Wildcard

Tito

Tito

The Salty Dog
+1.37



2u

Jags (-102)

Rams -1/Rams Over 36/Jags Over 42.5 (-120)


1u

Texans/Steelers UNDER 20 1H (-126)

Kyren Williams Rush Yards OVER 69.5 (-109)

Josh Jacobs Rush Yards Over 72.5 (-138)

Uncle Rico Over 2.5 Receptions (+113)

Rams pk/Pats +6.5/Texans +7 (-120)

Packers ML/Pats Under 46/Steelers 1H Under 20 (+277) **Live**



.5u

Parkinson Anytime TD (+265)
 
Last edited:
Happy to discuss any of these....


Bought .5 pts on both totals. Also strong lean to Chargers Under as well, and will probably be on it.
Still researching and waiting on some other plays. Really leaning to Over in Panther game. Rams road D has been horrible, but Panthers have had some bad home offensive outputs.

Jags have the luxury of facing one of the leagues worst run D's. Lawrence can ease into the game and/or lean on the run. Bills lose more on the D backfield, which helps Lawrence as well and the many options he has to throw to. Not sure Bills can stop all of the Jags receiving options. Obviously, never easy facing Allen, who is special, but still like this Jags team w their momentum and coaching advantage as well.
 
I like that 1H under in Pitt. Probably better than the full game in case shit gets weird towards the end.

Lean to playing the over in Jacksonville as I expect both teams to have success on offense. Not sure yet.

No real opinion on the total in Chicago, but gun to my head I would take the under based upon the first two meetings, the weather and both teams wanting to establish the run.

GL!
 
C-MAN said:
I like that 1H under in Pitt. Probably better than the full game in case shit gets weird towards the end.

Lean to playing the over in Jacksonville as I expect both teams to have success on offense. Not sure yet.

No real opinion on the total in Chicago, but gun to my head I would take the under based upon the first two meetings, the weather and both teams wanting to establish the run.

GL!
Click to expand...
Agree with @Tito and yourself about the under 1H at Three Rivers. This smells like a 10-6 halftime score. I try to avoid full game unders anymore due to wild 4ths. Can you imagine having under last week??

I'm on board with you on that over down in Duval. Makes sense.

Your reasoning in Chicago also makes sense. Maybe a 1Q under there!?
 
Tito said:
Happy to discuss any of these....


Bought .5 pts on both totals. Also strong lean to Chargers Under as well, and will probably be on it.
Still researching and waiting on some other plays. Really leaning to Over in Panther game. Rams road D has been horrible, but Panthers have had some bad home offensive outputs.

Jags have the luxury of facing one of the leagues worst run D's. Lawrence can ease into the game and/or lean on the run. Bills lose more on the D backfield, which helps Lawrence as well and the many options he has to throw to. Not sure Bills can stop all of the Jags receiving options. Obviously, never easy facing Allen, who is special, but still like this Jags team w their momentum and coaching advantage as well.
Click to expand...
GL Tito!

Appreciate the thoughts as always. Happy New Year my guy.
 
Thank you C, thank you Bar...hope you guys have a happy & healthy new year! I'm glad to hear you guys like it. Its also helped by the fact that the steelers have been slow starters the last 5/6 weeks.

I'm buying out of the Bears Under, I will count the lost juice against my record (I bought out w O 45 so we'll see). The weather looks like it's not as bad as it was initially looking, I should've waited. Also, I'm looking more at this game and see both these teams able to run all over each other. If both teams can run...it opens things up. So now I'm looking at rushing props for these games.
Not a fan of the Bears D, that makes me lean to the Pack.
 
Thx Bo, Trey...hope you guys have a great weekend.


Added a couple rushing props....Rams been saving Kyren for the playoffs and now he gets to go up against a bottom 10 rush D.
As I said before, not a fan of the Bears D and I think Jacobs could have a big day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top