EAST LANSING -- Anybody who's ever seen a police investigation from the inside out, from its inception to the conclusion, knows that things aren't always as they've seem. Anyone who's ever served on jury duty for a criminal case, or observed a trial from behind the rail, knows that the final facts don't always line up with first impressions. In fact, I'd wager to say that regardless of the outcome, the end result is almost always surprising in some way.
After covering cops and courts for the first four years of my journalism career and Michigan State sports, where athletes and trouble have all-too often gone hand-in-hand, for 21-plus the most important things I have learned -- the hard way in some cases -- is never assume and don't rush to judgment. Suspects I concluded were scumbags have turned out to be innocent and some I felt were choirboys later turned out to be scoundrals of the highest order.
And so it is with Wednesday's arraignment of Spartan defensive back T.J. Williams, linebacker SirDarean Adams and reserve defensive back Jeremy Ware on felony unarmed robbery charges -- Williams also has been charged with a misdemeanor assault and battery charge -- that I step back and wait for the picture to come into sharper focus.
The incident took place during the early hours of April 21, in a grocery store parking lot in close proximity to an apartment complex where a party was being held. The players were obviously out just hours before MSU was to hold its spring game. Even if the players had done nothing to warrant police involvement, they put themselves in a position worthy of being disciplined.
Although a direct correlation was never made, we can infer from subsequent circumstances that new coach Mark Dantonio did impose sanctions against these players for reasons explained only as violating team rules.
Williams was not allowed to play in the spring game. Furthermore, he and Adams were not allowed to be with the team during the summer, meaning they would fall behind and their starting jobs would be in jeopardy. Adams did lose his starting job in preseason camp and Williams was not allowed to take part in camp nor suit up for the first two games.
Was that enough under the circumstances? The knee-jerk reactions that have come in response to this incident are bruising foreheads everywhere. Some are saying Williams, Adams and Ware should be on indefinite suspension or kicked off the team. They certainly shouldn't be playing in games.
Keeping them on the team appears to be self-serving on Dantonio's part who needs Williams and Adams to win.
Those are the kind of criticisms that make coaching such a high-paying job, especially since it would be easier to give into such pressure than stand up to it. Hey, they're just kids, and disposable at that.
But, Dantonio said the players have maintained their innocence from the start. If you're a coach, how do you build a team if you show you're players you may not trust or believe them when the heat gets turned on under you? Is that how a family would do it, and make no mistake, teams consider themselves families?
The thing is, there is always more to a case than people on the outside, even reporters, know. Cops almost always have information about a case that ultimately fills in the blanks in ways that often are never expected -- they call them hidden case facts but I called them "a-ha moments". They could very well be what makes the case when revealed, or save a shakey case if kept secret.
Coaches, I have learned, also act on a lot more information that the public will ever know about. That information often is the difference between standing behind a player or throwing him under the bus.
So I don't rush to judgment. And isn't it amazing that after the Duke lacrosse team fiasco the climate still fosters a presumption of guilt. Wasn't it just within the last year that we all said, man, after what that prosecutor, the media and the university did to those kids -- staining their lives forever, disrupting their education, not to mention ruining their athletic careers -- that rushing to judgment is a bad thing?
Those Duke players can never get those college days back. The championship they might have won is gone for ever. And why? Because of case built on what turned out to be baseless information.
Of course Dantonio has to establish a code of discipline that his players will live by. Players who abide by the rules will not respect him if he doesn't deal appropriately with players who don't. Furthermore, players will not respect teammates who do bad things, and may even turn their backs on them in the locker room and on the field of play. So-called "star treatment" brought the MSU to its knees just a few years ago.
Players have a way of determining guilt or innocence better in some instances than a court of law can.
By the same token, players, and their parents, won't respect a coach they can't trust to treat them fairly and take them at their word when there is no evidence their word is no good.
I would think Dantonio knows these things, or he has no business being a head coach at any level.
It's a fine line. Ingham County prosecutor Stuart Dunnings III told me that a cell phone and a wallet were taken during the course of the alleged robbery. That's serious stuff. The victims' right are equally important and cannot be diminished in any way.
But until the case goes to trial, we don't know the actual circumstances or each player's alleged role.
I certainly don't have the knowledge or wisdome to say with any degree of certainty that Adams, for example, should be sitting out his final season as a college player based on what I know. That may be too high a price for him to pay once we know the extent of his alleged involvement. Based on what I know of Dantonio after a few months, I doubt it would not be enough, unless he is really being foolish.
And what if the players are acquitted? Punishing them beforehand in a public manner would mean Dantonio is presuming their guilt, not their innocence. How is due process served in that case?
And would suspending Adams and Williams for the season unduly penalize the rest of the team who are relying on them?
My rule of thumb is I always hope people get what they deserve in life. If convictions occur those penalties will be far harsher than missing a football game even if no jail time is involved. Being in the criminal justice system is no picnic.
Finally, what ever happened to second chances? How many of us have forgiven a son, brother or friend for getting a fight, or shoplifting, or minor in possession or drunk driving? Of course you see to it that they are punished, but you don't necessarily end their lives as they know it.
There is a fine line. I've always said that if I were a coach, I would have a hard time allowing a player to remain on the team if there is a good chance he'd be found guilty of rape, murder or manslaughter or arson. The ramifications of winning a championship with a rapist on my team are just too overwhelming unless I have rock-solid information my guy is innocent and the charges are baseless. That's a difficult judgment call, either way.
What is known about this case requires us to navigate through the gray areas of the law until the facts are brought to light in a courtroom, possibly as soon as next week's pretrial hearing to determine if there is enough evidence to go to trial.
How you feel about Dantonio's handling of this incident so far cannot be disputed.
Either you trust him to do the right thing, or you don't.
PREDICTION -- It's sobering how one minute you're contemplating whether MSU can win if its defense remains a sieve when it comes to big plays, and the next whether the lives of three young people could forever changed by the decisions they made or didn't make. But hey, isn't that true of all of us?
Still, there is a game to be played and has rarely been an easy out for the Spartans in recent memory. Hawkeyes 21, MSU 20.