content to be happy with a few WNBA units banked and not making any additional bets while waiting on the championship series.
Only made one play during the post season, the Carrington prop above. But I bought a play on tonight's game.

I have one of my two teams already in for the money series as the Liberty cracked the Aces.
But I did a lazy 'cap on the post season, mistakenly ASSuming that the WNBA was like the NBA - East champ meets West.
This would have given me Conn vs NY (an easy match-up for the Liberty) and Min vs Vegas (an easier match-up for the Lynx.)
Min had a 2-1 lead, but Con tied it at 2-2.
Now, they head back to Min for the deciding game.

It's Hm court advantage vs experience, and I'm taking experience tonight.
After watching the first four games my concerns about the match-up seem to be confirmed, Vegas was the better match-up for Min.

I didn't use Conn as one of my two championship picks because the Liberty have their number (like I said, I thought it was East vs East/West vs West for the semis) and NY have that huge edge in hunger as I mentioned in my write-up. You could see it very clearly in the first two rounds, this team does not look like it will be denied.
Plus, I saw the Sun choke late in a few games, I question their ability to close.
But I'm taking them tonight.
Reasons?
If they lose ATS, I still have a guaranteed profit in the champ series, but reduced, especially if NY wins as I expect them to.
And there's always the chance that Conn loses SU but wins ATS, and I can bank a unit tonight and still have Min in at +300

It's just a gut feel thing, after watching the four games.
Conn looks to be a hair better and the fact that they're getting +4 in what should be a close game makes them look like the correct way to go in this one.

Good luck to any who are on this one tonight. (I can't believe I'll be watching this game instead of Tuesday night college football. I'm in Bizarro World.)

Today's play:
Conn +4
 
Last edited:
Excellent write-up RBD & nice little post season run to put $$ in your pocket. I have played the over 2 games in this series(split 1-1, gm 1 I lost due to a 24pt 4th Q when both teams combined to shoot less than 30% it was going over easy and gm 4 they blew over the total by 20) and I am on the o151.5 50/88 tonight. If the high school calibre officials can get the big name players(Bonner, Carrington & Thomas) out of their heads and call a fair game I think its there for the homecourt Lynx to take. BOL & Cheers Steve
 
  • Like
Reactions: RBD
Recap: 0-1
Record: 5-3
Open Bets:
Minnesota +300
NY +140
(and one more, at the bottom of this post)

Review: Lost with Conn +4.
I always review losses to see if I can learn from them. And I'm the first to say "I screwed that one up, here's where I went wrong."
But I can't fault my Con +4 pick, they just had a bad night.

It happens. Teams just have off nights. A pitcher tosses a shutout then gets rocked for 6 runs in the 1st inning of his next start.
And not just teams and players, we all have bad days. Some nights my band was tight, some nights we sucked (I'm talking rehearsals, not live, you never have a bad night playing live, you feed off the crowds energy and girls dancing in front of the stage.)
But rehearsals we sucked sometimes, we just didn't click.
So we'd take a break, maybe smoke a doob (okay, definitely, not maybe) go back in the studio and . . . we still sucked. Timing was off or whatever the reason.

Here's what I learned - It's not a light switch. You can't just turn it off and on at will.
And that's how it is for sports teams, too.
And that's what happened to the Sun, they just had a bad night, at one of the worst possible times, an elimination game.

So I gave back the unit I picked up on Carrington in the opening round, but it's okay, I'm back to where I was at the beginning of the post season when I gave my two picks for the championship series. With one exception - they're both in.
And I have great odds due to buying early. Min is now +240, I have +300, NY is -282, I have +140.
Smart/timely shopping leaves me with a better price on both.

My pick for the winner?
WHO CARES??!!
That's the beauty of having a guaranteed profit regardless of who wins.

Based on what I saw in the posts season the high $ on NY makes sense.
They have a deeper bench and more experience.
And they have hunger after getting KO'd by the Aces in last year's championship. And as mentioned, I rate hunger very highly.
After they elminated the Aces, Sabrina Ionescu wasn't celebrating on the court. She wasn't smiling, she wasn't hugging and giving high fives.
She was shouting at her teammates, "We're not done yet! We're not done yet!"
She was keeping her team focused.
She was reminding them they have more work to do.
That's leadership.
THAT'S hunger.

So, edge to NY?

Remember this - the winner of the Commissioner's Cup got a $40,000 per player bonus.
The teams in this year's game? Min and NY.
And when the money was on the table the Lynx stepped up and took it, 94-89, from the -5 Fav Liberty in NY.

The $ is on the table again, 25k to each player on the championship team.

Min won 3 of 4 in the regular season, THREE of which were on the Rd. And to win in the playoffs you have to be able to win on the Rd.

So, who's going to win?
Like I said, doesn't matter much to me, that's the beauty of . . .

But I stopped by to say this - a big part of the reason the Lynx got to second place in the reg season and a trip to the championship series is because of the outstanding play of Napheesa Collier.
In the reg season she avg'd 9.7 rebounds per game.
In the post season she's snagged double digit rebounds in four of seven games, the other three she had 9, 5, and 6.
In the reg season against the Liberty she had 13, 16, 6, and 15.
The books made her 9' Ov -114 tonight.
Guess what I bet.

Good luck with your play today.
 
Last edited:
Good job RBD, I like your play and will be on it myself along with o159.5 Collier 3 straight games of +25pts and +10rebs a new WNBA playoff record I see her extending that tonight. As for the total I thought we would see something like165-167 so I gotta take my chances on the low number. Cheers & BOL
 
Good job RBD, I like your play and will be on it myself along with o159.5 Collier 3 straight games of +25pts and +10rebs a new WNBA playoff record I see her extending that tonight. As for the total I thought we would see something like165-167 so I gotta take my chances on the low number. Cheers & BOL
Appreciate the insight from yourself and @RBD here.
 
Good job RBD, I like your play and will be on it myself along with o159.5 Collier 3 straight games of +25pts and +10rebs a new WNBA playoff record I see her extending that tonight. As for the total I thought we would see something like165-167 so I gotta take my chances on the low number. Cheers & BOL
Going back to the well 1 more time o162.5 50/88
 
Back
Top